The Los Angeles Times has just laid off its only staff reporter dedicated to covering art. Museum directors across Southern California wrote this letter to the editor of the newspaper in protest. 

Sign the petition to insist that the paper restores the art reporter position.

Mr. Davan Maharaj, Editor, Los Angeles Times  Dear Mr. Maharaj, 

We were dismayed to learn that your art reporter, Jori Finkel, was let go in the Los Angeles Times’ most recent round of layoffs. We are writing to you now to share our deep concerns about this decision and to call for the reinstatement of this position. 

Jori is the go-to source here for art-world news and analysis, with articles that are consistently insightful and accessible and a byline that is read around the world. Her early coverage in 2011 of the Getty’s ambitious $10-million Pacific Standard Time initiative and the many collaborating museum exhibitions helped to shape much of the national and international coverage that followed. Since then, she has been breaking major museum news and writing must-read artist profiles, informed by a broad understanding of art history and the current scene as well as the art market. These stories give context for reviews by the paper’s critics – Christopher Knight most notably. Jori’s work and that of the critics go hand-in-hand to provide a sophisticated and robust picture of Los Angeles’s ever-expanding art scene. 

It is especially unfortunate to see you dismiss your only staff reporter specializing in art now that Los Angeles is increasingly recognized worldwide as the most influential center for contemporary art and culture. For instance, just as she was being laid off, the New York Times dedicated nearly three full pages to L.A.’s significance within the international art world. Without a dedicated art reporter the competitive positioning of the paper is seriously undermined. (It’s also worth noting that some of the potential buyers of the L.A. Times are art collectors and follow arts news with special interest.) 

Art and culture also have a serious economic impact on this city. According to the most recent Otis Report on the Creative Economy, one in eight regional jobs in L.A. and Orange County are generated by the creative industry, which has a total economic output of over $230 billion annually. The visual arts in Southern California have proven particularly rich, varied and impactful. Certainly a world-class city with world-class art deserves a newspaper that fully understands that impact. 

As Los Angeles Times readers and advertisers, we expect more from the paper. Moving forward we hope that the L.A. Times restores this important position and better recognizes its responsibility to cover the art and culture that shapes our creative city. 

Ann Philbin 
Director, Hammer Museum 

Jim Cuno 
President and CEO of the J. Paul Getty Trust 

Timothy Potts 
Director of the J. Paul Getty Museum 

Michael Govan 
CEO and Wallis Annenberg Director, Los Angeles County Museum of Art 

Jeffrey Deitch 
Director, Museum of Contemporary Art 

Steven Koblik 
President, The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens 

Kevin Salatino 
Director of the Art Collections, The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens 

Marla Berns 
Shirley & Ralph Shapiro Director, Fowler Museum at UCLA 

Elsa Longhauser 
Executive Director, Santa Monica Museum of Art 

Charmaine Jefferson 
Executive Director, California African American Museum 

Joanne Heyler 
Director/Chief Curator, The Broad Art Foundation 

Dennis Szakacs 
Director and CEO, Orange County Museum of Art 

Hugh Davies 
The David C. Copley Director, Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego 

Steven Nash 
Director, Palm Springs Art Museum 

Larry J. Feinberg 
Robert and Mercedes Eichholz Director and CEO, Santa Barbara Museum of Art

Kurt had been in a rut ever since his last Skype session with Blaine hadn’t gone over too smoothly. Blaine had berated him for the tattoo and Kurt didn’t even like to think about when Blaine had saw the piercing and almost had a panic attack over that as well. Yelling at Kurt for not asking him first because they were a couple and they made their decisions together. If that were true; Blaine would have asked him before going off to cheat on him but Kurt tried to leave that in the past. He didn’t want to bring up anything else for them to argue even more than they already had been that weekend.

Kurt told Rachel about what Blaine had said—who also agreed he was crazy—and Rachel only left Kurt alone in the apartment with some encouraging words about if he didn’t understand he wasn’t worth marrying. Kurt never thought about anything like that before in his life. That Blaine wouldn’t understand and it would drive them further apart. Kurt however didn’t get the tattoo for Blaine, it wasn’t to impress him or to up his lack in sex appeal. Hell, Kurt wasn’t exactly sure why he had done it but he didn’t regret it even if Blaine thought it was self-mutilation and wanted Kurt to take the bar out of his tongue and pay to remove the tattoo. It bothered him more than Kurt forgave and accepted Blaine after the horrible thing he had done and Kurt hadn’t done anything as bad. It wasn’t like he slept with the artist who had done it. Just exchanged numbers in case he ever wanted a new tattoo done.

However, Kurt couldn’t help being upset about what Blaine had told him. Grabbing ice cream and vodka from the freezer and ordering out for pizza so he could wallow in self-pity. Even finding himself texting Elliot to come over just so he could complain about how horrible Blaine was being to him about everything. Finding himself without Rachel to completely confide he enjoyed now having male friend to do the same in, especially since his friendship with Adam had gone south since his engagement.