Ok so I know that the general consensus is that Jack is a low key sugar daddy and that Bitty is flustered and somewhat embarrassed by the money that is spent on him (like “Jack you can’t spend this much money on me it’s ridiculous!)
But consider: Bitty is a Fashion Hoe and loves being able to own actual designer clothes.
Picture Eric Richard Bittle, with an extensive collection of men’s Louboutins flats, silk French cut shirts, fitted custom Italian suits and a few Prada sunglasses.
His most prized possession is a Valentino tux that Jack got him for his birthday to wear to a black tie event for the NHL.
And like, Bitty is always looking Fierce, and when Jack and Bitty are out, and they make appearances together, designers start to notice Bits.
That’s how his career as a fashion model begins.
He gets approached by a Vogue exec at an event and at first he thinks it’s about Jack but the guy is like “no, we want YOU.”
And he gets some advice from Alicia and ultimately just goes for it.
He doesn’t walk very often because of his height, but he is on the cover of Vogue Italia and GQ and he is the face of Armani’s Fall collection and he becomes a close friend of Christian Louboutin.
He ends up being one of the first male model to wear stilettos for a Louboutin collection and it goes viral.
BEYONCÉ retweets a pic of the ad with the caption “he did that” and Bitty keels over.
Bitty has brunch with Alicia,Tyra Banks, and Heidi Klum on a regular basis. This is of course where he is convinced to be a judge on the revival season of Americas Next Top Model and comes on as a guest judge a few times on Project Runway.
Eric and Jack have had lunch with Tim Gunn.
Jack, of course couldn’t be happier because now everyone gets to see how beautiful his boyfriend is.
And, when Bitty gets to the point where he has his own collection out, Jack is the photographer for the campaign.
Bitty doesn’t need Jacks money to buy designer clothes anymore.
Time for FRIDAY FASHION FACT!
Today’s topic is a bit more conceptual than the Facts I’ve done in the
past, but I think it is very important to recognize the over-arching
factors that influence fashion in order to fully understand how fashion
has developed. This is a bit difficult to explain in such a small space, so bear with me, and remember that this is all much more complex than I lay it out to be.
Throughout history, the biggest influence on
fashion has clearly been technology. The next biggest influence, though,
has been war. War causes huge divisions between people. It drains
resources. It pits agenda versus agenda, ideology versus ideology. It
has the ability to
effect every aspect of life. It can change the world, so it should come
as no surprise that it changes fashion.
In several of
my past posts, I have mentioned specific wars being an influence on
fashion- most commonly the French Revolution, World War I, and World War
II. While most wars have an impact on fashion, these three have had a
significantly bigger impact that the rest. The reason for the World
War’s having such a large impact is obvious- it’s right there in the
name. These wars spanned the globe, and wider geography means wider
The French Revolution, however, theoretically seems as though it would effect only France. Yet the effect of war is
rarely contained only to the country in which the war takes place. In
terms of fashion, during the era of the French Revolution, France was
the epicenter of fashion. There are still many people who would debate
that France is still the fashion capitol of the world, but in the 18th
and 19th centuries, there was no debate. France reigned supreme on the
style front. If the French wore a style, the rest of the western world quickly followed suit.
why do wars have such a strong impact on fashion? Well, every war is
different, so it varies from war to war. Overall, though, is due to
two factors. One is because war tends to be a huge strain on resources,
with vast amounts of funds and materials donated to the military
effort. Secondly, war pits (at least) two groups against each other,
groups with different values and goals. A person’s value system,
lifestyle, etc. is often reflected in their clothing. The values of the
prevailing side often seeps into the fashion of the people. Between
these two factors, war often means a dramatic lifestyle change not only
soldiers off fighting, but for those they leave at home. A change
in lifestyle results in a change of dress. This is why changes in
fashion that may take decades or more during peaceful times can occur
over the course
of just a few years during wartime.
An important thing to keep in
mind, though, is that fashion does not
change overnight, just like the wars that influence it do not happen
overnight. As the world starts to shift, conflict rises, and war is
imminent, fashion reflects the changing world. People often think that
women went straight from
wearing elaborate rococo gowns, complete with wide panniers, to simple
cylindrical muslin dresses. Or they seem to ignore the era between
structured Edwardian dresses and the untailored flapper look (though to
be fair, Downton Abby has had a huge impact in changing that.) The
reality is that aspects of the new styles are evident in fashion in the years leading up to the wars.
there are countless factors which have contributed to thedevelopment
fashion throughout the centuries (and don’t worry, I will cover as many
as possible in upcoming Facts! Plus I’ll be sure to go into more detail
about the wars I talked about in this post.) Just remember, the next
time you’re looking at historical fashion and see a dramatic shift, take
a look at what was happening in the world at that time!
Want to learn more about war and fashion? Check out these books:
Costume and Fashion: A Concise History, by Laver, de la Haye, and Tucker
History of World Costume and Fashion, by Daniel Delis Hill
Have a question about fashion history that you want answered in the next FRIDAY FASHION FACT? Just click the ASK button at the top of the page!
Dutch designer Christian Heikoop presents his visual statement on the future of Normcore subculture through three principles.
According to Heikoop, these three principles are as follows: “Raggedness: normcores value seclusion making body observance impossible for others. Anonymity: normcores like to keep to themselves and dress inconspicuous, therefore very private. All-in-one: normcores don’t like to distinguish themselves by making a choice; reducing the amount of options.”