BOMBSHELL REPORT: Obama threatened to shoot down Israeli aircraft

According to a report by a Kuwaiti newspaper, President Obama has threatened to shoot down Israeli aircraft in the event that Israel attacked Iran’s nuclear facilities.

From Israel National News:

The Bethlehem-based news agency Ma’an has cited a Kuwaiti newspaper report Saturday, that US President Barack Obama thwarted an Israeli military attack against Iran’s nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.
Following Obama’s threat, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was reportedly forced to abort the planned Iran attack.
According to Al-Jarida, the Netanyahu government took the decision to strike Iran some time in 2014 soon after Israel had discovered the United States and Iran had been involved in secret talks over Iran’s nuclear program and were about to sign an agreement in that regard behind Israel’s back.
The report claimed that an unnamed Israeli minister who has good ties with the US administration revealed the attack plan to Secretary of State John Kerry, and that Obama then threatened to shoot down the Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.

Read the Rest

If this is true, this is huge. I’m sure there will be more details to come.

camjphillips asked:

Someone just started a feminism/women's rights group in my high school. There are posters all around the school with things such as, "Did you know that women make 77 cents to the male dollar? Join to help make a change!" Tempted to join just to share with them some real facts about gender equality. Love your blog.

You should.  I would place little flyers underneath theirs debunking their BS including sources.

BINGO, Dr. Carson! Fighting to rid America of dependency DOES NOT mean conservatives don’t care about the poor. In fact, it means we care about them in the very real sense of the word. Using welfare to inspire dependency and fear isn’t caring for the poor, it’s making them into slaves.

reasons NOT to vote for Stephen Harper and the conservative party in the next federal election this year:
  • they are anti-environment
  • they are anti-peacekeeping
  • they are anti-union
  • they are anti-middle/working class
  • they are anti-women/anti-prochoice
  • they are anti-first nations
  • they are pro-coporation
  • they are pro-war
  • they are pro-rich
  • they are pro-white
  • they are anti-canadian

It’s finally happening. Today, the FCC votes on whether the internet is a free open service between you and the cable companies.

Groups funded by the likes of George Soros have already done a phenomenal job of pulling the hood over your eyes by getting internet users like you and me to believe that adopting new regulatory rules will keep the internet free, fair, and thriving—nearly 200,000 calls to Congress have been placed from Tumblr alone, hundreds of thousands more from a diverse coalition of partners, and 4 million total comments have been submitted directly to the FCC…but the CEO of Tumblr doesn’t even understand “net neutrality” himself.  Today is your chance to raise your voice and see if the government gives a damn about what you think, considering the FCC has totally withheld their plans from the public. By all accounts, we know that Chairman Wheeler is prepared to do the wrong thing—a politically expedient thing that President Obama wants him to do —and enact firm net neutrality rules under Title II of the Communications Act.

If this happens, it’s the end of the free internet.  It will be subject to all the rules and regulations that the government has taken over such as what they did with terrestrial radio and the open TV airwaves.  Did we mention the introduction of a new internet tax that you will end up paying?  So let’s make sure it doesn’t happen. If you haven’t called your representative yet,call your representative. If you’ve already called your representative, call them again.

Most importantly, call 1-888-225-5322 then choose #5 on the prompt to register your opinion to the FCC directly.

And with your help, we can stop an government takeover of the internet and insure an internet in which freedom is secure for generations to come.

An Idaho lawmaker received a brief lesson on female anatomy after asking if a woman can swallow a small camera for doctors to conduct a remote gynecological exam.
The question Monday from Republican Rep. Vito Barbieri came as the House State Affairs Committee heard nearly three hours of testimony on a bill that would ban doctors from prescribing abortion-inducing medication through telemedicine.
Dr. Julie Madsen was testifying in opposition to the bill when Barbieri asked the question. Madsen replied that would be impossible because swallowed pills do not end up in the vagina.
The committee approved the bill 13-4 on a party-line vote. Barbieri, who sits on the board of a crisis pregnancy center in northern Idaho, voted in favor of the legislation.

These are the men making legislative decisions about our bodies.