1- name calling to fans in a fandom automatically invalidates your argument. It’s a proven study on behavioral science.
If you cannot express yourself without calling names it means you already lost the argument.
It means you abandoned logic in favor of exaggerated expression of your own feelings and not fact. ( haven’t you ever watched a political debate?
People who name call are using dishonest tactics to try and win an argument. It means you did not appropriately research your topic but on going on your own beliefs and not fact. ( which is fine of course, but call it what it really is people. I mean I hate CS with the passion of a thousand burning stars. I don’t need to come up with reasons to validate my hate, I just do. Simple as that, just call it what it really is)
Which leads to part 2.. Research.
90% of Wikipedia entries are inaccurate. (CBSNEWS) (DAILYMAIL) (CANCER.ORG) (PEW RESEARCH CENTER) (NCCIH.GOV)
Most medical/health related advice on the Internet is over simplified to get across to more people. To get an accurate diagnosis, opinion, etc you’d in real life consult a professional face to face.
So if you are getting your sole source of “proof” for your argument (the one you already lost by name calling) from the Internet there is a high probability you are wrong.
If you are a “professional ” in that field of expertise I highly doubt you’d waste your time evaluating a fictional tv character, Esp when you would only be able to give a simple diagnosis not based on fact. And if you are a professional that would do this then please let me know your practice because I’d never want to be diagnosed by someone who takes a flippant look at a true issue.
A true professional knows that for any diagnosis whether health. Psychological, etc you need to be involved with that person(s) for some time before you can label things. And then at what degree? Not all cancers are the same, as is any medical or psychological issue. And with being involved with that person a professional would look to see if the criteria has been met before they’d call it abuse. Stockholm (which by the way, most haters have that completely wrong. Look up the true meaning, not Wikipedia, or a ransom medical sit. SS… it has nothing to do with falling in love with your captor.)
Even with your misinformation of facts that you “researched” on the Internet, Rumbelle has not even met the criteria for any of the above.
Now that the record is straight on that I have a suggestion.
The next time you want to prove your argument..
Don’t name call the fans in the fandom.
Do real (key word..real) research or just own it and admit it’s biased hate
Use your critical thinking skills.
And if you don’t have any then go back to topic #1.
One thing that is tough for people to do is separate their own bias from fact.
You cannot win an argument or win a person over if you resort to exaggerated emotional expression to prove and validate your opinion.
You cannot use exaggerated emotional expression to invalidate or disprove an opinion you don’t agree with. It just makes you look like an ass.