Tbh I don't think he even said 'she', it's just people assuming like always. That's just how it is with printed articles, good that we know him beter than that :)
The journalist is bad, the article is disgusting and everything apart from some good parts and quotes about music etc. was very yikes, but again, his team approved this and maybe it’s for the limitations they have, the contracts they have, the image they have to keep up with, i don’t know, but this is an article that is supposed to present the ‘new’ harry styles with ‘new authentic music’. on a ‘writing process’ point of view and for some things he said it’s interesting, but the majority of it its Harry Styles™ material and people need to realise that there is no ‘new’ here at the moment. it’s the same story but this time with more ‘artistic freedom’ than he had in one direction, and i think this is just because he’s working with sony and sony saw their ultimate dream come true with this solo deal. Again, we don’t know what’s the deal is but harry is in the closet just like louis and if louis has to walk with nasty at festivals and shoe places, harry has to ‘talk’ like this in the press (and yes, Louis has a fake baby too so it’s even worse than a rolling stone interview about taylor swift but still, yikes). that’s the game, unfortunately. FOR BOTH of them. what’s frustrates me its people that refuse to accept this and think he’s free and rebranded and far away from louis and the old years in the band. they are not there yet so we have to deal with these things. for both. B O T H.