Avatar

Radom-Shit

@sarcastic-yami

A proposal

Sometimes, in fandom, we just want to write id-tastic fic that rolls around in tropes that might be viewed as problematic. But we don’t want to address the problematic side of things in this particular fanwork; we just want to roll around and wallow.

It is considered courteous to give readers a heads-up via use of AO3 tags. I propose a tag that signals that a given fanwork is for rolling around, not giving a measured evaluation of anything. The MCU has carved out a space for this sort of fic with the “HYDRA Trash Party” tag, for which I commend them. Trash Party is a bit too specific to cover all of the ground I’m thinking of here, though; I propose “Dead Dove: Do Not Eat.”

For those of you not familiar with Arrested Development, Michael Bluth finds a paper bag in the freezer labeled “Dead Dove: Do Not Eat.” He opens the bag, finds a dead dove, and reacts as follows:

[gif of a white man saying “I don’t know what I expected” in a deadpan manner]

The “Dead Dove: Do Not Eat” tag would essentially be a “what it says on the tin” metatag, indicating “you see the tropes and concepts tagged here? they are going to appear in this fic. exactly as said. there will not necessarily be any subversion, authorial commentary condemning problematic aspects, or meditation on potential harm. this fic contains dead dove. if you proceed, you should expect to encounter it.”

WHOA WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS THE POST THAT SPAWNED DEAD DOVE DO NOT EAT

Holy Shit I found it!!!!

call me ignorant but i genuinely don’t understand why sports have to be split up by gender.

Avatar
my-username-is-classified

@ everyone in the notes talking about physical performance: if that were the case, then sports would be divided by physical performance. that’s a thing you can measure. that’s a thing that varies by individual. a weak man and a strong man would be an unfair fight in boxing/wrestling/MMA, which is why they divide those sports up into weight groups based on physical performance. but they also further segregate them based on gender. chess is segregated by gender for no reason but sexism. if it’s actually about skill and physical ability, then measure those and separate people by those metrics. don’t do some bullshit gender segregation and pretend like men and women are inherently on different levels no matter their individual abilities.

Avatar
aggrokawaii

Remember that time a teenage girl struck out Babe Ruth? That’s fucking why. Men are afraid of being beaten by women.

Remember that time male swimmers were pulled out of training because Kate Ledecky was leaving them ‘broken’ by swimming better than them? Remember how she didn’t even notice, because she was busy actually training?

Shooting is a sport that has no reliance on strength and so any allowance for gender variation is irrelevant. The last time there was a mixed competition (1992) a chinese woman named Zhang Shan won it.

Avatar
murderxbaby

It’s often presented as for the benefit of women. After all, they’ll be heartbroken when they‘re hurt or bested by men.

Projection is a hell of a drug. 

Avatar
yungcrybby-anonymousbosch

this is why they drug test Serena like crazy. the believe no woman should be that good. let alone a black woman. and black women have always been considered “manly” and less feminine.

also can we talk about how surfing is segregated as well? like how the dude who won this years international surfing cup or whatever was given $30,000 worth of prize money, while the woman who won the women’s comp was only awarded like $16,000 of prize money???? or whatever it was. but I know it was either half or less than half of what the man won. like why can’t they get the same prize money and when they’re competing internationally in the same competition? they surely have the same level of skill and talent.

Avatar
yungcrybby-anonymousbosch

the pay gap in sports between men and women is fucking insane.

The pay gaps, not to mention lack of sponsorships for women athletes who don’t look like models is insane. If you weigh over 250 pounds, no one will sponsor you. It’s why most female Olympic-class weightlifters live in poverty/out of their cars.

Avatar
intersex-mhacha

Reminder that in international (and usually national too) womens athletics anybody with 5m/mol of natural testosterone or higher is disqualified. (See legal case of Dutee Chand vs IAAF.)

Do you or somebody you know have PCOS? You are banned from international womens athletics because you are supposedly in posession of an unreasonable advantage in sports.

Folks disqualified for hyper-androgenism in womens athletics.

Francine Niyonsaba

Caster Semenya

Dutee Chand

Margaret Wambui

And more

-

Why are those disqualified overwhelmingly black and brown? Because testing is case by case when an athletes performance “raises suspicions”. They overwhelmingly test athletes of colour, for being too fast and not meeting white expectations of femininity.

Racism and intersexism(discrimination against intersex people) in sports is abject evil. Desegregate sports.

All of this.

Oh, this some good stuff. I share to others 

Avatar
esrathebaard

ABSOTUTAFUCKINGLUTELY. I AM SO INCREDIBLY SICK OF EVERYONE REGARDING WOMEN AS INHERENTLY LESS THAN MEN. “THERE IS NO SEXISM IN BA SING SE” MY ASS

Yup to all of this, especially the racism highlight

hey gamers I’ve started watching star trek does anyone else see the romantic tension between captain kirk and mr. spock

watching the realization publicly dawn in real time in the comments is fucking amazing

op's tags:

comments:

I DIDN’T KNOWWWW

I love talking with neurotypical people about my executive dysfunction because I'm like "yeah there's this invisible wall in my head that I'm incapable of getting past no matter what I do and it stops me from doing things" and they're like what the actual fuck

Meanwhile other neurodivergents are like

Seen it, you say?

A tip for excellent writing I just learned: Don't introduce a character with their Dramatic Backstory. It makes readers go "oh alright this is the Dramatic Background Story Character" and establishes a baseline of Tragic, either for the story as a whole or this character in particular. With no contrast of light and dark, pure darkness isn't impactful, it just looks like the absence of anything to look at.

If you really want someone's dramatic backstory to hit the audience like a gut punch, let them get to know the character first. That way the dark backstory doesn't come off as a description of who they are, but an explanation to why they are the way they are. Bonus points for connecting it to something that's already been established as a part of the character - what a devastating blow to suddenly put together that hold on, that funny quirky thing that they always do is a fucking trauma response.

I would die for Mr. Murderbritches

Avatar
pylertalma

You will

He’ll do it personally

I love this site.

Character [Mr. Murderbritches] has been unlocked as a Party Member

Special Ability: [Maul U]

Mr. Murderbritches’ claws and teeth deal +5 piercing damage

OMG I REBLOGGED THIS THINKING THAT WAS ITS NAME

Without my glasses I couldn’t tell those were chickens and thought he had been arrested for stealing ice creams.

my favourite thing about bbc merlin is that people with magic pretty much have one main attack ever and it’s just to telekinetically bodyslam the absolute shit out of their opponent

Anyhow I’ve only ever seen a man dress up as a woman to commit a crime 1 time and he got caught immediately because the first thing he did post-robbery was change clothes in his car, because he wasn’t actually a trans woman in real life, which is how disguises typically work

For those of you fortunate enough to be messaging me with no idea what I’m talking about, I’m referring to the popular strawman that is “man who pretends to be a trans woman in order to infiltrate Women’s spaces and assault women,” which causes otherwise sane and rational people to clutch at their pears and say, “Ohwell I suppose that’s possible, isn’t it?”

Which is how a strawman argument gets you: it looks at the environment you want to establish, invents a very specific and unlikely person who could theoretically abuse that system for their own nefarious benefit, and then pretends that this invented person isn’t only possible, but likely! And not even likely, but inevitable! And that this person exists in very high numbers and is just WAITING for you to give them the perfect opportunity- which is, conveniently, the opportunity provided by exact circumstances you are proposing.

The Male Predator Who Forces You To Let Him Into Women’s Spaces, Then Attacks From The Inside With No Recourse is a strawman. And like all strawmen, it is technically not impossible, but so incredibly unlikely and difficult and frustrating to pull off that there are a million other things that could accomplish the same goal that would be far easier and far less of a hassle to pull off. The thing that makes strawmen like this truly dangerous is that people have seen “technically possible, but one in a million” and said “well, someone has to win the lottery” and then dumped their retirement savings in lottery tickets, racing on about how they’re about to be a billionaire and if you do the same then you’ll be one, too.

What I’m saying is, forget what is technically possible and focus on what’s likely. Forget how something COULD be done, and look at how it’s BEING done.

If a man wants to assault a woman, does he need to form an elaborate persona to do so? No, of course not, he’ll just go ahead and do it the same way men who assault women have been doing it forever. He’ll roofie a drink at a gathering, or take pictures up skirts on the train.

So what kind of “Women’s spaces” are we worried about a theoretical male predator sneaking into? Trauma counselling? A spa? A women’s housing collective?

Cool, imagine a man does that. Imagine a man starts dressing in Women’s clothes and using female pronouns and a woman’s name and the women’s washroom and changes his government documents JUST to get into a group of cis women, and then he does it.

What does he do?

Does he assault a woman? Manipulate women? Follow a woman home, break into her house, steal her shit?

Because surprise, if HE could do it by pretending to be a trans woman, then it’s already something any cis woman on the planet could do anyways.

Except this imaginary dude we just made up just made the 99% of his life that WASN’T entirely built around becoming the ultimate predator is now a million times harder.

And that’s the whole fucking point of a disguise.

A disguise for the purpose of crime exists to distance yourself from the consequences of your crime.

I saw a man dress as a woman, rob a place, leave, take off his disguise, and run away. Because nobody on the planet is going to connect that image with him. He isn’t a professional drag queen doing shows in the same outfit on the side. It’s a burner identity, not HIM, and outside of hiding who he is he doesn’t want to be seen as a woman.

Someone who is a woman all the time? Who tells you they are a woman? They’ll be a woman when they leave. They’ll be a woman when they go home. They can change their appearance however they want, but they can’t just become a cis man later when it’s convenient. You see Bethany rob a store in women’s clothing today, she’ll be burning the evidence in her yard wearing women’s clothing later. The harder thing would be spotting her in a man’s outfit, at which point we’ve thrown the whole theoretical shitshow out the window with the bathwater anyways

If it’s possible to abuse the system, focus on what makes that abuse possible and manage that, don’t just attack whoever you think might try. Cause if a cis man could do it, or a trans woman could do it, then a cis woman could do it, which means anyone could do it.

The path to women’s safety isn’t locking other women out. It’s teaching all women how to recognize real danger and avoid it, how to support each other, and actually taking it seriously when something does happen.

The myth of the fake trans woman coming to get you is a cop-out. It’s a fun little distraction that makes you think, “what if a man tries watching me pee? What if a man tries to see me naked?” Instead of, “why should it be possible for ANYONE to watch me pee? What do I do if ANYONE busts in on me changing? If I’m the victim of a predator, what do I do, and will I be taken seriously?”

It makes me angry.

“what if a man comes along and watches you sleep through that camera we installed in your bedroom?”

bitch WHY DID YOU PUT A CAMERA IN MY BEDROOM