Yeah they obviously do but also she's got enough money that boycotting the game isn't actually gonna prevent this. like I already said yeah if you still wanna play the game you evidently value the people she's attacking way less than your ability to play Video Garm and that's not allyship.
but also I'm getting real frustrated with the notes of this post filling up with people arguing about whether or not people should buy or pirate or refuse to play a video game when like. the video game is at most a litmus test for whether you're willing to put anything at all on the line to push back against this.
JKR already has the money to buy her own rape crisis shelter to push her personal agenda, and to fund anti-trans groups, and to pay for legislative lobbying. She already has the platform to give voice and performed legitimacy to reactionary shit like "the death eaters represent the trans lobby!!!!" That doesn't come from Hogwarts Legacy and even if nobody had bought, played or talked about Hogwarts Legacy she'd still have that from the books and the films and the events and the walking tours and the billions of tons of useless tat with Harry Potter branding slapped on it that sells every year (did you know Le Creuset, the fancy cookware company, brought out a range of Harry Potter themed iron casseroles???? clown world.)
Hogwarts Legacy isn't the make-or-break product, but what it is is a collective touchpoint where anyone still buying into the JKR brand had the opportunity to break with Harry Potter. like to look at the extent and depth of the fucked up things she is doing to rhetorically and materially attack marginalised people, think about what it means to continue supporting that, and use Hogwarts Legacy as an opportunity to divest from the brand that's giving her that power. and in all fairness a lot of people HAVE got more aware of the need to divest from Harry Potter as a result of the chat around Hogwarts Legacy. A lot more haven't, but have had to acknowledge it and justify it in a way they didn't when it looked more like 'buying a Primark snitch onesie'
but like. the video game isn't the point? The video game was never the point? (except in a couple of instances which are about the video game, to whit making the antisemitic subtext around the goblins very much text) The video game is emblematic of the whole structure of corporate-led Harry Potter fandom which keeps merch on shelves, money going into JKR's pocket, and a veneer of legitimacy on JKR's bullshit.
if you can't drop the video game, you're fully bought into this. if 'don't play a video game' is too high a price for you to pay to stand against genocidal rhetoric and exploitation and abuse of vulnerable people then your politics aren't really grounded in anything. but that doesn't mean the video game is the point, or that without the video game she couldn't do any of this.
and it's really tiring that instead of using the video game as a jumping off point to talk about why we need to push back on JKR's power and actions, instead people keep coming back to the game itself (which, like a month after release, is kinda of diminishing relevance, unlike Rowling herself who continues to do outsize harm).