Eryka x Elise | The Spook’s Ultimate Love….For Her Copper
A long time I have loved the sunned mother-of-pearl of your body.
I go so far as to think that you own the universe.
I will bring you happy flowers from the mountains, bluebells,
dark hazels, and rustic baskets of kisses.
I want to do with you what spring does with the cherry trees.
- Eryka reciting Pablo Neruda’s poem, “What Spring Does To The Cherry Trees” to Elise (real or not is up to one’s own imagination!)
[Laura de Boer x
Clémence Poésy, “The Tunnel”]
The fact that Eryka’s an avid reader, loves poetry, and has a very complicated profession. The fact that, like Eryka, Elise is also a bibliophile, and a very unique character.
They share a lot in common. Their personalities compliment each
other. The ultimate kicker is the fact that both are one half of their
twin siblings whom they’d lost during their childhood.
Love kick-arse characters who also happen to be bookworms, too! How often do we come across that, aye? Cheers, Mr. Ben Richards!
Air Date : December 15th, 2014 Season Number : 4 Episode Number : 10 Episode Name : Bluebell Networks : The CW Genres : Drama, Comedy
Zoe and Wade try to work out their issues, Zoe makes a life-changing
decision and Wade does everything he can to make it happen before their
baby is born. Lavon feels guilty about misleading Lemon and is
determined to make things right. Meanwhile, George and AnnaBeth are
frustrated with their current situation, leaving them with a big
decision to be made.
Casts: Scott Porter, Kaitlyn Black, Tim Matheson, Rachel Bilson, Jaime King, Cress Williams, Wilson Bethel
“Bluebell or Cluedo”: Ghosts, Garridebs, and the Watson Family History
Hello everyone! This meta is pure speculation based on the subtext and time discrepancy within series 2. I wrote about the wibbly-wobbly timeline of series 2 here, claiming parts of A Scandal in Belgravia happened between scenes in The Hounds of Baskerville. Regardless of whether or not the discrepancy is intentional, for the sake of this argument please suspend disbelief momentarily and treat this misleading timeline as fact. Therefore, the four chunks of time rearranged into correct chronological order are as follows: The opening montage of cases in ASIB, the opening morning/afternoon in Baker Street in THOB (harpoon, lack of cases, need for nicotine, Mrs Hudson’s new man), the rest of ASIB starting with Irene touching the newspaper, the rest of THOB starting with the morning Henry Knight comes to London.
This analysis focuses on the subtextual answer to the question in THOB - “Do we Investigate what happened to Bluebell or do we play Cluedo instead?” Sherlock is fed up from not having any cases to solve and it’s getting on his last nerve. Bluebell is the only thing on his website and he’ll be damned if he’ll go out of his way to investigate a glow-in-the-dark missing rabbit. But we all know what happens later - he solves Bluebell’s case! Obviously, finding Bluebell is the answer to the ultimatum Sherlock gives John earlier in the episode. Wrong. Sherlock solves Bluebell’s case on accident because John picks Cluedo again. These two men play Cluedo twice - the first time being when Sherlock deduces the victim to be the murderer (even though it’s not in the rules) and the second time being when Sherlock stabs the board over the mantle (presuming our boys had another row while playing). If the time discrepancy is to be believed, that means complaining about the idiotic Cluedo game happens BEFORE we see the board stabbed into the mantle, therefore Cluedo was played twice. So what does that mean? What’s the big deal about playing Cluedo twice? Choosing to play Cluedo a second time instead of finding Bluebell shows that when given a subtextual choice, the characters picked Sherlock’s fall over the 3 Garridebs moment, foreshadowing both in the process.
~Are you guys ready to follow me down the rabbit hole?