again.. IT IS ONLY IN THE AREA OF SCIENCE that a burden of proof is one-sided. IN ALL OTHER FORMS OF EPISTEMOLOGY, the burden of proof is two-sided. Claiming someone fucks children isn't a scientific claim. Neither is the existence of God, Santa, or the toothfairy. Therefore, you are either denying his claim and moving on, or you're refuting his claim. If you refute, you have a burden or proof on your shoulders. This is basic, 5th grade shit you should have learned.
All existence is scientific. Either things exists or they don’t. I can claim anything exists but with out proof no one would believe me. And why should they?
Gods are no difference. They are subjected to our physical laws of existence. When our ancestors said “Zeus was throwing lightning down on us” they were wrong. Believing that to be true didn’t make it true even if they didn’t know the science behind it. An unanswered question is preferable to an unquestioned answer. I don’t need to refute a claim that isn’t true and has no proof.