I think what bothers me so much about the “feminists are ugly” or “feminists are hairy” or “feminists are lesbian” stereotypes is–

So fucking what?

Some of us ARE ugly. Some of us ARE hairy. Some of us ARE lesbians. And it shouldn’t fucking invalidate anything we’re fucking saying to you.

But you know, if you believed that, if you actually believed that our sexual usefulness to men is irrelevant to the conversation about our basic human rights, you wouldn’t be a fucking misogynist, would you?

How to tell when a feminist blog doesn't care about actual equality.

Doesn’t like that women are viewed sexually, but has hot shirtless guys all over their blog.

Doesn’t like that women can be judged on their breasts size, but has no qualms about making fun of men’s penis sizes.

Claims that all women’s voices should be respected, unless they disagree with feminists.

Doesn’t like women being called bitches, but has no problems calling men dicks, assholes, and bastards.

Bases their entire opinion on men’s struggles and mras on stereotypes of men and what they hear from friends.

Thinks the opinions of anyone who is white, male, straight, or cis matter less or not at all.

Thinks gay males have a privelege life becuase they’re male.

Tells people to “check their male privelege”, while ignoring the many many benefits and advantages of being female in western society.

Uses the word “privelege” to erase the opinion of others.

Tells people to kill themselves.

Talks about how ugly males are/furthering the assumption that their worth is determined by their looks or money.

Demands respect from men but does not offer the same in return.

Claims rape jokes aren’t funny, but joke about killing all men (genocide/murder joke).



“Check your privelege.”

Refuses to be critical of their own movement.

Supports Anita Sarkeesian, Zoe quinn, Mary Koss, or Amy Poelher.

Assumes anyone who disagrees with them is cis/male/white/heterosexual.

Thinks “manspreading”, “stare rape”, or being called bossy is oppressive.

Makes gender nuetral issues or issues that men experience more (such as domestic violence, murder, rape, or gendered jobs) into “women’s issues”.

Thinks anyone who isn’t a feminist or disagrees with them is a misogynist.

Dilutes the meaning of misogyny by claiming even the smallest inconveniences as misogyny.

Thinks misandry doesn’t exist.

Ignores or even encourages the abuse of men.

Encourages negative stereotypes and criticizes “not all men”, while opposing negative stereotypes of other groups.

Thinks the exact same problem isn’t a problem when it happens to males.

Encourages treating males poorly.

Uses the definition that feminism gave itself to excuse their actions.

Men do not owe you a thing.

Seeing how women not owing men anything is getting popular, consider this:

Men do not owe you a compliment, especially if they are typically the only ones to do it. Whether you are showing off a new outfit or are simply fishing for compliments, men do not owe you.

Men dont owe you the check. If you go on a date, men do not owe you payment for dinner. They are not obligated to cater to you when you arent willing to do the same.

Men do not owe you sex. Just because you think youre irresistable, doesnt mean guys are obligated to sleep with you. If they say no or show disinterest, deal with it. Dont rely on steroetypes about how males want sex all the time.

Men do not owe you presents. If you arent willing to reciprocate, men do not owe you a gift. Not during a date, not during an annivesarry, not as a make up gift, nothing. If you arent willing to be as considerate, dont expect anything from them.

Men dont owe you pity. You crying does not excuse your actions. That is not a get out of jail free card. If you abuse a child, the man, or are a horrible person, dont expect you crying to make up for that, especially if that is your go to response.

Men dont owe you manners. If you arent willing to do it for them, dont expect them to do but for you. Men dont owe you by holding the door. Men dont owe you by carrying stuff for you, men dont owe you by complimenting you, ect. Men are fine without catering to you.

Men dont owr you silence. If you are sexist, biased, or overall intolerant of someone becaue they are male, men dont owe you silence. Men can call you out just as much as you can call them out. Dont bother with buzzwords to erase their input, dont bother claiming they have it better when you out no effort into seeing how they have it and only have your own stereotypes to fall back on. You say something bad, expect men to say something.

Men do not owe you leniency. If you hit, insult, or overall abuse a man, they dont owe you forgiveness. Be prepared for tge same action tgat another women would give you for the same action. If you sexually harrass a man, he does not owe you a pass. You should be geld just as accountable. This also applies to court cases.

Men do not owe you their lives. Dispite the selective service giving their votes a condition that women dont have to deal with, men are not obligated to sacrifice their lives for you based on gender. Their lives are just as important as yours.

Men do not owe you respect. Respect is earned. You do not get it automatically for being a woman. You get it by showing that you are a person worthy of respect. The same goes for the guy. You are not owed respect because of your gender, especially when you dont reciprocate.

Men dont owe you the time of day, a smile, or leniency.

If women dont owe men anything, then men dont owe women anything.

Agony of being a 50/50 mum
Nicola Hewitt, 42, an office manager from Kenley, Surrey, faces the trauma of being without her children Devon, 10, and Sonny, eight, every weekend. Many women face this problem too.

I love the title sentence of the article: “Agony of being a 50/50 mum: Women once held the upper hand in custody battles. Now fathers are winning EQUAL access… and mothers are struggling to cope.”

This whole article is so freakin’ sexist against fathers and the double standards are outstanding. These women don’t want equal rights, they want special privileges under the guise of equal rights. It’s on “equal” if they benefit from it.

 Look at this: “This is the reality for Britain’s growing legion of 50/50 mothers, who divide their time with the children equally with their exes. It’s a growing phenomenon that - on the surface - might seem the fairest way for separated parents to organise their lives. But it comes at an emotional price for the mothers involved - and the consequences for children are as yet untold.”

I am L I V I D right now. 

What, so bonding between a child and their father along with his emotions aren’t important now? For years women have had the advantage in custody battle over men and we’re concerned over the emotional toll of the women who share EQUAL custody of their kids because they used to unfairly have MORE time with their children THAN the father. How about the damaging consequences that children and fathers had from not being able to see each equally.