artificial fun

Steven Universe Theory: How The Gem’s function

In this theory I am going to attempt to explain how the Gems of Steven Universe could potentially function in real life. This theory is based on a relatively superficial understanding of things like Quantum physics, so a more knowledgeable person in such fields would likely be able to tear this theory a new one. In fact I encourage such critiques, as I find debates like this rather entertaining.

With that disclaimer out of the way, let’s try to answer how, with my woefully rudimentary understanding of quantum physics, that The Gems could potentially function in real life.  

First we need to answer, what are the Gems? In the internet short called Classroom Gems, Pearl explains that Gems project hard light structures from their gems that comprise of their physical form from their gems. These Gems contain all of what they are, and their body is, as Steven puts it, “just an illusion.”

An illusion with Mass.

Is the concept of Hard Light possible? Actually yes, and in fact we’ve reputedly already made headway in this department. Princeton University has reported that they have begun Crystallizing Light. 

How have they achieved such a thing you ask?

Well what they did was they created a super conductive structure where the billions of atoms inside of it worked in tandem to create what they call an “artificial atom.” Photons that come in contact with this superconductive artificial atom take on the properties of said atoms, and they begin to interact with each other like particles. These photons, now entangled together like particles, began behaving like the states of matter, assuming qualities of liquids and crystallized solids.

In these experiments at Princeton, they reported that they were able to make light slosh about in a contained area like a liquid, and they were able to “freeze” this light into a Solid as well, all thanks to this superconducting “artificial atom” structure.

So we know now that there are potentially circumstances in which light photons can be made to behave like particles, thus creating hard light structures that are entirely malleable and able to shift between liquid and solid states very easily (assuming all this data is viable and laudable of course.) This sounds eerily similar to the Gem’s “physical” bodies. Much like with the results of these experiments, they are able to alter their physical forms at will, and as solids they behave just like regular physical bodies, if not much more durable.

So this begs the question, could a Gem potentially function as a superconductor?

A Superconductor is what is known as a Macroscopic Quantum effect, or something in quantum physics that is observable in large scale, as supposed to the atomic scale that quantum effects are normally associated with. A material becomes a superconductor when it reaches a temperature that allows energy to have zero resistance while traveling through the object. Normally an object’s conductivity is subject to resistance, which will cause the energy traveling through the object to be expelled via heat. This is why batteries run out of power when you put them inside something, because that energy is eventually expelled out of the wires via heat instead of continuing to circulate in the circuitry. In a Superconductor, the energy never leaves the circuitry and continues the circuit indefinitely until it no longer has its super conductive properties. 

This is consistent with Gems in Steven Universe, as all the energy they will ever need is inside their gems. While real life super conductors require intensely cold (or hot) temperatures in order to achieve this quantum state of conductivity, the Gems themselves appear to be a highly sought after theoretical state simply referred to as a “room temperature superconductor.”


A room temperature superconductive material would change the world of technology forever. Extremely advanced technology that is theoretically possible, but require an intense amount of energy with conventionally conductive materials, would be able to achieve the same effects with a room temperature superconductor with very little or no energy loss. As long as the equilibrium of Superconductivity is maintained, anything that utilized such materials would be able to function indefinitely.

This as well is consistent with Gems from Steven Universe. While each gem has variations on how much power they can exert at a given time, as long as they maintain within their boundaries and limitations, their gem forms will hold and sustain themselves for thousands of years with no sign of deterioration. This would also explain why maintaining larger hard light bodies than their Gems are equipped for is taxing for them. By pushing themselves beyond their equilibrium, they are losing their superconductivity and are losing energy from their gems via heat.

 When a gem is poofed, they retreat inside of their gems restore the equilibrium that superconductivity offers before reforming their bodies.

Can a Gem behave as a Superconductor? Gems, Diamonds and the like are composed of Carbon. Carbon can most definitely be used as a superconductor, especially as shown with experiments with a substance called Graphene. 

Graphene is essentially a 2 dimensional diamond, a lattice of carbon a single atom thick that is intensely durable (many times stronger than steel) and is a step in the direction of finding that coveted room temperature superconductor. Part of the process that takes place in the Kindergartens therefore, is changing the gem from a conventionally conductive substance to a room temperature super conductor, and feeding the energy that is drained from around them into the gem so it can achieve equilibrium inside of it and they can pop out fully formed. 

This would also explain why better formed gems like The Era 1′s are able to create things like Gem Weapons, while Era 2′s can’t even shapeshift. Gems like Garnet have energy to spare, so they can use it to create other hard light structures besides their bodies without affecting their equilibrium, while a gem like Peridot cannot afford such exertion. 

So far we’ve explained that, theoretically speaking, the Gems are a room temperature superconductive structure made of carbon, which house within them an equilibrium of energy that can be used to manipulate photons into behaving like particles, which they use to comprise their physical forms. Next is to explain where the intelligence and personality comes from. This is decidedly easier to explain. 

The Gems are artificial intelligence.

 Each atom inside of this room-temperature superconductive gem is a transistor, the thing that sends those 1′s and 0′s that are the building blocks of any and all computer programs and languages. We already have single atom transistors, so applying them in an intricate structure in the form of a seemingly ordinary gemstone is both plausible and practical. In fact we are currently working on a device that uses graphene (that afore mentioned 2 dimensional diamond) that uses light instead of electricity to compute things. In the lattice of graphene there is a single atom which operates as an “optical switch” 

Or a switch that can be flipped on an off at the speed of a photon. 

To put it in more simplistic terms: Its a computer that does its computing at the speed of light and is woven together at the atomic level, not with visible circuit boards. The kind of processing power such a structure would have would definitely allow for an artificial intelligence comparable with or even significantly smarter than the average human. 

So to recap: A Gem from Steven Universe, in real life, would theoretically be an Artificial intelligence, programmed into an atomic, superconductive-supercomputer (which computes at the speed of a photon/light) made of a type of carbon, has an equilibrium of light based energy within itself that won’t deplete as long as they stay within their boundaries of how hard they can exert themselves, and can manipulate photons into behaving like particles which comprise their physical forms. 

Here’s a selection of Massachusetts towns invented by a neural network.

To add a bit of a twist this time, I’ve also thrown one real Massachusetts town into the list as well, because it was included in the neural network’s output. Can you identify it without cheating and checking Wikipedia?

  • Prankic
  • Fallhard
  • Mockton
  • Dudefirle
  • Belchertown
  • Brewstork
  • Wrang
  • Duster
  • Hanesbury
  • Bestharp
  • Newford
  • Chilmont
  • Handingham
  • Stewhaver
  • Bycket
  • Hollington

Hello !! Please give this a LIKE or REBLOG if you’re interested in writing with an eccentric, selfless, reclusive billionaire who has an A.I. daughter that predicts various types of crimes BEFORE they happen, has over 20 aliases that mostly consist of bird names, TECHNICALLY doesn’t exist, & who’s a very private person. He saves people with an EX-CIA agent John Reese & later gets the help of Sameen Shaw ( an EX-ISA agent ) & ROOT ( an ex hacker-assassin for hire ). A mix of SCI-FI / SCIENCE FACT & vigilante / super hero & a little bit of crime-show genres. HAROLD FINCH from Person Of Interest. This portrayal takes the entirety of all 5 seasons into account & is SELECTIVE & PRIVATE. Multi-ship & multi-verse as well !! I have a general ( thorough, but still pretty small ) summary of the character & the show in my RULES for those unfamiliar.

                        ROLEPLAY BLOGS ONLY. Personals please do not reblog.

Sixteen more towns across the United States that do not actually exist, but probably ought to exist according to a neural network:

  • Village Knord, AL
  • Mallsport, NH
  • Heatchus, PA
  • Tray, SD
  • Maqualand Beach, FL
  • Ferra Ridga, KY
  • Hixton Ispent, FL
  • Grand Mans, TX
  • Warnester, NY
  • Yurlil Park, CA
  • Yuckys, NM
  • Edgewicutc, WI
  • Del Lake Prairies Lakes-Hiddle, MS
  • Cheatacks, PA
  • Manafayockatowkes, FL
  • Vampairia, IN


I hate being scared all the time. I don’t want to be scared of the future just because of what happened in the past. My mind haunts me with memories of what I just want to forget. And I hate being scared because I know it scares others. This is what mental illness does. It slowly gets you from the inside eating away at every part of your sane self. Making you question yourself over and over again until you believe what happened to you was your fault and that you deserve it. I know I don’t deserve this. No one does.

anonymous asked:

All this fighting on Tumblr over who is "actually white" and "are actually poc" makes me realize how STUPID modern race catagories are, especially the concept of whiteness. Now some are claiming that Western Europeans are the only "actual white people." How did they come to that conclusion? The sooner the concept of race is done away with the better. It's so useless. This fighting and your various posts have really driven that point home.

I remember a really futile discussion about whether Japanese and Chinese were the “same race” because of our “East Asian-ness” nevermind that what mattered during WW2 (and for much of Asian history) is that we have seen ourselves as separate ethnic groups and cultures. China and Japan have been at it for centuries as much as there was also cultural exchange.

A parallel discussion of that type was whether Holocaust victims like European Jews, Rroma, Polish, Russians etc were “really white” or “really POC” as if race wasn’t a social construct and American understandings of race cannot be pasted onto Nazi Germany. As if Nazi Aryanism wasn’t constructed around ethnicity, rather than so much skin colour alone vis a vis European Jews, Rroma and Slavic people.

Nobody is “actually white” because race is artificial. Also, a fun fact: the gene for fair skin Europeans have seems to be of Indian or Middle-Eastern origin. That’s why there are loads of non-Europeans just as light-skinned as Europeans like in India, North Africa, Iran, Central Asia, Turkey etc. From this ancestor, not because of later invasions. The irony! The first “white” person wasn’t even European at all by modern standards!

Discussions trying to force ethnic groups into the “white / poc” dichotomy outside the US are futile. “White” and “POC” are racialised identities quite loaded with US-specific context. Please don’t paste them on people arbitrarily as though it’s some real biological thing or like some sort of ethnic group. It isn’t. For whiteness, yes, this concept exists elsewhere but what is considered “white” is not the same as the US. Also racism elsewhere often operates around ethnicity not so much just colour, which “white / poc” functions on.

anonymous asked:

Hey, I just read your "invented pronouns" post, and, while I agree with a lot of it, using different pronouns for people who actually identify as that, I feel like a lot of people here on Tumblr don't really use this the way it's supposed to be used. For example, I've seen someone legitimately insist that people call them by "pink/pink/pinkself" pronouns because they like the color pink. And that just sounds... off. Because they "like" it? I mean, that's not how pronouns work, is it?

You know…I could give a serious response to this ask, pointing out all the things I disagree with and making an argument for why I believe we should accept people’s pronouns even if we think they’re silly. I could do that, but then both of us would just be repeating the same boring arguments about this that happen on Tumblr every day. How tedious!

So I’m going to talk about something more personal. I’m not trying to persuade you or argue with you. I’m just gonna give you a bit of an idea of where I’m coming from on this issue.

I love linguistics. I read grammar textbooks and invent artificial languages for fun. I must have created my first “fake pronouns” when I was around 10 or 11, along with other vocabulary. I didn’t do it for attention or to feel special; I never shared my notes on them with anyone. I wasn’t trying to make a statement about gender, either. I just did it for fun. I see language as a like a box of Legos, with lots of neat little interlocking parts you can tinker around with. You can create some fascinating stuff by messing around with how language works.

Languages are creative, living processes. They’re like works of art that each of us is constantly adding to and changing in small, subtle ways. We coin new words, we change the meanings of existing words, we drop grammatical rules and develop new ones, we form silly idioms, and so on. Even the most conservative grammar-pedants do this; you can’t avoid it. You’ll always leave a little bit of your mark on the language you speak.

I think it’s really cool that all of us can collaborate on our language, mess around with it, and adapt it so that it fits our needs better. Even if newly coined pronouns were completely useless–and they aren’t–it still makes me happy to see people playing with language instead of feeling limited and excluded by it. I love to see people realizing that language is something they can make work for them. Do people do ridiculous and silly things with language sometimes? Good! Let them be ridiculous and silly! Let them enjoy pronouns instead of feeling trapped by them. Linguistics is fun for me and I want it to be fun for others, too.

Besides, it’s not as if they’re screwing things up. English is already screwed up. Pronouns like “bun” and “pinkself” are positively rational compared to the horror of English’s spelling system.