Here’s the thing: I still don’t like bitter juries. But there’s a difference between a bitter jury and a jury who has dealt with constant bullying and who was never told the truth.
In bb14, Dan never bullied anyone and he always told the truth in his goodbye messages, and his finale speech was nothing but the truth as well. THAT jury was bitter - they were mad that Dan was so good, that they were fooled, so they voted for Ian out of spite. That right there is what I hate - and I don’t believe it was in true Big Brother spirit.
But for bb19, this jury had to choose between an okay, honest player and someone who had an advantage from the start, treated them terribly, and lied about it all the way up until finale night.
So if people are saying “Ugh, what a bitter jury, Paul deserved that win,” then they don’t fully understand the definition of a bitter jury. They need to rewatch bb14 and get back to me; that was the REAL robbed winner due to a bitter jury.