Avatar

Saam Daam Dand Bhed

@saamdaamdandaurbhed / saamdaamdandaurbhed.tumblr.com

We are not consigned to repeat the mistakes of our forebears.
Temperatures are rising, and so is communal hate. Rainfall is drying up, and so is employment. A war is being waged on the working masses by the corporates and ruling classes on every front. A war in which the people are losing one battle after another. But when the corporates and their henchmen in the seats of power thought that their victory over people’s lives and livelihood was imminent, they suffered a massive loss.. A battle in this war was won by the Indian farmers as the anti-people farm laws passed in September 2020 were repealed in November 2021.
A protracted movement for which over 700 farmers gave their lives and countless others toiled in extreme weather conditions at the borders of Delhi, the farmers’ movement was a sum of many struggles, aspirations and contradictions. But most importantly it was historic and its history with all its complexities, contradictions and aspirations must be preserved. The Journey of the Farmer’s Rebellion is a memoir of the farmers movement using the voices of those who led it and lived through it.
Using interviews with many farmer leaders, agricultural labourers and landless peasant leaders, and progressive artists and intellectuals, The Journey of the Farmers’ Rebellion explores the journey of the farmers and the obstacles it had to overcome to attain a resounding victory.
This book is a collaborative effort of three independent collectives — Workers Unity, Ground Xero and Notes on the Academy. Comprising over 512 pages, it has 21 in-depth interviews of peasant leaders as well as activists who participated in the movement in active solidarity.
Here is a brief outline of the contents:
The book is divided into four sections along with a foreword and an introduction.
The Introduction outlines how the brewing unrest of decades in Punjab found resonance in the more recent nationwide campaigns of the AIKSCC, demanding peasants’ freedom from indebtedness as well as the guarantee of MSP in all states. It engages critically with the organising potential of other sections of the peasantry like women, landless peasants and agricultural workers to assert that peasant resistance can consolidate despite the contending interests. The introduction also touches upon the absolute necessity of peasant-worker alliance and argues that the peasantry needs closer alliances with working class struggles and anti-displacement movements that are challenging growing corporate power over people’s livelihoods and resources.
The introduction is followed by the salient features of the three farm laws in brief for readers to relate meaningfully to the various aspects of the laws that interviewees refer to in their interviews.
The repeal of the three farm laws was achieved by an unprecedented unity of a coalition of 32 farmer unions in the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) along with other mass organizations like BKU (Ekta-Ugrahan) and Kisan Mazdoor Sangharsh Samiti.
In Section One, interviews with some prominent leaders show how this unity was achieved despite the different ideological persuasions of those involved. The determination to repeal the three farm laws and demand guaranteed MSP fostered unity, which further became a compelling imperative in the face of continuous state repression and distortion of the movement by mainstream media. Leaders also question the policies of international bodies like the WTO, World Bank, IMF and the world economic forum that ram down imperialist policies on national governments whose subservience paves the way for unbounded exploitation of workers and farmers.
Women leaders discuss the mobilisation of women farmers, both organised as well as spontaneous, in the protests and also share their views on their struggle as women within mass organisations to gain recognition for women’s participation in agriculture and in peasant resistance.
Interviewees explain how agrarian capital exploits farmers on the basis of feudal relations. SKM’s democratic functioning and information dissemination with regular updates drew support from across the country. The role of the Haryana and UP peasantry especially was spectacular and sustained. The grit and tenacity of the unions to sit in protest for 380 long days, even with peasants getting martyred in the process, made the movement historic in an unprecedented manner. Leaders reflect in this section about points of both agreement and differences and also opine on the way ahead. The need for a broad democratic movement to address the growing fascism of the ruling class is highlighted.
Section Two contains interviews with leaders of landless peasant and agricultural worker unions for whom fighting for land to the tiller and bargaining wage rates with landed farmers are a continuous struggle. In the course of the movement, agricultural worker unions came together to form a coalition named Sanjha Mazdoor Morcha to highlight their demands for both wages and guarantee of work. SKM made its support clear; yet, the struggles on the ground have become a test for this unity to be more decisive in the interest of landless peasants and agricultural workers. The interviews highlight the centrality of land relations in the lives of agricultural workers.
Section Three highlights how the landless peasantry has been historically denied land. Panchayati land reserved for Dalits continues to be usurped by upper and middle caste farmers with the connivance of the administration. Organising collectives and bidding in auctions for land happens at the cost of physical confrontation and fabricated criminal cases. They demand the implementation of the Land Ceiling Act. Although landless farmers are able to perceive the imminent threat of corporations coveting the same land, their active support for the repeal of the three farm laws is only part of the longer struggle for dignity, equality and restoration of justice after years of discrimination.
Section Four has interviews with journalists, economists and cultural activists who stood by the farmers’ movement in unwavering solidarity. It shows how the ethos of Sikhism and left politics in Punjab have evolved together. It problematizes the critical support lent by Dalits and agricultural workers and how their stake in fighting corporate aggression is crucial for the future generations. And above all, the section asserts how resistance fosters creativity be it plays, music, theatre or film making. The expressions of resistance are myriad; the beauty in resistance makes the vision of a future society sparkling clear and complete.
At the end, the book provides a chronology of the main events of the 380 days of resistance at the borders of Delhi. And the appendices list the names of all unions and organisations along with their charter of demands in complete detail.
The Journey of the Farmers’ Rebellion is being released in truly dark times. A bevy of judgements and laws that attack the very humanity of Muslims, from questioning their Indianness to letting loose the perpetrators of the vilest sexual assaults. Codification of labour laws that deprive workers of jobs and dignity and give international corporations ‘ease of doing business.’ Agreement after agreement handing over land to mining conglomerates. And ceaseless arrests and incarcerations of anyone who questions it. The Indian state’s program of selling India off to the capitalists seemed unstoppable until it passed the three farm laws. Recording that resistance from the vantage point of those who were in the middle of it is an important political task fulfilled.
As the foreword to the book asserts, the idea of this project came from a collective political belief in the collective conscience of the people of this country, even as that collective conscience today seems poisoned. There is growing hatred towards Muslims and other minorities. There is the nationalism of the most vulgar variety that is clearly programmed towards a wilful acceptance of the majoritarian Hindutva rule, backed by a coterie of crony-capitalists. Publishers of this book worked with a firm belief that this conscience will be reshaped, and it will be reshaped by people’s movements like the one whose footsteps they have tried to document in this book.
Ultimately, the book pays homage to the farmers movement, which gave hope and inspiration to all struggling sections.
To purchase a copy, contact:
By phone: 7503227235 and 9830411525
By e-mail: workersunity18@gmail.com, groundxero2018@gmail.com or notacademy@pm.me
Suggested contribution: Rs 499/-
Avatar
ghelgheli

read how economists formalize marriage is so illuminating when it's treated as 1) a game of near-perfect information between players; 2) involving cooperative bargaining; 3) that specifically confers "household" goods at a level of privatization in between the public and the individually private

Avatar
ghelgheli

this is literally why the family must be abolished

Is there a good article/book going over the historical and/or current dynamics of the uk housing market, especially how it relates to imperialism and immigration of third world people? Thanks!

Avatar

self promo alert but i wrote this back in may, responding to an earlier piece in tribune. haven’t re-read it so not sure what i’d make of it now, i can be p critical of past writing, but it’s something and has some references / things to look into. i’ll try and remember if i’ve read anything else good on it tho honestly ppl working on housing here (whether in research or organising) are shockingly disinterested in these issues for the most part

Avatar

thanks!

Although the Calcutta philosopher and historian of sci- ence Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya has been the major twenti- eth-century Indian Marxist philosopher, he has never received the recognition in Indian philosophical circles commensurate with his scholarly contributions. Such lack of status and rec- ognition is an indication of the nature of Indian academic philosophy, of those who have had the power to define the profession and the discipline.
Twentieth-century philosophical debates have tended not to be between competing idealist and materialist approaches but between variations of idealism. Indian materialism has been dismissed as a minor aberration, sometimes granted one small (early) chapter in a history of Indian philosophy. Earlier in this century, the most influential "professional" Indian philosophers (Radhakrishnan, K. C. Bhattacharyya, Hiri- yanna, Mahadevan, Murti, and others) were idealists who tended to be Hindu (most frequently Vedantist) traditionalists. More recent Indian idealists have often been more influenced by British and other Western idealism; indeed, their philoso- phical approaches are sometimes indistinguishable from vari- eties of contemporary Western idealism. Within such a set- ting, it is not surprising that Chattopadhyaya, who identifies himself as a historical and dialectical materialist and uncom- promisingly attacks Brahmanism and all other idealistic and metaphysical outlooks, has not received sufficient profes- sional status and recognition.

An important aspect of the shitshow in Nuh, that a comrade emphasised to me, is that it was a loss --- or at least an incomplete win --- for the fascists.

They did the demolitions and the rioting in a Muslim-majority area. This requires active planning. The hope is then that it spreads to mixed-composition localities due to mass fascist mobilisation, ie without active planning.

But it did not! And this can be attributed due to the farmers' protests and the increase in stature of the radical farmer unions that they resulted in. This is also being emphasised in the Collective slide deck above, in the last slide.

Since July 31 when Nuh, Gurugram, and adjoining areas of Haryana witnessed anti-Muslim violence during a rally taken out by Hindutva groups, farmers’ groups have held three major meetings in Jind, Hisar, and Mewat to counter the communal build-up in the state. Besides, nearly two dozen local Khap panchayat meetings have been held across the Mewat region, which spans both Haryana and neighbouring Rajasthan. For instance, a farmers’ meeting on August 9 at a grain market in Hisar’s Bass village, which was originally convened to discuss farmers’ issues, was renamed Bhaichara Sammelan (a meeting to spread brotherhood) to speak out against Nuh and Gurugram violence and subsequent hate speeches by Hindutva groups calling for the boycott of Muslims. Since farmers’ pushback against the hate, calls for such a boycott by Hindutva groups have largely stopped from Haryana. “It is the impact of the farmers’ warning that further bloodshed in Haryana has been averted,” Shamsher Singh More, a farmers’ leader, told The Wire. “Mewatis are our brothers. They stood with us during the farmers’ protest and organised langars. Meanwhile, the BJP supporters attacked and defamed us, by calling us terrorists. We are not returning any favour but we are standing with our brothers against miscreants who are trying to create disharmony in the country.”

---

Journalist Mandeep Punia – who has been covering farmers’ meetings and Khap panchayats closely – said that it is due to such coming together of forces against Hindutva groups, the situation has not become worse in the Mewat region. He said since Khaps dominate politics in Haryana, their influence is seen in averting any further crisis.

lmao I have been forced to use the Microsoft Authenticator app for 2FA and so I searched for it on the Google Play Store, the Trusted source of software for Android phones, and it turns out the first result is (an ad for) something called the Authenticator App, which has apparently bought ads for people searching "Authenticator", which is what most companies call their 2FA apps and thus what users search for when looking for those apps

the Authenticator App proudly proclaims its ability to provide 2FA for a wide variety of websites, though the savvy consumer might be wary that while the app itself is free it contains ads and has in-app purchases, and also that it's suspicious for anyone to advertise a 2FA authenticator in the first place, and that its host of positive reviews are broadly incoherent, nonsensical, and oddly infrequent

the app also has a significant number of rather recent reviews by less savvy consumers complaining that essential functions are paywalled, that canceling your ongoing subscriptions is basically impossible, that they were tricked into installing this horrible piece of shit while searching for a real and legitimate App for Authentication, and that they have deliberately made it difficult to switch from this to any other form of 2FA

now, the funniest part is that because the ads are presumably keyed to the word Authenticator, this means that Google's own Google Authenticator app is also shunted to second place when searched for, which has tripped up at least one recent commenter

I love security

*security theatre

every website where I'm forced to use 2fa is a website whose cookies i make my browser save, so that i don't have to log in any more.

Whereas the others... I'm never logged in and I don't know the 20-character pseudorandom passwords.

lmao I have been forced to use the Microsoft Authenticator app for 2FA and so I searched for it on the Google Play Store, the Trusted source of software for Android phones, and it turns out the first result is (an ad for) something called the Authenticator App, which has apparently bought ads for people searching "Authenticator", which is what most companies call their 2FA apps and thus what users search for when looking for those apps

the Authenticator App proudly proclaims its ability to provide 2FA for a wide variety of websites, though the savvy consumer might be wary that while the app itself is free it contains ads and has in-app purchases, and also that it's suspicious for anyone to advertise a 2FA authenticator in the first place, and that its host of positive reviews are broadly incoherent, nonsensical, and oddly infrequent

the app also has a significant number of rather recent reviews by less savvy consumers complaining that essential functions are paywalled, that canceling your ongoing subscriptions is basically impossible, that they were tricked into installing this horrible piece of shit while searching for a real and legitimate App for Authentication, and that they have deliberately made it difficult to switch from this to any other form of 2FA

now, the funniest part is that because the ads are presumably keyed to the word Authenticator, this means that Google's own Google Authenticator app is also shunted to second place when searched for, which has tripped up at least one recent commenter

I love security

*security theatre

Avatar
fatehbaz

on my hands and knees. scrubbing sticky spilled beverage off of the floor. it was heavily flavored with (artificial) vanilla, had a strong scent. so sticky, so much sugar. a customer had dropped a beverage can. management had said “don’t worry, we can write it off, it’s not that expensive. go wipe it up.” outside, it was snowing, heavily. there with me on the floor, puddles of melted snow, grimey, brought indoors by customers’ boots. apron stained. while there, on the floor, repetitive scrubbing, i considered that an English sugar-plantation-owner in Barbados in the 1790s was likely to have been 5-times richer than their wealthiest land-owning (white) childhood friends still living back in Britain proper. i wondered how vanilla has come to be so inexpensive. (is it actually “inexpensive”? or do landscapes and people still die to grow and harvest it?) where did this vanilla come from? where was the coffee grown? all of this sugar just tossed aside. like nothing. 125, 200, 350 years ago, vast amounts of people were enslaved and died for this sugar. entire communities, whole cultures invaded, destroyed, to bring Empires sugar, the Georgian-era equivalent of this spilled “BANG Birthday Cake Bash (TRADEMARKED) Keto-Coffee Protrein-Enhanced Energy Drink” which i’m scrubbing off of the floor, on my knees, almost in an act of worship. “we can write it off.” in 1540, how many people were murdered in Central America by Spanish colonizers to acquire this amount of vanilla for shipment back to a court in Iberia? in 1610, how much reward would an Italian merchant vessel have earned for delivering this coffee from North Africa to Venice? in 1805, how much cash would a London tea-shop-owner have paid for this sugar? all so easily acquired, now? in 2020, how many people still work and die so that these ingredients can be shipped to the Europe and the US, offered at such “inexpensive” price? now all of these substances are just … a sticky puddle on the floor? a stain on the apron? after scrubbing the floor, i entered the walk-in cooler, the white noise of the fans a reprieve, to read the list of ingredients on the labels of the coffee/energy drinks. “guava.” “acai berry.” “Nesquik Double Chocolate ready-to-drink milk.” how did it get here? a loud ringing. motion detectors. customers are entering the store. too much stimulation. supposed to be “working.” don’t know how long i have stood in the cooler. deep breath. attempt to revert to normal workplace behavior and thoughts. had to go back to “helping customers.” cannot openly discuss botany and colonization and land-theft of Regency-era British Empire. i leave the cooler. same day, a co-worker: “hey, check out the new hand lotion, really helps with the bleach burns, smells awesome!” me: “oh?” she says: “coconut and vanilla!” again my thoughts are dragged away: “what harms have come to the islands of the South Pacific? how did this substance extracted from tropical plants find its way here, to this snowy landscape? why is the coconut-oil lotion so cheap? who paid the real cost to bring it here? this process was not passive. which institutions stole local plant knowledge and patented this variety of the plant? who was forced under duress to harvest the coconut?” violence.

One thing that I keep seeing whenever I make posts that are critical of macs is folks in the notes going "they make great computers for the money if you just buy used/refurbs - everyone knows not to buy new" and A) no they don't know that, most people go looking for a new computer unless they have already exhausted the new options in their budget and B) no they don't make great computers for the money, and being used doesn't do anything to make them easier to work on or repair or upgrade.

Here's a breakdown of the anti-consumer, anti-repair features recently introduced in macbooks. If you don't want to watch the video, here's how it's summed up:

In the end the Macbook Pro is a laptop with a soldered-on SSD and RAM, a battery secured with glue, not screws, a keyboard held in with rivets, a display and lid angle sensor no third party can replace without apple. But it has modular ports so I guess that’s something. But I don’t think it’s worthy of IFixIt’s four out of ten reparability score because if it breaks you have to face apple’s repair cost; with no repair competition they can charge whatever they like. You either front the cost, or toss the laptop, leaving me wondering “who really owns this computer?”

Apple doesn't make great computers for the money because they are doing everything possible to make sure that you don't actually own your computer, you just lease the hardware from apple and they determine how long it is allowed to function.

The lid angle sensor discussed in this video replaces a much simpler sensor that has been used in laptops for twenty years AND calibrating the sensor after a repair requires access to proprietary apple software that isn't accessible to either users or third party repair shops. There's no reason for this software not to be included as a diagnostic tool on your computer except that Apple doesn't want users working on apple computers. If your screen breaks, or if the fragile cable that is part of the sensor wears down, your only option to fix this computer is to pay apple.

How long does apple plan to support this hardware? What if you pay $3k for a computer today and it breaks in 7 years - will they still calibrate the replacement screen for you or will they tell you it's time for new hardware EVEN THOUGH YOU COULD HAVE ATTAINED FUNCTIONAL HARDWARE THAT WILL WORK IF APPLE'S SOFTWARE TELLS IT TO?

Look at this article talking about "how long" apple supports various types of hardware. It coos over the fact that a 2013 MacBook Air could be getting updates to this day. That's the longest example in this article, and that's *hardware* support, not the life cycle of the operating system. That is dogshit. That is straight-up dogshit.

Apple computers are DRM locked in a way that windows machines only wish they could pull off, and the apple-only chips are a part of that. They want an entirely walled garden so they can entirely control your interactions with the computer that they own and you're just renting.

Even if they made the best hardware in the world that would last a thousand years and gave you flowers on your birthday it wouldn't matter because modern apple computers don't ever actually belong to apple customers, at the end of the day they belong to apple, and that's on purpose.

This is hardware as a service. This is John Deere. This is subscription access to the things you buy, and if it isn't exactly that right at this moment, that is where things have been heading ever since they realized it was possible to exert a control that granular over their users.

With all sympathy to people who are forced to use them, Fuck Apple I Hope That They Fall Into The Ocean And Are Hidden Away From The Honest Light Of The Sun For Their Crimes.

Okay this is crazy.

So, before 2020, ships used to emit sulphur dioxide, cos they used shitty fuel that was cheaper. This gas causes shit like acid rain. So in 2020 the UN stopped this shit.

BUT... there's a twist! SO2 is also an anti-greenhouse gas, cos it seeds clouds (SF afficianados will remember its appearance in Kim Stanley Robinson's The MIsnistry for the Future; this is also the same reason it leads to acid rain). The ships were unintentionally geo-engineering.

The effects of this stoppage have become visible in 2023:

theres some amazing stuff in that interview btw

the fbi maintained a theory-dense maoist bulletin for years holding forth on the sinosoviet split as a psyop! there are around fifteen thousand pages on the bulletin being reviewed now by the national archives in response to a foia request. is that not fucking nuts??

“The revisionist faction of the American communist movement is a treacherous organ for propaganda of the US federal govt”

L M A O