against reading

anonymous asked:

I'd like to rec Mere Colors by brostucky. It has so few hits but it's so unique! Bucky is a reluctant soulmate in a setting where soulmates are discriminated against. Please go read it :o

thanks!

mere colors by brostucky (clawstoagunfight)

That’s when Bucky takes a deep breath and shoves his way through the crowd.

And, really, it’s that moment that shit starts to hit the fan.

2

book aesthetics an ember in the ashes, sabaa tahir.

“life is made of so many moments that mean nothing. then one day, a single moment comes along to define every second that comes after. such moments are tests of courage, of strength.”

2

READ IN 2016: A Torch Against the Night by Sabaa Tahir

Once upon a time, a girl and a boy tried to escape a city of flame and terror. In this city, they found salvation half-touched by shadow. And there waited a silver-skinned she-demon with a heart as black as her home. They fought the demon beneath a sleepless spire of suffering. They brought the demon low and escaped victorious. A pretty tale, is it not? The story is in the city, little singer. Find the story, and you’ll find Elias Veturius. 

  • me: i have nothing to read
  • me: *has 20 unread books on bookshelf*

Democratic congressman joins efforts for faithless electors to reject Donald Trump

  • A new high-profile name has joined the calls for the Electoral College to reject Trump when electors meet on Dec. 19 to vote.
  • “We’re 5 wks from Inauguration & the President Elect is completely unhinged,” Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) tweeted Sunday night. “The electoral college must do what it was designed for.”
  • Himes’ call for faithless electors to break their pledge to vote for Trump came in response to yet another Trump tweet assaulting the press.
  • So far, only one Republican elector has publicly stated he will vote against Trump. Read more
Cursed Child was dumb and here are some reasons why

(warning: spoilers. this probably won’t make sense unless you’ve read the script. far be it from me to recommend this kneazle-vomit of a play, though, so if you haven’t read it, good)

  • the plot is messy, strange, and childish. there’s only one time-turner left!! how will the characters cope when said time-turner is lost? oh lol they’ll just use this other convenient time-turner. for convenient plot points, see also: harry can suddenly speak parseltongue again, because well he just kind of needs to be able to do that
  • Harry cursing “oh dumbledore” without a hint of irony. like really? really
  • the characterisation was a pile of dragon dung and we all freaking know it. let’s break it down into individual characters here because fuck if I can stop at one bullet point for this
  • Hermione: the brightest witch of her age, the constant crusader for the unloved and the unrepresented, whose successful career and capacity for kindness apparently rest in the hands of her romance with Ron Weasley. oh… but wait. it sounds a little familiar, this story. hear me out. let’s see now, a highly intelligent person who falls in love but doesn’t have that love reciprocated, and who then becomes a really fucking mean teacher at Hogwarts through bitterness. sound like anyone we know? fam, they tried to parallel Hermione and Snape. Hermione and Snape. this being the same Snape who sneered in Hermione’s face when she’d been visibly hexed, and made her cry; the same Snape who bullied Neville Longbottom for years, while Hermione muttered instructions under her breath to help him. if you want to tell me that Hermione would ever allow herself to become a Snape parallel then I will kindly invite you to shove a dirigible plum where there’s no lumos solem
  • Harry: when Harry was at his angriest in OOTP, and he’s yelling at Ron and Hermione, there’s one thing we notice. everything he yells is true. he means it. he’s bitter about it and he’s loud and furious, but he doesn’t have the kind of anger that just says anything to cause hurt, that speaks without thinking, not even at this crisis point in his life. are you really going to tell me that the boy who knows down to his bones what it’s like to feel rejected, and misunderstood, and alone, would ever say - even in anger - that he wishes Albus wasn’t his son? I am going to snap wands over this
  • Cedric. and this one burns. because Cedric was brave and he was true, and he had a sense of justice that led him to telling Harry about the way the golden egg worked, and led him to sharing the winning of the triwizard tournament with Harry. he died, he was murdered at the age of seventeen, embodying a sense of justice so strong, an innocence, a goodness. Cedric Diggory - the boy who believed in fairness with an integrity that is astounding - becoming party to the indiscriminate killing and casual torture of the Death Eaters just because he had his head engorged one time… is about as likely as Hagrid stomping on a dragon egg. it’s an insult to who he was and I am going to engorge the entire bodies of the writers of this fucking play so that hopefully they’ll just float away too, with all the grace and likeability of Aunt Marge
  • Voldemort: can we all agree now that Voldemort would not father a child. the idea of him experiencing lust seems out of character; the idea of him giving into a base urge seems more so. it’s too human, too vulgar, too physical; it would associate him with the common and the mainstream in a way that I contend he would find repulsive. Tom Riddle Sr. was trapped by Merope into sex and romance; to have sex would be to bring himself closer to his parents, down to the level of a Muggle and a witch who lacked power and craved love, two things Voldemort could never, ever stand. no. he wouldn’t have sex just because he wanted to; he’d be repelled by the idea. what other reason could there be for him to do the nasty with Bellatrix? to ensure the continuation of his line? that makes even less sense. achieving immortality for Voldemort was always a question of magic, a personal quest. he wouldn’t go for a messy, physical back-up plan. he always thought that he would win. if anything, he would see a child as a future threat, not a security. another being in the world with the promise of his power? he wouldn’t risk it.
  • what the fuck was that trolley witch scene though
  • “for voldemort and valour” are you serious. is there a Gryffindor spy in the Voldemort camp laughing their ass off because they actually managed to get that one through. and are they ten years old
  • overall, the message of the play infuriated me. Delphi was the child of Voldemort, so she was evil. Albus was the child of Harry, so he was good. Scorpius was the son of Draco, so he should have been evil, but Draco’s actually kind of good now and his mother was nice, so he can be good too. where is the complexity? was five hours of drama not enough to find some shades of morality? where is the hope, where is the resonance, in a story that says that good begets good and evil begets evil, and nothing can really change? the Harry Potter book series was about a boy who grew up with something inside him that was utterly evil, and who rejected it, fought against it, changed the path that fate seemed to wish him to walk. not slytherin, not slytherin. we had Regulus Black and Sirius Black, who rejected their pasts, whose heritage and whose House stood for nothing against their principles, their eventual and separate forms of bravery. we had Remus Lupin, who transformed into a monster but never became one, not even after years of rejection and pain. we had the word mudblood, and we watched Hermione fight it, we knew it was ridiculous to label someone based on their blood. and now… we have the Cursed Child. a play which is flat, and stupid, and tells us that your parentage inevitably dictates your character - and that how you’re treated is how you’ll treat others. dear writers, in the words of Albus Dumbledore, you fail to recognise that it matters not what someone is born, but what they grow to be. you fucks.
2

Google is reportedly earning money off a Jewish museum’s fight against Holocaust deniers

  • Earlier this month, the Guardian reported that the top Google search results for the question “Did the Holocaust happen?” were Holocaust denial pages.
  • When confronted, a Google spokesperson said that while they were “saddened, the company only alters search results in instances of "illegal content, malware and violations of our webmaster guidelines.”
  • Now, a Jewish museum is taking matters into its own hands — but Google is reaping the rewards.
  • David Schendowich, the marketing director of the Breman Museum in Atlanta, Georgia, told the Guardian that the museum was paying Google up to $2 a click in an effort to make its own site appear higher in the search results.
  • In other words, Google is earning money off a Jewish museum fighting back against Holocaust deniers. Read more

follow @the-future-now

4

Trump says the protests at airports were the real problem, not his Muslim ban

  • Trump posted on Twitter Monday morning to defend his Muslim ban
  • He said that only a small number of people were detained whereas the protestsand  a Delta computer outage, caused the real disruption.
  • Many of those detained, however, were either legal permanent residents of the U.S., or refugees who had already gone through vetting.
  • The administration announced Sunday those here legally would not be deported back to their country of origin.
  • The executive order is likely to face more legal challenges down the road, as groups like the ACLU vow to fight against the ban. Read more