Avatar

Sin título

@rswallow-ace-things

Hey, we just wanted to provide a few of asexual/romantic articles we have written so that all of you have a rebuttal ready if any aphobe comes at you saying that “asexuals haven’t historically been a part of the queer community”

The Golden Orchid- An order of lesbians, asexuals, aromantics, and women who didn’t want to get married to the men their family picked our for them looking out for each other.

Langston Hughes: the Poet - A take on the famous poets sexual and romantic orientation, considering that maybe both sides are right in a way.

Christina, the King of Sweden- Someone on the asexual spectrum who was one of the most interesting figures we have covered

Happy Pride!!! In honor of Pride 2018 I Present: Pride in Space Enamel Pins! These are a PREORDER, they’ll each need 25 sales minimum to be funded, more details on that on the etsy link HERE

20% of all funded pins will go to the Trevor Project!

(There is the possibility of more being added depending on the success of the first batch)

If Enamel Pins aren’t your game, pastel versions on various goods can be found HERE and HERE

SPACE GAY PINS!!!

Reblogging so I can find this later…

Daria Kerschenbaum is an asexual writer and artist working in New York City. You can follow her on Instagram @Daria_Kersch.

“[…]spinsters were seen as queer, not because they were not mothers or wives, but because they wanted to go into the public sphere and to break the gender boundaries between the private and the public.” — Hellesund Tone (Read Full Article)

what a lovely day to remember that aces didn’t exist until like 20 years ago and aren’t inherently lgbt+

what a lovely day for me to be in this tag. 

Let us first turn to the talking about drivelessness, but we have to answer the question beforehand: “Are there even anerotic people, men and women of a post pubic age without any desire for sexual activities?” It is often said about someone, even male but especially female persons who don’t have any sexual desires whatsoever. They be called asexual, anerotic or how one could also say “atropic” [i haven’t found any reference for that word…maybe he meant “atrophic”?]; It is not uncommon that such claims are made by relatives of those people. It is also not uncommon to claim from people who are celibate -something that is from a standpoint of biological and psychological factors something that goes against nature- that they have no sexual feelings 

121 years.

We affirm that all people are sensual, sexual, and compassionate beings and shouldn’t be labeled as hetero- homo- bi- or asexual.

December 1, 1970. “It Ain’t Me Babe”, a feminist newspaper from California.*

47 years.

“this right can be for us all - lesbians, celibates, bisexual, asexual, amazon virgins and heterosexual….
“For the most part, the herstory of heterosexual women can be summed up in three words: used, abused and abandoned. Not that the destructive male spares the lesbian or the asexual woman when he is set to mate the female.

1975, for both of these. (Also note how it doesn’t group asexual women with heterosexual women.)**

42 years.

1976, in a publication of Move, a UK newspaper.***

41 years.

*I do not necessarily share the opinions of any of these authors.**Bi erasure.***TV/TS appears to likely indicate outdated slang from 1976 to refer to a trans person.

Remind me - how long has ace exclusionary discourse existed?

Gay aphobes: “Aces/aros can’t be in the community! Resource stealing might happen!”

Bi people: “So are you going to address the fact that gay people take the resources meant for us and leave us with the scraps?”

Gay aphobes: “No.”

Bi people: “But-”

Gay aphobes: “Quiet down before I start bombarding you with biphobia again!”

Wait are people actually getting mad about this post? Bi organizations got $0 out of $97,189,139 for LGBT+ funding but if we dare speak out about it then we’re homophobic?

According to the most recent LGBT Funders Tracking Report:

Bisexuals got less than 1% of LGBTQ grant dollars despite making up about half of the LGBT+ community. Also both gay men and lesbians had an increase in funding (good thing!) while funding for bisexuals decreased (bad thing!). Which is appalling considering they were already getting less than 1% to begin with.

Bi people tend to fare worse than gay people in issues such as poverty, coming out, health, mental illness, violence, abuse, suicide etc. These statistics are constantly used to get more funding for LGBT+ organizations but then barely any of it goes towards bisexuals. Which is y’know stealing resources.

Anonymous asked:

Why is the "SAM" considered homophobic?

The split attraction model is considered (by some) to be enabling homophobia. Many see a queer identity to be defined by their sexual habits, so any ‘possibility’ offered that suggests a ‘lessened’ sexuality is watering down what ‘should’ be the case.

The hypothetical situation is this; someone struggling with their sexual attraction to their own gender can see this split-attraction-model, and therefore further ‘hide’ their true selves by going, ‘I’m not really gay! I’m homoromantic demisexual!’

Thing is, any intercommunal terminology can be claimed to be harmful. Because of hypotheticals. Because of ‘what ifs’. Because people see our identities as a diluted form what they think we should be.

So the SAM is not homophobic. It’s the people insisting so that are the problem.

- Fae

Avatar

It’s All A Fucking Joke, Right

In the few months I’ve been modding at fuckyeahasexual and touring ace Tumblr, there’s been a very. Steady. Stream of info that detail horrifically abusive situations and overall poor mental unhealth. Two a week in the inbox if I’m lucky, usually around seven-ten.

And there’s been so many, I can officially categorize all 500+ of these kinds of asks and submissions into an extensive bulletlist of Why Asexual Exclusionary Radicalism Is Incredibly Toxic And Shitty;

Coming Out To Family, Friends, And Employers

  • “My parents keep telling me that I’m something else, and it’s making me doubt my sense of judgement, not just about my sexual identity, but also about everything in general.”
  • “My family, friends, and co-workers keep referring to me as an inanimate object in a manner that’s clearly meant to humiliate and devastate me. Nothing I say will get them to stop.”
  • “My parents vocally/bodily forced me to undergo medical examinations, some of them concerning my sexual organs, many of them concerning blood tests and other trauma-centric procedures.”
  • “My family is intervening with my private life by changing my schedule to include exercise, socialization, friend influences, and whatever they think can ‘change’ me.”
  • “My friends/co-workers no longer respect my bodily boundaries when I came out to them, because they no longer see me as someone who should be respected. They regularly touch, fondle, grope, and prod me without permission, and/or verbally harass me, and don’t take my objections seriously.”
  • “My family, friends, and co-workers no longer just harass me, but also anyone I’m currently dating because they view my significant other as pathetic, underserved, or even being abused.”

First Few Days Of Dating

  • “My date got irrationally angry and confrontational when I came out to them, in a manner that made me fearful.” (SO many of these.)
  • “My date immediately lost any respect they had for my boundaries, no longer asked for consent, and {tried to} force themselves upon me.” (A lot of these, too)
  • “My date tried to verbally circumvent any boundaries and issues I confessed to, and it made me feel like I was in danger.”
  • “I didn’t come out to my date at first, and when they found out, they radically changed their behavior in an attempt to control and manipulate our new relationship to their benefit.”

Long-Term Relationships

  • “My partner has forcefully and radically changed our long-term relationship after finding out about my asexuality, and I’m now trapped and controlled in a way that I wasn’t before.”
  • “My partner broke up with me/is fighting with me because of my asexuality, and trying to make it seem like I’m hurting them. It’s made me doubt myself and my ability to trust my own intentions.”
  • “My partner is slowly changing from what was once supportive of my asexuality, and I’m wondering when I have the right to be worried and when I’d be overreacting. I’m aware of the worst case scenario, but I also worry that I’m being selfish and childish - which are things I’ve been told all throughout my asexual experience.”

Self-Care And Self Development

  • “I don’t trust my ability to say either yes or no in sexual situations, and this has extended to my life in general. I don’t feel comfortable in my ability to self-determinate.”
  • “The lack of authority, definition, and schooling of the concept of asexuality has made me very uncomfortable with what I think I am, and that uncertainty haunts me every waking moment.”
  • “I think it’s too late/too early to tell if I’m asexual, but the longer I hesitate, the worse my mental health and emotional wellbeing gets. I’m effectively stuck.”
  • “I see no benefit in coming out, or even identifying as asexual. There’s no positivity, role models, or supportive community for what I consider a big and scary part of my overall identity.”
  • “I think this was sexual abuse, but I’m wondering if I’m just being selfish and childish.”
  • “I think I was treated badly by my parents/friends/partner, but I’m wondering if I’m just being selfish and childish.”
  • “I want to believe that I’m deserving of equal freedom and human respect paid to other, not asexual people, but people tell me I’m being selfish and childish.”
  • “No one encourages this part of me. And that makes me feel forgotten and abandoned in general.”

Shut the fuck up about your petty beef with tumblr bloggers and youtubers and Archie comics or whatever. I literally do not care, I can’t care. I see these messages every goddamn day - this post was written and drafted a month ago, and I very easily compiled most of this bulletpoint list from scratch, just by eyeing what I see in the askbox and what comes across my dash. 

‘Ace discourse’ anger is empty and so meaningless. This is what I see by being part of this one 17k follow asexual ask blog for maybe half a year. I am so Done with all the faux rage posts and all the false positivity about how it’s ok to NOT be ace and all the acephobia that falls perfectly in line with the gaslighting typical of acephobia-101 while also having the audacity to claim it not so.

This is what’s real and I want to bleed it into your goddamn eyes.

Avatar

Reblogging this again, for obvious reasons

Ace ppl are not INSTITUTIONALLY OR SYSTEMATICALLY OPPRESSED BECAUSE OF THE DEGREE THAT YOU FEEL SEXUAL ATTRACTION. If ur trans ur lgbtq. If ur aro but ur gay, bi, pan ur lgbtq. If ur ace but homo, biromantic etc ur lgbt. Being ace doesnt make u lgbt by default. Does the interpersonal lack of understanding suck and should change? Yeah. But society doesnt want u dead so cishet aces stay tf out our business.

Someone read this, all this stuff about struggles of people coming out as ace, people abusing them and telling them that their identity isn’t real or is a problem to be fixed, making people feel worthless and feeling that they’re in the wrong about their own goddamn identity, and said “nah they ain’t oppressed™ enough to be in a community of people who face the same issues”

U mad huh?

Anyway….aces can’t be systematically opressed. None of those things are examples of systematic oppression

Also nice how they called it “asexual exclusionary radicalism” as if it wasn’t a cheap tactic to compare ace exclusionist to twerfs

Hey, instead of being a giant piles of garbage, try reading up:

Aces don’t face oppression

Asexuality was listed in the DSM as HSDD (Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder) until 2013, making it officially a mental illness that would be treated with therapy and medication. It is still in the DSM, except that you can ‘opt out’ if you self-identify as asexual, which is great except that asexuality is still so unknown that there undoubtedly many people who are asexual but don’t know that it’s “a thing”. This means that who knows how many asexuals have been sent to therapy and told they’re sick, then been “treated” for their orientation to try and force them to experience sexuality “correctly”.

In short, our orientation has been and continues to be pathologized, and asexuals have been put through corrective therapy: x,x, x, x, x

Posts of people describing the hardship they’ve faced for their asexuality:x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x, x

The blog @acephobia-is-real has so many submissions and examples of hatred, harassment, hostility, and abuse, of aces who have been raped and/or sexually assaulted in an attempt to ‘fix’ them, and made suicidal due to aphobia and/or their own perceived brokenness, that it would be pointless for me to try and link any. Just go and start reading. Try their suicide tag.

There may be dissatisfyingly little research done on asexuality, but there has been enough done to prove that they do face discrimination, no matter how hard some may find that to believe. But guess what? You, an allosexual person, do not get to say shit like “aces don’t get kicked out” or “aces don’t _____” any more than I as a white person get to say that things I don’t experience must not happen to black people either. Just because you haven’t experienced it personally or witnessed it with your own eyes doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. You haven’t walked in an ace’s shoes, you don’t know what they deal with. Period.

Not even other aces can tell asexuals that their experiences aren’t real or aren’t valid. Different people can deal with different amounts of oppression, that doesn’t mean the lack of oppression is the default “truth”.

Nobody is trying to say that asexuals have it “as bad” or worse than gay or trans people, but we don’t HAVE to “have it worse” to beincluded and for our experiences to have merit without being compared to anyone else’s. Let me say that again: our experiences have merit without being compared to anyone else’s.

We just want to protect our safe spaces

Aphobes have:

Are all aphobes this vile? Maybe not, but this is still the disgusting, hateful attitude festering in the gatekeeping community, and it stinks like shit. The examples I have provided above are only a fraction of the harassment and abuse that is perpetrated on a regular basis.

Het aces/aroaces are straight

Some het aces identify as straight. Some het aces don’t identify as straight, they identify as asexual, and it’s not your place to label them against their will. There is no world in which aroaces, people who experience no attraction to anyone, are straight.

We accept SGA (same-gender attracted) and trans aces

Firstly, SGA (same-gender attraction) is a term that was used and is still used in Mormon conversion therapy, so as one can understand,a lot of people are very uncomfortable being labeled with this description. Secondly, it enforces a gender binary of “same” and “opposite” gender that leaves a large number of nonbinary people out in the cold. Is a genderfluid person only “same-gender attracted” if they’re attracted to other genderfluid people who are genderfluid in exactly the same way? How about agender, intergender, demigirl/boy people? And before the argument “well they’re included as trans” is made, there are plenty of nonbinary people who do not identify as trans. I’m one of them.

The standard of “SGA and trans” as requirement for entry to the LGBTQ community is used nowhere outside of aphobic tumblr, and it seems crafted specifically for the purpose of excluding aces, aros, NBs, intersex people, and others not deemed “gay enough”.

(SGA did NOT come from ‘SGL’, same-gender loving. That is a term created by black queer people and not to be appropriated by white people.)

Discussion of the history of the word ‘queer’ and why it’s better than ‘SGA’: x, x, x, x, x

There are also many “SGA and trans” aces who are against the gatekeeping and feel that they are hated by these aphobes.

The LGBT community has always been about fighting homophobia and transphobia/we came together to fight homophobia and transphobia

Despite the fact that bisexual and transgender people have always been around, and have done great things for the community, they have faced a great deal of lateral oppression from the LG part of the group that did not want to see them get an equal share of attention, support, or legitimacy. This post is not about proving LG transphobia and biphobia, but it’s so rampant that I don’t feel like I need to provide sources whatsoever. Nevertheless, here’s a collection of biphobia, and the blog@terf-calloutdocuments some of the violent transphobia on this site, particularly in the lesbian community. This post is an example.

The A stands for Ally so that closeted people can be the community without being outed

No one is saying that we don’t care about closeted people, but a) even if you’re a closeted L, G, B, or T, you are still a L, G, B, or T. Allies do not need to be part of the acronym to be intrinsically welcomed. As someone said, this is like saying the ‘B’ in BLT stands for ‘bread’. We can pretty much safely assume that a sandwich is going to include bread, we don’t have to go of our way to give it a letter. Either you are outing every “ally” as a closeted queer person, or you are giving 100% cis straight people an LGBTQ member card, the very thing you are arguing against by trying to exclude asexuals.

Furthermore, this puts forth the argument “I’m willing to let cishet straight people into the community for the sake of a few closeted people” while at the same time stating “I’m not willing to let the A stand for asexuals because I don’t think letting cis heteroromantic asexuals into the community is worth giving all asexuals representation and support”. Which says that you consider asexuals less valuable and more of a threat than cis straight people.

Aces have never been a part of the LGBTQ/queer community

Stop tokenizing bi and trans people/stop comparing bi/trans and ace experiences

We’re not the ones doing it. They are comparing them, themselves.

I have proof of an asexual being homophobic/transphobic/racist/a terrible person

Of course there are asexuals who are terrible people. There are legions of gays and lesbians who are racist and transphobic. Does that make them not gay/lesbian? Does their bigotry invalidate their sexual orientation, or remove the L and G from the acronym? No, I don’t think so. Some asexuals being bad people doesn’t justify you trying to invalidate all of us.

’Allosexual’ is a bad word because ____

I actually have an ‘allosexual’ tag just for posts about why ‘allosexual’ is a perfectly fine word: x, x, x, x, x. x

The split-attraction model is homophobic

What we call the split-attraction model was first described by Karl Heinrich Ulrichs, a gay advocate from the 1800s, as “disjunctive uranodioning”. (source) (credit to this post)

The term ‘corrective rape’ was coined by South African lesbians and should only be used by lesbians

No one means any disrespect to lesbians or other victims of corrective rape, but this is not a correct statement.

“We’ll Show You You’re a Woman” describes the violence directed towards LGBT people in South Africa, stating, “Negative public attitudes towards homosexuality go hand in hand with a broader pattern of discrimination, violence, hatred, and extreme prejudice against people known or assumed to be lesbian, gay, and transgender, or those who violate gender and sexual norms in appearance or conduct (such as women playing soccer, dressing in a masculine manner, and refusing to date men).” It goes on to say, “Much of the recent media coverage of violence against lesbians and transgender men has been characterized by a focus on “corrective rape,” a phenomenon in which men rape people they presume or know to be lesbians in order to “convert” them to heterosexuality.”

The Wikipedia article on corrective rape in South Africa states that, “A study conducted by OUT LGBT Well-being and the University of South Africa Centre for Applied Psychology (UCAP) showed that “the percentage of black gay men who said they have experienced corrective rape matched that of the black lesbians who partook in the study”.”

It is not only lesbians, but also bisexual women, transgender men, gay men, and gender non-conforming people in South Africa who experience corrective rape. This is not in any way meant to minimize the horror of the epidemic or shift attention away from lesbians, but other victims, including asexuals, deserve attention as well. Do not silence or speak over victims of rape by policing their language.

Aces are valid, they’re just not queer/LGBTQ

You cannot in one breath say “Asexuals are valid” and in the next deny their experiences. Spend five minutes in the community and you will see testimony after testimony from aces describing their abuse, their sexual assault(s), the countless times people have called them confused, broken, wrong, mentally ill, inhuman, sinful, and how these experiences have left them feeling hopeless, alone, alienated, subhuman, depressed, and suicidal. Almost every asexual out there will tell you a story of how their orientation has caused them pain and struggle, and you can’t call them valid while at the same time calling these experiences invalid and nonexistent.

Form your own community!

a) We do have our own community, because every letter in the acronym has its own communityand yet is still part of the acronym, b) you fucking shits won’t stop sending us hate and bombarding us with shit meant to trigger and harass us.

Aces take resources from other LGBTQ who need them

I’ve seen some pretty wild claims about this one, insisting that asexuals “steal” things such as scholarships, beds at homeless shelters, food and space at pride events, suicide hotlines, and so on, yet I have never seen any actual proof that any “stealing” has ever taken place. For one thing, I thought “you’ll never get kicked out or fired for being ace”, “no one is suicidal because they’re asexual”, so why would you think aces need these resources? Either we don’t need them or we don’t use them, you can’t have it both ways.

For another, how heartless do you have to be to tell asexuals that they can’t use suicide hotlines? Do you realize that you’re saying that asexuals should be denied life-saving services? That, in essence, asexuals are suicidal due to their orientation, but you think they’re not “queer enough” so they deserve to die? Because that is the logical progression of refusing someone suicide prevention, and that’s the message aces receive when you tell them they are “stealing” suicide prevention.

Lastly, do you not realize we are alsoPROVIDING resources? We are bringing bodies and minds to the community, we are here to be voices, to volunteer, to bring encouragement, information, and support. We earn our keep. You just have to admit that you don’t WANT us here.

(Thanks to @livebloggingmydescentintomadness for these)

My own contribution:

Living in a world where the media is overflowing with sexual imagery and where society constantly puts value on sexual intercourse, virginity, and related topics - who can forget the phrase ‘sex sells’? - men and women who do not experience sexual attraction (the definition of asexuality) and who are sex-repulsed or masturbation-repulsed (as many asexuals, myself included, are) feel alienated and ‘broken’. We also face erasure in terms of representation, being either grossly underrepresented or represented as cold, harsh, and ‘synonymous with celibate’ people. Let’s not forget erasure from LGBT spaces - I have many times been told that asexuals do not belong in the acronym or in “our spaces”, even though asexuals have the capacity to be homoromantic, biromantic, panromantic, etc, as well as transgender or nonbinary. And, if we don’t belong in LGBT spaces, and we clearly aren’t heterosexual, what do we belong? Nowhere, it seems. Of course, the argument also drifts to “asexuals don’t experience oppression”, which is false.

Examples of asexual oppression:

Asexuals are the highest targets for corrective rape:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/20/asexual-discrimination_n_3380551.html

Go fuck yourselves. <3

I found out last year that I'm asexual or at least I think I am. I am still a little confused. I want to know what goes through a person's mind when they experience different types of attractions (sexual, romantic, aesthetic, etc.) I just want to know if I have felt any of them and maybe figure out my romantic orientation with help of this information. Thank you!

Avatar

Sexual - I am driven to this person with sexual energy, centered around them as an individual. I might desire to have sex with them, or otherwise interact with them sexually.

Romantic - I am driven to this person with romantic energy, centered around them as an individual. I might desire to interact with them in romantic scenarios.

Aesthetic - I am driven to this person because of their ornamentation. They are visually eyecatching in a visual, superficial/topical way.

Platonic - I am driven to this person under an attraction that cannot be defined as either romantic or sexual.

Sensual - I am driven to this person with energy that inspires my senses. AKA, look at that fluffy cat, can I please pet them.

- Fae

Avatar
tenitchyfingers:
Anyway the LGBT community is for anyone whose identity is outside of the heteronormative rule (heterosexual, heteroromantic and cis, all three of these) and any “older” LGBT person is gonna confirm BECAUSE THEY BUILT THE DAMN COMMUNITY. Try asking them. Ask a 40-50 year old (or older) gay man or lesbian what the community is for. Ask them. Do it though. Learn some of your own history from them, and then come back to me then try and tell me I’m wrong. 

You’re wrong.

I’m a 59 year old gay man and I’m telling you in no uncertain terms, You. Are. Wrong.

Here’s a history lesson from someone who both lived it and has read extensively about LGBT issues, as well as being involved in many different organizations. I realized what I was when I was very young. I first came out in the late 60s. I was an activist during the 70s, 80s, and early 90s.

This is long, but history is long. It’s important. I tried to break it down into smaller paragraphs for easier reading. But it’s long. I debated not putting this under a cut, but holy hell it’s long. 

If you’re actually interested in WHY you’re wrong, OP, I hope you’ll read it.

“”But to rewrite the history of the LGBT movement/community to say that “asexuals have always been there”, that it’s “for all non-heteronormative people”, that “bisexuality has always included asexuals”, that “bisexuality itself has always been a distinct ‘identity’ from lesbian or gay”, that “trans has never been about sex rather than gender”, etc. etc. etc.

You’re simply historically wrong.””

…anyway, this is what I was talking about. 

Also this collection of quotes from older LGBT people (specifically bisexuals who got erased from the main LGBT history’s narrative, as it always happens)

“[A]s a bi trans woman who was there and actually saw aroaces being part of the bi community and putting in the work and dealing with the oppression…  The bi community was actively rejecting definitions beyond ‘not gay, not straight’ into the mid-90s, because every definition offered excluded some of its members.” - @wetwareproblem, from this post “"[In a 1992 issue of The Advocate], Nona Hendryx’s interviewer used the word ‘bisexual,’ and Hendryx did not reject the word but said, ‘I try to think of myself as asexual.’“ – Bisexuality and the Challenge to Lesbian Politics, by Paula Rust
“When I grew up, heterosexual/homosexual/bisexual were explicitly not specifically sexual. “It’snot about sex!” was a battlecry. This was emphasized frequently as people would sit there trying to come up with some gotcha that meant that you couldn’t be gay and a virgin at the same time. Or — and this is important: that you couldn’t be queer if you weren’t interested in sex. While it’s not necessarily the same as explicitly affirming asexuality, this was a way in which the asexual experience was made intelligible under the mainstream organization of sexuality. “There was a lot of rhetoric that emphasized this point. In particular, that the fixation on the sexual part of homo/bi-sexuality was actually a form of heterocentrism in which hets would try to strip queers of the capability for romantic attraction. “Yes, there are problems there. Yes, there’s the privileging of romantic attraction as better and more pure than sexual. And it’s worth talking about.
“But that’s not what I’m getting at right now.What I am getting at, is that in the models I grew up with, among the queers I grew up around, both aro and ace people could qualify as not just bi, but bisexual…. “During a time in which being aro or ace (or aroace) was even less intelligible to the mainstream — or even the mainstream queer community — than it is now, where were the ace and aro bi people? Where did they organize under when trying to deal with monosexism? Where did they vent their frustrations over LG exclusion? Where did they openly talk about their attractions? Who were they fighting alongside? “Bisexuals. “They were with the bisexuals. “They were bisexuals.” – @atomicbubblegum, from this post

Aside from this, I already replied to this post saying how it enlightened me to reach the actual truth about the ace discourse: it’s pointless, because it’s a discussion on inclusion and exclusion of people in various parts of the world and it’s trying to speak over single LGBT groups’ policies. If you have a problem with your local LGBT group allowing aces to participate, you should bring it to them, not to the internet.

But my initial point still stands. The fact that von–gelmini has his own truth coming from his own experience doesn’t mean that everyone else’s truth is automatically false just because it doesn’t fit your narrative. So no, I wasn’t really being ahistorical. People were there and they remember things differently. 

“actually what you’re saying is only half true because wetwareproblem and autismserenity have made up things that say otherwise, ace pride!“ 

the thing that rly gets me is that all that history was well-documented

if asexuals existed in the community and were involved back then then where are the historical ace pamphlets? their photos? newspaper or magazine clippings? badges? stickers? posters? where are the references to their activism? where are their mentions in the literature?

not a single one. but someone on tumblr said something was true, so it must be true

the thing that rly gets ME is that exclusionists assume that these things don’t exist because they haven’t seen them. 

there’s this repeated logical fallacy in the discourse where people assume that because they don’t know of ace-related historical ephemera, or they don’t know of shared experiences aces have with the rest of us, or they don’t know of any examples of ace oppression, those things do not exist. 

and then they begin all their arguments at the “these things do not exist” point. 

mind you, what i should actually be annoyed by is the fact that no matter what I cite, they’re like U MADE THAT UP like really??? that’s the best you got???? 

that’s basically an admission that what I gave you DOES destroy your argument and that all you can do is be like “well then it must be fake.” 

but anyway

examples of lesbian and gay publications casually referencing asexuals

all examples below are from a new primary source collection, Archives of Human Sexuality and Identity: LGBTQ History and Culture since 1940, which contains approximately 1.5 million pages from organizations in Canada, the US, Mexico, and the UK. 

I have access to it through the San Francisco Public Library; if anyone’s local/school library doesn’t give them access, i’d be happy to share my login, just message me. It’s really easy to search and has amazing stuff.  

Here’s a page from a 47-year-old issue of “It Ain’t Me Babe,” which was California’s first feminist newspaper, and then became the first national feminist newspaper. The opening line of this article: “We affirm that all people are sensual, sexual and compassionate beings and shouldn’t be labeled as hetero- homo- bi- or asexual.”

(I mean obviously I disagree with the author, but the point is that they listed “hetero, homo, bi, or asexual” as the four options. (Keep in mind that “homosexual” was the “formal” language at the time, it wasn’t considered a slur; this wasn’t technically a lesbian newspaper, but like off our backs, it basically was one in all but name.))  

(OH MY GOD SIDEBAR: I just read more of the piece linked about, about how this was the first feminist underground newspaper, and OFC my old boss, Laura X, was involved in it. she has some “women’s herstory archives” she runs now, by which i think i mean a shed in her backyard BUT ANYWAY that’s a whole nother story) 

In 1975, a Eugene, Oregon newspaper called Women’s Press showcased a quote by lesbian Florence Rush, from “The Parable of the Mothers and Daughters,”  about women’s rights, which said “this right can be for us all - lesbians, celibates, bisexual, asexual, amazon virgins and heterosexual….” (I’m skipping a bunch of examples that are in the same vein, because why bother giving more similar examples when I could skip to examples of other things on the list?)

and another one in 1975 Pennsylvania, called Hera, published an article about battered women that lumped lesbian and asexual women together in contrast to straight ones: “For the most part, the herstory of heterosexual women can be summed up in three words: used, abused and abandoned. Not that the destructive male spares the lesbian or the asexual woman when he is set to mate the female.” (Bi erasure, but never mind.) 

but where are the people identifying themselves as asexual?

Bristol, apparently; the first classified ad on this 1976 page of Move, a UK publication, seeks a pen pal for a “lonely asexual tv/ts.” (today this would likely say “for a lonely asexual trans woman,” but it was nineteen fucking seventy six). 

In this 1977 issue of Feminist Communications, out of San Diego, CA, four women are interviewed about their sexual orientation and how they relate to the lesbian-feminist movement. Two are lesbians, one is bi in a “straight” relationship, and one, Pam, identifies as “self-sexual and not open to a relationship right now.” 

I’m not ace, but I know enough to know she’s saying she’s on that spectrum. Later in the interview, she clarifies, “I think labels are really oppressive and I really resent being called straight or bisexual, asexual, non-sexual, or having to deal with a label. I think that really inhibits me as far as relating to people. People see me as one sort of sexuality and they relate to me in that way… Such an emphasis put on who you relate to takes all the fun out of relating to anyone for me." 

The way she describes her experiences is basically, “I’m asexual but I hate labels, and I don’t know if I’m heteromantic or biromantic or lesbian or what honestly.” 

ok I need to take a break, but I’ve only gone through 6 years of this stuff and there are another 40 to go. 

TL;DR: where is all the LBGTQ+ community ephemera that mentions aces? i don’t know, did you look through any?

Can I just be momentarily salty on how we the voices of older bisexuals, trans people, and people of color (aka the people who we know for a historical fact were shunned by the 1960s-70s gay-cis-male centered movements) are all erased and accused of lying, but the voice of one older white gay cis man (aka the people who were centered in the movement, so, you know, someone who would have been hanging out in DIFFERENT POLITICAL/SOCIAL CIRCLES) is absolutely definitely 100% true the entire truth nothing but the truth and nothing else could ever come close. 

I’m not sure what’s worse, the hypocrisy, the willful ignorance, or the bigotry. 

Anonymous asked:

Your post about Heteromantic Aces in the LGBTQA+ community really struck a core with me. I always felt bad for saying I don't really feel part of the community or I don't really need it, because everyone wondered why. I realize now that I don't have to answer why, it's my own personal belief. If people need the community then that's amazing because they have it, but it's something I have never needed but will fight for other people to have.

This last sentence is so important when it comes to activism

it’s something I have never needed but will fight for other people to have

Just because you don’t need something doesn’t mean it isn’t life saving to others. Keep the belief always for all people.

Avatar

There’s a post going around about it right now, but it makes me uncomfortable due to its “if this happened to a gay character, you’d be up in arms!” tone, but I do want to talk about this issue:

A popular television show, House.MD, introduced an “asexual” couple, aimed to prove that asexuality is unnatural, aimed to pathologize the couple’s asexuality, aimed to cure their asexuality, and they were ultimately “successful.”

The episode aired in 2012, for reference. 

An asexual man and his female partner were told that their asexuality wasn’t real. They were put through a series of tests. They discovered that the man’s asexuality was caused by a medical problem and the woman was faking it. 

Seriously, this happened. Some select quotes:

  • (I have a patient who is asexual) “Is she a giant pool of algae?
  • “$100 says I can find a medical reason why she doesn’t want to have sex”
  • (What does it matter if she’s asexual?) “It’s the fundamental drive of our species. Sex is healthy.”
  • “Lots of people don’t have sex. The only people who don’t want it are sick, dead, or lying.”

In addition, the asexual man is subjected to various tests because of a bet made to disprove his asexuality when he was simply seeking medical care. The man is encouraged to seek treatment because his partner “has needs.” 

I can understand representing negative attitudes about asexuality in a realistic manner, and the above statements have been said in similar ways to me at times in my life. However, the episode validated these opinions

In a single episode, asexuals were told that:

  • asexuality isn’t real – it’s a medical problem
  • if your asexuality is a medical problem, you should seek treatment
  • sex is a basic human need that all people should have

Not only was this incredibly invalidating, but it promotes the pathologization of asexuality which contributes to medical abuse asexual people may face. I wont talk about my asexuality with doctors because of stuff like this. 

It promotes the idea that asexual people need to overcome their asexuality in order to be a good partner. You need to seek treatment. (The asexual man: “What if I don’t want the treatment?” His partner: A girl has needs.) 

By the end of the episode, it’s all about House making the right diagnosis! Let’s celebrate! He’s literally rewarded for invalidating a man’s asexuality by pushing tests and treatments on him that he didn’t ask for.

I don’t want people telling me that I have “no problems” as an asexual person, when getting medical care as an out asexual person can be risky. This episode demonstrated a real nightmare for some asexual people.

They validated a nightmare situation. They didn’t validate our identity.  

Asexual Sex-Ed: The Dom

image

When it comes to aces and sex, there’s these huge discussions going left and right. Every ace has their own feelings about sex, and having sex with other people in any context. I’ve talked to many aces (and partners of aces), and I’ve often said that being in a ‘dom’ role can really help reduce sex repulsion and anxiety while also offering sexual stimulation.

Asexual sex-ed is virtually non-existent, which means that aces are often left with limited information, and therefore limited options. But options exist. BDSM with aces may seem like a surprising match, but when you think about it, it really isn’t. 

Aces being active in BDSM isn’t without precedent. Kink is especially alive and kicking in the lgbt+ community as a whole, and BDSM in particular is known for being therapeutic. It’s common for those who’re living with trauma to pursue BDSM as a way to cope. And for aces who are sex-repulsed, and/or struggling with their sexuality and libido, BDSM can be an excellent choice.

So I’ve written a BDSM post about asexuality and doms, which is almost completely based off of my own experience of being a dom. I encourage everyone to pursue this information, regardless of their own sexuality or feelings on sex. This is information that needs to be more readily available to the community.

You can also check out my other asexual sex-eds - on masturbating, consent, sexual health, and mental self care. I’m no licensed doctor - I’m writing based solely on my own experience. My words are just one voice in what hopefully will soon be a menagerie of ace sex ed.

(Be warned, pictures to explicit imagery will be linked. This text post contains no explicit imagery.)

Things an asexual person should never hear

  • Trust me, once you do it, you’ll love it.
  • You haven’t found the right person yet!
  • You just need to relax.
  • You’re just not mature enough yet. You’ll come around.
  • I’ll show you that you aren’t.
  • I know you aren’t.
  • know you aren’t.
  • So you’re saving yourself for marriage, then?
  • Hey, if you’re saving yourself, that’s cool. You don’t need to make up a fancy label for it like the queers.
  • Let me help you loosen up, you’ll like it.
  • Were you abused or something?
  • Did someone hurt you?
  • Someone must have hurt you.
  • Well, you haven’t been with me yet.
  • You think you’re better than us because you don’t have sex?
  • So you’re like a nerdy-aspergers-introvert-Sheldon type, then?
  • You could probably get medication to help with that. Let me do some research.
  • No, you don’t seem like the type.
  • You’re just trying to justify being a tease.

People who get angry at asexuals who are attractive because they can’t have sex with them are ridiculous.

You don’t get angry at art galleries for displaying Renaissance art but saying you aren’t allowed to touch it. No, because you respect the fact that they are precious.

People are precious, why can’t you afford them the same respect?