Rosners

is my enthusiasm for my favorite series becoming embarrassing and annoying as I want it to be wildy sucessful and therefore want to do everything in my power or am I over-concerned about nothing

every story comes from somewhere, or, an On the Fence reading list

When I started On the Fence for NaNoWriMo 2015, I wasn’t sure what I was getting myself into. I’d never written a romance novel, or a new adult novel; I’d only driven through Kentucky (except for a summer trip to the Horse Park when I was eight or nine); and I didn’t know much about horse racing.

Cue five months (and counting) of constant research. Here’s a shortlist of stuff I perused to whip as much verisimilitude as possible into the manuscript:

habits-or-rabbits asked:

List 5 things that make you happy, then put this in the inbox of the last 10 people that reblogged from you!! Spread happiness

I like doing these things so uwu

> Puppies. Aka small bundles of joy and sunshine.

> Sitting in front of the fireplace. It’s very pleasing.

> Adam Rosner. Amazing and creative guy that made one of my favorite series. Has a great sense of humor.

> Honeysuckle flowers. I love their scent.

> The You Could Stop At Five Or Six Stores montage. I think it’s golden.

Gilad Rosner: In the age of connected devices, will our privacy regulations be good enough? Controversial ideas for privacy protection.

Gilad Rosner: In the age of connected devices, will our privacy regulations be good enough? Controversial ideas for privacy protection.

Did you read a privacy policy in full today? According to research from Carnegie Mellon in 2008, it will take you an average of 76 work days to read all the privacy policies you’ll encounter this…

View On WordPress

hrc.org
Rick Santorum and Marco Rubio: Two Peas in a Pod | Human Rights Campaign
Rick Santorum and Marco Rubio share a disturbing worldview, where LGBT people are second-class citizens unworthy of the most fundamental rights and basic protections
By Human Rights Campaign

HRC released the following statement upon reports that former Senator Rick Santorum is suspending his campaign for president and endorsing Marco Rubio.

“Rick Santorum and Marco Rubio share a disturbing worldview, where LGBT people are second-class citizens unworthy of the most fundamental rights and basic protections. Not only do they oppose marriage equality, they believe in a world where it’s acceptable for someone to be fired or evicted from their homes because of who we are or whom we love.  That’s fundamentally wrong, and today’s endorsement is only further proof that electing Marco Rubio would be a disaster for LGBT Americans,” said JoDee Winterhof, Senior Vice President for Policy and Political Affairs. “We can’t allow Marco Rubio to revoke, repeal, and overturn the gains made on LGBT equality during President Obama’s two terms in office. ”

Polling done by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner for HRC shows that a 55 percent majority of voters are less likely to support a candidate for president who opposes allowing same-sex couples to marry. This majority includes Independents, married women and white millennials. All of these groups voted Republican in the last congressional election. Meanwhile, Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) has reported that a 75 percent majority of Granite Staters support marriage equality. No other state showed stronger support for marriage equality in PRRI’s state-based polling.

On Marriage Equality

Rubio Said He “The Most Important This The Next President Will Do” Is Appoint Justices To The Supreme Court Who Will Disagree With Current Court’s Thinking On Obergefell. In an interview with CBN, Rubio said: “And beyond it, I think one of the biggest things the next President is going to do is appoint justices to the Supreme Court – justices who understand that the Constitution is a living and breathing document. It is a document of limitation and it’s supposed to be interpreted and applied based on its original intent. And there is no way that you can read that Constitution and deduce from it that there is constitutional right to an abortion, or a constitutional right to marry someone of the same sex. And what you have is a Supreme Court that wanted to reach a certain policy outcome and so creatively manipulated the Constitution to discover a right that for over two centuries, some of the most brilliant minds and legal history didn’t find. So you need judges that understand how constitutionally flawed that those two kinds of rulings and others have been and that’s what the most important thing the next President will do is appoint Supreme court Justices that actually will apply the constitution irrespective of their personal feelings about the issue.” [CBN, The Brody File, 12/5/2015; VIDEO]

Santorum Compared Lincoln Passing Anti-Slavery Legislation After Dred Scott Decision To Him Passing Anti-Marriage Equality Legislation After Obergefell Decision. At the Voter’s First Forum in New Hampshire, Santorum said, “‘Justice Roberts said it best, ‘There was no constitutional basis for this decision,‘’ Santorum said. ‘They also said that was the case was for Roe v. Wade. They said it was the same kind of logic used in the Dred Scott case. So whose side are you going to be on? People who decided the Dred Scott case and Justice Taney, or are you going to be on the side of Abraham Lincoln?’….Invoking Lincoln’s first inaugural address, Santorum said Lincoln expressed opposition to the Dred Scott decision during the speech and later ‘went on to pass a bill to free the slaves.’ ‘Are we suggesting that we’re going to be held by a Supreme Court that Abraham Lincoln wasn’t held by when an unjust and unconstitutional decision is handed down?’ Santorum said. ‘In my opinion, we cannot be.’” [Voters First Forum, Manchester, NH; Washington Blade, 8/4/2015; VIDEO]

On Kim Davis

Rubio Said Of Clerk Refusing To Issue Marriage Certificates “While The Clerk’s Office Has Governmental Duty To Carry Out The Law…There Should Be A Way To Protect The Religious Freedom And Conscience Rights Of Individuals Working In The Office.” The New York Times reported: “Senator Marco Rubio of Florida said on Wednesday that the government should respect the beliefs of the Kentucky county clerk who has denied marriage licenses to same-sex couples, arguing that society needs to accommodate public officials who object to carrying out duties they say violate their religious beliefs. ‘We should seek a balance between government’s responsibility to abide by the laws of our republic and allowing people to stand by their religious convictions,’ Mr. Rubio said in a statement to The New York Times, his first public remarks on the case. ‘While the clerk’s office has a governmental duty to carry out the law,’ he added, ‘there should be a way to protect the religious freedom and conscience rights of individuals working in the office.’” [New York Times, 9/2/2015]

Santorum Called Kentucky Clerk’s Actions “Heroic…Putting Her In Jail Is Ridiculous. It Is An Extreme Position.” The Hill reported: “Former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) says he stands with Kim Davis, the Kentucky county clerk jailed for refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses. Santorum said that law enforcement officials should respect Rowan County clerk Kim Davis’s religious faith rather than punishing it.  ‘What Kim Davis did, in my opinion, was heroic,’ he told host Chris Cuomo on CNN’s ‘New Day’ that morning. ‘I commend her for standing up for her principles,’ the 2016 GOP presidential candidate added. ‘Putting her in jail is ridiculous.  It is an extreme position.’ […]Santorum argued on Friday that the landmark legal decision violates religious liberty and First Amendment rights. ‘We have a situation in which the Supreme Court acted unconstitutionally,’ he said. ‘Why are we putting someone in jail because they have a religious exception?’” [The Hill, 9/4/2015; CNN, New Day, 9/4/2015; VIDEO]

On Religious Refusal Laws

Rubio Signed A Pledge Vowing To Push For Passage Of The First Amendment Defense Act In His First 100 Days In Office. According to the American Principles Project, Rubio was one of six signers of their pledge to push for the First Amendment Defense Act in the first 100 days of their presidency. “American Principles Project has joined together with Heritage Action for America, the action arm of the Heritage Foundation, and FRC Action, the legislative affiliate of the Family Research Council, to invite each of the candidates running for President to sign the following pledge: ‘If elected, I pledge to push for the passage of the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA) and sign it into law during the first 100 days of my term as President.’” [American Principles Project, Accessed 1/7/2016]

Santorum, As President, Would Sign Into Law The First Amendment Defense Act. According to MSNBC: “As president, Santorum said he would in his first 100 days sign into law the First Amendment Defense Act – one of five points laid out by NOM president Brian S. Brown to undermine the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in the gay marriage case, Obergefell v. Hodges. That law, as Brown envisions it, would ‘stop government discrimination against individuals, organizations and businesses that believe marriage is between a man and a woman.’ Santorum also said he would issue executive orders to make sure people were ‘given wide berth to practice their faith.’ ‘I will use the bully pulpit not to do what this president has done – to promote global climate change ideas or trans-fats or whatever else the science of the day is – but to rally the American people around this idea,’ Santorum said of strengthening religious freedom and the nuclear family. ‘That is using power for good.’” [MSNBC, 7/2/2015]

arxiv.org
[1602.01632] Magnetic anisotropy in the frustrated spin chain compound $β$-TeVO$_4$

[ Authors ]
F. Weickert, M. Jaime, N. Harrison, B.L. Scott, A. Leitmäe, I. Heinmaa, R. Stern, O. Janson, H. Berger, H. Rosner, A. A. Tsirlin
[ Abstract ]
Isotropic and anisotropic magnetic behavior of the frustrated spin chain compound $\beta$-TeVO$_4$ is reported. Three magnetic transitions observed in zero magnetic field are tracked in fields applied along different crystallographic directions using magnetization, heat capacity, and magnetostriction measurements. Qualitatively different temperature-field diagrams are obtained below 10 T for the field applied along $a$ or $b$ and along $c$, respectively. In contrast, a nearly isotropic high-field phase emerges above 18 T and persists up to the saturation that occurs around 22.5 T. Upon cooling in low fields, the transitions at $T_{\rm N1}$ and $T_{\rm N2}$ toward the spin-density-wave and stripe phases are of the second order, whereas the transition at $T_{\rm N3}$ toward the helical state is of the first order and entails a lattice component. Our microscopic analysis identifies frustrated $J_1-J_2$ spin chains with a sizable antiferromagnetic interchain coupling in the $bc$ plane and ferromagnetic couplings along the $a$ direction. The competition between these ferromagnetic interchain couplings and the helical order within the chain underlies the incommensurate order along the $a$-direction, as observed experimentally. Although a helical state is triggered by the competition between $J_1$ and $J_2$ within the chain, the plane of the helix is not uniquely defined because of competing magnetic anisotropies. Using high-resolution synchrotron diffraction and $^{125}$Te nuclear magnetic resonance, we also demonstrate that the crystal structure of $\beta$-TeVO$_4$ does not change down to 10 K, and the orbital state of V$^{4+}$ is preserved.