ambiguator

anonymous asked:

He posted three white pics? Without a caption? Or was he hacked? Is this telling me the end of the B&W IG as in 'new start'? A clean slate? 👀👀

I think it’s what it looks like. His IG has been very deliberate for a long time, he was certainly trying to convey things at a time when he was limited (beards, chains, stripes, no such green after all the traffic lights) and this seems the least ambiguous thing he’s done. It’s when he does stuff like this, I am reminded how stupid you’d have to be to think he WASNT involved in the bears.

“I hate you.”

“Yes, thank you, I’m aware, Daniel. We’ve been over this many times in the past three months.”

“No, I really mean it. If you died I wouldn’t care at all. And for the last time, it’s Dan. You can’t keep calling both of us Daniel forever, it’s already confusing enough.”

“Yes, thank you. Now get out of my office.”

“Fuck you.”

“Get out of my office or I’ll activate the ghost shield and leave.”

“Fine, go for it. You won’t have an office when you come back.”

“I’ll take everything important and leave. I’m rich, I can afford to replace a desk.”

more from what i’ve just decided to call the coexistence au where instead of killing everything dan is just very bitter and morally ambiguous ayyy, also hc that vlad has to get glasses pretty quickly after he loses his ghost half bc shockingly you age quicker after being reduced to half of your being

  • Me:*misses harry*
  • Harry:posts 3 ambiguous white pictures with no context
  • Me:*pores are cleaned, hydrated for the next 5 years, stress free, bank account filled, the bees are safe*

anonymous asked:

After three months...3 months nothing and this is the first things he posts. And some people play it down and be like 'he is dramatic just to mess with us' etc. It's Harry. He wouldn't do this if he could a) speak up or b) if it wouldn't matter. He takes this stuff seriously, he always has cause twitter warning tweets and his IG were the only ways (for a long time) to actively fight against this nightmare ❤️

Yeah I agree. I saw someone try to suggest it was for the people he lost but if you are going to honour someone’s memory you don’t usually do it an a way that’s ambiguous. There would be more obvious and appropriate ways to do it. Plus after 6 years, I think he would know how the pics would be interpreted.

This may be an unpopular opinion around here, but I don’t entirely reject the idea of the author-god. I don’t mean that readings different from what the author meant are necessarily wrong. Readers always bring something of themselves to the table, and I definitely don’t think that’s wrong or their readings less valid. But I also believe that authors have a real interest in telling a story that most people will experience a certain way. We want to give other folks an experience. It’s why we (or at least I) write.

And if a large portion of our audience experiences the story in a different way, not just filling a gap we didn’t think to address but something different from the story we were trying to tell, at some level I think that’s a failure of the world-builder. Snape can be morally ambiguous, but if the majority of your fans feel a great swell of sympathy for Voldemort, then you done screwed up.

I think that’s what I find so genuinely confusing about Mofftiss’s common insistence that the Johnlock-will-be-canon contingent are somehow deluding themmselves, or delusional. Because this isn’t some small fraction of fans, and it isn’t some group with a specific shared experience they’re reading into it. I mean, look at me: I’m an asexual who’s never really been a shipper or eve a great fan of romance in my life - I have no real prior tendency to read shows or books this way, and in terms of representation I’m probably better served by the more asexual readings of Holmes I saw in the books back in high school. But from the first moment I saw this show, there was such a romantic tension between John and Sherlock, an attraction, a pathos - and it was structured in ways that so mimicked so many romances I’d read across the years - I couldn’t help but read it that way.

I’m honestly not saying all other readings are garbage. It’s entirely possible that things I’ve seen coded so often as romance may be taken a different way - some sort of nonsexual life partners, for instance. And this show could be about moving on to something else once you’ve broken that possibility: maybe Reichenbach was the bridge too far for someone with trust issues like John, so whatever romantic potential there once was, it now has to take a different form.

What I honestly don’t get, though, is why Mofftiss would be so insistent that fans predicting canon Johnlock are reacting to nothing other than their own wishes and imaginings. And genuinely mean it, I mean; if it’s a lie to preserve the surprise, that’s something else entirely. But if we’re to read them as being genuine here, if they honestly think Johnlock-predicters are spinning gossamer from moonlight here? I just don’t think they’re that bad of writers.

olivia-sa  asked:

Hello!! Do you have any things that you would want to happen in the current arc of One Piece? Just wondering :) (( sorry for my bad English tho ))

UHHHH I LIKE I LIKE and your english is just fine :D

  • Luffy putting the goddamn strawhat on Sanji’s head
  • JEWELRY BONNEY 
  • LOLA
  • Nami x Lola moments
  • Zeff and the Baratie crew coming back
  • Gin too
  • Luffy and Zeff protecting Sanji together
  • Sanji crying
  • a lot
  • Nami saving Sanji’s ass
  • Carrot fights
  • Reiju being a multifaced, manipulative, morally ambiguous bitch who stabs her father and her younger brothers in the back and later on rules over Germa herself because Judge sucks as a villain
  • Carrot destroying either Niji or Yonji
  • Chopper and Carrot brotp moments
  • Sanji really, sincerly and actually falling in love with and eventually marrying either Pudding or Cosette I ship it both
  • more hella cute Brook and Chopper moments
  • Brook actually fighting properly and not being a scaredy cat like Chopper or Nami or absent Usopp
  • Carrot kicking ass
  • Reiju kicking ass
  • Nami kicking ass
  • Sanji and Zeff renuiting
  • Sanji crying in Luffy’s arms
  • Sanji getting some hella character devolepment and power up
  • Ichiji, Niji, Yonji being as handsome as ever
  • Also actual depth for them because they’re super one dimensional and I really have hard time caring for them or liking them
  • More Big Mom and her children, preferably daughters because DAMN Oda is the worst with his female character’s designs but he’s done a stellar job on Brulee and Praline for instance I love both their designs
  • Jinbe joining in all the ass kicking 
  • Luffy at the end of the arc telling Jinbe and Carrot to hop on the Sunny already
  • The crew reuniting 
  • Zoro actually saying Sanji’s name
  • Everybody hugging Sanji
  • More Snooj tears
  • Luffy telling the rest of the Strawhats that they have two new crewmembers now
  • That’s most of the things I can think of right now^^

anonymous asked:

Do you think there are some ideas that should be protected from criticism?

This is a rather complex and ambiguous question, so I can’t exactly give a simple answer. I can share with you my perspective on criticism, however, and you can judge for yourself.

First of all, let me make it clear that criticism is very important. Nothing is ever perfect, and without criticism we cannot improve and grow, as a culture or as individuals. That criticism might be self-criticism, but often it’s criticism from somepony else.

That stated, not all criticism is of equal merit. There’s good criticism, bad criticism, pointless criticism. Criticism on the whole is important but each individual instance of criticism is not.

For starters, criticism should be constructive and well argued. Simply stating something is bad isn’t going to accomplish much. Worse yet, being downright rude. I might shield somepony from criticism if that criticism is presented in a very poor way, even if I do not agree with the viewpoint being criticized.

Criticism should also have a basis to it. If you’re going to criticize scientific findings for example, then you need to have your own scientific methodology to do so with. One cannot just simply disagree and think that all opinions are of equal merit. There are informed opinions and uninformed ones.

Furthermore, criticism should have a purpose: to inspire change. If you’re going to criticize an idea, you should have an audience willing to listen. Often times you would criticize the pony who espouses the idea directly, but criticizing somepony who is not receptive to criticism is not helpful.

Related to the above, ponies are not obligated to listen to your criticism. If ponies kept criticizing me for reading, and I had heard and rejected that criticism countless times, it would get grating, would not be productive, and I would not listen to it further.

Furthermore, there are places where certain criticism is inappropriate, and may be discouraged or disallowed. If you join a book club just to criticize reading, that’s just rude. It is a gathering of ponies who appreciate reading and if you do not, don’t go there, and don’t be surprised if you are ejected.

Of course, there are also ideas I will defend from criticism. Defend and protect might seem like the same thing, but defending an idea generally means arguing its merits when criticized, whereas protecting it might be interpreted as disallowing criticism.

Baba Yaga is a hag from Slavic folklore. She lives in the forest in a hut that stands on chicken legs, and flies around in a large mortar.

Baba Yaga is one of three sisters, and appears as an ugly old woman with a prominent nose. She is usually described as a frightening, evil figure, but is more ambiguous in some stories. She was first mentioned in 1755 by Russian writer Mikhail Lomonosov, and has since become an enduring figure, not just in Eastern Europe, but worldwide.

Image source.

Monster master list.

Suggest a spook.

OKAY LISTEN UP YOU FRICKIN FRICKS SHIT FUCKS DICKY SICKY FUCK

I AIN’T SHITTING YOU WHEN I SAY MATH IS GG EZ KD RATIO 100/0 PLAY OF THE GAME

SO IVE BEEN SEEING THIS EQUATI*ON THAT GOES

6 / 2(1+2)

THIS QUESTION IS FUCKED UP AND HERE’S WHY KIDDOS

IT’S AN AMBIGUOUSLY FORMATTED EQUATION 

YOU COULD FOLLOW THE PEMDAS RULES AND STILL BE A FUCKING IDIOT MORON

YOU COULD ADD 1 AND 2 AND MAKE A BABY CALLED 3, DO IT SO THAT YOU MULTIPLY 2 WITH 3 AND DIVIDE BY 6 AND YOU’D BE RIGHT

AND WRONG

OR DO IT THE SHERLOCK WAY AND FOLLOW THE EQUATION LEFT TO RIGHT LIKE DEAN DID IN THAT ONE EPISODE IN THE T.A.R.D.I.S.

AND STILL BE RIGHT

AND WRONG

THE PROPER WAY TO FORMAT THIS EQUATION IS TO WRITE IT AS

6 / (2(1+2))

SO THAT YOU KNOW THE FUCKING SHIT FUCK FUCK ORDER ITS SUPPOSE TO BE 

FUCK

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

SOURCES: X X

theeldritchspork  asked:

Based on that SID bio for Frisk is Frisk biologically female that identifies as male, or does he just happened to have a more feminine figure than most guys?

I draw them purposefully ambiguous and they identify as gender fluid. So neither?

I have a lot of trouble with churchy weddings.

This whole idea that being married is somehow supposed to be an expression of your love of god, or that your love is secondary to God’s love…
Also throwing around the word love like it’s not an ambiguous abstract…

If I get married, God can sit that one out. Willpower will be the fuel for the steam engine of my commitment.

The only thing I don’t like about naps, is how fucked the dreams get …

I was watching some sort of animated movie, and from the tone I was getting from it, it was one of those new Disney movies where it’s hyped to hell and everyone says “it’s better than ___!”. Like Frozen and Zootopia, you know, that shit.

The plot was this sad main character is basically being destroyed by people giving him crap, and telling to act “grown up” or something like that. Like, whatever he enjoyed was just being slowly eviscerated until all he resembled was an empty husk that was only good at taking commands. It ended super ambiguously and the last couple frames, which I remember super clearly, are this large-eyed dog-furry’s eyes streaming tears and black slowly fading in around him with this super depressing Radio Head-ass music.

I’m sitting in the theater, and I’m dying. Everyone in the theater is talking about how it’s such a great message for a movie. They are all unanimously agreeing with the idea that this dog-furry was in the wrong for wanting to enjoy what he wanted. The moral was to give up entirely and just be complacent and joyless, because if you act like you’re having too much fun, it makes you seem childish (????).

So, the movie is basically torturing me to the point that I’m mentally and physically losing it. I remember actually squirming around in my seat and wanting to scream at the other people. Seeing people agree with this shit and call it great was actually making me want to completely flip out, but for some reason I never left my chair.

Then I wake up.

Keep in mind, this was not like a nightmare for me. Usually in my actual nightmares it’s a lot more traditional monsters and such and something is usually trying to kill me literally. 

So my subconscious is either really sick of everyone’s bullshit and is using recent Disney shit as some sort of lashing out mechanism, or I’ve traveled to another dimension and witnessed some sort of Lovecraft-ian hell cartoon made entirely out of existential and societal dread. 

I don’t know what interpretation I like better.

anonymous asked:

~Genital mention~ Hey! I'm dyadic and nonbinary. Is it appropriating intersex-ness if I want ambiguous genitalia?

i’m intersex and i don’t think it is. it would be unacceptable for you to say you wish you were assigned intersex at birth/born with ambiguous genitalia, or for you to say you “identify as intersex” or want to “become intersex”. 

- mod jay