Hey everyone, just a reminder that yesterday the supreme court decided that its unconstitutional for the police to look through your phone unless they have a warrant, EVEN if you are placed under arrest.
HOWEVER, the police CAN search your phone without a warrant if given verbal consent and they AREN’T required to tell you that you can request that they get a warrant. It’s up to you to know your rights, so PLEASE PLEASE reblog this so we can spread the word!
According to the report, after the NSA’s stockpile of offensive weapons leaked, the consequences included the following:
“Millions of people saw their computers shut down by ransomware, with demands for payments in digital currency to have their access restored. Tens of thousands of employees at Mondelez International, the maker of Oreo cookies, had their data completely wiped. FedEx reported that an attack on a European subsidiary had halted deliveries and cost $300 million. Hospitals in Pennsylvania, Britain, and Indonesia had to turn away patients. The attacks disrupted production at a car plant in France, an oil company in Brazil, and a chocolate factory in Tasmania, among thousands of enterprises affected worldwide. American officials had to explain to close allies—and to business leaders in the United States—how cyber weapons developed at Fort Meade in Maryland came to be used against them.”
Now consider the potential costs and consequences if the NSA’s stockpile of metadata on American citizens were to be breached by hackers or stolen by an insider, and then come under the control of Russia or China or North Korea or terrorists.
Chaos-loving Russian trolls could take to Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit to post phone numbers of millions who called abortion clinics, addiction and suicide hotlines, and tip lines to anonymously report crime to the FBI or local cops. China’s government could map the business networks of American corporations expected to be in high-stakes economic competition with Chinese firms. I’ll refrain from giving terrorists specific ideas about how they might exploit such information, but I can think of several frightening ways off the top of my head.
If you’re not fussed about the principles and civil liberties at stake, about the potential for internal abuse, about every petty authoritarian and nosy ex-boyfriend in intel and law enforcement trying their damndest to get in on the “data sharing,” about fucking ICE rifling through NSA surveillance databases to hunt down and round up people who don’t have their papers in order, about the “if you guys can do it, so can we” standards it sets among nations… at least worry about the very adversaries you’re authorizing all this bullshit to fight getting in on the data-breach extravaganza with all the dirt on your own citizens that your Honorable Intelligence Officers™ would never dream of abusing.
By all accounts, the head nurse at the University of Utah Hospital’s burn unit was professional and restrained when she told a Salt Lake City police detective he wasn’t allowed to draw blood from a badly injured patient.
The detective didn’t have a warrant, first off. And the patient wasn’t conscious, so he couldn’t give consent. Without that, the detective was barred from collecting blood samples — not just by hospital policy, but by basic constitutional law.
Still, Detective Jeff Payne insisted that he be let in to take the blood, saying the nurse would be arrested and charged if she refused.
Nurse Alex Wubbels politely stood her ground. She got her supervisor on the phone so Payne could hear the decision loud and clear. “Sir,” said the supervisor, “you’re making a huge mistake because you’re threatening a nurse.”
Payne snapped. He seized hold of the nurse, shoved her out of the building and cuffed her hands behind her back. A bewildered Wubbels screamed “help me” and “you’re assaulting me” as the detective forced her into an unmarked car and accused her of interfering with an investigation.
Hospital policy states that a nurse cannot take blood from an unconscious patient, unless that patient is under arrest or police have a warrant. None existed. She refused. Police arrested her.
My school- The principal- has decided that because my biological sex is female that me walking with my girlfriend across the stage for coronation would be an outrage. I am a trans student and shoulf not have to face such discrimination, I applied as a male walker and he still overpassed it and had the audacity to call me a woman. I just want to have a good time with my love at the dance for my senior year.
So… I made a petition!
It has over 200 spots to fill so wish me luck! I will be taking these signitures to my superintendent so he may pass his judgement.
Brian Kilmeade: James Clapper came out and said, “I’m national intelligence director. If somebody wiretapped Trump Tower I would know about it, and it didn’t happen.”
Judge Napolitano: He actually didn’t say it that way, he chose his words very carefully. He said if somebody got a FISA warrant for this I would know about it. The president doesn’t need a FISA warrant, because the statute authorizes him to bypass FISA. And, quite frankly, Brian, we are all skeptical of anything James Clapper says because he lied under oath. We all know that. When Senator Wyden asked him is the NSA spying on tens or hundreds of millions of Americans, and he answered no, senator Wyden knew the answer was yes, General Clapper knew that the answer was yes, they gave him a chance to correct the answer, and he didn’t do it…
Sequel to my Post in Factions in the REpublican party, Factions in the Democratic Party
so last time I went over the factions of the Republican Party, lets
do the same for the democrats. Two things to understand first that
are critically. Firstly like with the GOP, I am not talking about
the Centrists who are part of the party, even though they are a major
element. The centrists are basically an entirely separate party who
due to the two party system split themselves between the Dems and the
Reps, and are sort of their own thing, but know that especially among
the leadership of the Dems there are a lot of centrists which is
where Clinton fell as a leader on the political spectrum, I am more
talking about the main democratic base just like I was with the
Republicans. Secondly, a big difference between the democrats and
Republicans is that the democrats are more a collection of core
interest voters, each of whom has a certain topic which is “there”
core issue. There are fully formed ideologies in the Democrats but
they don’t really vote on those, while in the Republican party the
seven factions are roughly speaking seven fully formed ideologies,
who reluctantly work together. This will be more important I swear.
So what are the interest groups of the Democratic Party?
The Civil Rights Faction
who prioritize Civil Rights. These are the people who are
marginalized and oppressed groups within the US and want to fight
back against systemic oppression. Women, African Americans, Latinos,
Asians, Native Americans, Jews, Muslim, GSM, the disabled, and any
other group who have historically been targeted by bigotry and hate
make up this faction. As you can tell that is a wide variety of
people and they are not really united, I mean go unto any Social
Justice forum and you will see African American activists being
sexist, Feminists being transphobic, Gay men being nasty to gay women
(and both to bisexuals), Transgendered people being Islamophobic,
Muslim hating Jews and via versa etc etc.
But in the last decade has
lead to a far greater sense of shared identity among these various
groups, they fight and they squabble and many reject the notion of
having anything in common, and many are bigots among them but we’ve
been seeing more and more people give at least lip service on all or
almost all of the issues, which is why I am counting them as a single
voting bloc. Or rather, when we are up against the Republican Party
they are a single voting bloc, because the GOP has made it its
business to target…all of those groups and so among people who
identify strong with these groups, they tend to serve as a single
faction. When I say identify btw, I mean that they understand they
are an oppressed group and make voting decisions based on that
choice. As this election showed, not all women come out and vote
based on gender issues, not all Latinos vote based on racial issues,
not all gay men vote based upon homphobia ect. But many do, and for
good reasons because one party is trying to kill them and the other
is mostly content to say how sad it is as they die, so among all of
these groups you have identity factions trying to protect their
lives, and during election years they tend to come together and vote
as a bloc.
They care primarily about hate crimes, the rise of the
Alt Right, BLM and other examples of police brutality, Stop and
Frisk, Immigration reform, an insensitive and uncaring media that
treats them like spoiled children because they don’t care much for
being abused regularly, completely segregated and unfair school
system, anti welfare policies aimed at screwing them over, a totally
unrepresentative entertainment industry that thrives on offensive
negative stereotypes, a chunk of the country that seems to think
women having control over their own bodies and Gay people wanting to
get married is somehow something to be contested over, and of course
an internet culture that basically sees the existence of free speech
means that it is their duty to make these already oppressed people
miserable every minute of every day. Also keeping the Republicans
out of power because the Republicans have made it clear they want to
kill these people just to watch them die.
second group are the old founders of the modern democratic Party,
people who care about class. These are ex union workers, the lower
classes, working classes and increasingly the middle class. They
aren’t all white, but the majority of them are, and they know full
well they are getting fucked over by the current state of the
country. They are furious primarily at the wealth gap, declining
wages, lobbying in politics, these horrible trade deals that seem to
exist to fuck them over, the total lack of political oversight on
corporate shadiness, the total breakdown of welfare, the constant
threat to Social Security/Medicare/Madicaid, the total lack of a
reasonable healthcare policy, the fact that Wall street basically
wasn’t punished for the crash, the low Corporate Tax rate, the rising
wealth gap, the slow death of the middle class, right to work states,
our broken infrastructure, and lobbying, seriously these guy really
hate lobbying. Some of them defected to Trump during the election in
a few Rust Belt States.
The Anti War Faction
we have the anti war people, who really want the War on Terror to end
and have been spending the last 15 years in a constant state of
endless sadness. They want to reduce the war, they want to cease
torture, they want to close Gitmo, they want to want to stop
supporting coups abroad, they want nuclear disarmament, and they want
to ratchet down tensions with the rest of the world. The thing they
really want is for us to rethink our relationship to Israel and Saudi
Arabia. These guys never get what they want and live in a state of
we have the environmentalists who want us all not to die from Climate
Change. Their primary goal is for us not to die from climate change,
and likely because we never listen to them, we are all going to die
from Climate Change, thanks Baby Boomers thanks a lot.
finally the people who want to defend Civil Liberties, they think
that the 1st
amendment have taken a beating that needs to be corrected, they want
a non corporate owned Press, they want to curtail the power of the
CIA and NSA, they want greater government openness and government
accountability, they want to have more accountability for government
screw ups and they want to end the War on Drugs.
and also everybody on this list would like Prison Reform, College
Reform, and Public Education reform.
you might notice something looking at all of these groups, none of
them have really gotten much of their core demands met since 1980, or
at all, because again the Democratic Party is not actually led by
leftists, its led by Centrists who have a different sent of
priorities than the liberals.
All five of these factions feel like
they aren’t ever heard, like the main power centers ignore them and
don’t take them seriously, like they are constantly fighting against
society at large, and every day things get worse for their interest.
And they are correct because Reaganism and Neoliberalism have really
fucked over the Left. Also notice something important, Hillary
Clinton doesn’t belong to any of these groups, because she is in the
Centrist Group, within the Civil Rights the Feminists mostly like her
but mostly because they want somebody to finally break the glass
ceiling but that is about it, none of these groups were really having
their interests met by either Clinton or Kaine.
looking at these groups you will notice…they don’t contradict. You
can care about the death of the middle class, systemic oppression,
the environment, opposing the war abroad, and NSA overreach without
any ideological contradiction, which simply isn’t true of the
Republicans. Jingoism, Libertarianism, Alt Right, Know Nothing
Nationalism, Conservatism, the Religious Right and the Bushiness
Party all actively contradict each other and if it wasn’t for the two
party system they would basically fall apart. That just isn’t true
for the Democrats, and that is why our infighting still hasn’t gotten
to the level of vitriol that you see on the right. It is also why
they turn out up vote more, the GOP base (not its leaders its base)
is more ideological than us, and so if they feel like their ideology
is dying out, they commit themselves fully.
the Left actually unified for once in their life and put aside those
difference, we could basically emerge victorious because if the five
factions worked in tandem we would win over a lot of republicans and
independents, and between these five groups you have a majority of
the country, and in particular among the youth. As the elder
population starts to die off, these views will become more and more
mainstream, we just need to harness that energy in the meantime.
During demonstrations that erupted across the nation after the election of President Trump last year, the Los Angeles Police Department arrested hundreds of protesters — far more than any other law enforcement agency in the country.
Of the 462 people arrested during marches that wound through downtown, Westlake and onto the 101 Freeway between Nov. 7 and Nov. 12, most were held on suspicion of blocking a roadway or failing to disperse after officers declared unlawful assemblies.
But nearly a year later, a Los Angeles Times analysis of arrest records shows, the LAPD has sought formal charges in only 10 cases, and prosecutors have filed charges against just three people. In all, three felony cases were filed with prosecutors, but two were dismissed due to lack of evidence, according to the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office. Of seven misdemeanor cases presented to the city attorney’s office, only two resulted in charges, according to spokesman Rob Wilcox.
The low number of charges has renewed criticism that the LAPD was too aggressive in arresting protesters. Civil liberties advocates said the LAPD tactics used last year could deter people from exercising their 1st Amendment rights.
“Our freedoms are vanishing. If you do not get active to take a stand
now against all that is wrong while we still can, then maybe one of your
children may elect to do so in the future, when it will be far more
riskier — and much, much harder.”