Tav: It's a shame we killed that guy. Seemed more lonely than cruel. 😔
Not even five seconds later: *discovers a secret room dedicated to poison and torture with a corpse in a barrel*
and on April 13th, 2006, niel banged out the tunes, and it was good
Just by chance we happened to find a matching ring for me. They're probably cursed or something.
The thing about me is that I am constantly singing dumb little songs about my dog.
Okay so this is bothering me.
Doing research on tail docking I keep running across the claim that there was a tax in England on pet/non-working dogs, and docked tails were used as a way to show that a dog was used for work and thus exempt:
It sounds fine. It even makes sense when looking at dogs in England at the time that are docked versus ones that aren't.
But the thing about this claim- which I see referenced in academic journals: I CAN'T FIND A FUCKING SOURCE FOR IT.
I've found an article on a different dog tax that makes no mention of working dogs or docked tails, which is sometimes incorrectly cited as a source for this. I've been shown a countess mentioning this tax in a parliament debate thingy. The closest I've found to an original source is an old article in a periodical that makes reference to 'ancient forest laws.'
I haven't though found a single source that shows evidence that this tax was ever a thing.
WHERE did this come from? Was is just hallucinated in 2007 in front of parliament? Did the article about a different tax get incorrectly cited and then that citation just got repeated because nobody actually checks citations? Is this an inference someone made? Am I just missing a very obvious keyword in my searching?
If someone has a source for this claim I would love to see it!
I see you in my notes on my 'helpful dog' post. I see you and I know what you are.
REDDITORS.
Trying to find the source of a repeated Known Fact and all the citations regarding that Known Fact are like
- Paper about something unrelated
- Paper that contradicts the Known Fact
- Trust me bro
- Trust that guy bro
- Completely uncited opinion piece
- Paper citing one of the above
This is a photo of a wolf according to my fiance.
Dog at the dinner table.
"Will your mouth still remember the taste of my love" is the sort of line that you'd expect to come from a guy audibly masturbating on a phone call with the public library but it's actually from a song written for sub-mid cover bands to sing at weddings for 19 year olds.
Fluffy babies!
what most people don't know about Easter is that if Jesus sees his shadow after emerging from the tomb, we get six more weeks of sin
Let's take a moment to look closer at these guys! Look at the ones that are in the big groups! Compare them to the one that's sitting at the farthest bottom left. See how their faces look greyer (they'd be striped in a clearer photo) and lack the mutton chops?
They're all BABIES!
And look at where they're all facing and moving towards- they look like they're all watching and following the adult! They're little fresh green sprouts just learning how to Bird!
me and the mutuals
Boop?
BITE
Source is SHARKEEE ON TWITTER who posts tons of original amazing wildlife shots and videos but I needed to show you what lamprey look like mating, you won’t regret it especially not when one of them is still so worked up it starts swinging a boulder around with its face
If you super boop me and i dont super boop back, i promise its just cause im on mobile



