federation day


Dia de los Muertos - Mexico City 

A few shots of a local “ofrenda” on Day of Dead that is celebrated at the end of Oct/Nov each year in Mexico and are accompanied by late night music, thousand of colorful decorations of flowers, food and art all over the country. During these days homes are decorated with their personal “ofrendas” to their loved ones that have past and serve not only as a cultural day but also a form of uniting and bringing family together in celebration.

Purpose of festival: A day of remembrance and homage to those that have passed and is considered as a day when they are allowed to return to the world of the living.
Held: Oct 31st - Nov 2nd
Reason to love: Lots of cultural events, costume and food/partying all over the country. 

Random Stuff from RnM 03x10
  • Rick and Morty break 2,000 Federal Laws a Day
    • But because Rick and Morty saves Earth from time to time they are not held accountable for law breaking. 
    • But Rick thinks they never tried to because it would be difficult to impossible to detain Rick and Morty. 
  • “Moving to a New Earth is a Bitch and a Half“ - Rick Sanchez
  • Rick: South Park did it four years ago.
    Morty: They’re fast.
    Rick: Or we’re slow. (I assume they mean VR)
  • Sanchezium (rare element for detaining Rick that Rick made up) 
  • Rick is afraid of pirates 

Ida Wilson Lewis, lighthouse keeper and fearless Federal worker

In observance of National Lighthouse Day, we’re sharing the story of lighthouse keeper Ida Wilson Lewis of Rhode Island, one of the most well-known lighthouse keepers in the world and a Federal civil servant. During her career, she saved somewhere between 13 and 25 lives, including men stationed at Fort Adams and a sheep.

Photograph of Ida Wilson Lewis, from her official personnel folder. The image is from New Idea Woman’s Magazine, vol. 21, January 1910. The magazine captioned the image “As Miss Lewis looked in 1869.”

Ida Wilson Lewis was born Idawally Zorada Lewis in 1842.  In 1853, Ida’s father, Capt. Hosea Lewis, was appointed the first lighthouse keeper at Lime Rock, an island in Newport Harbor, Rhode Island. A few months after his appointment, Captain Lewis was stricken by a paralytic stroke. As a result, his wife, Zorada, and Ida carried out the lighthouse duties in addition to their everyday household chores.

Performing numerous lighthouse and domestic duties groomed Ida for an appointment as the official lighthouse keeper of Lime Rock in 1879 and sent her down the path to becoming a renowned rescuer. Ida was an expert oarswoman and had developed exceptional boat-maneuvering skills from making countless trips back and forth between the island and the mainland to transport supplies and her four siblings.

Ida’s first rescue occurred in 1854. The 12-year-old girl came to the aid of four men who had capsized a small sailboat. But it was the 1869 rescue of Sergeant Adams and Private McLaughlin of Fort Adams that made her famous. Because Ida (a woman) saved two men from drowning in the midst of a squall, she was deemed the “Grace Darling of America,” after Grace Darling, a famed English lighthouse keeper’s daughter who helped save several people from a 1838 shipwreck.

For her bravery, Ida was awarded a silver medal from the Life-Saving Benevolent Association of New York and presented with a new boat by the citizens of Newport. She was featured on the cover of Harper’s Weekly magazine (the only lighthouse keeper ever to receive such a distinction).

Throughout her life, Ida received numerous other awards, including the Gold Lifesaving Medal (awarded to an individual who attempts rescue at the peril of his or her own life) and the congressionally awarded American Cross of Honor.

Read more at:  Ida Wilson Lewis, lighthouse keeper and fearless Federal worker | Pieces of History

Taylor Swift's Lawyer Tells All


Forgive the tabloid headline. Venable partner J. Douglas Baldridge is actually quite discreet when discussing his famous client. But he spent last week litigating under a blinding media spotlight, with everyone from People Magazine and Inside Edition to The New York Times covering Taylor Swift’s six-day federal trial in Denver.

“Man, what a ride,” Baldridge said. “After 30 years, you kind of know how to try a case. But here, there was so much going on outside the courtroom, it added a whole new dimension. We were on trial every waking moment. It was a brand-new experience to walk out of court every day and have an extraordinary number of reporters and cameras in your face.”

He kept his cool—and declined comment—throughout the trial. “I didn’t say a word until we had the win,” he said. “What I had to do was try it and win it inside the courtroom. That’s what I do. I’m not an outside-the-courtroom guy.”

The pop superstar was completely vindicated in her clash with disc jockey David Mueller, who Swift testified “grabbed my bare ass” at a pre-concert meet-and-greet in 2013.

Mueller was fired two days after the alleged groping, and blamed Swift, her mother Andrea Swift and radio promotions director Frank Bell for getting him canned. (Baldridge represented all three). The DJ demanded $3 million for interference with contractual obligations and tortious interference with business relations.

Swift counter-sued for assault and battery, and asked for $1 in damages.

“It was not about trying to bankrupt the man or take his money,” Baldridge said. “To her, it was about making a statement. It wasn’t her fault, she didn’t do it.”

Or as he put it in court, “Grabbing a woman’s rear end is an assault, and it’s always wrong. Any woman—rich, poor, famous, or not—is entitled to have that not happen.”

Based out of Venable’s D.C. office, Baldridge was not an obvious pick to represent Swift, who according to Billboard was the highest-paid artist of 2016.

In legal circles, he’s made a name successfully litigating pay-for-delay pharmaceutical cases—wildly complex, billion-dollar battles at the intersection of antitrust and intellectual property, with regulatory overlay from the FDA and FTC to boot.

But his practice is eclectic. Or as he put it, “I’m a garbage man. I do a little bit of everything.” And he likes to be in court. “I’m not a paper litigator,” he said.

In addition to some shareholder, real estate and First Amendment disputes, he’s also represented a few celebrities starting with Tiger Woods in 2006. (They have a mutual friend, he said, which is how he got the chance to pitch for the initial business, a dispute involving unauthorized use of a photo of the golfer.)

He first represented Swift when she was sued in 2014 by clothing company Blue Sphere for infringing its “Lucky 13” trademark. The case settled on confidential terms in 2015. Along the way, he got to know the 27-year-old’s close-knit family, striking up a friendship with her father, Scott.

He has nothing but praise for the singer, who he described as one of the most genuine people he has ever met. “She’s a principled person, and I’m not just saying that because she’s my client,” he said. “She has an incredibly low ego for someone so famous. She listens, she’s a very quick study … She contributed to the defense.”

The trial team also included Venable partner Danielle Foley and associate Katie Wright

Juror selection began on August 7—the first time in his three decades as a litigator that not one juror tried to get out of being selected, Baldridge said, laughing. He described the panel of six women and two men as “dispassionate,” and said they gave few outward signs of their feelings.

They never got to decide Mueller’s claims against Swift. On August 11, U.S. District Judge William Martinez tossed the suit against Swift on a Rule 50 motion, though he kept alive the claims against her mother and Bell, as well as Swift’s counter-claims.

After four hours of deliberation, the jury on August 14 sided with team Swift across the board.

The case was remarkable in part for the blunt, powerful testimony Swift delivered on the stand when she testified on August 10.

One key piece of evidence was a photo snapped at the meet-and-greet where Mueller’s hand, while not actually visible, appears to be suspiciously low on Swift’s backside.

Mueller’s attorney, Gabe McFarland, conceded the photo was “awkward” but said there was nothing visibly inappropriate happening.

Addressing him by first name, Swift on the stand responded, “Gabe, this is a photo of him with his hand up my skirt—with his hand on my ass. You can ask me a million questions—I’m never going to say anything different. I never have said anything different.”

McFarland pressed on, noting that her dress in the photo is not visibly ruffled.

“Because my ass is located in the back of my body,” Swift said.

If Swift was so upset about the incident, Mueller said she could have taken a break from meeting other fans. “Your client could have taken a normal photo with me,” she responded.

He also pointed out that she was closer to Mueller’s girlfriend in the photo.  “Yes, she did not have her hand on my ass.”

McFarland wanted to know why no one else saw the grab. “The only person who would have a direct eye line is someone laying underneath my skirt, and we didn’t have anyone positioned there,” Swift said.

When he suggested that Swift’s bodyguard could have intervened if there was inappropriate contact, and asked whether she was critical of him, she responded, “I’m critical of your client sticking his hand under my skirt and grabbing my ass.”

And Swift refused to let McFarland make her feel guilty about Mueller losing his job. “I’m not going to let you or your client make me feel in any way that this is my fault. Here we are years later, and I’m being blamed for the unfortunate events of his life that are the product of his decisions—not mine.”

Was there a risk in a star witness giving such unflinching, even antagonistic testimony? Baldridge said it came down to the Swift being herself and being honest.

The starting point, he said, was to ask “What are you honestly feeling?”

The answer was anger and disappointment—and that was what came through, to brutally brilliant effect.

“It was important to her to be who she is,” Baldridge said.

Meanwhile, On Earth C-137.01

Rick: That’s right Morty, I planned it all from the beginning. I didn’t sacrifice myself for the family. I got rid of all of my greatest enemies and now I’m in charge, Morty!

Morty: If you planned it all from the beginning, why did you wait an entire year to put your plan into action? Why didn’t you do it years ago? How did you know you’d be put in a facility with the Level-9 access?

Rick: Because I’m a genius, duh! I wouldn’t expect you to understand my reasons, Morty. You’re too dumb for that.

Morty: Why did you have to abandon your family and planet to do it? Why did you try to run away from the Federation for days before you turned yourself in?Why did you let your best friend die?

Rick: I…

Morty: You were totally making it up as you went along.

Rick: Shut up, Morty.

on the subject of accents and language etc i’ve always found the universal translators… troubling, as all plot devices that writers use inconsistently to serve the story of the day are

and obviously i still haven’t seen the whole series so this is probably already addressed somewhere

but irrespective of canon my personal headcanon is that garak speaks federation standard, has been speaking federation standard the whole time, but no one knows he speaks federation standard until the day the universal translators stopworking and garak continues on his conversation with bashir about whatever novel they’re reading this week perfectly fluently as though nothing had happened at all

(he probably gets annoyed about it later because he would have played dumb if he’d clued in faster, but he’s disadvantaged by the fact that if he doesn’t have a customer he doesn’t speak to anyone but julian for days, and being a polyglot has gotten him careless)


Series: World War II Posters, 1942 - 1945. Record Group 44: Records of the Office of Government Reports, 1932 - 1947

While April 15 is now the traditional deadline to file Federal income tax returns for most households and individuals, the deadline for 2017 is Tuesday April 18.

While the National Archives does not collect or hold IRS tax forms or returns for individuals or entities, it does hold a wealth of material about taxes.