Fundraiser-Dinner

March 9th - Day 68

Yesterday, I got out and about with my mom. And the reason was to go get brownie mix. Because tonight at church, we are having a fundraiser bake sale. Hot dogs, chips, and bunches of cookies. Chili, onions, anything you could want. We had such a fantastic selection of snacks and goodies. I myself ate WAY too much. But it was delicious.

dude knew his audience
  • me:*at fundraiser dinner/auction to benefit AR Advocates for Children and Families*
  • host/local personality Craig O'Neill:Our second auction item is a front row seat to see Donald Trump when he comes to town.
  • me:*groans and rolls eyes*
  • Craig:And you'll get to wear a pagan Kali mask.
  • me:....ok that's actually pretty good.
Find Your Purpose By Helping Others

External image

I remember how in November 2013 my wife (and fellow Intentional Insights co-founder) and I, together with a great bunch of people, organized a spaghetti dinner fundraiser at our Unitarian Universalist church in Columbus, OH. The event was a big success, with more than 120 attendees, a music program, a raffle and silent auction. We raised over $2000 for the Mid-Ohio Food Bank. It might surprise you that the dinner organizers and volunteers came from Columbus secular humanist, atheist, and skeptic groups, including the UU secular group, as this religious denomination embraces believers and non-believers alike. The dinner honored the Flying Spaghetti Monster, a light satire meant to promote reason-based scientific education in biology classes. No belief in a deity was required to participate in community-oriented civic engagement at this dinner – in fact, the event was explicitly oriented toward secular-minded folks.

The Scientific Benefits of Helping Others

Studies indicate that opportunities to serve others, whether in civic, private, or professional settings, as well as charitable giving, result in a stronger sense of purpose and meaning in life, leading to better mental and physical well-being. This does not mean that serving others is necessary for a strong sense of meaning and purpose, but such civic engagement generally helps contribute to gaining this sense. Volunteering together with others in your community enables the creation of strong social bonds, which adds further to a sense of meaningfulness. In the United States, religion offers the main venue for community belonging, and also for working with others to pursue civic engagement. Civic engagement ranges from donating one’s time to bring about a better world such as through the spaghetti dinner fundraiser described above, to pursuing social justice through advocacy and lobbying, as exemplified by BREAD, the main interfaith social justice organization in Central Ohio. No wonder that the majority of the research indicates that church-going believers in the US generally have a stronger sense of life meaning. However, as my research illustrates, other societies create many alternative venues besides religious ones that provided similar opportunities and the benefits that can result.

Helping Others In the United States

So is there something similar happening in North America? Here’s the thing: there are more and more secular communities around, and they are actively participating in social justice activities. Just here in Columbus, besides the FSM dinner, the Humanist Community of Central Ohio does regular blood donations, which were featured in the main newspaper in Central Ohio, participates in LGBTQ activism, and promotes other forms of social and economic civic engagement. The local chapter of the United Coalition of Reason hosted a walk-a-thon to benefit the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, part of a broader national effort by the Foundation Beyond Belief. And COUNT, a Columbus secular group, is explicitly dedicated to volunteering. My wife and I have also led a year-long effort to get BREAD to open up its doors to secular folks, and then successfully mobilized a large contingent of non-believers to attend this event. National secular organizations, such as the Secular Student Alliance and the Secular Coalition for America, increasingly promote civic engagement. More and more opportunities are emerging for nonbelievers who want to volunteer together with others who share their value system, whether for more secular-themed causes such as Camp Quest, reason-based summer camps for children and youth, or social justice in general.

Effective Altruism

A particularly promising new trend in civic engagement is Effective Altruism. This movement is devoted to using well-reasoned, evidence-based approaches to find the most effective ways to improve the world, especially through charitable giving. Prominent notables are turning to Effective Altruism as the most reason-based, rational strategy of giving. Effective Altruism is endorsed by famous philosophers such as Peter Singer.

Practical Take-Aways

What are the practical takeaways here? Whether you are a believer or secular, to gain a greater sense of purpose and meaning in life it helps to participate in civic engagement with others from your community. It might be more challenging if you are a non-believer, but there are plenty of local secular groups around the United States that offer opportunities to contribute to social justice on a local level. Take the initiative to push your local communities to do service for the social good. You will likely help yourself and others find a more powerful perception of life meaning, increase mental and physical well-being for yourself and others, and you can gain greater agency through achieving your personal and social goals. Here, altruism and self-orientation combine for the win!

  • Have you done any volunteering with others in your social circle?
  • If so, what benefits do you think you gained?
  • If not, what are practical steps you can take to help yourself and others in your social circle engage in social service activities?

Featured photo credit: Community via flickr.com

The post Find Your Purpose By Helping Others appeared first on Lifehack.

via Lifehack http://ift.tt/1mfgVgU


External image
External image


from Blogger http://ift.tt/1KZxIem
lifehack.org
Find Your Purpose By Helping Others

External image

  • Studies indicate that opportunities to serve others whether in civic, private, or professional settings, as well as charitable giving, result in a stronger sense of purpose and meaning in life, leading to better mental and physical well-being
  • I remember how in November 2013 my wife (and fellow Intentional Insights co-founder) and I, together with a great bunch of people, organized a spaghetti dinner fundraiser at our Unitarian Universalist church in Columbus, OH.
  • Studies indicate that opportunities to serve others whether in civic, private, or professional settings, as well as charitable giving, result in a stronger sense of purpose and meaning in life, leading to better mental and physical well-being

[Viral Now] Find Your Purpose By Helping Others

External image

I remember how in November 2013 my wife (and fellow Intentional Insights co-founder) and I, together with a great bunch of people, organized a spaghetti dinner fundraiser at our Unitarian Universalist church in Columbus, OH. The event was a big success, with more than 120 attendees, a music program, a raffle and silent auction. We raised over $2000 for the Mid-Ohio Food Bank. It might surprise you that the dinner organizers and volunteers came from Columbus secular humanist, atheist, and skeptic groups, including the UU secular group, as this religious denomination embraces believers and non-believers alike. The dinner honored the Flying Spaghetti Monster, a light satire meant to promote reason-based scientific education in biology classes. No belief in a deity was required to participate in community-oriented civic engagement at this dinner – in fact, the event was explicitly oriented toward secular-minded folks.

The Scientific Benefits of Helping Others

Studies indicate that opportunities to serve others, whether in civic, private, or professional settings, as well as charitable giving, result in a stronger sense of purpose and meaning in life, leading to better mental and physical well-being. This does not mean that serving others is necessary for a strong sense of meaning and purpose, but such civic engagement generally helps contribute to gaining this sense. Volunteering together with others in your community enables the creation of strong social bonds, which adds further to a sense of meaningfulness. In the United States, religion offers the main venue for community belonging, and also for working with others to pursue civic engagement. Civic engagement ranges from donating one’s time to bring about a better world such as through the spaghetti dinner fundraiser described above, to pursuing social justice through advocacy and lobbying, as exemplified by BREAD, the main interfaith social justice organization in Central Ohio. No wonder that the majority of the research indicates that church-going believers in the US generally have a stronger sense of life meaning. However, as my research illustrates, other societies create many alternative venues besides religious ones that provided similar opportunities and the benefits that can result.

Helping Others In the United States

So is there something similar happening in North America? Here’s the thing: there are more and more secular communities around, and they are actively participating in social justice activities. Just here in Columbus, besides the FSM dinner, the Humanist Community of Central Ohio does regular blood donations, which were featured in the main newspaper in Central Ohio, participates in LGBTQ activism, and promotes other forms of social and economic civic engagement. The local chapter of the United Coalition of Reason hosted a walk-a-thon to benefit the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, part of a broader national effort by the Foundation Beyond Belief. And COUNT, a Columbus secular group, is explicitly dedicated to volunteering. My wife and I have also led a year-long effort to get BREAD to open up its doors to secular folks, and then successfully mobilized a large contingent of non-believers to attend this event. National secular organizations, such as the Secular Student Alliance and the Secular Coalition for America, increasingly promote civic engagement. More and more opportunities are emerging for nonbelievers who want to volunteer together with others who share their value system, whether for more secular-themed causes such as Camp Quest, reason-based summer camps for children and youth, or social justice in general.

Effective Altruism

A particularly promising new trend in civic engagement is Effective Altruism. This movement is devoted to using well-reasoned, evidence-based approaches to find the most effective ways to improve the world, especially through charitable giving. Prominent notables are turning to Effective Altruism as the most reason-based, rational strategy of giving. Effective Altruism is endorsed by famous philosophers such as Peter Singer.

Practical Take-Aways

What are the practical takeaways here? Whether you are a believer or secular, to gain a greater sense of purpose and meaning in life it helps to participate in civic engagement with others from your community. It might be more challenging if you are a non-believer, but there are plenty of local secular groups around the United States that offer opportunities to contribute to social justice on a local level. Take the initiative to push your local communities to do service for the social good. You will likely help yourself and others find a more powerful perception of life meaning, increase mental and physical well-being for yourself and others, and you can gain greater agency through achieving your personal and social goals. Here, altruism and self-orientation combine for the win!

  • Have you done any volunteering with others in your social circle?
  • If so, what benefits do you think you gained?
  • If not, what are practical steps you can take to help yourself and others in your social circle engage in social service activities?

Featured photo credit: Community via flickr.com

The post Find Your Purpose By Helping Others appeared first on Lifehack.

External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image

Source: Lifehack.org

Opposition parties say already declare political funds

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 1 — Federal opposition parties said there is no need for them to take the lead and publicly declare their political funding despite Umno’s donation controversy, insisting that the source of their finances was already commonly known.

Rejecting comparisons to Umno’s multi-billion political donations, Klang DAP lawmaker Charles Santiago said his party has always disclosed the amount raised from fundraising dinners and events immediately after these are held.

“We are not a rich party and we obtain our funds through the right channels and that is the public from dinners and other events.

“And at the end of the function, we will tell the people how much we have raised,” he told Malay Mail Online when contacted, adding that he did not see the need to announce the amount again.

Instead, Santiago suggested for the Election Commission (EC) to step up and address the issue of political funding involving foreign funds by imposing a clear guideline on the matter.

“The EC can impose a rule on this as at the moment there is no clear guideline on foreign funds,” he said.

PAS vice-president Datuk Mohd Amar Abdullah also said the Islamist party is different from Umno as it does not receive contributions from the corporate sector or foreign funding like the latter.

Instead, he said PAS drew its resources from members and donations during political rallies.

Questioning what PAS has left to declare when it already announces the funds raised from ceramah participants on the spot, Mohd Amar also asserted that PAS has “no connection” with foreign organisations and never had foreign funding.

“If there are laws that make a declaration compulsory, if there are any contributions, we will declare. Every party has to follow the law,” he said.

Another PAS vice-president, Idris Ahmad, agreed with the need to declare fund sources for the upcoming general election, but said “Only hope that it has to be transparent and fair to all. Don’t just act on the opposition. (While) the government is let off.”

The Bukit Gantang MP said the party already makes declarations regarding its election funding to the EC, further stating that PAS discloses the details of its cash flow through its annual general meeting’s report.

Meanwhile, PKR strategy director Sim Tze Tzin suggested that the opposition-led state governments of Selangor and Penang adopt the method of financing political parties on a yearly basis and act as models for the federal government.

The Bayan Baru MP said this approach that has been implemented in countries like Germany would not only reveal details of political funds channelled to parties, but will also help eradicate corruption.

“In Germany, the government pays 5 euros for each vote garnered by a political party and that money is paid to allow parties to operate annually.

“Selangor and Penang can follow similarly and the people will be able to keep track of the monies going to these party during state assembly sittings and this won’t allow any room for foreign influences,” he said.

It is unclear if public fundraising is the primary source of income for the parties that claim so, as none in Malaysia publicly declares how it is financed in its entirety, due to the absence of laws governing political financing.

Last Friday, Umno supreme council member Datuk Abdul Aziz Kaprawi disclosed that a part of the US$681 million (RM2.08 billion) cash gift from Saudi Arabia’s royal house to the prime minister in 2013 was used for an election.

Abdul Aziz was asked about the discrepancy of some US$61 million, following the Attorney-General Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali’s recent disclosure that an unutilised sum amounting to US$620 million (RM2.03 billion) was later returned in August 2013.

Apandi had earlier on Tuesday declared that there was no criminal wrongdoing in the cash transfers into Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s private bank accounts and said he would instruct the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) to close the case, but the latter said it will refer the decision to its Operations Review Panel for a review as part of its standard procedure.

Obama vs. Jefferson on Islamic terror

External image

Democrats have long heralded Thomas Jefferson (along with Andrew Jackson) as the founder of their Party. i They traditionally hold annual Jefferson-Jackson Day fundraising dinners, and President Obama is one of their most sought after speakers. But this past year, Democrats began to remove any mention of Jefferson’s name from their functions. ii They claim that this is because Jefferson was a bigoted racist, iii but this excuse is historically inaccurate, based on an errant modern portrayal. iv

If you doubt this, ask yourself why black civil rights leaders over the past two centuries (such as Frederick Douglass, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, Benjamin Banneker, Francis Grimke, Henry Highland Garnett, and so many others) openly praised Jefferson as a racial civil rights pioneer and champion, v as did abolitionists such as John Quincy Adams, Abraham Lincoln, and others. viThey recognized that Jefferson led a vocal lifelong campaign to emancipate all slaves in the United States, but that the laws of Virginia prevented him from freeing his own slaves. (All of this is covered in my new book, “The Jefferson Lies.”)

The real reason that Democrats should discard Jefferson is that he held nearly no policy position similar to those Democrats hold today. Consider fifteen major categories where the policies of Presidents Jefferson and Obama are opposite.

1. RADICAL ISLAM AND THE WAR ON TERROR. President Obama’s approach to the War on Terror throughout his two terms has been non-engagement. As described by one national political observer, he “feels the U.S. should do as little as is politically feasible in battling these groups overseas. Bump off some of their bigwigs by drones, bomb them from time to time with air strikes and provide a bit of training and military assistance to their foes.” vii In attempting to negotiate and pacify rather than annihilate and defeat, he has spent $779 billion on the War on Terror, viii making it a big-ticket item in his administration.

When President Jefferson took office in 1801, he had been personally dealing with Muslim nations for almost two decades, and the terrorism issue was also a big-ticket item for him as well: twenty percent of the federal budget was being spent to mollify radical Islamicists. ix

By way of background, in 1784 shortly after the close of the American Revolution, Congress dispatched Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Benjamin Franklin as diplomats x to negotiate with five Muslim nations attacking American ships and citizens in the Mediterranean area xi (the same general region where conflict is still occurring today). At that time, America had no military capable of traveling overseas to destroy the seedbed of the war-mongering Islamicists plaguing Americans, so America resorted to large payments of money and goods in attempts to purchase peace and end the attacks. This unhappy policy, adopted under the Confederation Congress, continued under President George Washington.

Washington expressed his open frustration with this approach, declaring:

Would to Heaven we had a navy able to reform those enemies to mankind, or crush them into non-existence. xii

As he neared the close of his presidency, he requested that Congress appropriate money to build a navy capable of traveling to the Mediterranean to smash the Islamicists. xiii Congress did, and the navy was constructed under President John Adams, xiv who became known as “The Father of the Navy.” xv But Adams refused to use the new navy, continuing the payments instead.

When Jefferson became president, his long experience with Muslim leaders and nations taught him there were three possible solutions: (1) continue to rely on negotiations and diplomacy, which also required large concessions of rights and payments of monies in hopes of placating the terrorists, (2) limit American lifestyles and activities by keeping American business interests and shipping out of that predominately Muslim part of the world (which would destroy American commerce), or (3) use decisive military force to put an end to the attacks. xvi Jefferson discarded the first option out of hand:

I was very unwilling that we should acquiesce in the … humiliation of paying a tribute to those lawless pirates. xvii

Jefferson had earlier concluded that the second option was bad policy, explaining:

The persons and property of our citizens are entitled to the protection of our government in all places where they may lawfully go. xviii

He favored the third option:

I very early thought it would be best to effect a peace through the medium of war. xix The power of making war often prevents it, and in our case would give efficacy to our desire of peace. xx

There were several reasons Jefferson believed this option was the best policy:

Justice is in favor of this opinion; honor favors it; it will procure us respect in Europe (and respect is a safeguard to interest) … [and] I think it least expensive [and] equally effectual. xxi

Understanding that it was time to end terrorist attacks against American persons and interests, he deployed an expeditionary force under General William Eaton and Commodore Edward Preble to exterminate the radical Islamicists. xxii The terrorists, after five years of being pounded by American military superiority, decided the price they were paying was too high and thus signed a treaty of peace. xxiii
Interestingly, Jefferson understood that in dealing with Islamicists, a drawdown of American forces was bad policy – that an insufficient application of American strength would cause the enemy to escalate their attacks. He therefore initiated a military surge, explaining to Congress:

There was reason … to apprehend that the warfare in which we were engaged with Tripoli [Libya] might be taken up by some others of the Barbary Powers [Algiers, Tunis, Morocco, Turkey, et. al]. A reinforcement therefore was immediately ordered. xxiv

He also related to Congress an account of how an Islamic warship had attacked a much smaller American vessel and the result was “a heavy slaughter of her [Islamicist] men, without the loss of a single one on our part.” xxv He observed:

The bravery exhibited by our citizens on that element will, I trust, be a testimony to the world that it is not the want of that virtue which makes us seek their peace but a conscientious desire to direct the energies of our nation to the multiplication of the human race and not to its destruction. xxvi

We sought peace not because we were weak (as had been the American situation for the previous two decades) but rather because our use of superior military force drove the Islamicists to peace, thus ending further human devastation at their hands. We were willing to take lawless lives in order to save countless times more innocent ones. Waging war in this situation was thus humanitarian.

Obama holds the opposite view. His refusal to use military force has led to an increasingly strong Iran xxvii(the chief global sponsor of terrorism xxviii) as well as the explosive growth of ISIS, xxix which has been responsible for thousands of civilian murders. xxx ISIS acknowledges that the only army it fears is that of Israel, xxxiand consequently it has largely refrained from martyring Jews (although it loudly blusters about doing so xxxii) But fearing nothing from America, it openly martyrs Christians. (It is a lesson of note that when ISIS murdered Egyptian Coptic Christians, Egypt responded promptly and with decisive military force xxxiii and further martyrdoms halted.)

Jefferson’s use of unequivocal military force against terrorists brought America its first respite in the decades old Islamic attacks but Obama’s refusal to do so has caused the numbers of murders committed by Islamicists to soar. President Obama would have done well to have heeded Jefferson’s observation that:

[H]istory bears witness to the fact that a just nation is taken on its word when recourse is had to armaments and wars to bridle others. xxxiv

2. THE “RELIGION OF PEACE.” President Obama (and other Democratic leaders) often repeat the platitude that Islam is a “religion of peace.” xxxv They therefore place its adherents into positions of influence within the Obama administration, xxxviincluding even those from the Muslim Brotherhood, xxxvii which is recognized as the radical wing of Islam that fuels many of its most violent adherents. xxxviii
President Jefferson did not believe that Islam was a religion of peace. He personally learned this from the mouth of its own leaders, and from Islam’s own writings. In 1786 (two years after Congress dispatched him to negotiate with leaders of the terrorists), he and John Adams approached the Muslim Ambassador, inquiring as to the reason behind the unprovoked attacks against America. According to Jefferson:

We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the grounds of their pretentions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation. xxxix

So why were the Islamicists so fixated on attacking Americans even though America had done nothing against them?

The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the laws of their prophet [Mohammed], that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise. xl

It was Muslim leaders who told Jefferson that Islam was not intrinsically a religion of peace. Certainly, not all of its adherents were as warlike as the religion itself had historically tended to be (after all, there had been individual Muslims living in America since 1619 xli ), but wherever Islam was dominant in a nation or a region, lasting peace seldom accompanied it. As the Ambassador affirmed, war was the one sure guarantee of spiritual salvation for Muslims, so they had a compelling spiritual motivation to engage in perpetual violence.

One way for Americans in Jefferson’s day (and today also) to determine for themselves whether the Ambassador’s claim was true was by reading the Quran for themselves, so the first American edition of the Quran was published during the Jefferson administration. xlii The editor’s preface promised that once Americans had read it for themselves, “Thou wilt wonder that such absurdities have infected the better part of the world and wilt avouch that the knowledge of what is contained in this book [the Koran] will render that [Islamic] law contemptible.” xliii

Jefferson believed what Islamicists said about their religion and acted accordingly. Obama dismisses the same claims as mere hyperbole and tries to explain why Islamicists do not really mean what they say and why we should ignore what they do.

iOriginally listed at Democratic National Committee, “Brief History of the Democratic Party” (at http://ift.tt/1ScE3ei). That page has now been pulled from the national Democrat website but has been preserved in published books showing that webpage. See, for example, David Barton, Setting the Record Straight: American History in Black and White (Aledo: WallBuilders Press, 2004), p. 14.

iiSee, for example, “Connecticut Dems strip Jefferson, Jackson names from fundraising dinner,” FoxNews, July 23, 2015, and many others

iiiSee, for example, “Connecticut Dems remove Thomas Jefferson from dinner name over slavery,” The Hill, July 23, 2015, and many others.

ivSee David Barton, The Jefferson Lies (WND Books, 2016), pp. 119-120.

vSee The Jefferson Lies, pp. 119-150.

viSee, for example, John Quincy Adams, An Oration Delivered Before the Inhabitants of the Town of Newburyport, at Their Request, on The Sixty-First Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, July 4th, 1837 (Newburyport: Charles Whipple, 1837), p. 50; The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, Roy P. Basler, editor (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1953), Vol. 3, p. 124, “Third Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Jonesboro, Illinois,” September 15, 1858 (quoting a Congressional resolution); Abraham Lincoln, “Special Session Message,” The American Presidency Project, July 4, 1861; Abraham Lincoln: Complete Works, John G. Nicolay & John Hay, editors (New York: The Century Co., 1894), Vol. 1, pp. 532-533, to H. L. Pierce and Others, April 6, 1859; Vol. 1, pp. 608-609, “Address at Cooper Institute,” February 27, 1860.

viiSteve Forbes, “Obama Has No Heart For the War on Terrorism,” Forbes, January 21, 2015.

viiiKimberly Amadeo, “War on Terror: Facts, Costs, Timeline,” aboutnews, November 23, 2015.

ixIn 1795, entering the final year of George Washington’s presidency, the total had reached sixteen percent of the federal budget (U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, “Historical Statistics of the United States” (New York: Kraus International Publications, 1989), Part 2, p. 1104). It had climbed to twenty percent by the time Jefferson took office six years later (“First Barbary War,” Wikipedia (accessed on January 15, 2016)).

xThomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew A. Lipscomb, editor (Washington, D. C.: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1903), Vol. V, p. 195, to William Carmichael on November 4, 1785. See also Garner W. Allen, Our Navy and the Barbary Corsairs (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, and Company, 1905) p. 28.

xiThose five nations were Tunis, Morocco, Algiers, Turkey, and Tripoli – North African and Mediterranean nations. Naval Documents Related to the United States Wars with the Barbary Powers, Claude A. Swanson, editor (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1939), Vol. 1, pp. 1-6, to Thomas Jefferson from Richard O’Brien, June 8, 1786. See also, A General View of the Rise, Progress, and Brilliant Achievements of the American Navy Down to the Present Time, (Brooklyn, 1828) pp. 70-71; “Barbary Pirates,” The Encyclopedia Britannica, Hugh Chisholm, editor (New York: The Encyclopedia Britannica Company, 1910), p. 383.

xiiGeorge Washington, The Writings of George Washington, Jared Sparks, editor (Boston: Russell, Odiorne, and Metcalf, 1835), Vol. IX, p. 194, to Marquis de Lafayette, August 15, 1786.

xiiiJ. Fenimore Cooper, The History of the Navy of the United States of America (Philadelphia: Thomas, Cowperthwait & Co., 1847), pp. 123-124. See alsoA Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents: 1789-1897, James D. Richardson, editor (Washington, D. C.: Published by Authority of Congress, 1897), Vol. I, p. 193, from Washington’s “Eighth Annual Address,” December 7, 1796.

xivDictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships (1968), Vol. III, pp. 521-523, “John Adams,” Hazegrey.org, (accessed on January 15, 2016).

xvDictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships (1968), Vol. III, pp. 521-523, “John Adams,” Hazegrey.org, (accessed on January 15, 2016).

xviThomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew A. Lipscomb, editor (Washington, D. C.: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1903), Vol. V, p. 327, to Colonel Monroe, May 10, 1786.

xviiThomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew A. Lipscomb, editor (Washington, D. C.: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1903), Vol. I, p. 97, from Jefferson’s Autobiography.

xviiiThomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, H.A. Washington, editor (Washington, D. C.: Taylor & Maury, 1854), Vol. VII, p. 624, “Opinion Relative to Granting of Passports to American Vessels,” May 3, 1793.

xixThomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew A. Lipscomb, editor (Washington, D. C.: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1903), Vol. V, p. 364, to John Adams, July 11, 1786.

xxThomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew A. Lipscomb, editor (Washington, D. C.: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1903), Vol. VII, p. 224, to General Washington, December 4, 1788.

xxiThomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew A. Lipscomb, editor (Washington, D. C.: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1903), Vol. V, p. 365, to John Adams, July 11, 1786.

xxiiSee, for example, “The First Barbary War,” Monticello (accessed on January 15, 2016); “The Barbary Wars, 1801-1805,” The Mariners’ Museum, 2000; Charles Prentiss, The Life of the Late Gen. William Eaton; Several Years an Officer in the United States’ Army, Consul at the Regency of Tunis on the Coast of Barbary, and Commander of the Christian and Other Forces That Marched from Egypt Through the Desert of Barca, in 1805, and Conquered the City of Derne, Which Led to the Treaty of Peace Between the United States and the Regency of Tripoli; Principally Collected from His Correspondence and Other Manuscripts (Brookfield: E. Merriam & Co., 1813).

xxiiiYale Law School, “Treaty of Peace and Amity, Signed at Tripoli June 4, 1805,” The Avalon Project.

xxivThomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, H. A. Washington, editor (Washington, D. C.: Taylor & Maury, 1854), Vol. VIII, p. 17, “Second Annual Message,” December 15, 1802.

xxvThomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, H. A. Washington, editor (Washington, D. C.: Taylor & Maury, 1854), Vol. VIII, p. 8, “First Annual Message,” December 8, 1801.

xxviThomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, H. A. Washington, editor (Washington, D. C.: Taylor & Maury, 1854), Vol. VIII, p. 8, “First Annual Message,” December 8, 1801.

xxviiSee, for example, Charles Krauthammer, “Defy America, Pay No Price,” National Review, January 7, 2016.

xxviiiMelanie Batley, “Intel Chief Agrees With GOP: Iran ‘Foremost Sponsor’ of Terrorism,” Newsmax, June 12, 2015.

xxixMario Loyola, “NYT: How Obama Contributed to the Rise of ISIS,” National Review, August 12, 2014.

xxxNick Wing & Carina Kolony, “15 Shocking Numbers That Will Make You Pay Attention To What ISIS Is Doing in Iraq,” Huffington Post, December 14, 2015; Abdelhalk Mamoun, “30,000-50,000 number of ISIS elements in Mosul,” Iraqi News, January 7, 2015; Samuel Smith, “UN Report on ISIS: 24,000 Killed, Injured by Islamic State; Children Used as Soldiers, Woman Sold as Sex Slaves,” The Christian Post, January 15, 2016.

xxxi“Israel is the only country ISIS fears,” IBC World News, January 4, 2016.

xxxiiSee, for example, Lev Selmon, “Islamic State vows to reach ‘Palestine’ and ‘kill the barbaric Jews’,” The Jerusalem Post, August 30, 2015 (at: http://ift.tt/1qcKE9f); Mary Chastain, “Islamic State to Join Palestine to Fight the ‘Barbaric Jews’,” Breitbart, August 1, 2014 (at: http://ift.tt/1OQIHKJ); “ISIS directly threatens Jews as Israel remains vigilant and watchful of the terrorist threat at its borders,” United With Israel, January 4, 2015 (at: http://ift.tt/1ScE3uU); and so forth.

xxxiiiDavid K. Li, “Egypt attacks ISIS hours after release of beheading video,” New York Post, February 16, 2015.

xxxivThomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, H. A. Washington, editor (New York: H. W. Derby, 1861), Vol. VIII, p. 40, “Second Inaugural Address,” March 4, 1805.

xxxvChris Perez, “Obama Defends the ‘True Peaceful Nature of Islam’,” New York Post, February 18, 2015.

xxxvi“Muslim Brotherhood Infiltrates Obama Administration,” Investor’s Business Daily, December 5, 2013; Anthony Martin, “Report – Obama Quietly Appoints Muslim Brotherhood to Key Posts,” Examiner, February 15, 2011.

xxxvii“U.K. Condemns Muslim Brotherhood, While White House Hosts It,” Investor’s Business Daily, December 29, 2015; Bob Unruh, “General: Muslim Brotherhood Inside Obama Administration,” World Net Daily, January 9, 2014.

xxxviiiTodd Beamon, “UK Declares Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Group, Breaks With Obama,” Newsmax, December 22, 2015; “FBI Chief: Muslim Brotherhood Supports Terrorism,” IPT News, February 11, 2011.

xxxixThomas Jefferson, The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Julian P. Boyd, editor (Princeton University Press, 1954), Vol. 9, p. 357, letter from John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, American Commissioners, to John Jay on March 28, 1786.

xlThomas Jefferson, The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Julian P. Boyd, editor (Princeton University Press, 1954), Vol. 9, p. 357, letter from John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, American Commissioners, to John Jay on March 28, 1786.

xliIt is reported that Muslims were among the first slaves arriving in America, and that up to ten percent of slaves were Muslim. Thomas A. Tweed, “Islam in America: From African Slaves to Malcolm X,” National Humanities Center (Accessed on January 15, 2016).

xliiThe Koran, Commonly Called the Alcoran of Mahomet. Translated from the Original Arabick into French, By the Sieur De Ryer, Lord of Malezair, and Resident of the French at Alexandria. The Whole Now Faithfully Translated Into English (Springfield: Henry Brewer, 1806).

xliiiThe Koran, Commonly Called the Alcoran of Mahomet. Translated from the Original Arabick into French, By the Sieur De Ryer, Lord of Malezair, and Resident of the French at Alexandria. The Whole Now Faithfully Translated Into English (Springfield: Henry Brewer, 1806), p. iv, “To the Reader.”

We are soo obsessed with long rectangular banquet tables! Wedding receptions, galas, fundraisers and practically any event can be transformed into a night of elegance using long tables. They look amazing and give you a different type of element to work with. For a multidimensional approach, mix long tables with round and/or square tables. The look is amazing! #eventplanning #specialevent #long #eventdecor #homedecor #homedesign #decor #banquet #rounds #marketing #PR #lighting banquettable #pipeanddrape #cheflife #dinner #dinnerparties #fundraisers #galas #wedding

10

It was a complete pleasure to be part of the UNICEF UK charity fundraising dinner and after party for the Next Generation London.

Working with our caterers of choice Ravenous Food Company along with Everything Everything the evening was a roaring success!

Raising lots of cash and awareness for the #childrenofsyria - the party goers ate, drank and got merry in our Daylight studio, and danced the night away.

Contact us for how we could host any of your events…info@loftstudios.co.uk

Liberal Party fundraiser piggybacks on taxpayer-funded meeting

New Brunswick Liberals are defending their decision to piggyback a party fundraiser on a taxpayer-funded meeting of the four Atlantic premiers.

Stephen McNeil of Nova Scotia, Wade MacLauchlan of Prince Edward Island, and Dwight Ball of Newfoundland and Labrador will join New Brunswick’s Brian Gallant on Wednesday for a meeting of the Council of Atlantic Premiers.

But the four leaders are also on the bill for a $250-a-plate fundraising dinner for the New Brunswick Liberal Association Tuesday night, an all-star partisan line-up that would not have been possible if the premiers weren’t coming to Fredericton at taxpayers’ expense.

The evening also features a “business networking reception” that party donors can attend for $400. Ticket-buyers can attend both the dinner and the reception for the single price of $500.

‘Unique opportunity’

Several federal Liberal cabinet ministers are also attending the fundraiser. They’re also joining the four premiers for meetings on Wednesday.

Rarely is there so much power and influence in a single room, according to Liberal Energy Minister Donald Arseneault.

“This is a unique opportunity, and if we want to give access to business stakeholders and whatnot to advance their projects, their causes, hey, rightfully so,” he said.

Arseneault described the fundraiser as another chance to help the regional economy.

It represents “more opportunities for over 300 people, business people from across New Brunswick and across Atlantic Canada to come together and network with these federal ministers and these Atlantic premiers,” he said.

“At the end of the day, what we want is to create economic activity in this province, and if we can reach out, if we can get people to reach out to these decision-makers, we will do that,” said Arseneault.

Alison Redford appeared for PCs

The Opposition Progressive Conservatives say the fundraiser amounts to letting people pay for access.

But the Tories have also used taxpayer-funded, out-of-province guests to sell fundraiser tickets.

In June 2013, then-Alberta premier Alison Redford was the star attraction at a PC Party of New Brunswick fundraiser in Fredericton.

Redford was in the province to visit the Irving Oil refinery in Saint John and to address the legislature to promote the Energy East pipeline proposal.

Current PC leader Bruce Fitch says the Redford appearance at the Tory fundraiser was different. “There was a positive event that came from that visit,” he said, referring to the promotion of the pipeline.

The British Royal Courts: Prince Charles at the Invest in Futures annual gala dinner
On Thursday, Prince Charles spent the evening with Kylie Minogue, Jerry Hall and personalites English.

4 February evening is solo he went to Old Billingsgate Market in London. There, waiting the beautiful Australian singer Kylie Minogue, molded in a golden sheath dress low-cut. Were also part of the young boy-friend of that Joshua Sasse, Jerry Hall as Prince of Wales warmly embraced, the former Spice Girl Geri Halliwell, the British rapper Tinie Tempah or the heroes of Brothers and Homeland Damien Lewis. All participated in the Invest in Futures annual gala dinner, principal fundraising event for The Prince’s Trust, a charity close to the father of two’s heart which helps young people aged 13 to 30 who have difficulty school or are unemployed.

The heir to the British Throne had received at his London home Clarence House, the Emir of Kuwait Sheikh Sabah IV Al-Ahmad Jaber Al-Sabah and King Abdullah II of Jordan
Photo Credits: Paris Match

External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image
External image


via Blogger http://ift.tt/23T9fTs
New Post has been published on Librarian Chat

New Post has been published on http://www.librarianchat.com/?p=151520

Authors’ Dinner raises funds for Berkeley Public Library - Berkeleyside

image

BerkeleysideAuthors’ Dinner raises funds for Berkeley Public LibraryBerkeleysideOn Saturday night, the Berkeley Public Library Foundation hosted its 14th annual Authors’ Dinner, a fundraiser which this year will help remodel parts of the Central Library, especially for the use of teenagers. Hundreds of guests mingled with 32 local …und weitere …read more

Read more here:: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&ct2=de&usg=AFQjCNEr3WO3FekiI0J5LSh5SkaIYtsxiQ&clid=c3a7d30bb8a4878e06b80cf16b898331&cid=52779044459774&ei=Pdu4VrDAD8nN3QGi0pSwAQ&url=http://www.berkeleyside.com/2016/02/08/authors-dinner-raises-funds-for-berkeley-public-library/comment-page-1/

The If's & But's Around Wedding Tux

If you are on the lookout for a Wedding tux, they are probably looking in furtherance of the men’s tuxedo that is suitable not only for the wedding day but for other ceremonious events in the future such as your honeymoon sailplane, formal dinner parties, black tie events, fundraisers, official dinners etc. very to name a trivial. Instead of renting quantitative only for the evening, them must consider buying a well ad rem tuxedo that you pack away wear for the years to sense.

Investing in a men’s tuxedo is like investing in an apparel that is suitable for future events also. Occasions like incorporation party of a confrere or a family member eagle hunch still the fascination card reads “black tie upshot” are as you say to make you think surmount the key question, i.e. what am HE going to wear now? In said a situation a tux is the most appropriate feathers to wear. Wherefore, you must trow the utility ope also while selecting for its pattern, colour or style.

Selecting a wedding tux is not an easy decision. Everyone is hesitant and uninformed about choosing the perfect type of tuxedo. The most important step in planning for your meaningful sequent is to allow plenty of time to grotesque on your customary attire. You must meditate the time of year i.e. while as well insomuch as the time of the day choose the perfect style. As an example, a white jacket fits ascendant for midwinter or intimate climate settings whereas standard unpropitious jackets look unambiguously nice access winters and lower temperature days.

At the unchanging time, higher levels of desired formality may foil you from going for a white tux. Accurate measurements are essential all for getting the right probe jacket and flag.

Another really demand thing that matters in a tuxedo is its germane. Allow your formalize plenty of time to refit the sell over inside of facet you choose the wrong size. Accessories to with a tux are as essential as its fittings, neoconcrete art or colour. For example, hand-clasp ties look are more formal than neckties, also while black ties are considered formal, white ones are ultra formal.

As for the vests, other self can complement its colour with limiting hues. Beyond, if inner self are wearing a cummerbund instead of a pertain, you should of a complementary colour and should never endure worn without the duffel.

Instead of searching through aisles of local retail stack room, ethical self can browse online for perfect idiosyncrasy and best bargain. Online tailors not only deliver the sublime suit versus make yourself look like a million buck but they have several offers going as things go you till make better self in budget.