Avatar

[still on the boats at chibi]

@rabbitprint / rabbitprint.tumblr.com

Hi, I'm Rabbitprint! You can find me on writing sites like AO3. I mostly reblog other content here, but sometimes cross-post fic and do prompt calls. Feel free to drop me an ask! Pronouns are he/him/his.

A lot of old radical feminist theory would compare the masculinity of butch lesbians with the masculinity of cis straight men, which I think is interesting, because a lot of cis straight men’s masculinity is acted out of fear of being seen as gay, and the masculinity of butch lesbians are what make them immediately identifiable as gay. Which makes me think of this quote from Carol A. Queen;

“Loving masculinity in a woman differs crucially in one way from loving it in a man: In her it is a badge of standing out, not of fitting in. It is grown into through pain, or at least a sense of separation from those less different.”

The comparison of butch lesbians and cis straight men just doesn’t make sense.

Can you say more on this, with respect to the tags?

Yeah sure!

So basically, men and other people who aren’t women or lesbians have a long history of butch gender identity and presentation. There’s a few reasons this isn’t well known, including that “masc” has replaced “butch” in a lot of contemporary queer men’s vocabulary, but I honestly think that one of the reasons is that mainstream feminism and online Rainbow communities love gender essentialism.

I have never seen gay men’s masculinity used as a reference point in discussions of butchness or butch gender. The only reference points are cishet masculinity and lesbian/women’s masculinity. Why is that? Personally, I think it’s because gender essentialist beliefs have locked people into thinking that the only way masculinity can be non-hegemonic or non-toxic is when it’s being done by a woman, because women are the opposite of men and it therefore negates the “toxicity” of the masculinity.

But as the post says, a pillar of cishet masculinity is the fear of looking gay. So why do we never talk about gay men’s masculinity when we’re talking about butch, since they’re liberated from this fear? Is it because gender essentialism makes us lowkey believe that gay men are all femme, or at least that their gender presentation can only be nontoxic/counter-hegemonic when it’s femme?

I don’t think that men doing butch is exactly the same as women doing butch; for one thing, queer men’s butch is inflected with trying to get men to fuck you in a way that women tend to avoid (though I would be fascinated to see butch bisexual women using those elements!). There’s also less emphasis on chivalry than there is in the common conceptions of women’s butch, though given the way I’ve seen butches talking about feeling used as a result of that I’m not sure that’s a bad thing. What I’ve seen from cis queer men also suggests that butch is treated as more of a standalone identity, rather than having an expectation that a butch man will naturally pair up with a camp/femme man.

But despite the differences, there are a lot of points of crossover and sharing! Both are about deliberately (over-)performing masculinity to get the attention of other queer people, both liberally poach from mainstream men’s aesthetics and then spin them into something visibly queer. Despite the mythologising by separatists, queer men’s and women’s communities have always been connected; their cultures developed interdependently, not in their own little silos, so of course the people doing queer masculinity were going to borrow from each other.

If you’re interested in learning more about queer men’s butch, let me recommend you Clark Henley’s The Butch Manual, an affectionate satire of 1980′s California gay men’s butch (post with some pages here, full PDF here); Butch is a Noun, a collection of essays by S. Bear Bergman; and here’s a post where I compiled references to gay men using the term “butch” in the books that were on my shelf at home.

cc @genderkoolaid since you reblogged my tags earlier, here’s more!

As a final note, if you would like to rage at me for saying that anyone other than lesbians have a claim to the terms butch and femme, I instead invite you to download Grindr and tell that to all the men with “no fats, no femmes” in their profile bios 👍

Avatar

Agape 🤍 for the hurt

Cover for an upcoming artbook containing Curse of Strahd related artworks that focus on my Paladin character Ionel.

Avatar

[id: Tweet by iconawrites, which reads: "I love public libraries because they are built on the principle that books are so important and so necessary to human flourishing that access to them cannot depend on your income." end id.]

I was a grown ass adult before I realized the library was free.  I went into the library and asked to join.  When they gave me the form to fill out for a library card, I asked if they took credit cards and the librarian had to explain to me that the library was free.  You did not pay to join it.

I cried.

ITS FREE?? YOU DONT EVEN HAVE TO PAY MONEY FOR THE CARD??? THATS AMAZING

I think some librsries might have you oay a small fee for the card but most dont.

Avatar

Most don't charge for the card as long as it's your first one. There may be a $5 fee to replace it if you lose it.

Or not. Depends on the local library's funds. But their budget generally includes free cards for users.

Libraries are free! We may charge if you don't live in our county/state/down/district, but that's because your taxes don't go toward paying for us. Many libraries are even going fine free for late materials, so if you're forgetful like me, it's okay! And we offer e-book and downloadable audiobook services, so you can get books for free even from home!

Use your local library, we're pretty cool!

Let me also emphasize the above because it is going largely unnoticed in many circles: 

Many libraries are going fine-free. That’s right -- no overdue fees. If you don’t return materials for long enough that it has to be considered lost (ex, 1-2 months after the due date, depending on your library), then there’s going to be a cost -- but that’s not going to happen overnight, and even then you can talk to the librarians about what your options are. 

Plus, if you use e-books and other e-materials (which often automatically return at the due date), there are no lost fees ever.

How do libraries survive without fines? If you use their materials -- checking out books, eBooks or database access online, going into a library and using any public computers or other equipment provided, or even just taking a book off a shelf and browsing it before setting it on a reshelving cart -- it demonstrates via usage numbers that they’re providing a service to the community. It’s a beautiful circle where you can show they’re useful just by interacting with them, and by showing that, you can directly improve on what that library can offer in its collection, because it can then ask for more funding to support what’s in use. 

When it comes to libraries, it’s ok to use all the services they have! They exist for you, no matter who you are.

There are more mantis shrimp in Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy

Look at this beautiful rainbow buddy. Do you recognize him?

Photo credit: me!

He's a mantis shrimp! Which, thanks to the webcomic The Oatmeal, is a pretty popular species these days. One of the most visceral descriptions in the comic was "sociopathic sea creatures that look like party clowns."

Image credit: The Oatmeal

At this point, if you say "mantis shrimp" to anybody who is even vaguely online, they're probably going to imagine one of these fancy rainbow buddies. Which is accurate, but only partially so! The highly colorful animal pictured in the Oatmeal comic is actually only one species: the aptly named peacock mantis shrimp.

There are actually more than 450 species of mantis shrimp, all in the genus Squilla (A+ name). Some of the species are very drab, but others display an amazing range of colors and patterns. It's just that, of course, the one called a "peacock" gets all the attention because humans are suckers for bright shiny rainbow things.

Take a look at some of the other neat species of mantis shrimp!

Zebra Mantis Shrimp, The Life Aquarist

Chiraga Mantis Shrimp, The Life Aquarist

Leopard Mantis Shrimp, Reef Builders

Blue Spot Mantis Shrimp, Roy Caldwell

Acanthosquilla derijardi, Roy Caldwell

Urchin Mantis Shrimp, Roy Caldwell (feat. that spiky body segment)

Gonodactylaceus falcatus, Roy Caldwell

There are so many cool, beautiful mantis shrimp that I could totally make a "do you love the color of the sky"-length post with just kick-ass photos. Now that we've gloried in their aesthetic diversity, though, let's talk about why these guys are often framed as the murder mittens of the sea.

Here's a basic mantis shrimp anatomy guide, featuring our peacock friend again. It's basically your typical shrimp body plan, but what we want to look closely at is the "raptorial appendage" and the "dactyl."

Mantis shrimp are known for the fact that they basically punch their food to death - and it's a one hit kill. But they don't use their legs to do it! Mantis shrimp punch with their mouth. Specifically, they use one of their five pairs of mouthparts, called raptorial appendages or raptorial claws. (The other four pairs are used for cleaning and grasping.)

There are two different “types” of mantis shrimp, categorized by the way their raptorial appendage is generally structured: the actual scientific language is "spearers" and "smashers." Spearers are ambush predators that typically hunt from their burrows, and have a long, spiky tip on their appendage which they use to skewer and grab prey like fish; smashers are foragers, and have a much thicker appendage that ends in a club for breaking open hard-shelled animals like mollusks and crustaceans. In the image below, you can see an example of each, with a spear on the left and a club on the right.

Through a very complex physical system, mantis shrimp yeet their appendages at prey or perceived predators with some of the fastest speeds known in biology. In an article for The American Scientist, Dr. Sheila Patek explained that smasher mantis shrimp's raptorial appendages "accelerate like a bullet in a gun (100,000 meters per second squared) and achieve speeds up to 31 meters per second that rival highway traffic moving at 69 miles per hour. The duration is so brief that more than 100 of these strikes could fit within one blink of an eye." Spearer mantis shrimp strike slowly in comparison - y'know, only somewhere between 1-7 meters per second.

How do they strike so fast? The (very) simple-language summary is basically that there's a spring-and-latch system (made of tendons and chitin and other biological bits) within the appendages that stores energy to power their strikes. Mantis shrimp have a special adaptation that lets their muscles generate really strong forces, with the tradeoff that they can't do it very fast. So they don't actively use those muscles to hunt - they use them to create potential energy in the "spring" that is released when they hit. Think of it like a bow: you create the energy to fire an arrow by pulling back on the string. Mantis shrimp do that by engaging both the muscles on the appendage at the same time, which loads energy into the elastic pieces in the "spring" (the exoskeleton of the merus) and retracts the fighting end (dactyl) towards the body. Little scales on the tendons of the smaller muscles "latch" onto the exoskeleton as they move past it, which helps the muscles continue to hold position - sort of like the teeth on a ratchet strap or car jack. When the mantis shrimp wants to hit something, it relaxes both muscles, the "latching" scales disengage from the exoskeleton, and the stored energy releasing from the "spring" makes the appendage shoot forward with incredible speed. The spears get to big stab, and the clubs go smashy-smash.

Anderson et. al, 2014 (smashing on the left, spearing on the right)

But wait, that's not all! There's also incredible physics phenomenon that occurs when things move that fast underwater - it's called "cavitation." Basically, when something moves super fast through a fluid, it forces the bits of fluid right next to it to move really fast, which puts them into a low-pressure state. Liquids at a low pressure state become a gas, so this creates "cavitation bubbles". The water right around the bubbles, though, is still at its original pressure, and it is pushing inwards: so cavitation bubbles almost immediately implode as the water vapor in them turns back into a fluid. The collapse of the bubble releases all the energy that was pushed into the water when it changed state into a gas. It goes bang, generating not only a shock wave but sound, light, and a ton of heat!

Video from O. Supponen et al., gif made by @fuckyeahfluiddynamics The video shows a bubble (black, center) in a fluid imploding and a shock wave emanating out from it in a ring.

So just in case the prey wasn't already dead when it was clubbed by a smasher, it then gets hit by nature's version of a flash-bang. Even if the mantis shrimp didn't manage to hit it, the shock wave and the super-heated water from the collapsing cavitation bubble probably did .* (According to at least one paper I found, spearer strikes don't create cavitation, because they're slower - relatively - than smasher strikes.)

I'm very proud of you for sticking with me through all that! Here's another pretty shrimp as a reinforcer, because... there's more!

Cloridopsis dubia, Roy Caldwell

So all that anatomy and physics stuff is pretty freaking cool, right? What the last couple paragraphs haven't conveyed, thought, is how incredibly powerful those strikes can be. Some of the smasher mantis shrimp can strike with impact forces more than 1000 times their body weight. I was reading one of Patek's papers on the biomechanics of raptorial appendages, and came across this stunner of a sentence:

"With a typical hammer weighing less than the mass of two toothpicks (on the order of mg), mantis shrimp with total body mass on the order of tens to hundreds of grams can achieve peak forces similar to the bite of a 20 kg hyena."

When the internet says "mantis shrimp can punch hard enough to break aquarium glass", that tells you that they can punch with a lot of force. But there's a difference between "break glass" amounts of force and "crunching through femurs like candy" amounts of force. Smashing mantis shrimp are able to hit faster than stabbing mantis shrimp, but they all generate a ton of acceleration and force relative to how tiny their bodies are.

Earlier, we had a nice, scientific image of what mantis shrimp hunting behaviors look like ... so ... here's the somewhat more nightmare-fuel reality of what a spearing strike looks like irl.

Mantis Shrimp (species unknown) catching a fish. Tetiaroa Society

What I find fascinating is that mantis shrimp can purposely modulate how much force they use, too. Smashing mantis shrimp also spar with each other over mates/territory using their clubs - but they don't kill each other! In part, this is because they aim for the telson (the last segment of the body, kind of looks like a "tail"), which can dissipate a lot of force without being damaged. But it's also a ritualized activity where it's evolutionary detrimental for competitors to kill each other, so they're "pulling their punches" so to speak. Winners actually appear to succeed based on the number of strikes to exhaustion, rather than how hard they can hit or how much damage they do. Here's a video showing documented sparring in a lab at Duke University (sparring starts at 0:53).

Folks, I just love mantis shrimp so much. There's so many incredible things about them. According to one paper, "their capacities to manipulate the environment and respond in subtle ways to their surroundings, and the speed and intensity by which they communicate with each other mark them amongst the “intelligentsia” of crustaceans."

In no particular order, some more neat facts:

Smashing mantis shrimp (a group which includes our buddy the peacock mantis) strike so fast that it outpaces the rate at which neurons can send a signal to and from the brain. Like, literally, they don't have time to adjust their aim or anything - by the time the brain registers it's happening, it's too late! Which means they can't learn how to hunt from real-time feedback, and have to learn from information they can detect before/after a strike instead.

While smashers are the famous shrimp, with their super speed and flashy bubbles, spearers actually comprise the majority of mantis shrimp species. Bigger spearers actually strike more slowly than smaller spearing species, too, and we don't know why yet.

One paper called mantis shrimp sensory systems "a treasure trove of unique and sophisticated adaptations." They have chemoreceptors in addition to an olfactory system, external and internal mechanical receptors that are thought to pick up vibration, and incredibly complex vision. Mantis shrimp can see fluorescence and UV wavelengths and detect polarized light. Most species have at least 12 and sometimes as many as 20 different types of color-sensing cells in their eyes (compared to a human's 3) ... but they're actually worse at color discrimination than we are. Some mantis shrimp appear to be able to recognize specific individuals using chemical cues - it appears to be most common in species that compete heavily for burrows or rely upon pair-bonds.

Mantis shrimp are being studied heavily because of the potential for technologies that use biomimicry. Imaging technology is looking at using structures similar to those found in their eyes to detect a specific type of polarized light; the structure of their smasher clubs is of interest to engineers because of their strength and resistance to cracks.

Okay, that's been a lot about mantis shrimp. Thanks for taking this journey with me. To end, let's circle back to the buddy who inspired the whole post: here's my new favorite peacock mantis photo, courtesy of the Great Barrier Reef foundation. Absolutely intimidating and unsettling and beautiful.

*The Oatmeal comic about mantis shrimp got a couple things wrong, and while I don't want to harp on them for it, it is important to me to address the errors. The statement that contains them is "their limbs move so quickly that the water around them boils in a process known as supercavitation." This is incorrect for two reasons:

  • Cavitation and boiling are the same phenomenon - liquid becoming a gas - but calling cavitation boiling is highly imprecise, because they occur in very different situations. When liquid turns into a gas because of a temperature change at a constant pressure, that's boiling; when it happens at a constant temperature because of a drop in pressure, that's cavitation.
  • Supercavitation is a specific phenomenon: it occurs when the bubble of vapor created during cavitation becomes so big that the object causing it is actually traveling through a pocket of gas inside of the liquid. This is mostly being used in military technology (it reduces drag) and requires the nose of the object to be designed specifically to trigger cavitation. I have found no mention of this specific phenomenon in the literature I've read on mantis shrimp hunting mechanics.

Selected Sources:

Seattle Public Library is doing this awesome program called Books Unbanned that allows teens and young adults (ages 13-26) access to their collection of e-books and e-audiobooks from anywhere in the USA. All you need to do is fill out a simple form and you get their Books Unbanned card. Please share this information far and wide. I know they're not the only ones to have done this, but the more the merrier!

Avatar

https://www.bannedbookbook.club/ for the reading list