Thisss. Don't ever hit me with this "respect all religions 🥺" bullshit because most of religions not only deserve to be disrespected but to be hated and eradicated from the society forever.

It kills me that the same people saying “fuck Christians and anyone like them - blind faith is stupid and your ideologies are harmful” are also the people saying “if you criticize or question my identity you are a transphobic bigot - just accept that I feel a certain way and move on or you’re an awful person”.

Also ironic that they consider radfems and lesbians to be on the same side as evangelicals. But they’re the ones saying homosexuality is equivalent to pedophilia and lesbians just haven’t tried the right dick yet.

This is pornsickness in action. Castrate him

This isn’t just pornsickness, there was some real malicious intent here. He spent who knows how fucking long meticulously photoshopping these pics and revealed them at Christmas dinner. This wasn’t something done on a whim, there was actual effort to humiliate OP and ruin her life. This could have easily ended OP’s marriage had the BIL been believed and the family could have even pressed charges because sharing nudes with a minor is a felony. Like this dude is dangerous and this almost definitely isn’t the last (or maybe even the first) time he’s going to try to hurt a woman like this.

I really liked this response re: women wanting their uteri removed because they don't want children.

boost this post bc it's so real and important.

sex is never “work”. if you feel like it is then you have an extremely warped view of consent

If you’ve only ever had sex as a favor to someone else and not because you wanted to engage in passionate mutual physical intimacy, then that’s a very warped view of sex.

how unsurprising, coming from a leftist man. Leftist men view women as communal property while conservatives believe women to be property of one man. Disgusting

Imagine calling yourself “sex positive” and holding the belief that sex is something women give to men as payment for men performing the illusion of emotional intimacy. Like, this is straight out of those 1950s marriage handbooks that explain to men that they need to act “nice” and give women compliments in order for the sex coins to fall out because women have no natural libido and do not experience sexual arousal, only emotional fulfillment in having pleased their man.

Ways to Know Your Radfem Post Was Good

This is my theory on how pedophilia is going to be normalized by deepfakes.

Step 1: (which has already occurred) Indoctrinate generations of women into accepting, enabling, and even encouraging a porn culture in which it is considered abnormal for a man to not watch porn. Create a pattern of escalating behaviour, in which men begin by watching fairly “normal” sex scenes, and then gradually seek out more taboo and violent scenes as their sensitivity to images of sex drops, and they require more stimulation to feel anything.

Step 2: (also already happened) While actual child porn seems to be the current moral and legal cutoff point at which people will say, “No more,” simulated child porn, using young-looking actresses one day past 18, or illustrations/animations is considered a morally acceptable substitute. Have “teen porn,” “daddy/daughter” and “incest” become some of the most popular genres on earth.

Step 3: (in the process of happening right now) Take simulated child porn to the next level by creating pseudo-real porn. For example, create deepfake videos of real child celebrities’ faces digitally edited onto the bodies of technically legal porn. Give men the tools they need to create these porn videos themselves, so that they can use photos of children they know personally to make videos for themselves, without needing strong computer skills. Men will share these videos online, and inevitably, some will become popular and widely circulated.

Step 4: Somewhere in the world, a man will be arrested for watching real child porn, and his legal defense will be that he thought it was fake. He may or may not be found guilty, but the case will make the news, and talking heads will start asking: Is pseudo-real child porn using images of real children wrong? Is it a man’s fault if he actually watches real child porn when he was trying to find fake child porn? Are these men considered pedophiles? Men everywhere, who watch these videos in private, will panic when they realize that it easily could have been them on trial, because they don’t know whether any of the videos they watched are fake.

Step 5: The left-wing “progressives” will take up the cause of protecting the “civil liberties” of a temporarily increasing number of men accused of watching/collecting child porn who claim it was an accident. They will claim it has begun a matter of right-wing anti-sex Christians trying to crack down on all porn, and therefore on sexuality as a whole. Left vs. right debates continue in the way they usually do, on cable news and in the newspaper, with both sides misrepresenting the others’ arguments and accusing the other of bigotry and hatred. The right-wing argument will be that deepfakes are “too far,” and people should watch porn that depicts adult-looking women. The left will argue that their civil liberties are being attacked, that their sexuality is being judged, and that “right-wingers” want to kinkshame them. No one on either side will argue on behalf of the actual children, who are unknowingly having their likeness raped on film, and how it will change the ways the men who watch these deepfakes interact with them in real life. 

Step 5 and a half: Absolutely no media coverage will be given to the small group of radical feminists who oppose porn for feminist reasons. Hollywood and academia will portray the only anti-pseudo child porn arguments as coming from the traditional, patriarchal religious right wing. Neither left nor right wing conventional political journalists or bloggers will address the matter of escalating behaviour in sexual deviants, or that men who watch something in porn want to act it out in real life. Absolutely no one except de-platformed radical feminists will address the recruitment and treatment of the 18 and 19-year-old actresses who are actually involved in the production of the original porn videos.

Step 5 and ¾: Some fake feminists who are enthusiastically pro-porn will say that actresses are especially happy to perform in scenes that are tailor-made by the burgeoning deepfake industry for the purpose of digitally creating pseudo-child porn. They will argue that this is the very easiest type of porn to act in, because the women don’t even become recognizable as their faces are edited to look like someone else. None of these liberal feel-good feminists will ask themselves why porn is the only industry in which workers do not want to be recognized for their work.

Step 6: Eventually, the neoliberal, anything-goes “left wing” will win the deepfakes debate decisively, as they always do. People will blame the porn hosting websites, or the internet service providers or the “dark web” for allowing real child porn to surface, but men will be thoroughly reassured that it is not their responsibility to check if the pseudo-child porn they are watching is actually real, because how could they? And when a man is horny, how dare you make him wait while he verifies that the porn he’s watching isn’t actual footage of child rape?

Step 7: Almost all men are now watching deepfake child porn, except for the men who prefer some other violent fetish. Because it is so normalized, people will start making jokes when they see a very attractive or compliant child that probably, there is porn of that child’s face on the internet. Preteen girls will be groomed online into providing photos of their faces that are especially clear and easy to edit into these videos, and then humiliated once they deliver. Boys will watch the deepfake videos of their female classmates online, and show them to each other. Children, but mostly girls, will start finding out about the deepfake videos of them that are getting popular, and they will be bullied at school. Parents of these kids will try to demand these videos be taken down, but they will be told there’s nothing anyone can do, because it was their fault for putting innocent pictures of their childrens’ faces on Facebook. Girls in these videos will commit suicide, and everyone will blame “bullying,” a gender-neutral phenomenon that obviously pre-dates the existence of deepfakes. Anyone who connects the normalization of pseudo-child porn to the despair felt by little girls who get pornified against their will will be accused of being a right-wing Christian bigot who hates gays.

Step 7 and a half: Preteen and teen girls will dress even sexier and wear make-up meant that makes them look older. This will be an attempt to avoid looking childish enough to be targeted for deepfakes, but instead this behaviour will only further reinforce adult mens’ perceptions of them as acceptable objects of sexual consumption. This self-perpetuating cycle of grooming, and backlash to sexual grooming via further grooming will set the stage for the next two steps. Some more extreme left wingers will try to push for legalization of actual adult-child sexual activity (i.e. child rape), but will be told “not yet” by more centrist members of their movement.

Step 8: The perception that “all men” are attracted to kids anyways, that pedophiles are just normal people, that pedophilia isn’t even a sexual orientation but an innocent kink, will set in. Women who fight back will be told that they just don’t understand men’s libidos, that they’re vanilla, or they just hate the sexualization of children because they’re old and jealous.

Step 9: The left wing decides that it’s now the right moment to make their big push for legalizing sexual relationships between adults and children. Maybe it will take a few years of cable news anchors yelling at each other and indignant internet blog posts, but they will win, as they always do, as sexual libertarians always do, as men always do. Child rapists might even become a protected group, like gay people or transgender people. Everyone celebrates. The little children celebrate because their liberal parents tell them to, but they don’t really understand what has just happened, because they’re children.

me: this is why we need to fight back against a trend that ends in child sexual abuse

a male who sees himself as space cowboy: it hurts my feelings that you acknowledged that 98% of child sexual abuse is committed by men, and really, that’s what’s important here

This is a useful tactic for a class of people characterized by their excessive cruelty and exploitation of women. Women’s kindness, especially toward one another, throws men’s hatred for us into sharp relief.

So they say “well one is actually kind. No one actually cares about women. When other women are kind to you, they’re faking it and secretly hate you. Humans are innately evil, misogyny is natural, and only men are fully human.”

Remember in middle school when people would start drama by going up to 2 friends and telling each of them that the other was saying mean things about them behind their back? Males are doing this to women on a large scale.

I think part of this is also the assumption that women mean their compliments the same way men do. When the average man compliments someone/something, it’s performative and empty. If a man says”you’re pretty” it means he wants to fuck you. They assume women also have ulterior motives.

Men loooooooooooooove the "Women are all devious, catty bitches that thrive on constant conflict with other women" lie. Sure women can be jealous. Women can be shitty people. But this made up garbage that "Women give other women compliments because they hate them" is just a blatant falsehood.

When I compliment women I don't know at work or in public, it's genuine. I see a woman dressed in a beautiful embroidered dress and I compliment her for it, I'm not twirling my villain mustache, secretly thinking "Who does this c*nt think she is walking around lookong like a clown?" I'm actually complimenting her because she looks awesome and I enjoy helping other women feel confident in themselves. When I worked in retail and I helped a woman that had ribbons braided into her hair, I told her how amazing it looked. And I love getting compliments from other women because they're probably not bullshitting me to try to get me to sleep with them like men do. If a man compliments you, odds are he's got an ulterior motive and would rhapsodize about the moon being made of green cheese if it would get him a blowjob

Weird because why is it "men insulting each other is good" and "women are nice but don't mean it?" Men also lie and compliment people they don't like. (Whether these people are men or women) Also the narrative keeps changing, first it was "Women are so catty and mean" Now it's "Women may be nice but actually secretly hate you"

i don't care if a trans woman hasnt "done the work". i dont care if she doesnt shave. i dont care if she has short hair. i dont care if she has broad shoulders. i dont care if she has a flat chest. i dont care if she has flat hips. i dont care if she has a deep voice. i dont care if she wears "mens" clothing. she's a woman because she says she is. she doesn't have to "do the work". she doesnt have to do anything, actually. she's a woman regardless of how she looks, acts or sounds. she's a woman because she is one.

Unfortunately that happens to many cis women of color, and Jewish cis women, and cis women with pcos, and intersex cis women. Like that is very much something that happens consistently in the everyday lives of plenty of cis women. Degendering is a very common form of racism and antisemitism against women who don’t fit the European standard of femininity, and the gender police will readily throw cis women under the bus on their hunt for The Big Bad Trannies.

And this is why I don’t understand poc that are TERFS, especially black and darkskinned women, like babe we’re literally in the same, if not very similar, boat as trans women.

Indian woman here, y'all moids can fuck off with your racist, misogynistic ass. All your projecting insecurities are laughable. And the women who believe in this crap, i hope you wake up soon.

women do not have our own names. even if a woman doesn't take her husband's last name, she does not have her own name. our last names belong to our fathers. our mother's maiden names belong to their father. we don't have our own identities, and we haven't for centuries.

a feminist upheaval of the patriarchy requires more than refusing to take a man's last name. we need to make our own names. if we don't start, it'll never happen.

To add to this,

even our middle name is our father's first name. Many women even have to change their first name. My mom did because there was someone with the same name in my dad's family. Like wtf?

A man's name has no business in the child's name when the woman is the one growing the baby inside her, birthing and, most of the time, raising the child all by herself.

Now I'm off to think of a last name that's a mix of both grandma's names and changing my middle name to my mom's first name.

When a radical feminist (or anyone, actually) points out that males are, on average, stronger than females, everyone gets up in arms. “You’re saying women are weak! You’re saying that women are biologically inferior! You think women are feminine little dolls who need to be protected by big strong men! Why do you hate women?!”

But, their bizarre leap from “less muscular” to “weak and feminine” aside, raw strength is not the only metric of physical capability. For example:

Women are much better at ultra-endurance sports, owing to:

The science of female endurance leads us to the next point: women are more likely to survive extreme situations like natural disasters, famine, and disease.

Want to bring a little more neuroendocrinology into this? Women are more likely to remain cool under pressure, from direct threats to physical safety to emotional stress.

tl;dr get a man if you need a hyperemotional brute to kick down a door. If your physical task needs durability and logic, a woman will be much more helpful.

There's no way to make rape a job. Being raped isn't work. Filming it does not make it work. Being raped is not labor.

Money is power. Using power to get sex is rape. Porn is rape on tape.

"Under capitalism all labor is coerced!" Yes, and what do you call coerced sex? That's rape.

If you don't want to have the sex itself, you only want the money, you're being raped. If you dissociate and go somewhere else mentally, you're being raped. If you need cocaine or other drugs to get through a scene, you're being raped.

Prostitution is rape. Filmed Prostitution is still rape.

Jacking off to rape desensitizes you.

It's insane how there's this narrative that "women are believed over men" regarding abuse but it's literally always the men getting public support in abuse cases and the women getting disgusting harassment

“imagine if the genders were reversed, there would be outrage!” as if we don’t constantly see evidence to the contrary

How drag is offensive to women.

"Drag" is a subculture homosexual men feel entitled to engaging in, believing femininity is liberating from the hold toxic masculinity has on men. To women, however, drag is an expression of oppressive and dehumanizing tactics placed on us by patriarchy.

Drag is the performance of stereotypical traits associated with women. For starters, the men are referred to as "queens", a term regarded for women of royalty. The men also give themselves female personas, pronouns, and titles. Drag queens are "ladies", and are "she" not "he". They must perform femininity: strip themselves of body hair, wear high heels, wear skirts or dresses, have padded breasts, and over-the-top makeup. Their personalities are most of the time silly, dumb, clumsy, and comedic. In a word, drag is mockery. The mockery of women.

What this does for actual adult human females is become associated with these stereotypes indefinitely. If woman = femininity, non-feminine people = not women. It also implies womanhood is a costume, a feeling, an act, that you may dress up as and become. These offensive qualities are effectively stripping women of our humanity.

Thanks to drag, "woman" is a joke.

This 👆 is precisely the logic we take issue with. This is the reductive reasoning that makes this - and all gender discourse - offensive to all women. Drag reinforces gender roles. You aren’t “disrupting the binary”, you are giving it power.

You are one of the realest women I have came across on tumblr. I'm ashamed of my movement being like this and I agree with you on everything. The radfem movement should be filled with women like you instead, not male loving racists.