He called Hillary Clinton a crook. You bought it.
Then he paid $25 million to settle a fraud lawsuit.
He said he’d release his tax returns, eventually.
You bought it.
He hasn’t, and says he never will.
He said he’d divest himself from his financial empire, to avoid any conflicts of interest.
You bought it.
He is still heavily involved in his businesses, manipulates the stock market on a daily basis, and has more conflicts of interest than can even be counted.
He said Clinton was in the pockets of Goldman Sachs, and would do whatever they said.
You bought it.
He then proceeded to put half a dozen Goldman Sachs executives in positions of power in his administration.
He said he’d surround himself with all the best and smartest people.
You bought it.
He nominated theocratic loon Mike Pence for Vice President. A white supremacist named Steve Bannon is his most trusted confidant. Dr. Ben Carson, the world’s greatest idiot savant brain surgeon, is in charge of HUD. Russian quisling Rex Tillerson is Secretary of State.
He said he’d be his own man, beholden to no one.
You bought it.
He then appointed Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education, whose only “qualifications” were the massive amounts of cash she donated to his campaign.
He said he would “drain the swamp” of Washington insiders.
You bought it.
He then admitted that was just a corny slogan he said to fire up the rubes during the rallies, and that he didn’t mean it.
He said he knew more about strategy and terrorism than the Generals did.
You bought it.
He promptly gave the green light to a disastrous raid in Yemen- even though all his Generals said it would be a terrible idea. This raid resulted in the deaths of a Navy SEAL, an 8-year old American girl, and numerous civilians. The actual target of the raid escaped, and no useful intel was gained.
He said Hillary Clinton couldn’t be counted on in times of crisis.
You bought it.
He didn’t even bother overseeing that raid in Yemen; and instead spent the time hate-tweeting the New York Times, and sleeping.
He called CNN, the Washington Post and the New York Times “fake news” and said they were his enemy.
You bought it.
He now gets all his information from Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, and InfoWars.
He promised to never be the kind of president who took cushy vacations on the taxpayer’s dime, not when there was so much important work to be done.
You bought it.
He took his first vacation after 11 days in office.
On the taxpayer’s dime.
And went golfing.
To become law, Trumpcare has to go through 4 additional steps:
1. Pass an amended version in the Senate
2. Go to “conference“ to hammer out differences between the House and Senate
3. Pass in the House again
4. Pass in the Senate again
I hope you’ll be there every step of the way, until Trumpcare collapses under the weight of its own cruelty.
Here’s what you can do:
11 days of congressional recess starts today. At this very moment, your Representatives are on flights back home to your district. Over the next week they’ll be holding fundraisers and working out of their district offices. As of today, only 5 members of Congress have scheduled town halls.
First, call on them publicly to have a town hall to explain their vote on Trumpcare. If they won’t, show up at their district office and give clear feedback.
When these members are forced to vote again on Trumpcare, they will look back to the responses of their constituents this week.
To help you make your voice heard loud and clear over the next 11 days, Indivisibleguide.com has put together an updated Trumpcare resources webpage (below). Please make use of it.
Here’s another whopper from Trump today: “Beyond the severe energy restrictions inflicted by the Paris accord, it includes yet another scheme to redistribute wealth out of the United States through the so-called ‘green climate fund’ — nice name — which calls for developed countries to send $100 billion to developing countries,” Trump said.
In the Paris Accord, all developed countries (not just the United States) promised to eventually raise $100 billion a year globally to help developing countries mitigate climate change.
The United States has already given the Green Climate Fund $1 billion already. Trump described this amount as “costing the United States a vast fortune.” Rubbish it’s a rounding error in a budget where total federal spending in the 2016 fiscal year was $3.9 trillion.
There are many reasons this fund makes sense. First, it’s only fair. So far, the largest global polluters by far have been developed nations like the United States.
Moreover, fast-growing countries like India are building the next generation of power plants, and the Paris Agreement won’t work unless they decide to forgo dirtier forms of energy like coal. The goal of the funding is to help nudge developing countries towards cleaner energy like wind and solar instead.
If the funding succeeds in lowering emissions and preventing a major temperature increase, the United States reaps the economic benefits as well.
And by helping countries that are especially vulnerable prepare for the effects of climate change, we would prevent or minimize future refugee crises that could destabilize regions and spill over into the developed world.
When Americans think of how the economic rules are
stacked against them, they naturally think of Wall Street.
When the Wall Street bubble burst in 2008 because of
excessive risk-taking, millions of working Americans lost their jobs, health
insurance, savings, and homes.
But The Street is back to many of its old tricks. And
its lobbyists are busily rolling back the Dodd-Frank
Act, intended to prevent another crash.
The biggest Wall Street banks are also much larger. In
1990, the five biggest banks had 10 percent of all of the nation’s banking
assets. Now, they have 44 percent – more than they had at the time of the 2008 crash.
They have a virtual lock on taking
companies public, play key roles pricing commodities, are involved in all major
U.S. mergers and acquisitions and many overseas, and responsible for most of
the trading in derivatives and other complex financial instruments.
as they’ve gained dominance over the financial sector, they’ve
become more politically potent. They’re major sources of campaign funds for
both Republicans and Democrats.
Wall Street banks supply personnel for key
economic posts in Republican and Democratic administrations, and lucrative
employment to economic officials when they leave Washington.
It’s a vicious cycle. The bigger they get, the more likely
it is that government will bail them out if they get into trouble again. This,
in turn, confers on them an ever-larger competitive advantage over smaller,
community-minded banks that don’t have the implied guarantee – which gives the biggest banks
even more economic and political power.
What should be done?
First, resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act that used to
separate investment from commercial banking.
Second, put a small sales tax on every financial
transaction. This would discourage speculation and slow down the casino. Not
incidentally, such a tax could generate billions of dollars a year for, say,
But the most important thing we should do is bust up the
big banks. Any bank that’s too big to fail is too big, period.
Antitrust law should be used the way it was against
the big oil trusts and the telephone monopoly. The idea was to prevent too much
economic and political power from concentrating in too few hands. And that’s
precisely the problem with Wall Street.
The only sure way to stop excessive risk-taking on Wall
Street so you don’t risk losing your job or your savings or your home, is to put
an end to the excessive economic and political power of Wall Street.
A Yiannopoulos, Bannon, Trump Plot to Control American Universities?
The events at
Berkeley Wednesday night have been a boon to Milos Yiannopoulos, of Breitbart
News, and to Steve Bannon, formerly head of Breitbart News and now Trump’s consigliere.
As you may know, on Wednesday night, February 1, Berkeley gave Yiannopoulos a major forum to spout his racist
and misogynistic vitriol. But police had to cancel the talk because
about 150 masked agitators threw Molotov cocktails, smashed windows where
Yiannopoulos was scheduled to speak, and threw rocks and fireworks at the
police – delivering made-for-TV images of a riot.
a promotional Breitbart story that ran before the event, Yiannopoulos was going
to “call for the withdrawal of federal grants and the prosecution of university
officials who endanger their students with their policies.”
exactly what Trump did via tweet early the next morning: “If U.C.
Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people
with a different point of view — NO FEDERAL FUNDS?”
Yiannopoulos had a friendly interview on Fox News’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight” –
a show that, according to the Washington Post, has ridden anger at left-wing
activism into best-in-class prime time ratings.
The conversation focused on how Berkeley proved the point that the Left was ceding its right to
federal grants by cracking down on free speech.
Which raises the possibility that Yiannopoulos and Brietbart were
in cahoots with the agitators, in order to lay the groundwork for a Trump
crackdown on universities and their federal funding.
Thursday night on CNN, I said “I wouldn’t bet against” that possibility. Almost immediately an
indignant article appeared in Breitbart News, misleadingly headlined “Robert
Reich Lies, Claims Breitbart News Organized Berkeley Riots.”
Hmmm. Connect these dots:
(1) Yinnopoulos writes for Breitbart News, which Steve Bannon – Trump’s strategy director – ran before joining Trump.
(2) Before Yiannopoulos speaks at Berkeley, Breitbart publishes an
article saying that Yiannopoulos will call for the withdrawal of federal grants
and the prosecution of university officials who endanger their students with
(3) Berkeley opens its doors to Yiannopoulos, but campus
police have to cancel the event because of masked agitators.
(4) Hours later, Trump
issues a misleading tweet, accusing the university of not allowing free speech
and promoting violence against innocent people with different views, and threatening to withhold federal funds.
next night, Yiannopoulos on Fox News says the incident proves that universities
like Berkeley don’t deserve federal grants by cracking down on free speech.
That same night, on CNN, I raise the possibility that Yiannopoulos and Breitbart could
have been collaborating with the agitators – saying “I wouldn’t bet against it.” This generates a belligerent column in
Breitbart with a misleading headline calling me a liar for claiming that Breitbart News organized the riots.
I don’t want to add to the conspiratorial musings of so many about this very conspiratorial administration, but it strikes me there may be something worrying going on here.
Make no mistake: The Senate’s bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act is not a healthcare bill. It’s a tax cut for the wealthiest Americans, paid for by a dramatic reduction in healthcare funding for approximately 23 million poor, disabled, and working middle class Americans. America’s wealthiest taxpayers (earning more than $200,000 a year, $250,000 for couples) would get a tax cut totaling $346 billion over 10 years.
If enacted, it would be one of the largest single transfers of wealth to the rich from the middle class and poor in American history, at a time when the rich already have a higher percentage of the nation’s wealth and income than in over a century.
Mitch McConnell – the Senate leader who refused to hold hearings on Obama’s Supreme Court pick and then pushed Neil Gorsuch through by changing the Senate rules on Supreme Court confirmations – has scheduled no hearings on this bill. He has shut out not only his own Republican colleagues but also major hospitals, physician groups, consumer advocates and organizations representing millions of patients with heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and other serious illnesses.
The core of the bill is a huge reduction in Medicaid – America’s healthcare program for the poor – even beyond the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act.
Reducing the federal government’s share of Medicaid is not reform, by any sane person’s definition. It is an enormous cost shift to the states – many of whom will not make up the difference. Among the programs sure to be cut are state responses to the opioid addiction crisis, of which more than 40 percent of the cost has been covered by Medicaid.
If this shameful bill is enacted, Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump – as well as every Republican senator who signs on –will bear the burden of tens of thousands of deaths that could have been avoided were they not so determined to make rich Americans even richer.