activestate

New Post has been published on Step-by-step Linux Tutorials for Beginners and Pros 

New Post has been published on http://tutorialforlinux.com/2015/02/13/how-to-install-komodo-edit-on-linux-mint-17-1-rebecca-lts-32-64bit-easy-guide/

How-to Install Komodo Edit on Linux Mint 17.1 Rebecca LTS 32-64bit Easy Guide

External image

Install Komodo Edit 8.X for Linux Mint 17.1 Rebecca 32/64bit The Linux Tutorial Show Step-by-Step How-to Install Komodo Edit 8+ 32/64bit on Linux Mint 17.1 Rebecca LTS Mate/Cinnamon/KDE i386/amd64 Desktop. google_ad_client = “ca-pub-0951995613945280”; google_ad_slot =…

Online Meetup: High Availability and Scalability in the Cloud

We are hosting our Cloud Online Meetup at 9.00 - 10.00 am Pacific!  In order to join our session, please sign up here!

High availability and scalability are critical to managing modern enterprise cloud workloads. However, effectively implementing and harvesting the benefits of both takes considerable investment in code, configuration, training, and people.

Modern technologies and tooling are rapidly evolving and have made this process much more easily attainable. Instead of months, deploying a reliable, scalable, available application on a reliable infrastructure can be accomplished in minutes.

In this webinar, John Wetherill of ActiveState and Shawn Madden of Piston Cloud discuss the many challenges, advantages, and benefits using the best of modern cloud technologies - ActiveState’s Stackato Private PaaS, and Piston CloudOS. Some of what they will cover includes:

- The many faces of availability
- Application Autoscaling vs. Infrastructure Autoscaling
- Cloud and application orchestration through REST
- Interaction between PaaS and IaaS
- And more… 

We are hosting our Cloud Online Meetup at 9.00 - 10.00 am Pacific!  In order to join our session, please sign up here!

Hey IT — embrace, don’t stifle, developers’ flight to cloud

#SuryaRay #Surya You’re stuck in bumper-to-bumper traffic. No one’s moving. It’s hot, the air conditioner is busted and next to you is a tempting escape … a wide-open breakdown lane. Sure, you could move over and jump ahead. You’d get where you wanted to go faster, but you’d be breaking the rules.

Shadow IT projects crop up in much the same way. Gridlocked by the processes and protocols imposed by IT management, developers very often give in to the temptation of moving their projects outside where they can progress faster. These “shadow IT” or “dark ops” which happen when developers go outside the firewall — spinning up and provisioning their work on beyond-the-firewall cloud resources to support time-sensitive project delivery. These efforts typically happen without the knowledge of IT (or accounting) departments.

Dark ops: a symptom of impatience, colliding objectives

Dark ops emerge when dev/devops teams hit communication breakdowns, governance constraints, and resource limitations. The whole rationale for the devops movement — in which company developers and operations people — who often work at cross purposes — are encouraged to work together to build, then deploy,  incremental software updates and improvements. It sometimes doesn’t work that way, hence the rogue developer.  sometimes that’s because IT management has implied or stated outright that it doesn’t have the time, in-house skills, resources, or desire to deal with their projects. At the same time, developers are under pressure to innovate to keep the enterprise competitive.

The public cloud breakdown lane: tempting, but risky

Look at it from the developer’s perspective. Would you jump into the dark ops breakdown lane? Cloud offerings such as Amazon’s Web Services are tempting, quick options for developers looking for bandwidth, scale, and resources, without having to go through time-consuming IT channels. But without IT’s involvement, issues abound.

For instance, think of the “success-failure” scenario: What happens if the shadow project is a successful trial, and corporate end users demand broader rollout? IT has to integrate that shadow project back into the corporate network, connecting it to legacy applications, databases, and service frameworks. Trying to do that after the project is already under way is far more difficult and resource-intensive than if IT were involved in plans from the start.

Even worse: What if the third-party service provider suffers an outage or a security breach? IT is a corporate risk manager, and determines maximum tolerable failure windows, necessary protections against data theft/loss, and how often to back up data on-site. In addition, IT constantly measures corporate cloud utilization to avoid overage costs that can get out of hand. It’s not likely that a developer would consider these critical factors when purchasing immediately available public-cloud VMs. In most organizations, the developer’s understandable lunge towards Shadow IT can expose the company to risk and unnecessary expense.

So, how do you foster developer creativity and still maintain IT control?

1. Embrace dark ops culture

Resolve the culture wars being waged by your development and IT teams. In spite of their respective biases, developers and IT management share a common goal: to do what’s right for the company. If your devs are going rogue, review your deployment administrative processes. It’s a problem if they aren’t following the rules, but it’s a much bigger problem if your rules are hindering developers’ ability to innovate. Acknowledge the developer’s lament: “Don’t make me write another report! I’d rather be coding!” Then empower them: They want to be able to provision their apps. Take advantage of virtualization technologies to enable that.

2. Invest in the cloud

Instead of imposing arcane processes on the dev team, establish new infrastructure to support the best way for them to work. If your devs want to go to the cloud, give them a cloud to go to. If you need to keep data in-house, get a private cloud and give your devs control over their own piece of the sky. Otherwise, outsource your hosting to a public-cloud provider. The important thing is that your devs can spin up VMs and not have to wait weeks for approval to do so.

On the IT side, set up management and control procedures— as non-intrusively as possible—to make dev cloud work visible. Middleware in public or private PaaS models can provide sophisticated cloud management solutions for IT without burdening devs with overhead administration.

3. Collaborate

Hold a hackathon. Bring your teams together for a day or even a week to brainstorm on new ideas, build prototypes, and learn from each other. Make multi-day quarterly hackathons open to all employees and impose just one rule: work must benefit the company. Hackathons can get your teams thinking creatively, boost morale, and make your company and products better.

4. Open up your enterprise’s breakdown lane

With mutual respect established, virtualization options made available, and team collaboration under way, you’ll see positive changes in the enterprise developer/IT relationship. That unity will lead to faster, more cost-effective, and less-risky research and development. Open communication and mutual respect will focus your team on what’s important: moving the enterprise forward. You just have to open up that extra lane to get past the traffic.

_Bart Copeland is the CEO of ActiveState, a cloud software provider, will be speaking at GigaOM’s Structure Europe in Amsterdam later this month. _

_Feature photo courtesy of Shutterstock user Viktor Gladkov_

External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
http://dlvr.it/2F3Tk5 @suryaray

New Post has been published on Tutorial for Linux | Linux Tutorial for Beginners

New Post has been published on http://tutorialforlinux.com/2014/07/29/how-to-install-the-best-html-code-editor-for-ubuntu-14-04-trusty-lts-32-64bit-linux-easy-guide/

How-to Install the Best Html Code Editor for Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty LTS 32-64bit Linux Easy Guide

External image

Install Komodo Edit on Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty The Linux Tutorial Show Step-by-Step How-to Install Komodo Edit 8.5+ on Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty Tahr LTS Unity i386/amd64 Linux Desktop. ActiveState Komodo Edit 8+ is a Free Multi-Featured Rich Editor for: PHP, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, Perl, Tcl, XML, HTML…

ActiveState, activestate komodo, best html code editor ubuntu, Getting Started, Guide, How-to, Html, Html Editor, html editor ubuntu, html ubuntu, Install, komodo ubuntu, Linux, Tutorial, Ubuntu, Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty tahr

finanznachrichten.de
ActiveState Joins EMC, IBM, HP, Pivotal, Rackspace, SAP, VMware and CenturyLink to Bring Open Multi-Cloud Platform-as-a-Service to Enterprise Computing

PHOENIX, Feb. 24, 2014 /PRNewswire/ In a letter sent today to Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed by over 80 members of the business community including other trade associations, the Arizona Tec…

New Post has been published on Tutorial for Linux

New Post has been published on http://tutorialforlinux.com/2014/05/28/how-to-install-activeperl-5-x-on-ubuntu-14-04-trusty-lts-32-64bit-linux-easy-guide/

How-to Install ActivePerl 5.x on Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty LTS 32-64bit Linux Easy Guide

External image

Install ActivePerl 5.X on Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty 64bit The Guide Show How-to Install and Getting-Started with the Latest ActiveState ActivePerl 5.16/5.18 Community Edition for Ubuntu Linux 14.04 Trusty Tahr i386/amd64 Desktop/Server. ActivePerl is the the industry-standard, commercial-grade Perl…

activeperl linux, activeperl ubuntu, ActiveState, Guide, How-to, Install, install activeperl ubuntu, Linux, Perl, Tutorial, Ubuntu 14.04 Trusty tahr

#CloudFail: Six pitfalls to avoid with enterprise cloud deployment

#SuryaRay #Surya Done right, the enterprise cloud reduces IT overhead, delivers scalability, fosters innovation, and improves the way enterprises work. And that can save time and money.

You’ve heard the cloud marketing spiel … faster, better, cheaper. Those are seductive adjectives. But for some organizations, cloud benefits like that can remain out of reach. Cloud Computing is just so…new, and as some industry experts have oh-so-astutely noted, “much can go wrong.” And that’s reason enough for many to fear cloud computing.

But it shouldn’t be enough to preclude it. Perhaps it goes without saying, but your enterprise will enjoy the cloud’s benefits only with the commitment of organizational buy-in. Will your enterprise’s cloud-computing initiatives succeed? Let’s hope so. Winning in the cloud isn’t difficult, but it’s also not guaranteed. If you’re an IT leader, avoid these rookie mistakes … or your enterprise cloud might just rain down on you.

1. Plan for yesterday

It’s classic IT short-sightedness: “Invest now and relieve your immediate pain!” But here’s the thing: Cloud computing _changes_ everything. Yesterday’s planning involved provisioning hardware for a ten-year lifespan. Today’s planning involves spinning up 10,000 VMs. Overnight. Yes, you must migrate your legacy apps to the cloud. But you also must ensure your cloud supports new, as-yet unimagined, multi-component, polyglot-developed, infinitely-modifiable, dynamically-redeployable applications. That is hardly the status quo now.

Today — yes, today –your application developers are leveraging the cloud to work in completely new ways. Cloud computing has the power to change the way your team thinks about delivering customer value. Change the way you think about IT management. Start from your end user customers and work backwards up the value chain. Then map out a cloud computing strategy to get there. You’ll end up with an IT org that’s proactively strategizing for the future instead of reacting to yesterday’s pain point.

2. Go public…if you’re big

How big is your enterprise? How costly is downtime? How much of a control freak are you? If you answered “massive,” “massively costly,” and “massively type-A,” then the public cloud probably isn’t for you. Outages—though extremely rare—can still occur. “Four nines” uptime sounds great, but it’s also unrealistic. Can your org can handle downtime if your public-cloud data is unavailable?

Public cloud is a great IT-outsourcing option…in a one-size-fits-all kind of way. And when something goes wrong in a public cloud, remember that you’ve also outsourced disaster recovery (and limited your own visibility into recovery efforts). No big deal as long as you don’t mind twiddling your thumbs while someone in hosting tech support seeks the root cause of that outage in the Eastern zone.

3. Go private…if you’re small

Private cloud is great, but it’s not right for everyone. Is your enterprise a small business? If you’re looking at a private cloud solution (even a dedicated hosted solution), expect significant upfront investment in hardware, maintenance, and IT management. Or, look at something more convenient like a cloud hosting provider service. And get to the cloud…faster, better, cheaper.

4. Don’t worry about security

Public cloud providers deliver best-in-world security. And it’s fast and easy to push data to a public cloud like AWS. Your proprietary data’s safe there. Probably. But public-cloud breaches — though extremely rare — (say it with me) can still occur. And they can be costly. (What’s your cloud data worth to you?)

“Hoping for the best” is not a sustainable strategic approach. Plan for redundancy and disaster recovery, whether your cloud is public or private. The private cloud route can be safer, but security is under your control (and as good as your own firewall). In a public cloud, consider advanced security layers—Some private PaaSes served from a public cloud can “individually wrap” your applications, so if a neighboring tenant gets hacked, your data stays protected.

5. Ignore data sovereignty

Does your enterprise have international operations? With most public cloud services, enterprise customers have little control over where their data resides. That’s a sticking point for companies doing business in jurisdictions that require corporate or public sector data to remain within a specific geography. If adhering to such data sovereignty mandates is a priority for your enterprise, consider a private cloud solution…running in your organization’s own datacenters in the appropriate subsidiaries.

6. Wait

Don’t wait and see. Cloud computing’s not a fad. It’s a game-changer. And if you’re not moving to the cloud, then you’re Goliath and your nimble competitor is David, using cloud-computing models to advantage. The sooner your enterprise gets to the cloud, the sooner you’ll realize its benefits.

_Bart Copeland, CEO of ActiveState will speak about the evolution of  private PaaS adoption on a panel at GigaOM’s upcoming Structure Europe conference in Amsterdam. _

_Photo courtesy of Shutterstock user  Vladitto_

External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
http://dlvr.it/2CG3Dj @suryaray

Is there a 'beautiful code' collection for Python? [reddit]

I’m looking for a collection of very well sorted (style, performance, security, organization) code examples in Python.

Currently I’m looking for good examples of how to structure my tests in particular, but I think it would be nice to have a solid list of projects (github/bitbucket?) or snippets (StackOverflow, gists, activestate recipes). Any good links anybody?

submitted by marcinpohl
[link] [1 comment]

[ link ]
Global Platform as a Service (PaaS) Industry

NEW YORK, Aug. 25, 2015 /PRNewswire/ – This report analyzes the worldwide markets for Platform as a Service (PaaS) in US$ Million/US$ Thousand by the following Types: almPaaS (Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service), aPaaS (Application Platform as a Service), iPaaS (Integration Platform as a Service), MFTPaaS (Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service), bpmPaaS (Business Process Management Platform as a Service), and Other PaaS. The report provides separate comprehensive analytics for the US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Rest of World. Annual estimates and forecasts are provided for the period 2014 through 2020. Also, a five-year historic analysis is provided for these markets. Market data and analytics are derived from primary and secondary research. Company profiles are primarily based on public domain information including company URLs. The report profiles 159 companies including many key and niche players such as -

ActiveState Software Inc.
Amazon Web Services, Inc.
Apprenda Inc.
AppScale Systems Inc.
Dell Boomi, Inc.



Read the full report: http://www.reportlinker.com/p03180716-summary/view-report.html



I. INTRODUCTION, METHODOLOGY & PRODUCT DEFINITIONS

Study Reliability and Reporting Limitations I-1 Disclaimers………….. I-2 Data Interpretation & Reporting Level I-2 Quantitative Techniques & Analytics I-3 Product Definitions and Scope of Study I-3 Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS)………….. I-4 Application Platform-as-a-Service (aPaaS) I-4 Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) I-4 Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFT PaaS) I-4 Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) I-5 Other PaaS Services…………..I-5 Data Platform as a Service (dPaaS) I-5 Business Analytics PaaS (BaPaaS) I-5

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. INDUSTRY OVERVIEW………….. II-1 Strong Growth in Application Development: The Cornerstone of PaaS Demand………….. II-1 Table 1: Spiraling Increase in Mobile App Downloads Provides the Right Business Climate for Adoption of Mobile App Platform as a Service (PaaS): Breakdown of Number of Mobile App Downloads (In Million) for the Years 2012, 2014 & 2017 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-2

Table 2: The Untapped Opportunity in Enterprise Application Platform as a Service: Breakdown of Global Spending on Enterprise Applications (In US$ Million) for the Years 2012, 2014, 2016 & 2018 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-2 Cloud Computing Transforms the Approaches to Application Development………….. II-3 2007-09 Recession & the Ensuing Economic Hardships: The Turning Point for Opportunistic PaaS Adoption II-4 Table 3: Recession Fuels Innovation & Technology Adoption: Key Statistical Results of Surveys to Identify Corporate Willingness to Adopt New Technologies to Cut Costs & Scale Back on New Technologies to Cut Costs (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. II-5 Growing Investments in Disruptive Technologies to Benefit Growth of PaaS………….. II-6

2. KEY MARKET TRENDS & DRIVERS…………..II-7 Growing Competitive Pressures Spur Adoption of PaaS II-7 Technology Improvements in PaaS Services to Benefit Market Growth II-7 Trend Towards “Develop Your Own Applications” Fuels aPaaS Adoption………….. II-8 Adoption of Cloud Computing Among Application ISVs to Benefit Growth of PaaS………….. II-9 Growth in App Consumption & Usage Drives App Development Efforts & Demand for aPaaS…………..II-10 Enterprise Mobility & Growing Use of Enterprise Mobile Apps Set the Business Climate for Growth II-10 Corporate Apps Stores Poised to Proliferate & Benefit aPaaS II-11 Key Factors Encouraging BYOD Trend among Enterprises Ranked by Importance Attached by Enterprises II-12 Select Mobile Apps Used in Enterprise Environments II-12 Digital Revolution Drives Opportunities for PaaS in the AIM Market………….. II-12 Growing Focus on Cloud Integration Spurs Demand for iPaaS II-13 Digital Data Explosion & Data Integration Issues Spur Interest in dPaaS………….. II-14 Strong Budgetary Outlays for Business Intelligence: A Key Growth Driver………….. II-14 Business Intelligence & Big Data Integration Spurs the BDPaaS Market………….. II-15 Growing Importance of BPM Fuels Adoption of BPMPaaS II-16 Focus on Sustainable Application Development Spurs Interest in ALM PaaS………….. II-17 Security Issues Spur Demand for Private PaaS II-17 Vendor Lock-In Issues Spur Migration Towards Hybrid PaaS II-18 Portability Benefits Drive “Open Source PaaS” as the New De Facto Standard………….. II-19 Hybrid IaaS: Is It a Competitive Threat to PaaS? II-20 First Next-Generation Multi-Cloud Enterprise PaaS Witnesses Strong Growth………….. II-20 Growing Internet Speeds Provides Ancillary Growth Support for PaaS………….. II-21 Table 4: High Speed Internet Spurs Demand for Ultra-Low Latency & Reliable PaaS Services: Internet Connectivity Speeds (In MBPS) in Select Countries Worldwide (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..II-22 Chronicling the Challenges to Growth in the PaaS Market II-22 Market Outlook………….. II-23

3. COMPETITIVE SCENARIO………….. II-24 Market Structure………….. II-24 Entry of IaaS Vendors Threatens Smaller Public PaaS Players & Highlights Convergence of IaaS and PaaS II-24 Select Leading PaaS Providers in the Global Market: A Snapshot II-25 Table 5: Leading Players in the Global Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market (2014): Percentage Share Breakdown of Revenues for Amazon.com, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Salesforce.com, and Others (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-26

Table 6: Leading Players in the Global Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS) Market (2014): Percentage Share Breakdown of Revenues for Amazon.com, Engine Yard, Google, Microsoft, Salesforce.com, and Others (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. II-27

4. PRODUCT/TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW…………..II-28 Introduction………….. II-28 Benefits of PaaS………….. II-28 Faster Application Development & Deployment II-28 Complete Life Cycle Services…………..II-28 Flexibility………….. II-28 Agility………….. II-29 Scalability & Elasticity…………..II-29 Reduced Total Cost of Ownership II-29 Less Burden on IT Teams…………..II-29 Convenient Pricing Models…………..II-29 Limitations of PaaS………….. II-29 Security………….. II-29 Comparatively Lower Performance than IaaS and SaaS Models II-29 Integration Issues with In-House Applications and Systems II-30 Key Market Segments & Definitions II-30 Application Platform-as-a-Service (aPaaS) II-30 Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS)………….. II-31 Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) II-31 Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) II-31 Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFT PaaS) II-31 Other PaaS Services…………..II-31 Data Platform as a Service (dPaaS) II-32 Business Analytics PaaS (BaPaaS) II-32 Types of PaaS Based on Environment II-32 PaaS fixed to an Operating System II-33 PaaS Residing in a SaaS Environment II-33 Open Platform PaaS………….. II-33 Types of PaaS Based on Environment: A Snapshot II-33 Types of PaaS Systems…………..II-34 Standalone Systems………….. II-34 Application Delivery-Only Systems II-34 Add-On Development Systems…………..II-34 PaaS Users Based on Usage Criteria II-34 Application Developers…………..II-34 Application Testers…………..II-34 Application Deployers…………..II-34 Application Administrators…………..II-34

5. PRODUCT INTRODUCTIONS/INNOVATIONS II-35 Red Hat Rolls Out OpenShift Commons II-35 Microsoft Unveils Azure Service Fabric II-35 TigerText Introduces TigerConnect PaaS II-35 Liaison Technologies Launches Alloy Platform II-35 NetObjex Unveils NetObjex IoT PaaS II-35 HotSchedules Rolls Out Bodhi…………..II-36 Red Hat Introduces OpenShift Enterprise 2.2 II-36 IBM Introduces New Cloud Services in BlueMix II-36 ActiveState Unleashes Stackato® 3.4.2 II-36 ActiveState Announces Stackato 3.4 PaaS Support for SUSE Cloud 4 II-36 Apprenda Unleashes its Private PaaS on Amazon Web Services II-37 Volute™ Rolls Out wPaaS™…………..II-37 CSC Expands its Big Data Platform as a Service Offering II-37 OnSIP Rolls Out The OnSIP Network II-37 ShepHertz Introduces Backen Platform as a Service and App42 PaaS II-37 Restlet Unveils APISpark…………..II-37 Telit Wireless Extends m2mAIR Cloud PaaS II-38 exoscale Rolls Out New PaaS Solution II-38 MyCloud.by Introduces Jelastic’s PaaS Offering in Belarus II-38 Engine Yard Announces Support for Java II-38 Engine Yard Enhances Multi-Cloud Capabilities with Windows Azure Support………….. II-38 Caspio Expands Caspio Global Sites II-38 DNAnexus Introduces Specialized PaaS II-39 Jelastic Introduces PHP PaaS…………..II-39 KidoZen Unveils Enterprise Mobile-First PaaS II-39 SnapLogic Introduces SnapLogic Integration Cloud II-39 Progress Software Adds New Features to its Progress Pacific PaaS II-39 OutSystems Rolls Out The OutSystems Platform II-39 Capgemini Introduces Insurance Connect PaaS II-40 Qubell Rolls Out Qubell™ Adaptive PaaS II-40 TIBCO Software Introduces TIBCO Cloud Bus™ II-40 Software AG Introduces Software AG Live II-40 Chunghwa Telecom Collaborates with IBM to introduce Smart PaaS II-40

6. RECENT INDUSTRY ACTIVITY…………..II-41 IBM Teams Up with CSC…………..II-41 Powertek to Provide PaaS Offering II-41 TeamUltra Signs Distribution Agreement with Plat4mation II-41 CloudBees Discontinues RUN@Cloud PaaS II-41 Ericsson to Takeover Majority Stake in Apcera II-41 HumanTouch Snaps UP CorasWorks II-41 Apprenda Joins Hands with Piston Cloud Computing II-42 cloudControl to Takeover Docker’s dotCloud PaaS Business II-42 Progress Takes Over Modulus…………..II-42 Certus Solutions forms Partnership with eProseed II-42 CloudBees Inks Pact with Verizon Enterprise Solutions II-42 Progress Offers Progress PaaS to Carego International II-42 Red Hat Teams Up with Correlsense II-43 VMware Teams Up with Pivotal…………..II-43 ActiveState® Takes Over Appsecute™ II-43 OpenText™ Takes Over Cordys…………..II-43 Software AG Acquires LongJump…………..II-43 VeliQ Enters into Commercial Partnership with Portugal Telecom II-43

7. FOCUS ON SELECT GLOBAL PLAYERS…………..II-44 ActiveState Software Inc. (Canada) II-44 Amazon Web Services, Inc. (US) II-44 Apprenda Inc. (US)…………..II-45 AppScale Systems Inc. (US)…………..II-45 Dell Boomi, Inc. (US)…………..II-45 Engine Yard, Inc. (US)…………..II-46 EMC Corporation (US)…………..II-46 GigaSpaces Technologies (US)…………..II-46 Google, Inc. (US)………….. II-47 Informatica Corporation (US)…………..II-47 International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) (US) II-48 Microsoft Corporation (US)…………..II-48 MuleSoft, Inc. (US)………….. II-49 Oracle Corporation (US)…………..II-49 OrangeScape Inc. (US)…………..II-49 OutSystems (US)………….. II-49 Pivotal Software, Inc. (US)…………..II-50 Red Hat, Inc. (US)…………..II-50 Salesforce.com, Inc. (US)…………..II-51 SAP SE (Germany)………….. II-51 Software AG (Germany)…………..II-51 SnapLogic, Inc. (US)…………..II-52 TIBCO Software Inc. (US)…………..II-52 WSO2, Inc. (US)………….. II-52

8. GLOBAL MARKET PERSPECTIVE…………..II-53 Table 7: World Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-53

Table 8: World Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..II-54

Table 9: World 12-Year Perspective for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. II-55

Table 10: World Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..II-56

Table 11: World Historic Review for Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-57

Table 12: World 12-Year Perspective for Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS) by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-58

Table 13: World Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-59

Table 14: World Historic Review for Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..II-60

Table 15: World 12-Year Perspective for Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS) by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..II-61

Table 16: World Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-62

Table 17: World Historic Review for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..II-63

Table 18: World 12-Year Perspective for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..II-64

Table 19: World Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-65

Table 20: World Historic Review for Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-66

Table 21: World 12-Year Perspective for Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS) by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..II-67

Table 22: World Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-68

Table 23: World Historic Review for Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-69

Table 24: World 12-Year Perspective for Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-70

Table 25: World Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Other PaaS Services by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..II-71

Table 26: World Historic Review for Other PaaS Services by Geographic Region - US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Million for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-72

Table 27: World 12-Year Perspective for Other PaaS Services by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for US, Canada, Japan, Europe, Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan), Latin America and Rest of World Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) II-73

III. MARKET

1. THE UNITED STATES………….. III-1 A.Market Analysis………….. III-1 Outlook………….. III-1 Market Overview………….. III-1 Growing Application of PaaS in AIM: A Key Trend III-1 ISVs Rely on PaaS to Build Next-Generation Applications III-2 Product Launches…………..III-2 Strategic Corporate Developments III-7 Select Players………….. III-9 B.Market Analytics…………..III-18 Table 28: US Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-18

Table 29: US Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-19

Table 30: US 12-Year Perspective for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..III-20

2. CANADA………….. III-21 A.Market Analysis………….. III-21 Outlook………….. III-21 ActiveState Software Inc. - A Major Canadian Player III-21 B.Market Analytics…………..III-22 Table 31: Canadian Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-22

Table 32: Canadian Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-23

Table 33: Canadian 12-Year Perspective for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..III-24

3. JAPAN………….. III-25 A.Market Analysis………….. III-25 Outlook………….. III-25 B.Market Analytics…………..III-26 Table 34: Japanese Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-26

Table 35: Japanese Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-27

Table 36: Japanese 12-Year Perspective for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..III-28

4. EUROPE………….. III-29 A.Market Analysis………….. III-29 Outlook………….. III-29 Growing Importance of Mobile Apps in Enterprise Environments Extends Opportunities for PaaS III-29 B.Market Analytics…………..III-30 Table 37: Europe Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - France, Germany, Italy, UK, Spain, Russia, and Rest of Europe Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..III-30

Table 38: Europe Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - France, Germany, Italy, UK, Spain, Russia, and Rest of Europe Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-31

Table 39: Europe 12-Year Perspective for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for France, Germany, Italy, UK, Spain, Russia, and Rest of Europe Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-32

Table 40: Europe Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-33

Table 41: Europe Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-34

Table 42: Europe 12-Year Perspective for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..III-35

4a. FRANCE………….. III-36 A.Market Analysis………….. III-36 Outlook………….. III-36 Product Launch………….. III-36 B.Market Analytics…………..III-36 Table 43: French Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-36

Table 44: French Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-37

4b. GERMANY………….. III-38 A.Market Analysis………….. III-38 Outlook………….. III-38 Product Launch………….. III-38 Select Players………….. III-38 B.Market Analytics…………..III-39 Table 45: German Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-39

Table 46: German Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-40

4c. ITALY………….. III-41 A.Market Analysis………….. III-41 Outlook………….. III-41 B.Market Analytics…………..III-41 Table 47: Italian Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-41

Table 48: Italian Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-42

4d. THE UNITED KINGDOM…………..III-43 A.Market Analysis………….. III-43 Outlook………….. III-43 UK: The Major Market for PaaS in Europe III-43 Product Launch………….. III-43 Strategic Corporate Developments III-43 B.Market Analytics…………..III-44 Table 49: UK Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-44

Table 50: UK Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-45

4e. SPAIN………….. III-46 A.Market Analysis………….. III-46 Outlook………….. III-46 B.Market Analytics…………..III-46 Table 51: Spanish Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-46

Table 52: Spanish Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-47

4f. RUSSIA………….. III-48 A.Market Analysis………….. III-48 Outlook………….. III-48 B.Market Analytics…………..III-48 Table 53: Russian Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-48

Table 54: Russian Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-49

4g. REST OF EUROPE………….. III-50 A.Market Analysis………….. III-50 Outlook………….. III-50 Product Launches…………..III-50 Strategic Corporate Developments III-50 B.Market Analytics…………..III-51 Table 55: Rest of Europe Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-51

Table 56: Rest of Europe Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..III-52

5. ASIA-PACIFIC………….. III-53 A.Market Analysis………….. III-53 Outlook………….. III-53 B.Market Analytics…………..III-53 Table 57: Asia-Pacific Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - Australia, China, India, South Korea, and Rest of Asia-Pacific Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-53

Table 58: Asia-Pacific Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - Australia, China, India, South Korea, and Rest of Asia-Pacific Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-54

Table 59: Asia-Pacific 12-Year Perspective for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for Australia, China, India, South Korea, and Rest of Asia-Pacific Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-55

Table 60: Asia-Pacific Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..III-56

Table 61: Asia-Pacific Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-57

Table 62: Asia-Pacific 12-Year Perspective for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-58

5a. AUSTRALIA………….. III-59 A.Market Analysis………….. III-59 Outlook………….. III-59 B.Market Analytics…………..III-59 Table 63: Australian Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-59

Table 64: Australian Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-60

5b. CHINA………….. III-61 A.Market Analysis………….. III-61 Outlook………….. III-61 Chinese PaaS Market Overview III-61 B.Market Analytics…………..III-62 Table 65: Chinese Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-62

Table 66: Chinese Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-63

5c. INDIA………….. III-64 A.Market Analysis………….. III-64 Outlook………….. III-64 B.Market Analytics…………..III-64 Table 67: Indian Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-64

Table 68: Indian Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-65

5d. SOUTH KOREA………….. III-66 A.Market Analysis………….. III-66 Outlook………….. III-66 B.Market Analytics…………..III-66 Table 69: South Korean Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-66

Table 70: South Korean Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..III-67

5e. REST OF ASIA-PACIFIC…………..III-68 A.Market Analysis………….. III-68 Outlook………….. III-68 Product Launch………….. III-68 B.Market Analytics…………..III-68 Table 71: Rest of Asia-Pacific Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-68

Table 72: Rest of Asia-Pacific Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-69

6. LATIN AMERICA………….. III-70 A.Market Analysis………….. III-70 Outlook………….. III-70 B.Market Analytics…………..III-70 Table 73: Latin American Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - Brazil and Rest of Latin America Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-70

Table 74: Latin American Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - Brazil and Rest of Latin America Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-71

Table 75: Latin American 12-Year Perspective for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Geographic Region - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for Brazil and Rest of Latin America Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-72

Table 76: Latin American Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..III-73

Table 77: Latin American Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-74

Table 78: Latin American 12-Year Perspective for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-75

6a. BRAZIL………….. III-76 A.Market Analysis………….. III-76 Outlook………….. III-76 B.Market Analytics…………..III-76 Table 79: Brazil Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-76

Table 80: Brazil Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)………….. III-77

6b. REST OF LATIN AMERICA…………..III-78 A.Market Analysis………….. III-78 Outlook………….. III-78 B.Market Analytics…………..III-78 Table 81: Rest of Latin America Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-78

Table 82: Rest of Latin America Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) Market Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-79

7. REST OF WORLD………….. III-80 A.Market Analysis………….. III-80 Outlook………….. III-80 B.Market Analytics…………..III-81 Table 83: Rest of World Recent Past, Current and Future Analysis for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2014 through 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart)…………..III-81

Table 84: Rest of World Historic Review for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets Independently Analyzed with Annual Revenues in US$ Thousand for Years 2009 through 2013 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-82

Table 85: Rest of World 12-Year Perspective for Public Platform as a Service (PaaS) by Service Type - Percentage Breakdown of Revenues for Application Life Cycle Management Platform as a Service (almPaaS), Application Platform as a Service (aPaaS), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), Managed File Transfer Platform as a Service (MFTPaaS), Business Process Management Platform as a Service (bpmPaaS) and Other PaaS Markets for Years 2009, 2015, and 2020 (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) III-83

IV. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

Total Companies Profiled: 159 (including Divisions/Subsidiaries - 162)

The United States (99) Canada (2) Japan (3) Europe (43) - France (7) - Germany (8) - The United Kingdom (15) - Rest of Europe (13) Asia-Pacific (Excluding Japan) (14) Latin America (1)
Read the full report: http://www.reportlinker.com/p03180716-summary/view-report.html

About Reportlinker
ReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution that finds, filters and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need - instantly, in one place.

http://www.reportlinker.com


__________________________
Contact Clare: clare@reportlinker.com
US: (339)-368-6001
Intl: +1 339-368-6001

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-platform-as-a-service-paas-industry-300133063.html

span.p_span{font-size:8pt !important;font-family:"Arial" !important;color:black !important;} a.p_a{color:blue !important;} li.p_li{font-size:8pt !important;font-family:"Arial" !important;color:black !important;} p.p_p{font-size:0.62em !important;font-family:"Arial" !important;color:black !important;margin:0in !important;} ;}

Some TT love 😍
____________________________________
🚗: @joshreahm
📷: ?!?
———————————————
Wanna get a shoutout?! Follow these steps!

Follow @apollo_prjkt
Tag your photos with #OmniLifestyle
Tag a friend 💯
———————————————-
CHECK OUT THE CREW⤵️
@activestance
@importcat
@camber.nation
@bigwhips_
@groundclearance
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ #cargram #carporn #carsdaily #carsofinstagram #carswithoutlimits #wheels #wheelporn #united #limitless #low #lowered #lowlife #apolloprjkt #usdm #jdmdaily #jdmfamily #jdm #japland #euro #eurocar #stance #stancenation #americanmuscle #truckporn #lifted #tuned

New Post has been published on Tutorial for Linux

New Post has been published on http://tutorialforlinux.com/2014/05/19/how-to-install-latest-activeperl-5-x-on-linux-mint-17-qiana-lts-3264bit-easy-guide/

How-to Install Latest ActivePerl 5.x on Linux Mint 17 Qiana LTS 32/64bit Easy Guide

External image

Install ActivePerl on Linux Mint 17 Qiana 32/64bit This Guide Show Step-by-Step How-to Install and Getting-Started with the Latest ActivePerl 5.X Community Edition x86/x64 ActiveState on Linux Mint 17 Qiana LTS Mate/Cinnamon/Kde/Xfce 32/64bit Desktop ActivePerl is the the industry-standard,…

ActivePerl, ActiveState, Guide, How-to, Install, install activeperl linux mint, Linux, Linux Mint, linux mint 17 qiana, Mate, Perl, Tutorial