Dr. William Pierce, National Vanguard Magazine - Number 117 (March-April 1997)
History has taught us that the most
fundamental necessities for the existence of a healthy and progressive White
society are the racial quality of its members and a moral code or value system
which complements and enhances that quality. Ultimately, of course, the former
is much more fundamental than the latter. Only a sound race can give birth to
sound racial ethics. Without the living biological entity, there is and can be
nothing. But as long as the race survives–as long as the potential for
effective racial sovereignty exists–alien and spiritually damaging values
alone will not prove fatal.
The enemies of our race have obviously
long understood this truth. That is why, a half-century ago, they waged the
most vicious war the world has ever seen in order to destroy an idea based upon
that racial truth. That is why they subsequently organized the systematic
swamping of White civilization by millions of alien immigrants. And that is why
they have used their control of the news and entertainment media, of the
government, and of schools and universities to implement a massive propaganda
campaign to encourage miscegenation between Whites and non-Whites.
Of course, miscegenation is not a natural
occurrence. Evolution would have been impossible if every evolutionary
experiment had been short-circuited by cross-breeding. Nature’s urge toward
higher and more complex life forms has demanded that subspecies remain
genetically isolated until all possibility of genetic admixture has been
removed. Even though such isolation of the various human subspecies from one
another has not been of sufficient length to ensure the impossibility of
genetic admixture, it has ensured the existence of deep-seated psychological
barriers which, under natural conditions, prevent miscegenation.
When these natural conditions are disrupted
and distorted, however, unnatural sexual activities such as homosexuality and
miscegenation have been known to result. Just as bulls have been known to mount
mares, and St. Bernard dogs have tried to mate with Chihuahuas when forced into
close confinement and deprived of their natural environment, so Whites have
copulated with Negroes in similar circumstances. It is the disruption of the
White man’s natural environment and the dehumanization of his society and
culture, therefore, which the Jews and their collaborators in the news and
entertainment media have consistently worked for in order to encourage racial
This campaign began at least as early as
1967, when 16 U.S. states still had laws against miscegenation. In that year
Jewish director/producer Stanley Kramer brought out the film Guess Who’s Coming
to Dinner, starring Katherine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy as a couple whose
daughter begins an affair with a Negro. The aim of the film was clear and since
has been admitted. It was designed as an “educational film” for White
Americans: after seeing their on-screen heroes, Tracy and Hepburn, surrendering
their White daughter to a Black male, they would feel less compunction in doing
the same .
Since that time Whites have not just been
encouraged to mate with Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians, they have been subject
to every conceivable Pavlovian method to blackmail and bully them emotionally
into doing so. With ever increasing intensity the message has been that
miscegenation is not just an option, but the option that society expects.
Particularly, the primary aim of the Political Correctness movement, in all of
its manifestations, has been to confuse heterosexual Whites and make them feel
sinful and guilty for being White; to encourage them to “repent” by
helping put their race out of existence.
The Hollywood film Last of the Mohicans,
which came out in 1992 with the Jewish actor Daniel Day-Lewis in the leading
role, is a typical example of how the Jewish news and entertainment media have
spearheaded this campaign. In the film White males are portrayed as weak,
cowardly, disloyal, and barbaric–and as justly deserving of their slaughter at
the hands of the noble, dignified, courageous, and sexy Red Indians. Yes, just
to ensure that White women don’t miss the implication that White men are
worthless, the leading White female character dumps her despicable
British-officer fiancé and runs off into the sunset with the Mohican hero. The
underlying message of the film is clear: race-mixing is not only natural and
understandable, it is also the morally right thing to do.
Zoologists and anthropologists have
identified two types of feral constraint which ensure that under natural
conditions animal groups–including human groups–which may be able to
interbreed with each other refrain from doing so. On one hand, there are inborn
biological impulses based upon physical “sign stimuli,” such as
smell, color, and visual differentiation. Then there is the behavioral
imprinting and habituation which takes place in the early weeks and months of
infancy based upon the intimate relationship between the mother and the infant.
This helps to ensure that when sexual mating is eventually attempted, it will
take place only with those forms that resemble the parent or siblings .
Not surprisingly, the Jews have gone all
out to corrupt and cripple the latter tendency in Whites, particularly under
the guise of “children’s entertainment.” In 1994, for example, the
Walt Disney Company brought out a re-adaptation of its 1967 film The Jungle
Book. This was Disney’s first children’s offering since being taken over by the
Jewish clique headed by Michael Eisner, and, predictably, it was a complete
distortion, both of the original Kipling story and the 1967 Disney animated
version. With a story line remarkably similar to Last of the Mohicans, the
White heroine rejects her British-officer fiancé for an Indian jungle boy
played by a Chinese actor.
Significantly, the White girl’s decision
is portrayed as being based upon moral considerations of right and wrong, upon
her realization that White society and White men in particular are irredeemably
bad. Eisner pursued this line in the two subsequent Disney animated children’s
films, Pocahontas and The Hunchback of Notre Dame, which are similar both in
their pernicious race-mixing propaganda and in their blatant disregard for the
original stories. Such systematic consistency in shape and content suggests design
rather than coincidence.
In any case, the actual motivation of
Michael Eisner in churning out such material is not the most important
question. The thing that really matters is the actual effect of his efforts:
young children are being influenced, at an age where they are most open to
behavioral imprinting, with a message that miscegenation is good and morally
correct, and that Whiteness is evil and morally wrong.