What happened with Fyz? I never understood
I am gonna dig up some older posts so you can understand:
(NOTE: None of the links used in this post point to the site. This is a safe place)
They are constantly cropping Louis Tomlinson out of the pictures even if he is in the close vicinity of Harry Styles. This way twisting your perception and supporting that ridiculous narrative that the friendship (and relationship) of the century broke because Louis was sick of the gay rumors and they are not even on speaking terms. Nothing new, just add this to the usual crap we get about HarryandLouis by Modest.
FYZ’S POSTED PICTURE:
This was a lie that actually got out of the basket, and we have no idea how many times they have been pictured together. We all know there is a photo ban on HL.
They are supporting Harry’s womanizer narrative, Harry Styles and mystery women (and now men) walking on the street, but forgetting to report when he is in a gay bar, and OH SURPRISE there is a new HQ about Louis landing when he is a continent apart from Harry, let’s fucking post it, we hate Louis but lets post it. So see people Louis is landing in Luton, they are posting 674 HQ pictures and then look people Harry is in L.A. Louis in the UK. Harry is in L.A. Louis in the UK. Harry is in L.A. Louis in the UK. Harry is in L.A. Louis in the UK. Got it? Harry and Louis are not together can you see it? #NOTWITHLOUIS.
And the other times Louis appeared on the site was when the narrative required it. Meaning that they are posting candids with the title: the boys on their way to their rehearsal and guess who is never featured? Louis William Tomlinson. NEWSFLASH! One Direction has 5 members. Not 4. But look there is a new Louis picture, oh right. Because his beard appeared, let’s post some pictures from a private plane because apparently these 13-14 year olds running this site have their purses full of green crispy dollars and can buy out sets of pap pictures.
OOPS, did I say buy out? Well, more like stealing them and posting them without a source. So they got called out and got threatened with a lawsuit by jojopics and they claimed jojopics was spreading lies, but then SURPRISE! They had to change URL’s and SURPRISE 2.0 ALL THEIR CANDIDS WERE DELETED. Yeah, not shady, right? So who is the liar now?
And besides that they are rude and arrogant. They used disgustingly hateful tags for Louis and they are not my kind of pal.
Now they cut the OU (which referred to Louis) from their URL and still exist, still stealing pictures, posting cropped and edited shit instead of the original ones. Putting a disclaimer on the site that they are not hosting the images apparently worked. They are still Modest’s/HJPR mouthpiece. Same old sh.. but a different URL.
What can you do? IGNORE THEM. DO NOT REBLOG ANYTHING FROM THEM. BLOCK THEM. DON’T GIVE THEM TRAFFIC.
1) they’re literally posting pics illegally without the consent of the people taking the photos. (this photographer is going to sue them for this)
2) They’ve always hated Louis. People will say they banned him after the weed video but trust me, I used to follow them since 2012 and they’d always take any opportunity to bash him. Never really understood why they call themselves fuckyeahzourry if they only blog about zarry. (My problem is not against the ship, its my #2 favorite ship, my problem is with the blog)
3) there are so many more reasons but I’d rather let the law take care of them and enjoy blogging about louis!
Okay so basically the conclusions we can draw from this sketchy-as-fuck situation, all of which I have said before but which we now seem to have evidence of, are:
There is some sort of ban on candid photos that are taken of Louis in the same vicinity of Harry.
Fans will not say anything if they see Harry and Louis at the same time.
Regardless, and, perhaps, because of, both these facts, Harry and Louis still leave at the same time… four years later.
So does a photo ban mean that every single pap, gossip website and magazine knows about their relationship?
Yes that’s exactly what it means. Paps who are not aware will take them, but no one will buy them. I think I explained once to someone this way:
Think of a pap taking pictures of a celebrities child, they’d have to get consent from the parent in order to publish them (unless it is a well known fact that it is allowed), now think of Modest! as Harry and Louis’ parents.
Does that help?
THERE ARE SO MANY HURDLES AND CHECKPOINTS TO GO THROUGH TO PUBLISH A PICTURE #OR ATLEAST PUBLISH TO BE PURCHASED (AND BY PURCHASE I DON’T MEAN SOLD LIKE YOU WOULD BE SHOCKED BY THE AMOUNT OF PICS THAT DON’T GET BOUGHT) #SAY I’M A PAP AND I TAKE A PICTURE #THAT THEN HAS TO BE PROCCESSED BEFORE BEING AVALIABLE TO BE BOUGHT #AND THEN ONCE IT’S PURCHASED EVEN THEN IT DOESN’T MEAN PEOPLE WILL PUBLISH #PEOPLE WILL BUY UP JUST SO THEY HAVE THE MONOPLOY OVER THEM FOR A MAYBE IN THE FUTURE SITUATION #ANYWAYS I USED TO WORK FOR GETTY IMAGES #AND THE PLACE I WORKED AT PROCESSED FOR FLAME FLYNET SPLASH AP AND EVERY AGENCY UNDER THE SUN #THE PEOPLE THAT DID THE LEGAL PROCESSING (NOT ME I DID FASHION STUFFS) HAD GIANT BOARD #COVERED IN PINNED NOTICES AND NAMES AND STUFFS #YOU WOULD ALWAYS COME IN AND SEE A CELEBS KIDS NAME ON THE WHITEBOARD LIKE HOLD SALE (@whitepaintedhair)
So how would people find out about it if there was a super-injunction? You seem to know a lot about them considering they’re so secretive, so how do people even know they exist if they’re so secret?
Useful tag: photo ban#ukpoli#fame culture#remember when the guardian was first fighting a superinjunction and no one really knew about them back then?#and it was an ACTUAL POLITICAL ISSUE#about illegal waste dumping#smh how the fuck did that judge think it was ok to grant a superinjunction in that case
The only ways people can find out about specific super-injunctions are if
- a huge leak/breach/scandal happens like what happened with The Sun a few years ago,
- a judge decides that the super-injunction can no longer be held up by the privacy law that allowed it to be granted in the first place, in which case it’s open season for the media to report on it,
- a non-English or non-Welsh media outlet finds out about it and decides to report it (this has happened a few times, things getting published in Scottish papers that couldn’t be published here), or
- the people directly involved (so in other words, Harry and Louis in this hypothetical scenario) voluntarily reveal that they have a super-injunction out.
And most people who are aware of them know that they exist because, as I said, there was a huge scandal a few years ago. It was practically all that was talked about in the media for months.
Also possible (but discouraged):
- having an MP break the superinjunction while under parliamentary privilege, as newspapers are allowed to report what MPs have said as long as they pretend it isn’t a fact
Journalists and other people in the know are well aware of what the superinjunctions prevent them from saying, and have sometimes accidentally broken them. Wiki article about the 2011 superinjunction controversy if anyone wants more details.
I always find it interesting that people think things like super-injunctions are dismissible conspiracy theories, when there is evidence and history that they have been and are used to hide the activities of corporations and individuals who can afford to pay. This isn’t anyone’s fantasy - the Trafigura case is worth reading up on, especially how the law firm involved, Carter Ruck, tried to prevent the Guardian from reporting on a debate in the UK Parliament. Essentially, regardless of your opinion of ~fandom things, these things do happen. The world is not nice. It is not straightforward. Facts are hidden and lies are told as truth. Especially when you have the money to employ good lawyers