Cancelled for Primeboys Crimes

Yeah on the net sorry for cq one I mostly meant when I used to see takes that cq didn't care about anyone at all and wanted to take over with LN (+was basically cdream) and specifically that him helping ctommy (and some others) was like a long con to manipulate them for his own personal gain. To clarify that point on the poll. Not saying cq was never manipulative in LN. I said most take bc I saw the cq is evil to ctommy takes a lot and very much disagree with most of those.

Todays Sequel to worst dsmp takes I've seen over the years and recently.

I realize an all of the above option was highly requested but before I ran out of poll slots and also I don't want everyone to just vote all bc thats no fun so sorry no all above 😭.

you’d think I’d choose c!prime mutually obsessed! you would. but as gross as that is I’ve seen c!awesamdream stuff with such… concerning ideas about consent that I can’t vote anything else. “it’s consensual kink” “they’re in a petplay relationship lol” “isn't it funny how c!sam is totally obsessed over fucking c!dream apparently” Besties That's Rape. why r you treating repeated rape and sexual abuse- which is what any relationship between a jailor and prisoner is- as a funny Bit. c!dream can’t consent if he's a prisoner, even if it’s all part of his master plan, bc at any time c!sam could force him into it. stop making rape jokes you don’t even realise are rape jokes it’s so uncomfortable.

This is so cute to me

c!tommy would LOVE splatoon

he would be dogshite at it. due to his disabilities making it hard for him to react in time. but he’d love it.

Unused enemy found in the code of Super Paper Mario that appears as a circle of four rapidly rotating Marios. The Marios are in fact copies of the playable Mario - they mimic all of his animations, and attempting to Tattle them gives the same information as Tattling the playable Mario. Jumping onto the Marios hurts Mario - although whether this is due to the circle’s status as an enemy or due to Mario’s jumping hurting the rotating Marios, hurting him in turn since they are copies of him, is unclear. Main Blog | Twitter | Patreon | Store | Source

Trust nobody not even yourself or yourself or yourself or yourself

Just on a whim, because I know that Alcibiades is one of the weirdest and funniest characters in ancient Greek history, I asked ChatGPT "What's the weirdest thing Alcibiades ever did?"

ChatGPT came back with the details of something Alcibiades (henceforth referred to as 'Alci' so I don't have to keep typing it out) was accused of, but acquitted of.

When I pointed out that he had been acquitted and may not have actually done this thing, Chat GPT apologised and said, "yes, he was acquitted", and then went on to tell me that, nonetheless, the event was significant because it made Alci flee the city.

Alci did not flee the city, he was sent away on a military expedition, which was exactly what he'd wanted and asked for. When I pointed that out, ChatGPT apologised again for being wrong.

I asked again for weird things he might actually have done, and was told one version of a story I've heard before about how Alci stole some stuff from a friend. ChatGPT's version was different from what I'd heard, though, so I mentioned that, and only then did ChatGPT acknowledge that there were different versions of the story. As part of its apology and correction, ChatGPT said that it did not always have access to all information - but then proceeded to provide details of the version of the story I'd heard before, showing that it did, in fact, have access to that information.

I asked again, what is the weirdest thing Alcibiades ever did? ChatGPT gave me an answer, which was a story I'd never heard before, so I asked for a source. ChatGPT told me it was in Plutarch's Lives, and I presumed it was in his Life of Alcibiades, so that's where I looked. When I said I couldn't find it there, ChatGPT told me, sorry for not being specific, it was actually in Plutarch's Life of Nicias. So I went and read Plutarch's Life of Nicias and couldn't find it.

So I told ChatGPT that I couldn't find the story in that book, could it please be more specific? What I was hoping for was a chapter or page number or something, I just presumed I'd missed it.

ChatGPT came back with "no, actually it's not in that book, it may be a later invention, there is no concrete evidence for this story."

TL;DR: ChatGPT cannot be trusted. Even when it does give you a source, it can be wrong. It has no capacity to evaluate the accuracy or likely accuracy of the information it gives you. It will present you with wrong or debatable information and give you absolutely no indication that it may not be correct, or that other versions or interpretations are possible.

gotta remember that chat GPT works basically the same way autocomplete works, but it can autocomplete longer runs of reasonably coherent text.

it’s not looking up facts, its both trying to say the thing that’s most likely to come next in the text it was trained on, and also trying to not perfectly replicate the training text, because it’s supposed to be a bit creative.

what this means is that it’s actually primed to lie to you. you can feed it nothing but perfectly factual text and it will spit back lies because the truth replicates the training set too closely.

it’s not really capable of answering a question the way a person might.

what it does is generate text that reasonably seems like what an answer to that question might look like.

it’s a bullshit generator.

it is made to bullshit tech investors. (who exclusively talk by making up things that sound correct without regard for the actual truth) so, if you’re smarter than a venture capitalist then don’t fall for the bullshit meant to ensnare venture capitalists.

That's a really good way to put it!

it’s an advanced pattern recognition tool yeah lol. it’s a fun toy but it can’t like. create and know things.

c!prime.

i think a really good way to end this event would be through the theory i haven’t seen around much anymore: the dead eggs aren’t dead, the federation just took them away. it’d be a good way to deal with the issue of the streamers getting genuinely attached to the point where an egg death could mean total burnout, because their kids aren’t gone. it gives them more motivation to break free from the island and the federation’s control, and to show just how deep the federation’s roots run. they can tell the residents anything and they have to take it as truth. how much more of their reality could be another one of the federation’s lies? it sets an even more personal reason for the streamers to push towards the supposed endgame of defeating the federation, because now not only do they need to get out, they need their goddamn kids back.

OH MY GOD THATD EXPLAIN WHY “HEAVEN” WAS A TINY ROOM UNDER THE GROUND. IT WAS A TRICK.

which raises horrible questions about the hell juanaflippa described after her first death. what did they put her through?

i am c!tommy and even I’m not straight woahgh

it’s been said before and it will be said again but i’m begging you all nicely to restrain yourselves from being so casually aggressive and rude and obnoxious in the tags & reblogs of a complete stranger’s posts. no one wants to know that you hate [tv show that op giffed]. no one wants to know that you hate [character that op drew]. no one wants to hear you being ugly and negative for no reason. say what you want to say in your own post. don’t hit the reblog button. blacklist relevant tags. unfollow or block relevant accounts. log out. shut down. get help.

Guys it’s time for me to come out

💯

why was my first thought church prime.

came home drunk last night and got way too excited to see my cat

““cat is traumatised”” nah kitties just love to Stare.

I DIDNT REALISE IT WAS YOU EITHER. THE POWER OF CPRIME