People seem to think this post debunks the legitimacy of Freddie’s birth certificate.
Big Larries are telling their followers that you can just order that form and fill in the blanks with anything you’d like and that is SO completely far from the truth. That informational copy of Freddie’s birth certificate is a certified copy. All that the informational copy is missing is a impressed/embossed seal. What InTouch posted was an average, informational, birth certificate.
I’m just going to copy what I posted last night (which I’ve also added to):
1. “So no one seems to care that right under the InTouch logo is a statement “For Information Only. Not a legal document to establish paternity”. [EDIT: apparently it says IDENTITY.]” <— This isn’t even what it says omg
Per your link: “An informational copy contains the same information as an authorized copy, but will have a legend across the face with the statement “INFORMATIONAL, NOT A VALID DOCUMENT TO ESTABLISH IDENTITY.” <— This is what is actually says on the document obtained by InTouch.
2. “This is not the certificate the parents would receive. This is a copy that ANYONE can BUY from the state.”
Yeah. Obviously. I highly doubt anyone from InTouch birthed this child??? What does this have to do with anything? Why would anyone besides Briana and Louis have an authorized copy. And the document is signed by Briana and Louis. It just isn’t a live signature on the informational copy.
It is an informational copy of a real birth certificate. Anyone can purchase one from the state because it is not an authorized copy. That’s why it’s watermarked with “VOID VOID VOID” That doesn’t mean the document is made up nonsense, it just can’t be used officially. Like if you wanted to obtain a passport you’d have to use an authorized copy.
3. “You can even buy a them online.”
This is irrelevant. You can purchase them online, because it is public record. You aren’t purchasing them from fakebirthcertificates.com. You are purchasing them from the State of California. Are you suggesting the County Clerk’s office is falsifying documents? Are you suggesting InTouch is forging government documents? Do you even know how much trouble they would be in if they did that. Falsifying documents is a FELONY.
The certificate InTouch published isn’t strange at all. It has all the ear markings of a perfectly valid document. You just choose not to see this because you don’t want to believe in the existence of this child. Why not spare yourself from writing all of this nonsense and just say: “The birth certificate isn’t real because I don’t want it to be.”
Also if you google “Trump v. The State of Hawaii” you get this:
“Trump v. The State of Hawaii” is not a real court case, so I wouldn’t be lecturing anyone on how to use google. What you do find is a wiki page on “Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories” Idk about you, but I’m sure as Hell not going to discredit this birth certificate based on a blurb about Donald Trump, found on a random wiki page, sorry.