i know there are many many ridiculous alien species in star wars legends but my new favorite thing i’ve learned about is snivvians, bc a distinguishing characteristic of their culture is that every set of twins contains one GUARANTEED EVIL TWIN who is a genius supervillain
literally it says “when male twins are born … invariably, one would grow to become a sociopathic despot” and this was a big moral dilemma for their society where they were like “we can’t just kill both of them, that would be terrible” so they would try to lock up both twins and wait to see which one turned out evil, except that since he was always an evil GENIUS and MASTER MANIPULATOR that was not necessarily successful
Let me ask you one question
Is your money that good?
Will it buy you forgiveness
Do you think that it could?
I think you will find
When your death takes its toll
All the money you made
Will never buy back your soul
Donald Trump’s firing of James Comey is an attack on American democracy. He can now pick his own man (or woman) to run the F.B.I., and this person will have the authority to close down the Russia investigation.
TYPES AS CHARACTERS (and character tropes) IN MY STORIES ~by INFP writer
So here I go once again to offend everyone (not really)
INFJ > VILLAIN > quiet, mistycal and wise > ready to sacrifice everything for Greater Goals > valuable friend (for some) > have a really estabillished worldview > mentor figure > beautiful strange eyes
ESFJ/ENFJ > miss perfect on the outside depressed on the inside > very warm and protective > Responsible Older Sister™ > save introverts’ asses in social situations > NATURAL BEAUTY > smart > care more about others than themself > suprisingly shy but hide it very well
ENTJ > so much anger > despotic > very strong personality > once again so much anger > D E E P > that inner flame so bright > determinated > doesn’t actually realize how much they need others > impulsive
INTJ > crave power more than anything > know better™ (they actually do) > “I knew it” > just better than you in everything > more enemies than friends > don’t trust anyone > tired of ur bullshit™ > judging glare > FASHION ICON
ISTJ > l o y a l > they don’t know how to handle feelings at all > withdrawn and closed > problem solvers > gangsta as fuck > logical and practial-minded > get shit done > need lot of alone time > comfortably numb
ENFP > biggest nerds > so talented oh my god > brave > MESSY > dedicated to their passion > gain trust of others very easily > true to themselves, never pretend to be someone else > probably believe in aliens
ISTP > 100% introverted > likes animals more than hummans > shy and cute > ace anything they do > practial, problem solvers > lot of unresolwed trauma > warm and kind but hidding it
ESTP > fuckboi > left their wife for their friend probably > tired of all this bullshit > but also feel responsible to fight for what’s right
ENTP > Q U E E N > extremally charismatic > rebelious, making everything their way > debater and social animal but also inventor and sciencist > once again SO MUCH CHARISMA > though and confident > can accomplish basically anything > hard working hard working hard working
ESFP > makes friends everywhere they go > everyone likes them > funny and optimistic > eager to help others > life is a party > friends are family
INTP > nerd > shy and akward but also very brave > curious, has to check everything themself > prefer books to humans > have like one (1) friend > observe everything. > wear the same pair of boots everyday > free spririt > quiet rebel > smart. intelligent.
As with many of my fellow Americans, I don’t consider myself partisan
politically - never have. I am a registered independent voter and have
been for most of my life. With that in mind, I submit the following:
Can we please get this out of the way? None of what is happening at
the top of government now is normal. None of it. And no one should
normalize it. No one.
We have a President who lies without a second thought. Big bold lies that are easily disproven. That is not normal.
We have serious allegations around obstruction of justice by that President. That is not normal.
We have an FBI director fired for insisting to continue pursuing a
serious investigation into the sanctify of our republic. It has never
happened before in our history. That is not normal.
We have a hostile foreign power attacking and undermining our electoral process. That is not normal.
We have an Attorney General under a serious shadow of association
with said foreign power, with indications that there is much more to
this story than we yet know. That is not normal.
We have Federal judges, our closest foreign allies, and the free
press under scurrilous attack from the President and his enablers. At
the same time we have despots praised. That is not normal.
We have an Administration fanning the flames of division over race,
ethnicity, religion, sexuality, and gender. That is not normal.
We have an overhaul of our entire health care system being written in secret on a rapid time frame. That is not normal.
We have a sordid confluence of the President’s business interests and his political power. That is not normal.
What concerns me even more than any of these items is the fact that
they are largely being met by a shrug or excuses from most Republican
elected officials. Even many Democrats seem overwhelmed and are inclined
to let some of this just ride. That may be how politics works. But this
is bigger. It’s about our nation.
We are shifting the goalposts for our democracy. We are failing to
be outraged by the outrageous because there is something even more
outrageous that always seems to hit the news cycle. And that is
What gives me hope is we have had waves of abnormality in our
country’s history. And we’ve had times when what we would consider now
to be not normal, like segregation, was considered normal. What has
centered and saved our country time and again is civic engagement. I
believe that most people in this nation don’t think any of this is
normal. And they could very well vote out those elected officials in
both parties who are normalizing these outrages.
Your movement of anti fascism will fail. Do you know why? Because fascism doesn't exist. We killed it after world war 2. Honestly if you did even a little research into fascist Italy Japan or Germany you'd see you're just like them. Black uniforms, masks with skulls, attacking people to instill total fear into the hearts of people who don't agree with you. Fighting fascism with fascism doesn't make you the good guys, it makes you a slightly different version of fascist.
Sigh. The sad thing is that we get messages just like this from clear, well-informed experts on fascism like ask-changeling-eight all the time.
Because fascism doesn’t exist. We killed it after world war 2
Oh, that’ll be a huge surprise to Francoist Spain or the Estado Novo regime in Portugal or the people suffering under the fascists of Daesh/ISIS/ISIL or the 200+ fascist cults, political parties, and terrorist groups that have existed since WW2. You should tell them.
you’d see you’re just like them. Black uniforms, masks with skulls,
Of course, because fascism (which we’ll remind you no longer exists according to yourself) is defined by the clothes people wear. That’s in the dictionary-definition of fascism, right?
fascism [fash-iz-uh m] noun1.(sometimes initial capital letter) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.2.(sometimes initial capital letter) the philosophy, principles, or methods of fascism.3.(initial capital letter) a political movement that employs the principles and methods of fascism, especially the one established by Mussolini in Italy 1922–43.
fascism noun fas·cism \ˈfa-ˌshi-zəm also ˈfa-ˌsi-\
1often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition2: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control early instances of army fascism and brutality — J. W. Aldridge
attacking people to instill total fear into the hearts of people who don’t agree with you.
Right. Because advocating for apartheid and genocide = just another, perfectly normal opinion that we may not agree with and should just have a polite debate about over tea.
hooligan-nova “Fighting fascists makes you a fascist” makes no sense. The defining feature of fascism is not violence.
If I fight a mugger I’m not a mugger. If I fight a bear it doesn’t make me a bear. Fascism is about control and antifascism is about refusal of that control.
Let’s leave the last word for Holocaust survivor Frank Frison, shall we?
“If fascism could be defeated in debate, I assure you that it would never have happened, neither in Germany, nor in Italy, nor anywhere else. Those who recognised its threat at the time and tried to stop it were, I assume, also called “a mob”. Regrettably too many “fair-minded” people didn’t either try, or want to stop it, and, as I witnessed myself during the war, accommodated themselves when it took over … People who witnessed fascism at its height are dying out, but the ideology is still here, and its apologists are working hard at a comeback. Past experience should teach us that fascism must be stopped before it takes hold again of too many minds, and becomes useful once again to some powerful interests.”
ask-changeling-eight, if you’d like to actually learn about what fascism is and how it developed so you don’t look like such an ill-informed jackass the next time you decide to opine on the topic, we’d recommend having an adult read & explain this book to you.
Request from anon: please can you do an imagine where Draco and the reader are like the king and queen of Slytherin or whatever and they’re like the coolest couple ever and one day someone crosses her path and she makes sure he pays for it
Thanks for requesting anon! I’m sorry if this is really bad, I wrote this in one sitting :/
You had been dating Draco for a good two years - you were both in sixth year and had structured a pretty notorious reputation; everyone always referred to the two of you as the ‘King and Queen of Slytherin’. Ever since people had found out about the two of you, they noticed how perfectly you fit together - Draco was a respectable, almost despotic character yet you were oddly kind, though everyone warned “Get on the wrong side of Y/N Y/L/N and you’re dead meat.” You knew how to defend yourself, having come from a similar family as Draco, it came naturally to the two of you.
You were surprisingly clever (one of the top in your year, actually) and you were proud of it. If you didn’t put those extra hours in at the library, you probably wouldn’t have passed your O.W.L.S; it came as a shock to your parents when you were placed in Slytherin (your mother was a Ravenclaw and so was your father) yet you supposed your house destined who you were meant to be. You were a Slytherin and you were proud of it.
You wish to know where my true loyalties lie? Not with any king or queen, but with the people. The people who suffer under despots and prosper under just rule. The people whose hearts you aim to win. If you demand blind allegiance, I respect your wishes. Grey Worm can behead me or your dragons can devour me. But if you let me live, I will serve you well. I will dedicate myself to seeing you on the Iron Throne because I choose you.
If Romeo and Juliet had taken it slow nothing at all would have changed. Juliet is aware that they are being too hasty (“Although I enjoy in thee, / I have no joy of this contract tonight. / It is too rash, to unadvised, too sudden. / Too like the lightning which doth cease to be / Ere one can say “it lightens!”) And yet she pops the question only a few lines later, and thank god she did.
If she had actually left Romeo “unsatisfied” in the balcony scene—if she had decided that they should wait before considering marriage, it wouldn’t have changed the fact that Tybalt would have looked for Romeo the next day. Romeo would have been banished anyway, because the tragedy isn’t caused by Romeo and Juliet’s precipitate love: it is caused by the violence, the hatred, and the prejudice of the feud.
A slower development of their relationship wouldn’t have saved Romeo from banishment. And a slower development of their relationship wouldn’t have changed the fact that Capulet sold Juliet to Paris. She would have had to marry him anyway. The only difference would have been that if she weren’t married to Romeo, but still in love with him, I doubt that Friar Laurence would have agreed to help her escape. Why bother breaking the rules, hurting Juliet’s parents by faking her death, just because Juliet didn’t feel like doing her duty? She would have had only two options left: either unwanted marriage or death. Looking at her words right after meeting Romeo, she seems determined to choose a husband on her own, or otherwise she will have none of it. (“If he be married, my grave is like to be my wedding bed.”)
And if they just hadn’t fallen in love at all, I believe it would have been the same: Romeo would have been banished and, without Juliet’s help, I doubt he would have survived long. He’s just not good at coping with pain and oppression—he needs affection. He needs people to take care of him. I think he would have ended up killing himself anyway, because he is terrified by the concept of isolation. (Or perhaps if he had never even attended Capulet’s party, he wouldn’t have had to fight Tybalt the day after. Perhaps he could have survived for a while—but how long? Look at Benvolio. He ended up unwillingly fighting Tybalt in the first scene. How long would it have taken for Romeo to take part in a fight? I think the point of the play is that they just can’t elude the feud, no matter how hard they try: it drags everyone down sooner or later.)
And if they hadn’t fallen in love at all, Juliet would have never become the powerful, intelligent, lively girl we know. She would have been this docile daughter who allows her parents to command her life: “I’ll look to like, if looking liking move, / But no more deep will I endart mine eye / Than your consent gives strength to make it fly.” Now compare those lines with the way she speaks in the balcony scene. (“Bondage is hoarse, and may not speak aloud, / Else would I tear the cave where Echo lies / And make her airy tongue more hoarse than mine / With repetition of ‘my Romeo!’”, “My bounty is as boundless as the sea, / My love as deep; the more I give to thee / The more I have, for both are infinite.”) She feels limitless. She feels free. But looking at Paris’ attitude in the friar’s cell, I think she would have been very miserable had she ended up marrying him. He just couldn’t care less about her feelings and opinions.
Yes, Romeo and Juliet behaved hastily, and I’m glad they did, because at least they could be happy and free for just a few days before the despotism of their society devoured them.