Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Spirit of Justice comes west in September
Not twelve hours after the demo leaked the name, Capcom has formally announced Ace Attorney 6 will be localized as Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney - Spirit of Justice!
From the PR:
SAN FRANCISCO — May 11, 2016 — Today, Capcom, a leading worldwide
developer and publisher of video games, has confirmed that the
much-anticipated next installment in the Ace Attorney® courtroom drama
series will make its way to North America and Europe as Phoenix Wright®:
Ace Attorney® – Spirit of Justice. This narrative adventure stars
beloved defense attorneys Phoenix Wright and Apollo Justice and sees the
return of many familiar faces alongside some interesting new additions.
The title will be released as a digital download in the Nintendo
eShop for the Nintendo 3DS™ family of systems in North America and
Europe in September this year at an MSRP of $29.99 / £24.99 / €29.99.
Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney – Spirit of Justice sees Phoenix in a brand
new location: a courtroom situated in the Kingdom of Khura’in, origin
of the Kurain Channeling Technique, where mysterious séance trials
decide the fate of all defendants. Brand new to the series is the
Divination Séance gameplay mechanic that allows the player to revisit
the last moments of a victim’s life. Players must fight to unravel the
discrepancies and contradictions between the Royal Priestess’s Insight
and what is shown in the séance. Meanwhile, defense attorney Apollo
Justice faces his own challenges holding down the fort at the Wright
Anything Agency, as he takes on a case that will have explosive
implications. Both our heroes are joined by a host of returning friends
and adversaries in their fight to bring about justice.
The new game is filled with puzzling cases to solve using popular
investigative techniques from previous installments. More details on
gameplay features will be revealed in the coming months, so stay tuned!
We also get a few names in the trailer - Leifa’s official transliteration is Rayfa Padma Khura’in, and Bokuto is Ahlbi Ur’gaid!
GREAT COURTROOM DRAMAS 1954-1962: The Caine Mutiny (1954), The Wrong Man (1956), 12 Angry Men (1957), Witness for the Prosecution (1957), Anatomy of a Murder (1959), Compulsion (1959), Inherit the Wind (1960), Judgment at Nuremberg (1961), To Killa Mockingbird (1962) and The Trial (1962).
Fans everywhere agree that Wisconsin native Steven Avery was the breakout star of Making A Murderer’s first season, which chronicled Avery’s decades-long battle with the evil Manitowoc County Sheriff’s Office in a 10-episode, heart-wrenching courtroom drama. Now it appears that, with this newest appeal from the show’s lead performer, fans could be seeing the continued adventures of Avery and his wacky family as early as this year.
Given the show’s overnight success, it’s not surprising that Avery is eager to get back in the courtroom as soon as possible. After all, he wasn’t particularly famous before his Netflix premiere (Making A Murderer is his only credit on IMDb); and now that he’s gotten a taste of fame, he’d probably like to get some use out of it before his 15 minutes are up.
“I don’t like making movies that nobody’s going to see or care about, and I also don’t want to try to do just “important” movies, because every movie’s important. For instance, the thing I’m doing next is a courtroom drama of sorts. But it’s a lot more than that, and the only reason I’m doing this movie is because my wife is producing it. She’s passionate about it. It’s a fantastic script, and it is a bit of a departure for both of us. And now that we’re doing this courtroom drama (even though it really isn’t one), we’re getting all these courtroom drama scripts, like that’s what we want to do for the next 12 years. And I’m like, “Well strangely, no.””
In one sense, Thursday’s Grey’s Anatomy (8/7c, ABC) will feel less like a regular episode of the series that we all know and love, and more like a standalone movie, says Kevin McKidd, who not only plays Owen but directed the hour. “Since most of it takes place in the courthouse, it’s kind of like a really wonderful courtroom drama, like Kramer vs. Kramer.”
In another sense, “Mama Tried” will probably feel a whole lot like classic Grey’s, since the stakes are as high as they’ve ever been in the OR. As McKidd notes, in fighting for custody of daughter Sofia, “Callie and Arizona are fighting for their lives, in a sense.” Here, he previews for TVLine “the very emotional and heart-wrenching” installment that will decide the fates of Sofia and her mothers… and possibly Penny, too.
TVLINE | What was the mood on the set like while working on this episode? Intense. It was intense to shoot, and I think it’s going to be really intense to watch. I think people are going to really respond to it. It’s very emotional, very powerful. I mean, to fight over the custody of a child, for a parent, is probably one of the most [difficult] things they could have to do. Plus, the audience loves Callie. The audience loves Arizona. We want them both to be okay.
TVLINE | And obviously, they can’t both come out of this okay. Even their friends can’t, right? Yeah, that’s the hard thing for all [the rest] of our characters. We’re all asked to give testimony for the person we believe should have custody. It’s really tough when you have to pick a side like that, and that’s part of the reason why it’s such an intense episode. Everybody gets cross-examined, and some people do better under that pressure than others. It really puts Callie and Penny’s relationship to the test when Penny testifies, and affects their relationship going forward in a big way. The testimony that Penny gives… she does her best for Callie, but it doesn’t go as planned, and that causes problems.
TVLINE | Is there ever a moment when Callie and Arizona are like, “What are we doing? Let’s work this out”? They do try to connect at a certain point, but the lawyers get in there and do their lawyering thing and cause damage, so [the ex-wives’] interaction is very charged. There are a lot of hurt feelings. They try to stay civil, but it’s hard when things get thrown at you by a lawyer. Arizona especially, I think, really feels hard done in the courtroom.
TVLINE | Is there any sign, any hint at all, of the love that they used to feel for each other? There is. They both in a way come to a point where they can acknowledge the relationship that existed. In spite of the hurt feelings, they try to reach a higher ground and respect the [past]. But it’s hard when there are hurt feelings in the heat of the moment to really follow through on that.
TVLINE | And when the heat of the moment has cooled? After this episode, the aftermath plays out in a really interesting way in the lead-up to the finale. It gets pretty hairy in this episode. There is animosity. It’s not all fluffy and pretty and nice. There are really intense, complicated emotions flying around. But there’s a really beautiful payoff in the finale connected to this.
Kindergarten teacher Helen Hulick made Los Angeles court history — and struck a blow for women’s fashion — in 1938.
Hulick arrived in downtown L.A. court to testify against two burglary suspects. But the courtroom drama immediately shifted to the slacks she was wearing. Judge Arthur S. Guerin rescheduled her testimony and ordered her to wear a dress next time.
Hulick was quoted in the Nov. 10, 1938, Los Angeles Times saying, “You tell the judge I will stand on my rights. If he orders me to change into a dress I won’t do it. I like slacks. They’re comfortable.”
Five days later, she returned to court in slacks, angering the judge. She was told to return the following day “in acceptable dress” or risk being found in contempt of court and punished.
The next day, Hulick showed up in slacks. Judge Guerin held her in contempt. She was given a five-day sentence and sent to jail.
“After being divested of her favorite garment by a jail matron and attired in a prison denim dress, Miss Hulick was released on her own recognizance after her attorney … obtained a writ of habeas corpus and declared he would carry the matter to the Appellate Court,” The Times reported.
Hundreds sent letters of protest to the courthouse. Guerin’s contempt citation was overturned by the Appellate Division during a habeas corpus hearing. Hulick was free to wear slacks to court.
A couple of months later, Hulick came back to court. Her point made, this time she wore a dress.
It’s Ludum Dare time again, and I have another excellent game for you beautiful people! This one is a courtroom drama set in the prehistoric era, where you help a guilty Tyrone Rex in improvising a defense and staying out of Dino Prison!
The game is fully voiced by myself and ProZD and features a totally original soundtrack! Please enjoy!
20 films I’d like to see play at Cannes 2015 - Part 4
Suffragette - Sarah Gavron, UK
Barely any explanation is needed for this one. With an all star cast that includes Carey Mulligan, Helena Bonham-Carter and Meryl Streep, Sufragette is being positioned as an Oscar player which would make it a perfect Cannes pick.
Sweet Red Bean Paste - Naomi Kawase, Japan
At this point Kawase is a Cannes constant. While her films have struggled to find U.S. distribution they have picked up a variety of awards at Cannes including the prestigious Camera d’Or.
A Tale of Love and Darkness - Natalie Portman, Israel
After two high-profile unsuccessful attempts at working with women director’s Portman put herself in the directing chair herself in this adaptation of Amos Oz’s highly acclaimed autobiographical novel.
The Whole Truth - Courtney Hunt, USA
Hunt earned an Oscar nomination for the screenplay of her debut feature Frozen River. Now seven years later, she’s back directing her second film, a courtroom drama starring Keanu Reeves, Gugu Mbatha-Raw as two lawyers trying to defend a young teenager who may or may not have murdered his father.
Token Slot - For Any Male Director, From Any Country
This list is in part a response to similar lists made by widely read publications like The Guardian and Indiewire by industry professionals who are only able to cough up one token slot for a film directed by a woman. It often seems like no effort at all was even put in to selecting this woman’s film, just that they realized that they should probably have at least one and included the first one they could think of.
In honour of the token woman slot I include the token man slot. Feel free to imagine the male filmmaker of your choice here.