sorry but if your bed isn’t against at least one wall you’re not valid
I used to think this post was stupid because most people like both sides of the bed free but then I realized some psychopaths put their bed like this so not even the headboard is against a wall and this post is about these animals.
A single person’s bed is generally against 2 walls, a couple’s bed is generally against 1 wall, and people with 0 walls have no fear of the dark/unseen with direct access to their head, and therefore cannot be human.
ok the bed just out in the middle of the room is bad but have you considered: only the footboard end against a wall
no i hadn’t. why would you put that image into my head?
the monster under my bed is a foot fetishist no i will not elaborate
is this loss
the penalty box in hockey is such a funny concept to me. big fighty men go in the naughty cube. imprisoned for sports crimes
Go to the terrarium and think about your punching, you knife-footed ice-gremlin
All they do is sit there plotting their little gremlin plans for as soon as you let em out of the gremlin cube.
Cleavon Little and Gene Wilder, Blazing Saddles (1974)
That has to be the most genuine smile in cinema history
thats because the morons line was an ad-lib so the smile really is genuine cause hes cracking
Big Dave. One of the good ones.
guys batista is honestly one of the greatest human beings alive ude
Dave Bautista cried when he got the role of Drax in GotG and then threw himself into acting classes to prepare.
I love him
Just wanted to add a more recent awesome post of his.
The weirdest thing about this site’s culture is the mass denial of the existence of news.
“next year’s 2020″ : not terrible
“this decade ends in 2 months” : bad
“1980 was nearly 40 years ago” : somehow the worst thing i’ve ever read
Say... what’s your favourite breed of horse?
I like….BIG BOYS
ITTY BITTY BOYS
MISSISSIPPI BOYS
INNER CITY BOYS
I like the pretty boys, with the bow tie,
Get ya nails did! Let em blow dry!
I like a big beard!
I like a clean face!
Don’t discriminate, come and get a taste!
From the playboys,
To the hay boys
Go and slay boys, you my fave boys
people who argue over whos the better (gay) fictional wizard, gandalf or dumbledore, are BOTH wrong. its merlin from the sword in the stone (1963).
this guy set the bar for wizard characters nearly 60 years ago and he's been killing the game ever since
Gone for an old favourite tonight - chorizo fried in rose wine, with red chili, fresh coriander and pitta. #food #dinner #meat #chorizo #rose #wine #coriander #pitta #bread (at West Kensington) https://www.instagram.com/p/B4DW4EcnbOk/?igshid=1h01217hxhm5v
Adhd is so weird because ghosts could be messing with me and moving my stuff and I literally wouldn’t know. That chair wasn’t there a second ago? Oh well I must have moved it without thinking. The tv was on all night? I guess I forgot to turn it off. Did I leave this window open? Probably.
News Anchor in my area loses it over a Fat Cat that likes to swim.
I don’t know what’s funnier, how she said physical activities or the snort.
I love how she gradually loses it. She gives it her best try and then you can just hear where her composure starts breaking down.
i always lose it when her voice trips into the fifth dimension as she says physical activities
Why she sound like Peridot?
Whats a lichen if not a plant
(Note: writing this response with Capitals™ bc its long and kind of hard to read otherwise, I’m trying to do that more with my longer posts)
Either an ecological event or a superorganism, depending on how you look at it.
To explain this. like. we do not ‘know’ what a lichen is. We know like, what they are, or at least we’re getting increasingly closer to finding out everything that makes up a lichen, but lichenologists have really struggled to define it as like, A Sole Thing. Botanists and mycologists of the past thought lichens were primarily fungi, because when you dried one out and weighed it, most of the dry weight was fungus; this is why today we still name lichens based on their fungal components, while it turns out that the give and take of all organisms in a lichen are pretty much equal.
It’s a symbiotic relationship, we’ve known that for a long time, but now we know, for instance, that some fungi can pair up with different species of algae to make different lichens. How can we reliably name something after it’s fungus if that fungus can pair up with different things to make multiple different ‘species’? And as of 2016 we know that lichens can have up to four different players: a fungus, and algae, a yeast, and (in some families) a second fungus, previously thought to be parasitic on the lichen itself.
I will personally argue that lichens are an ecological event. To me, this theory gets down to lichen reproduction, which is….completely off the shits.
Lichens can reproduce in a few different ways, the simplest ones being 1. a piece of lichen breaks off and lands in a fitting environment, creating a new lichen that’s a clone of the mother system, and/or 2. a lichen has special organs that release specially-made ‘mini lichens’ that have the main components packaged together into little ‘spores’ (these organs are called isidia and soridia, and look slightly different), creating a similar result to #1 with a clone of the mother system.
Now, you may be wondering: ‘But lichens have sexual structures. can’t they have like, Lichen Sex™?’. Which. Like. This is where it gets wild, because it ties back to the ecological mystery of how lichens ‘make new lichens from scratch’ so to speak.
The thing is, those sexual structures don’t have the components paired together. They only produce sexually-made spores of the fungus, and if these spores land in the right conditions, they won’t form a lichen, they’ll form a non-lichenized version of that fungus. So, conventionally, as we currently understand it, the way for them to form a new lichen would be for two compatible spores- one algae and one fungus, or like, one algae and one fungus or one yeast, we don’t know how those other components fit into the equation yet– to meet in the right conditions, under which case the pair recognizes each other and starts to spontaneously go down an entirely different developmental path to become a lichen. Keep in mind that lichen and algae spores are like…everywhere in the air and in the world around us, just the majority of them don’t find the proper growing conditions and die, so this does happen enough to make all the lichens we see on a day to day basis.
But. There are agonizing mysteries about this process. For example:
-We do not know how the algae and fungal spores, when they meet, know that they’re compatible in the first place. Like, on a cellular level.
-We do know that after a certain point, the organisms involved are locked into their developmental path. They need to meet at an extremely young age (as spores) to become a lichen. If a mature fungus and a mature algae meet, nothing happens, even if they would have been compatible as spores.
-Science, to my knowledge, still has not yet been able to replicate the ‘lichens being made from scratch’ process in a lab. The spores will recognize each other and start developing on a microscopic level, and then they’ll just….stop developing and die, which is why we can only produce new lichens in a lab by growing sterilized fragments from old lichens. Whether or not we’ve just been like, missing all the ‘ingredients’ and you need a yeast or second fungus or something to finish the process, I have no idea.
In conclusion: Lichens are mysterious soups. Lichens, to me, aren’t a thing that lives, but more like a thing that happens between living things. It’s an event of several different things coming together to proliferate on a tree or a rock or wherever, and they are everywhere, and we do not know everything about what they are or how they work. Some people, again, will call them ‘superorganisms’, which isn’t wrong either, but I personally like to think about them in a weird like…..temporal sense? Idk man they haunt me every day of my life.




















