Avatar

a morbid longing for the picturesque at all costs

@prouvvaire / prouvvaire.tumblr.com

✧ persephone ✧ they/she ✧ 24 ✧
gothic lit scholar + clacksmith ✧ dice shop!

I'm curious, fellow writers, what's your writing setting? like, google docs or word? white page or coloured background? notes app? Times New Roman or Arial?

(mine is open office, black background, no margins, zoomed at 165% exactly, arial 12, though i've been experimenting with comic sans lately for ~scientific~ reasons)

thinking back to when i was a child (wolf girl adjacent) and im a little surprised that i was never upset about the lack of a warrior cats/guardians of gahoole-esque middle grade fantasy about wolves. but then again my first favorite classic novel was call of the wild. so

I think it's great that people are appreciating deconstructions of the dark academia trope through books like Babel (R.F. Kuang), but it's quite strange to me that somehow The Secret History always comes up in conversations criticising the elitism of dark academia, alongside mediocre books like If We Were Villains and Grimrose Girls. TSH is a deconstruction too! Babel is a post-colonial response to DA, TSH is a satirical response. The book was written by Donna Tartt as a sort of revenge tragedy fantasy based on her lived experience at Bennington College in the 1980s, and the way- like Richard- she was considered an outsider by the haughty academics of her campus. Just because the book has beautiful prose and a somewhat insufferable fandom doesn't mean that it is a love letter to celebrating ivory tower elitism in academia! You're meant to read the story as a statutory warning! Donna Tartt is not writing to market her book as "dark academia aesthetic" That was an unfortunate byproduct of social media. TSH is a satire and it makes fun of self righteous academics who are distanced from their privilege. Please stop comparing this book to its hundred ripoffs by YA authors.

Avatar

so many songs to listen to. so many books to read. so many things to watch. so much stuff to write. i think i will sit here and decompose

veganism has absolutely nothing to do with the land back movement. i hate to break this to y'all, but if you believe in moral veganism and believe nobody should use animal products, you are not fighting for native sovereignty. hunting and animal product usage is integral to the way of life of thousands of tribes and when we get our land back we will be continuing those practices.

capitalism and colonialism are the threats against land back, not animal agriculture, and dismantling that colonialism includes getting rid of colonial plant agriculture too. your dietary choice to not use animal products does not inherently make you supportive of land back and if you think it does then you do not have the full picture. colonial plant ag is no different from colonial animal ag in the way it damages our tribal land and sovereignty and animal products are important to that sovereignty. without that, we're just doing the same shit under different management.

I just remembered that when I was like 6 I had a dream where I heard a very tiny “hello!” and I looked and it was this tiny white puffball and it looked like this

Image

that was god

calamity really was the full brennan lee mulligan special. you had divorced people. you had complex family dynamics. you had anti-establishment sentiments. you had wizard and elf slander. you had hardcore player vs dm heckling. you had almonds

obsessed w the dabloons trend on tik tok actually its giving 2008 warrior cats roleplay forums

Strawberry Hill House—a Gothic Revival villa that was built in Twickenham, London 1749

Avatar

came across this sentence today and now i know what he meant

(x)