double standards!!!!!!

How could you believe Liam would freely agree to  have a child with someone for exploitation purposes? HOW COULD YOU BELIEVE THAT? The same people who have major hissy fits when antis talk shit about their favorites, don’t have any problem to say that about Liam. Again, SOME larries double standards are really disgusting. This is for you to know how little they think of him.

anonymous asked:

A thing that bothers me and might be related to the (numerous) double standarts. It's always "let men express their feelings" first, but when it's done in art, it's "manpain" or "another brooding dude". This has probably contributed to my writer's block among other things :( But I wonder if there's a line between actual bad writing and just people harping on art because it's done by men.

I feel you so much on this :/ The same group of people want men to express themselves, but insult them when they do? I don’t understand the logic, and I think it’s a very sad loop that boys find themselves caught in. It’s psychologically damaging and scarring and society needs to do a better job about it. 

never forget that hope achieved something no other goalkeeper or male player has ever accomplished when she reached 200 caps for the NT. yet she will never be rightfully honored for it bc of bullshit double standards and greedy raggedy ass ussf top brass who care more about appearance than substance and who have all benefited in their positions of power in large part due to hope’s years of dedication and skill

anonymous asked:

But are Larries… idk… do they know they hypocrites? Or just wild dumb? I told one of them she was being a lil bit of a double standards hoe and she told me I'm the one being stupid? Like sure Jan, just admit you dgaf about Liam and go lmaooo, they're so full of shit and hypocrisy

Sadly, yes. As always, pay attention. Unfollow and take away their platform.

anonymous asked:

I don't get why people say DCEU is rushed and messy, while Marvel already has some kind of perfectly built cinematic universe. Marvel doesn't even give every of their superheroes a solo movie. Where's Hawkeye movie? Where's Black Widow? Or even Scarlet Witch & Quicksilver? Or Mark Ruffalo's The Hulk? Like, does DC have to make solo movies literally for everyone first, and then DC has a permission from people to make a Justice League movie?? Ugh

It’s double fucking standards. It’s because the MCU is ‘’fun’’ or some shit and that apparently forgives everything.

You know what they call “double standards”? Having different judgment methods on something based on your personal bias.

That’s what game reviewers do, and that’s why I rarerly - if ever - take them seriously. Or, at the very least, take what they write with a pinch of salt. In the end, all game reviews turn out to be a bunch of SUBJECTIVE feeling on the product tested whereas it should be an OBJECTIVE list of things that applies equally to EVERY videogame.

Unfortunately, it’s not the case.

Have you ever heard of “Tomb Raider Angel of Darkness”? If you did, nothing to add. If you didn’t, here’s a tl;dr version of what happened: badly managed development process -> rushed and cut final product. That means, the game is halfed-baked in many sections and you can stumble across glitches and control problems. Alright, the consequence of this were, of course, a storm of negative reviews and the game being a critically panned commercial failure. It doesn’t matter whether it’s very deep, with interesting characters and a well developed plot, beautiful soundtrack and even good atmosphere/level design. All reviewers could see were “technical faults”. In fact, the game still gets ridiculed or mocked even by offcial gaming magazines to this day, for being “BROKEN”.

Then, I have to see my friend, playing a super critically acclaimed videogame - considered one of the best games of all time - showered with praise here and there, like Shadow of the Colossus, that is literally UNPLAYABLE. I mean it. Game-breaking bug and all that. I won’t even mention the atrocious frame rate problems because one can get past that. But now my friend can’t proceed further into the game because it freezes on him always in the same spot, and apparently there’s no solution for this. You could think “maybe it’s just me”, yet after a quick google search you’ll find out that “oh yes, this happened to most people, and it’s quite common”. Long story short, you either have to start from a new save point (which means re-starting the game again losing all your progress) or buy a new disc. Wow.

This game got all 9s and 10s from official reviews for its beautiful concept, story, characters, enviroments, everything else. It’s a fucking technical mess, but everything else is great (and it truly is). This way it got away with it. You know what other game didn’t get away with it? Yes. Angel of Darkness. And to make it clear, AOD never once crashed on me, nor did I ever encounter game breaking bugs. You know what AOD’s curse was? Aside from Eidos, of course. The fact that they publibly announced it was unfinished and not polished enough. So, people of course shaped their judgment around that and GOOD DAY, they already made up their mind. I believe it would’ve been a bit different if NO ONE knew its internal problems and what went on behind the scene, and just got the game in their hands to play without prejudice.

Or at least, that’s what I tell myself to try and save the reviewers’ reputation in my eyes, which is pretty much already tarnished enough to be restored. Otherwise, I can’t give an explanation as to why two games with VERY similar faults don’t receive the same treatment.

Just a reminder: Angel of Darkness is NOT as bas as they all tricked you into thinking or at the very least, there are other games with embarassing faults that have much more to offer, just like AOD. And just because “a journalist says so” doesn’t make it automatically right. I tend to believel they sometimes get even PAID to praise certain games, I don’t swallow all the bullshit they tell us, I simply don’t buy it.

In any case, I find a 9 out of 10 for a game relesead with game-breaking bugs and bad technical faults embarassing just as much as an insulting 5 or 6 out of 10 to a game with a masterfully written story, a wonderful concept, great atmosphere, good characters and amazing level design.

We have to think for ourselves more and rely much less on people being paid to tell us what they want us to believe.

@positivelyamazonian I think you might be interesting in reading this…

What I want more representation of. People with small and flat butts. Like boobs. It makes me so djjdhdjdd whenever I see posts that criticize smaller butts and people yell at artists to not be cowards and give huge asses like stfu not everyone has giant round asses ok. What’s wrong with small flat butts y'all hypocrites with double standards.

anonymous asked:

Okay but Chiam seemed so frickin fake and Cheryl is so attention-seeking and now they have a (probably real) baby.... what if it's the same with BG 1.0? What if it only seems fake af but it's real too...

BG 1 isn’t real tho 

Anonymous said to shadyshit91:Ok but why do y'all have to be hypocrites… Simon publicly stated to hate Liam, this is just another farce to sabotage the boys and y'all out there eating this shit? This bg 2.0 is just as shady as bg 1.0, but y'all Larries just have double standards at this point? At least Antis treat all these things equally ffs

?????? Are you ok? I’m not even answering this because you clearly doesn’t know howto read anything so congrats 

Anonymous said to shadyshit91:okey but what if harry made a song for dunkirk

haha that’d be big, but it’s quite not realistic 


Really lol 

eriithedog replied to your post “SPOILERS AHEAD Gintama characters are allowed to fight alongside the…”

Very great post! Everyone especially the girls, like Tsukki, Taechan or Sacchan, is so precious in their own way and doesn’t do anything bad to get bullied like that.

Thank you! Yes, everyone is free to dislike characters, it’s just absurd to me to see the girls hated for the same things the guys do that everyone loves and justifies to any extreme. But the girls are always held to different standards and they’re judged by a single gag trait or two without viewing their character (the layers and the growth) as a whole. They always have to prove somehow that they belong in the story whereas the guys can do whatever they want and still be called important, relevant characters. 

I can think of a few reasons for why people do that and it amazes me how some people can be so blind to their own double standards, but, regardless, it’s so tiring, especially as a woman, to see this. Sometimes I regret making this blog, because the last ten years have been nice and peaceful when I didn’t catch wind of silliness and personal, bitter vendettas against various characters (sometimes people seem more obsessed with the characters they hate than the ones they love). But I’ll stick around for a bit, especially since I’ve met some nice people here and I enjoy chatting with them. Also, this is my only outlet for obsessing guilt-free over Gintama

I love the female and non-binary characters, and it’s one of the few shounen series where we get such diverse and strong female/nb characters.

Anyway, thank you for your comment. 

hey listen, if you think crushes between straight kids are adorable and pure but you think it’s inappropriate to show the same type of puppy love between gay kids, you need to check yourself

“My boyfriend isn’t allowed to talk to other girls,” is just as unhealthy as “My girlfriend isn’t allowed to talk to other guys.”

“You can’t hang out with [boyfriend’s female friend] anymore,” is just as abusive as “You can’t hang out with [girlfriend’s male friend] anymore.”

“My man isn’t allowed to go out with his guys unless I’m with him,” is just as creepy and possessive as “My girl isn’t allowed to go out with her friends unless I’m with her.”

A woman who controls and manipulates her boyfriend is just as abusive as a man who controls and manipulates his girlfriend, pass it on.