Avatar

Of Art, Pokémon, Nintendo, Star Wars, Etc...

@rex-shadao

On Nintendo Network (and formerly Miiverse), Pokémon forums and various other websites, I am simply known as Shadao. I tend to write a lot of things regarding to Pokémon and any Nintendo-related stuff, as well as other franchises like Star Wars. I like to make artworks in my spare time, and I hope they'll find an audience here on this social network.  Visit @rexshadaoart for my art gallery.

Ash and Red: Timeline of Appearances

I plan to make a long essay talking about the connection between Ash and Red throughout the Pokémon franchise, but since the franchise is over 27 years old, and much of the old Internet is scattered and lost to time, I decided to make a timeline of the early years of Pokémon to compile all the evidences in chronological order, most consisted of their first appearance, the mention of their names in various media, some forums talking about the two, and any other misc information. I also included links to each specific media to keep track of where I found such information whenever necessary.

I know for certain that I'm missing some media here or there, but I'll be updating this post whenever I find new information. If you have any new information, I'll be happy to include it in this massive timeline doc.

Also note, the timeline will not extend beyond 2010 because by that point, Ash and Red have been officially considered to be two distinct characters. This is merely a timeline to document how Red rose into prominence in the Pokémon fandom and at what point was he considered to be a separate character from Ash rather than just Ash with a different name.

Reading about how some Twitter teen harassed a disabled artist off Twitter (and man, it really does seem to be marginalised people that antis go after nine times out of ten, huh. What a funny coincidence), claiming that they had ‘amputated their own leg’ because of a ‘fetish,’ only to then turn around when people got angry at them to go “No, you can’t do that to me! I’m disabled and a minor! Oh, there’s nothing I can do now that harassment has started, people will never accept an apology, this is awful,” without seeing a lick of irony in the fact that they landed themselves with exactly the same treatment they deliberately provoked for someone else (well, with the addition that they actually did do the things they’re getting harassed for, unlike their victim), and just – 

It’s such a textbook bullying and abuse behaviour, you know? “I get to hurt other people, and I need to hurt other people to feel a sense of power and control, but the moment I get any kind of backlash, it’s cruel and unfair. Other people aren’t real and are acceptable targets for me to slander, harass, and bully, but I have feelings and deserve grace and kindness when I make mistakes. I am always the wronged party, regardless of what’s happening, and never the one wronging others.”

Avatar

People who say "we need a botw 3 to round out a trilogy!!!" are such FOOLS. Age of Calamity is RIGHT THERE. we ALREADY HAVE a trilogy. The story arc is already fully rounded out.

BOTW: Blue (Wisdom)

AOC: Red (Power)

TOTK: Green (Courage)

The Switch Triforce

"Dorothy threw her arms around her little friend and hugged and kissed her rapturously." - The Road to Oz (1909)

A last artwork for #pridemonth2023 before the month is over. The background is composed of colors of the LGBT flag, Lesbian flag, and Transgender flag.

A little trivia, it was inspired by the #Lumity kiss in the Series Finale of The Owl House.

« Stories have told us that mermaids are sweet, lovely, peaceful creatures… » And what kind of stories have you been told Dreamworks ?

Honestly, all of the things to jab at Disney, Dreamworks went with a jab that would only work in the 2000s or the 90s, back when parodying Disney was at an all-time high thanks to the Disney Renaissance. But once Disney started making vicious mermaids for Pirates of the Caribbean, that jab has long become outdated.

And what's even worse, the marketing campaign seems to be centered around making fun of The Little Mermaid... at the expense of spoiling a critical plot twist and opening itself to Dreamwork's shortcomings regarding deeper storytelling and characterization.

The term I'm hearing now is "Average Dreamworks Movie" aka Shrek Film without Layers. After Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, there really is no excuse to be just a shallow Shrek film.

Dorothy Gale and Ozma of Oz.

Back to back pose with their weapon of choice. Wicked Witches, beware! Based on the latest redesigns I made for them.

Note: Decided to give Dorothy silver shoes instead of ruby slippers just to see if they work out well here (and thus I won't worry about MGM or whoever owns the 1939 film coming after me since Silver Shoes are public domain).

Based on this pose reference from @adorkastock.

Updated Redesign of Tip and Ozma, complete with expression sheet.

Tip's outfit has been designed to better match the color motif of the Gillikins. It's more closer to the original illustration overall, though I did pull several elements from my old designs to create this new look.

The hairstyle was updated to make it easier to animate and drawn. The original hairstyle had a tendency to get exaggerated in size and didn't look that great when Tip/Ozma is facing forward to us. Also was inspired to make Ozma's hair longer after seeing this Twitter post.

Anonymous asked:

I think cause there's been a recent trend of sympathetic villains being redemeed (most of the time in lackluster ways) in other properties, people in the fandom found refreshing how the show treated Belos as 100% evil with no attempts at redeeming him.

People finding it "refreshing" makes me wonder how big their entertainment pool really is or they'd know that redeeming a villain is the exception, not the rule, regardless if it's a recent trend. Take it from a Villain Enjoyer who drops redeemed Villains the moment it happens. There's only been a handful of villains that were redeemed, the most popular one to be compared is Steven Universe, compared to a good majority of shows where the villains get what's coming to them, be it death, imprisonment, banishment, or a fate worse than death.

The moment "witch hunter" was uttered in Hollow Mind, it was very obvious that he was not going to be redeemed or have a change of heart.

Belos was a villain that deserved better writing and focus but when the fandom hears that, they automatically default to the black-and-white thinking that it means redemption. That's why when the finale aired and Belos enjoyers and myself expressed dissatisfaction with it, the default was "You wanted him redeemed". Ew.

The writing was good enough to make him a good, complex HUMAN villain so it needed to follow through with his ending and not cop out on something the show already touched on where he survived. His death should have been given to a writer that actually liked him and used the lore that was put in place to give a satisfying, and quite final, end to him.

I've said this before and I will say it again: Most real-life serial killers have sympathetic backgrounds. That does not mean they get a pass for what they've done just because they said "sorry".

Avatar

The thing that people forget about those "sympathetic" villains being redeemed is that often, they are paired with villains that are not redeemed and are utter evil monsters.

You have King Andrias from Amphibia. He gets redemption, and all of his evil actions are then excused by fans by pointing to the Core (aka King Aldrich) as the source of Andrias' evil. You have Catra and Hordak from Netflix's She-Ra being redeemed, but then you have the big evil Horde Prime serving as the irredeemable villain. Prince Zuko? You get Fire Lord Ozai. Darth Vader? Emperor Palpatine aka Darth Sidious. Live-Action Maleficent? King Stefan and Queen Ingrith will fill in the role.

You can even see it in the Owl House itself. Remember when Lilith or Hunter were once considered to be villains?

The only show that has ever avoided that trope entirely was Steven Universe. And even then, there are individuals who remain unrepentant. It's just that they don't have enough evil to truly stand out.

So more often than not, the irredeemable villains still remain a constant in the mainstream media. And that's for shows with sympathetic or redeemable villains. Now let's put in other media stories where no villain gets redeemed (The Super Mario Bros Movie comes to mind). Suddenly, the irredeemable villains outweigh the presence of redeemable villains.

My only guess as to why audiences got the opposite feeling is because most of these pure evil villains are generic and stock, being forgotten within the next two months.

HMMMMMMMMmm :/

Here be the irony. Matthew Rhys voices both the False Conductor (Amelia in disguise) and Alrick Timmens.

It wouldn't surprise me if Dana Terrance got Rhys onboard to voice Belos once she told him of Belos' backstory, which is essentially Amelia's backstory with a far more darker undertone.

After all, Rhys did said that Belos was "misunderstood".

Non-MB/CM Villain Highlight: Calamity Ganon from The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Why he's not an MB: Generic Doomsday Villain animalistic in his nature

Why he's not a CM: Generic Doomsday Villain, implied to completely lack moral agency

Why I like him: Despite the lack of personality (which Ganondorf seems to have in spades in this game's sequel), what makes him noteworthy than is the sheer threat he poses and the presence he commands in the game. He's a former shell of himself determined to destroy Hyrule at any cost, with no reason as to why. He plagues the kingdom for a full century after he kills the pilots of the Divine Beasts and corrupts its guardians, turning the Kingdom into a hellscape overrun with monsters that serve him and powerful sentries that kill on sight. He's this terrible, corrupted beast overrun with malice as much as the kingdom he's damned. And at the end of the game, he's shown to either give up or refuse to give up this endless cycle of reincarnation just to kill Link and Zelda to destroy Hyrule once and for all. Of all of Ganon's incarnations, this is the single most raw personification of Demise's curse, committing endless cruelties in his forgotten name.

-Stella

Oh, I think that little moral agency problem has been resolved in Tears of the Kingdom.

Y’know, Tulin becoming the new Rito Champion in place of Teba (assuming/hoping Teba became village chief) makes sense when you bring AoC into the equation.

Terrako brought forth the new champions into the past to save the original champions. Yet we find out later that there’s been sighting of a young Rito (which Teba immediately realizes is his son) and they go to rescue him.

Terrako had pulled Tulin into the past. Tulin had survived on his own for presumably days/weeks/months. (I don’t remember the exact timeline, I need to go rewatch/replay that chapter) And he was like… eight. And we see in the cutscene afterwards that he almost mimicked Revali’s Gale perfectly, calling it Tulin’s Tornado (which is absolutely adorable) and Revali actually praised him.

It’s been hinted at all along that Tulin is one of the new Champions. He and his father.