but no one is free from criticism either

MBTI types as schools of philosophy

ISFJ: historicism, the belief that some event(s) or period(s) in history has/have had a pivotal role in the way humans have developed (e.g. believing that the fall of Rome was the turning point of human history)
ESFJ: antipositivism, the belief that human social life does not follow definite laws the way the natural world does
ISTJ: stoicism, the belief that bad and destructive emotions come from poor judgment and that one is most free when they are free from anger, jealousy, and envy
ESTJ: pragmaticism, the belief that practical topics (topics that have real-life applications) are the most relevant topics
ISFP: romanticism, part of which holds that intense emotions like apprehension, awe, horror, and fear are the most beautiful things that humans can experience
ESFP: empiricism, the belief that  knowledge either only or primarily comes from sensory experience
ISTP: objectivism, the belief that reality exists as purely as ever even without conscious creatures observing it but that humans have a connection to reality through their senses
ESTP: critical realism, the belief that some of the senses provide accurate versions of reality, while others do not
INFJ: neohumanist universalism, the belief that extending your love to all living and nonliving beings in the universe allows you to see the ultimate truth
ENFJ: epicureanism, part of which holds that making friends is essential to living a happy and satisfying life
INTJ: solipsism, the belief that the only thing that you can be absolutely sure exists is your own mind
ENTJ: transhumanism, the belief that advanced technology can and should be used to enhance humans’ physical and intellectual abilities
INFP: idealism, the belief that reality as we can know it is purely mental and does not exist outside of our minds
ENFP: ethical egoism, the belief that an ethical deed is, by definition, one done in self-interest, so long as you do not knowingly hurt others in the process
INTP: logical positivism, the belief that all of your decisions, conclusions, and beliefs should be rooted in scientific discovery and evidence
ENTP: structuralism, the belief that human social life functions as a large, overarching system or process

Zodiac signs:behavior when in love.

♈ Aries: Will demand their freedom yet become possessive themselves. Will see the world through rose-coloured glasses when they are in love. They become total romantics yet can be embarrassed by this and don’t like people seeing their vulnerable side
♉ Taurus: They are old fashioned in love and a confusing mix of sentimentality and toughness. Although they appear composed they have deeply intensified feelings of love and
like to show physical evidence of it. It takes a long time for Taureans to give away their hearts, and only the strong will survive the wait
♊ Gemini: A Gemini will want to make friends with you first. Most of the relationship will base around conversation, big ideas and soul satisfying deep and meaningfuls. Although Gemini is desperate to find their long lost twin; they often surprise themselves with their detachment from people, and a lack of feeling; they also guard their freedom very forcefully
♋ Cancer: A Cancerian will instantly know what their partner wants in a relationship; they are very intuitive and ‘sixth-sense’ when it comes to this. They take love rather seriously and are very sensitive to any turbulence in their relationships. While their friends are out drinking; they’re busy picking names for your future children or mentally decorating their nurseries
♌ Leo: Leo are very proud and boastful in their love. They tend to gravitate towards people that fulfil their higher standards and they love to show their loved one off. Leo want the whole world to know they are in love and become a lot happier people when they are
♍ Virgo: Virgo prefer serene relationships and will become easily embarrassed in times of heavy emotionalism. If they like you, they will re-arrange their schedule; and find a time to fit you in it. Virgo’s nervous tendencies are especially evident on the first date
♎ Libra: A Libran lives for love; and spend their life searching until they find someone who balances the scales. Libra will always feel incomplete until they have found a mutually beneficial relationship. Libra wait years until the right person comes along, leaving friends and family wondering why someone with with such affability and liveability is still single
♏ Scorpio There is no middle ground for Scorpio; either they are deeply passionately in love or they don’t want to know you. They can be maddening to their partners; one minute they are detached, mysterious and ego-centric, and then ever shift into commitment and generosity
♐ Sagittarius Sagittarius require their freedom in relationships or it will be intolerable. Curiously, they can be quite possessive in relationships; only because they are aware of their own malleability and sense of detachment towards love. Even if Sagittarius has found true love their casual nature can make them appear indifferent
♑ Capricorn Love helps free the Capricorn from their own critical and stoic natures. Trying to break down the walls of a Capricorn and win their heart is no easy task. They have much more than ribcages protecting themselves. They are huge on family, and are deeply loyal to their own
♒ Aquarius Aquarius prefer to forge a friendship first and usually prefer the live apart relationship for as long as they can. Love generates many overwhelming and confusion to an Aquarius, emotions which they struggle to read, this often makes them lose their rationality. Aquarius love love, but guard their independence fiercly
♓ Pisces Pisceans tend to wear rose-coloured glasses about their loved one in a relationship. This can cause many of them to find themselves in self destructive relationships with horrible partners. Sometimes, in love, a Piscean doesn’t realise they can do better for themselves. Love has been the core of many of the Piscean fantasies

Alright alright alright. So for the people surprised that Amelie closed like why??? If you don’t get any noms like 90% of the time you close. For those saying it’s too soon for a good show to close Bonnie and Clyde only ran a month Tuck Everlasting only ran a month, it happens. For those surprised Pippa Soo couldn’t keep it open,,, why?? While she is well known in the theatre community she is by no means a huge box office draw. She was the only category Hamilton didn’t win in last year, with one hit show and no tony it’s not surprising such a young actress couldn’t carry the show alone (while I’m Adam chanler-berat’s number one supporter we all know he’s not a draw either). I’m not saying she isn’t a great singer or actor, I saw her in great comet and Hamilton and she blew me away, but from a wider standpoint of theater goers, not strictly Broadway stans, it makes sense. Also Amelie, while totally critically acclaimed, isn’t as well known and loved as something like Matilda, for example. While it sucks that some of our favorite shows are closing too soon, it makes sense 🤷🏼‍♀️

Zodiac Signs: Behaviors When Inlove

♈ Aries: Will demand their freedom yet become possessive themselves. Will see the world through rose-coloured glasses when they are in love. They become total romantics yet can be embarrassed by this and don’t like people seeing their vulnerable side

♉ Taurus: They are old fashioned in love and a confusing mix of sentimentality and toughness. Although they appear composed they have deeply intensified feelings of love and

like to show physical evidence of it. It takes a long time for Taureans to give away their hearts, and only the strong will survive the wait

♊ Gemini: A Gemini will want to make friends with you first. Most of the relationship will base around conversation, big ideas and soul satisfying deep and meaningfuls. Although Gemini is desperate to find their long lost twin; they often surprise themselves with their detachment from people, and a lack of feeling; they also guard their freedom very forcefully

♋ Cancer: A Cancerian will instantly know what their partner wants in a relationship; they are very intuitive and ‘sixth-sense’ when it comes to this. They take love rather seriously and are very sensitive to any turbulence in their relationships. While their friends are out drinking; they’re busy picking names for your future children or mentally decorating their nurseries

♌ Leo: Leo are very proud and boastful in their love. They tend to gravitate towards people that fulfil their higher standards and they love to show their loved one off. Leo want the whole world to know they are in love and become a lot happier people when they are

♍ Virgo: Virgo prefer serene relationships and will become easily embarrassed in times of heavy emotionalism. If they like you, they will re-arrange their schedule; and find a time to fit you in it. Virgo’s nervous tendencies are especially evident on the first date

♎ Libra: A Libran lives for love; and spend their life searching until they find someone who balances the scales. Libra will always feel incomplete until they have found a mutually beneficial relationship. Libra wait years until the right person comes along, leaving friends and family wondering why someone with with such affability and liveability is still single

♏ Scorpio There is no middle ground for Scorpio; either they are deeply passionately in love or they don’t want to know you. They can be maddening to their partners; one minute they are detached, mysterious and ego-centric, and then ever shift into commitment and generosity

♐ Sagittarius Sagittarius require their freedom in relationships or it will be intolerable. Curiously, they can be quite possessive in relationships; only because they are aware of their own malleability and sense of detachment towards love. Even if Sagittarius has found true love their casual nature can make them appear indifferent

♑ Capricorn Love helps free the Capricorn from their own critical and stoic natures. Trying to break down the walls of a Capricorn and win their heart is no easy task. They have much more than ribcages protecting themselves. They  are huge on family, and are deeply loyal to their own

♒ Aquarius Aquarius prefer to forge a friendship first and usually prefer the live apart relationship for as long as they can. Love generates many overwhelming and confusion to an Aquarius, emotions which they struggle to read, this often makes them lose their rationality. Aquarius love love, but guard their independence fiercly

♓ Pisces Pisceans tend to wear rose-coloured glasses about their loved one in a relationship. This can cause many of them to find themselves in self destructive relationships with horrible partners. Sometimes, in love, a Piscean doesn’t realise they can do better for themselves. Love has been the core of many of the Piscean fantasies

Source: neurolove.me

If I see one more person be like “steve’s such an asshole, how could he betray tony like that?” Like no. How could Tony betray Steve by willingly contributing to the continual victimization of Bucky…how could Tony champion a system that wants to execute someone who spent 70 years being mind controlled and used without consent, a system that wants to continue to use people that way, and then dispose of them when they aren’t useful anymore…

astroquestions  asked:

what do the signs feel like to you?

This could be a bit biased but here we go:

Aries: Strong personality, they don’t try to hide who they are and you don’t have to do much to get them into action. I understand how others can think that Aries feels like too much but most feel spirited and open to me.

Taurus: Dependable, easygoing vibe. They listen and they keep the atmosphere level-headed. Some Taurus have that charm and those who are perceptive can see there is a low-key stubbornness and practical approach to them.

Gemini: You can always recognize a Gemini by their energy and highly social behavior. I have only met a few Geminis who weren’t funny and were the more detached, observational type of Gemini. To me they give off a up-beat and involved vibe. They energize me.

Cancer: They come off as reserved but I always feel welcomed by a Cancer. They are easygoing and understanding. Their prickly side can make anyone uncomfortable but that side rarely ever comes out.

Leo: Big-hearted and big personality! They live large and some spread a sunny, motivational energy while others might try to dominant with their strong vibe. Cockiness and confidence are up for interpretation and they speak their mind.

Virgo: Great with first impressions, surprises me still with their helpfulness that emerges at random times, and their vibe is blunt and sometimes high strung. I personally love their bluntness, I never see it as mean and I like the straight-to-the-point, earthiness of it.

Libra: Their vibe is airy. There is charm, persuasion, and charisma yet a hard to detect aloofness. They have a level-headed, logical aura and there is something about them that is hard to ignore. Some Libras give off a tricky vibe and others a peaceful one. Their cooperation feels natural to me.

Scorpio: Intense but not the in-your-face kind of intense, more like getting under your skin intense. When they speak there is power and confidence. I see Scorpios mystery but it doesn’t always intrigue me like it does for some people. I really admire Scorpio’s fearlessness and fascination with the darker side of life. Every Scorpio I’ve met no matter what they look like or what their beliefs are oozes a sex-appeal, usually one unique to them too.

Sagittarius: There are two different vibes I get from Sagittarius. Many shine like a light with optimism and their hyper/energetic nature is spread everywhere. Their bluntness comes out consistently and they are funny people. The second Sagittarius spreads negativity and especially criticism around like a disease, but they are still funny… some maybe using humor as weapon. Mean, nice, hopeful, or negative all Sagittarius have a wild and free persona.

Capricorn: Why so serious? This sign can get goofy and is famous for wit but there will always be an underlying seriousness to them. I’ve noticed most are either really approachable or really hard to approach, either way they have a steadiness to them. You can’t beat their pragmatic approach and many Capricorns speak with authority.

Aquarius: You can SEE their quirkiness. They wear their “strangeness” or originality on their sleeve. I can feel their fierce independence and aloofness, they are entertaining and fun to talk to. You can learn a lot by just watching an Aquarius yet their unpredictability creates waves with those around them.

Pisces: This is the energy of everything. They mesh and adapt to the people around them and seem to give off all types of vibes. To me their vibe is strong yet personality soft. You can spot Pisces by their extreme niceness. While I love their nice and easygoing personality I’ve noticed people tend to get jealous or suspicious of that “overly nice” attitude. They are fluid, accommodating, and perceptive. (I’d like to note that I am surrounded by Pisces in my life which maybe is why I get the “everything” vibe… but they are also the melting pot of the zodiac).

2

this is what sensitive looks like. this is what sensitive looks like at its ugliest, and most useless. 

after the episode, approximately four fans posted about their discomfort with the ableism inherent to the helen keller joke. they didn’t attack, they weren’t aggressive (although they would have every right to be): they were huge supporters of the show who engaged deeply with the text and contributed art, speculation, fanfiction, and general support on a regular basis. basically they were exactly the kind of fans a small podcast needs in order to reach new people and make a profit. in response to the discomfort expressed by these fans, the creators wrote a very demeaning, hostile post accusing fans of wanting to be pandered to for not liking ableism, and claiming that it was against their artistic integrity to apologize or change. when people responded critically and said they would no longer be supporting the show, they suggested that those people were a small, vocal minority, and made comparisons to a torch-carrying mob. then they cried about it on reddit to an echo chamber of anti-sjws. 

at the end of the day, these men made an unoriginal, ableist joke–one that people would have likely forgiven without incident had they simply acknowledged fault and made a commitment to do better in the future. instead, they are treating critiques of their joke as an attack on their artistic freedom and integrity. they are treating a weak, overplayed joke as if it is unreproachable, visionary artistic genius; they are treating any critique, however mild, as “animosity” and claiming that it “really took a toll” to be gently asked to understand why the joke was harmful. they are blocking fans/former fans who speak against them, however thoughtfully. what they have shown in these last few days is that they want every single thing they produce to be received uncritically and lauded as funny, provocative, innovative, and flawless. they do not have realistic expectations of what an audience is, and they do not have realistic standards for themselves. 

in my eyes, there are two ways to be sensitive. you can be like the fans who spoke up: people whose sensitivity stems either from personal stake in issues of ableism, or from a deep concern for the wellbeing and dignity of others–or you can be like the king falls am creators, whose sensitivity is to any form of criticism. one kind of sensitivity stems from a desire for dignity, for integrity, for positive change: the other kind is regressive, self-serving, and halts the possibility for growth. the creators of king falls am are free to embody this latter model, but they can’t pretend that they’re simply more enlightened and more rational than the fans who asked for accountability. 

POC aren’t required to be nice to racists. Your feelings aren’t magically more important.

And yes, if you think that keeping racist practices in fandom free from criticism is a GOOD thing and that POC are the sensitive ones, you’re probably a racist.

So either be prepared for sharp responses to your racism or you know… Stop being a racist dillhole.

Star Vs. The Finale - Chapter 7 - Bad Boys Don’t Dance

Previous Chapter Tumblr | FanFiction.net

Hey everyone!
Thanks for your patience and support.
This chapter was kind of tricky for me, especially the Starco dance scene.
Things will get seriously crazy in the next part. Stay tuned!
Hope you enjoy! Feel free to read it / leave your opinions/criticism/comments either here on Tumblr or on FanFiction.net.

Chapter 7 – Bad Boys Don’t Dance

Stars glittering in the night-sky, lavish costumes, fountains, elegant decorations, a rich buffet and Florian classical music played by a live orchestra: the Grand Ball of Floria was as fancy as Star expected. The vast terrace where the dance was being held was crowded with some of the most important people from the Kingdom and other dimensions as well. And the princess had to greet every one of them, as part of her “first real assignment”, as her Mother told her on Mewnie the day before.

“Duke of Urbia, such a pleasure to meet you…”
“Countess Riva, you look wonderful tonight…”

And every one of them looked pleasantly surprised to see the infamous rebellious princess of Mewnie finally acting like a real member of a royal family. “Nothing caught fire… yet…” – she would even joke, in a self-mocking but still dignified tone of voice.

For about one hour, Marco followed Star around, as surprised as everybody else for her regal and responsible behavior. They were surrounded by the highest aristocracy from Floria, from countless of other Kingdoms and, for the first time ever, while hanging out with his best friend, he felt somehow out of place. “She’s a princess…” – he seemed to realize, feeling stupid for having overlooked Star’s obvious royal status all this time.

Keep reading

Zodiac Signs: Behaviors When Inlove

♈ Aries: Will demand their freedom yet become possessive themselves. Will see the world through rose-coloured glasses when they are in love. They become total romantics yet can be embarrassed by this and don’t like people seeing their vulnerable side

♉ Taurus: They are old fashioned in love and a confusing mix of sentimentality and toughness. Although they appear composed they have deeply intensified feelings of love and

Keep reading

anonymous asked:

You never answered my former messages, you just answered this one. You, see, ignore criticism, snap at hate. It takes time, I know, I am a "learning artist", all artists are "learning artists", but I'm talking about the shit YOU make, 'cos I haven't seen the shit THEY make. And Jesus, listen to me, I AM NOT SAYING YOU ARE SHIT. I AM NOT SAYING YOU'RE UNTALENTED. So quit self-pitying. Boo-hoo, I know I'm terrible, boo-hoo, don't tattoo the shit I draw, YOU ARE A TALENTED PAINTER, I'VE SEEN IT. -

- now take this awesome sense you have for colours, these brushes, JUST TRY SOMETHING DIFFERENT. This is how you make things dynamic, not by doing the same thing every time. You’re not confident about anatomy? Your characters look kinda weird? Well, nevermind the proportion tutorials, try to see how it looks when it’s free, try curves, try ink instead of pencil, try your left hand, change it.

haha I’m sorry if I connected the messages wrong way, but I am guessing they are both from you? I hope._.

Either way, I don’t know what your ‘former messages’ were. I didn’t read or didn’t get the ones you actually wrote criticism and explained why it was boring to you..To be honest I don’t think I’ve gotten any ‘criticism’ with explanations at all (except kind of this one).

I don’t think you called me ‘untalanted’ nor I think you called me shit. Nor I self-pity myself, it’s more of being angry at myself, it’s different. I didn’t say I was TERRIBLE, I said I wasn’t good enough YET and I don’t yet know many things, but then again, I say so only because I THINK so. And it’s my right to see my art one way or another, not to mention it’s normal not to be satisfied with it. You’re a learning artist too, so you probably should know. Not satisfaction always pushes forward, doesn’t it? 

Now, for your second message. It will probably look like not taking criticism good enough (again), but in this case I kind of feel like your understanding of ‘boring’ (or at least what you find boring in my art) is different from what I find boring in my art. Same with the understanding of ‘dynamic’.

Because if I’m completely honest I actually like drawing what I draw now. (not the way it turns out but still) .And probably draw ‘the same things’, because these things are my favourites to draw…For me ‘boring’ ‘s not exactly the matter or subject, but more of a matter of..context?

I don’t want to CHANGE something completely (like use my left hand, brushes, whatsoever else), I just want to improve what I’m doing now and get better in this my way of going. *good advice about ink though, I’ve been thinking about it for a while*

Either way, changing isn’t so easy (for me at least), so I don’t know how it will go.

I’m sorry but I guess things you’d want to change in my stuff are different from those I would want to \change\ (or more of improving in my case) so…I guess I will just try to draw in my own way and hopefully by some time I’ll get better at those things I dislike now.