4 horsemen of the weird guy apocalypse

establishing a new weird guy apocalypse horseman standard as having no visually recognizable arms

This guy alone just filled my "live your life with passion" quota for the year.

a man came up to me the other day and asked me if I had a wife and kids and while I was incredibly shocked that he was remarkably incorrect, I was more shocked that he passed completely by both gay (incorrect) and bi (actually correct) to land on Complete Heterosexual. so shocked I could not confirm him with an answer and he told me to “have many babies” anyways.

reading an article on weaving and birth in aeschylus and i am obsessed with the idea of evil weavers weaving evil fabrics now. if you were an evil weaver what evil fabric would YOU weave

chartreuse exclusively. next question

Jfc…and of course, also Columbus this weekend, too.

(Tweet link)

I saw my first drag show in 2005…If you would have told me it would be 20 times less safe to go to one in 2022, I’d have never believed you.

every year same shit different day

anyway not only did the “legalization” of cannabis in California fail to free Black and Brown people imprisoned for the sale and possession of cannabis, it also did not halt urine testing for cannabis as a means of re-incarcerating people on parole and probation, or change the fact that folks in California prisons who test positive for cannabis can lose visitation or be put in solitary confinement

the thruline here in case you missed it is that in states where weed is legal the state is still very much using weed as a pretense to steal people from their families

It bothers me how, at least in the English language, so many seemingly neutral and basic words are assumed to have romantic connotations by default. When you “like” somebody it means you have a crush on them, and when you’re in a “relationship” it means you’re romantically involved… even though “like” and “relationship” are among the most basic words to describe any human relations whatsoever.

We can’t even have language to describe how we relate as people without it being tainted by amatonormativity.

#I mean I guess#it’s a fair point but it’s a little subjective#i agree with OP up until they use the word ‘tainted’#so much of our existence as people is built off someone’s urge to fuck someone else it’s not surprising those connotations exist#and while it’s valuable to discuss the deconstruction of those connotations#‘tainted’ is such an inherently negative word that I sorta wish OP reflected on how really beautiful love and relationships can be#even if they don’t relate to the experience much

I get what you’re saying, but it’s kind of rude to tell an aromantic person they need to “reflect on how beautiful love can be”, especially when they are specifically talking about how amatonormativity alienates us from language. It’s upsetting to not be able to talk about how you feel and the relationships you do have when everything is assumed to be romantic, and romantic attraction is given precedence over everything else. Aromantic people are extremely alienated from relationships and the language used to describe them (at least in English) because of this. I imagine OP used a negative word on purpose because this can have a really negative impact on aromantics; it’s upsetting to constantly have to try and navigate language and relationships when everything is romantic by default, especially if you are romance-repulsed and that distresses you.

I’m not saying this was your intent, but to me, it feels kind of… a bit too close to “why do aromantics have to be so negative about love, stop trying to ruin it for the rest of us just because you’re bitter!” for comfort. We are allowed to express negative feelings about love and romance, and we shouldn’t have to pander to alloromantic people’s positive feelings about it, you know? Most aromantic people have had to think a lot more and a lot deeper about the meaning of love and their feelings about it than alloromantic people have.

really need someone to slonk my shit rn stupid style

ha Ha… YEAH 👍 Thanks For thee Knew Vocab   Love to Gulp and Slonk sloppily Any Day

One Time I even Got a noise Complaint. . , … Arrested & tacked a , PIG on my way out ….But that’s a Story for Phone, or Off-Line.

 if you’re a Slipperry Slonker , Throat GOAT , or GulpFreak , You Should contact me or      My Estate (by those means (only)).

Contact me if you Gulp, L oud and proud ! Any Sowlawing sorts are welcome.

but get in touch Off-Line, or by Phone, only.

can host / N S A  / Discrete if you need 

 —Gulpingfan22

this is one of my college professors

he’s very well read

HARRY DU BOIS & CRASH BANDICOOT: ROADTRIP OF A LIFETIME. FRIENDSHIPS MADE. SOULS BONDED. THE BROTHERHOOD FORGED.

and then they kissed.

Post: atheist youtubers are overdosing on deep rock galactic pussy me: not true Post: bunnies and cats are learning how to write in new language called US american cuneiform me: thats right

Teach your children how to deal with emotions in a constructive way. I wish I had done this with my children.

rigged

It bothers me how, at least in the English language, so many seemingly neutral and basic words are assumed to have romantic connotations by default. When you “like” somebody it means you have a crush on them, and when you’re in a “relationship” it means you’re romantically involved… even though “like” and “relationship” are among the most basic words to describe any human relations whatsoever.

We can’t even have language to describe how we relate as people without it being tainted by amatonormativity.

Your more recent post, "who up pissing in they pants" hasn't been doing quite as well as it could. We recommend broadening the demographic audience, and changing the style of the post to a call to action to drive engagement, e.g. "Does anyone else think pissing their pants is really important?"

You'll notice that people do this in multiplayer games for much the same reason!

reblog to orbit your mutuals and even oink or perhaps go buzz buzz or honk

Whatever *does this*