Avatar

Palpable Notion

@palpablenotion / palpablenotion.tumblr.com

Sarah or palp // she/her // ace and proud // autistic and loud // aromantic and loving it // agender demigirl // autigender // always willing to chat so message me!

The History of the American Magic Users’ School System

It is known by Wizarding Society that North America has a school, much like the isles of Great Britain. Ilvermorny was fashioned, to a great extent, off of Hogwarts more pronounced characteristics, such as having four houses, a sorting ceremony, and teaching children between the ages of eleven and seventeen years of age.

What is less discussed is how that system didn’t work for us.

It did for a time, when there were only 13 colonies, however, as the country expanded the school became less and less convenient, affordable, and realistic. Add to that, there was a growing urge to keep family close, especially after the American Civil War. American magical parents did not want to send their children away for 9 months out of the year and some couldn’t afford to - many needed the help of their children day to day with their business, such as the bramble leaf farmers of Tennessee who needed the extra hands to separate the leaf from the blackberries as they sold the blackberries to primarily No-Majs and the leaves, primarily to Ilvermorny for potions classes.

Once thought to be the most welcoming and down to earth of the magical schools, Ilvermorny became of symbol of magical elitism to much of the American magical society.

The Alternatives

Homeschooling became quite common, which presented its own set of problems. Some children were never taught, some were taught extremely poorly, and all sets of standards flew out the window - often with physical objects as control was not well taught in general.

Many communities, If there were enough magical folk there to begin with, would transport their children to a single home where they would learn together- it wasn’t uncommon for 3-5 mothers to oversee this. The issue with this was that attention couldn’t be paid to level of understanding and as new children were born and grew, there was a constant influx of absolute beginners.

This proved untenable and so more methods were experimented with.

Out in the West, they would cast an Undetectable Extension Charm on an enclosed carriage and merely fill it up with as many students as they could reach (along with those willing to teach). It wasn’t a perfect solution, but it allowed for more structured learning. In the Midwest, especially northern states such as Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, Floo Networks were more utilized as large fireplaces were less likely to stand out, allowing for actual school buildings to be built to support the growing classes. Portkeys were used more often in the South than anything else, but the South also had a rather unprecedented number of cities founded and populated entirely by magic users.

What ended up forming were dozens upon dozens of regional schools that functioned more like No-Maj public schools than Ilvermorny. The child would attend school for the afternoon and return home.

MACUSA was initially against these alternative schools, all of which they considered unauthorized and breaking Rappaport’s Law (this was despite the fact that many communities using this alternative schooling set up were not, in fact, using wands but casting techniques and devices native to their own backgrounds. For instance, New Orleans was known for incantatory - the repetition of enchantments without a wand. It was a hybrid form of magic most notably utilized by the Afro-Caribbeans that seemed to be a mixture of the wandless magic used in Africa and the wand  incantations of Europe. Occasionally talismans or magnifiers were used to empower an incantatorial spell, but the students were taught both with and without these objects. Note: Incantatory was both considered easier than “true” wandless magic and also wildly unpredictable if performed with little control, such as when a Louisiana Creole boy was frightened by a storm, threw his blanket over his head, and chanted Lumos so vehemently that the entire block lit up. His parents were able to control it quickly enough that most No-Majs that saw it thought it was some bizarre lightning. The Chinese-Americans of the Old West were known for practicing - and teaching - medi-amplification, a technique wherein the magic user would meditate, concentrating on their magical self, and have bouts of intentory (gùhuàn) wherein intention is enough to make magic happen. Some view this as simply wandless magic, but there’s a clear distinction in how the magic is approached and because of that, spells are not actually needed.

The CASI

This divide between the MACUSA and the Unauthorized Wizarding Institutions (named by MACUSA) was one of the motivating factors in forming the CASI or the Committee for Alternative Schooling and Institutions which ultimately led to a more or less benign infiltration of the No-Maj government and formation of a Congressional CASI. To this day, most No-Majs believe the CASI to be a Committee that implements and endorses private schooling, home schooling, and religious schooling, which the Committee doesn’t dispute because it serves its purposes just fine. Of note, perhaps, is how in the 40s, as so much of the Wizarding World was preoccupied with the war in Europe, a No-Maj was appointed to the Committee by mistake. He sat on the Committee for 10 years and if asked what the CASI did, he would give a vague response that confused both himself and the one who asked and then wander off, slightly befuddled.

The CASI’s main purpose was to redirect just enough revenue to facilitate the upkeep and sustained use of these regional schools - the initial building could sometimes be finagled and land deeds could be purchased if the school/region had no grounds or no building, but that was kept to a minimum and often locales had to raise their own funds for such an endeavor.

The formation of the CASI almost caused a civil war, but MACUSA realized that numbers were not on its side. A vast majority of the American magical population was for the use of regional schools and would fight to defend their right to teach their children how they wanted. After much negotiation and capitulation - and leading to the repeal of Rapparport’s Law - the CASI was incorporated into MACUSA. A strict tenant of that incorporation, however, was that regions could form and institute schooling how they wished, with minimal to no oversight by MACUSA, thus forming the American Magic Users’ School System, or the AMUSS.

Ilvermorny is still in place and while all American witches, wizards, and magic users can attend, it is largely viewed in the same vein as private schools are among the No-Maj.

The Transportation

Today, the instituted method of arrival for regional schools involves  a strictly monitored portkey system and Extended busses. Apollo Fleet was founded for exactly this reason and you can find an Apollo Fleet office in almost every city because of this. To No-Majs, it is merely another charter bus company but to magical children, it’s their bus. Children can walk, be dropped off, or Floo to their nearest Apollo stop. There’s a checklist for each stop or registered children and authorized parents/guardians to control who can and can’t travel to the school. The children are let into the school specific waiting area, one of the several portkey rooms inaccessible to the No-Maj populace. In the morning, the school’s portkey is used to transport everyone to the secondary stop (special harnesses were made specifically to stop dropping children between the initial and secondary stops). At the secondary stop, the children in the portkey rooms - often coming from several locations - are put on an Extended bus and then it’s off to the next secondary stop - always in the area but there is a Quickening  Charm, not unlike the English Knight Bus.

Some arguments were made about this system taking too much time or being too complicated, but it was implemented after a bombing on one of the schools in the late 1920s, explained to the No-Majs as happening for political reasons but understood to have occurred when a Scourer gained access to a portkey that transported him directly to the school. After this, all schools were required to have anti-portkey charms as well as anti-apparition charms and absolutely no connections with any Floo networks. Apollo Fleet is a MACUSA run business, which means that nearly all of the employees have had Auror training - special programs were put in place to train new employees in a vein not dissimilar to the No-Maj police academies. They do not need to be as proficient as actual Aurors, merely able to defend and detect - it wouldn’t do to let in someone masquerading as one of the registered children, after all.

Because of this, the initial and secondary stop system is considered sufficient means of protecting their schools, which to the unsuspecting eye looks like a typical No-Maj school. (Most schools are also now protected with the Fidelius Charm, but that isn’t considered sufficient as so many have to be let in to begin with).

The Ages

A marked difference to other countries’ schools, actually, was implemented shortly after the bombing incident. Nearly every region has formed separate schools for the different ages. The main reason for this was to prevent catastrophic tragedy - the bombing had nearly wiped out the entire generation of magic users in its region. The different schools - primary, secondary, and tertiary, though those terms are used almost exclusively in system and not by the students or parents - are viewed as insurance. If another tragedy occurs, it will at least be for only a single age group and not the entire 4-18 year old populace.

Ilvermorny to this day only intakes students 11 years of age through to 17 years of age, like the European schools before, but the AMUSS was specifically designed to better assist the general American Magic User and so that meant taking the children earlier. No-Maj and Magic User populations are so overlapped here that it didn’t make sense to allow children to go so long without learning some control over their abilities. The primary schools, therefore, teach some of the most basic techniques in order to give them children structure in which to develop their magic. Mostly, history and theory are taught at this time, as well as No-Maj concepts that are needed to be successful in either world - math, language arts, general American history - and as the student grows and moves onto the secondary and then the tertiary school, the No-Maj lessons lose more and more focus as proper magical theory and practical applications can be utilized.

While not technically involved in the AMUSS, the Association for Magical Child Care (the AMCC) was recently formed to provide safe daycare options for working parents/guardians. It should be noted that “safe” here refers mostly towards No-Maj children who are occasionally injured, confunded, or generally stunned by children of magic users who are far too young to have any control over magical abilities. The AMCC helps to set up and monitor magic user friendly/only daycares. Children are accepted into these daycares typically until schooling age, though some will watch children of all ages after/before school hours and on weekends. Daycares that provide such accommodations are typically allotted their own private portkey for travel to and from the secondary stop mentioned above, making them the only non-Apollo Fleet location involved in the transportation process.

The Mascots

While Ilvermorny has the different houses, the regional schools don’t. Population isn’t always high enough to support such a system but more than that, the AMUSS decided that a singular mascot could bring a school together where different houses institutionalized dividedness. Instead of having a House Cup or playing sports against other houses, competition was between other schools.

There are as many mascots as there are schools - though some do overlap. A popular mascot is the dragon, popular enough that most schools that use it prefer to pick a breed. There are several schools, mostly coastal, that have some form of mer as their mascot. But largely, there’s a regional basis for it. For instance, the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, having one set of schools for the entire peninsula, had originally been the U.P. Lycanthropes in honor of the Wolf-Man of Michigan. (The Lycan Association of the Americas has been attempting to get them to change it, to no avail so far, though now only the tertiary school has the lycanthrope as it’s mascot.)

One instance of particular note are the Las Vegas Animagi - while technically being students from all over Nevada, the tertiary school is widely considered to be defined by Vegas. The students there are actively taught animagi theory and nearly all can take animal form by graduation. There were rumors that the school taught children how to become skin-walkers, perpetuated by detractors of the AMUSS, but that is untrue. What is true is that Lorraine Ashwinder, when attempting to invent a cloak of transfiguration - putting it on would, in theory, transform the person into someone else, who’s likeness was woven into the cloak - unknowingly invented a form of transfiguration that many compare to what little is known about the skin-walker legends. But she was a graduate and never taught the Las Vegas Animagi. Her cloak has since been banned by MACUSA, who believed it too powerful and convenient for impersonating other magic users and possibly evading arrest.

Magicians or Magical Inheritors

Known by many different names throughout the world, the original system for dealing with those that inherited magic but were unable to utilize it themselves was not unlike the European procedure. NOTE: The use of the term “squib” has been considered derogatory for nearly a century, with a marked trend away from the term after the 1926 Obscurial Incident in New York. There were protests and campaigns. A rallying cry of “Even Squibs Have Magic in Them” became common to hear in big cities and transfer points, anyplace with large populations.

It wasn’t entirely for the benefit of the magical inheritors, the term that was first coined by Macky Rowdes, one of the more well known inheritors who went on to publish some of the most well known socio-magical texts known to American magic users, as well as father six proficient magic users themselves and one magical inheritor. This movement was a campaign against MACUSA and what were considered endangering practices that allowed such destruction to be wrought.

It was also utilized by the CASI and leaders in the proto-AMUSS as ways to further this alternative schooling and discredit MACUSA, the only entity that had authority to lay waste to the progress being made in this school system. The CASI started pushing a new slogan, “A Squib in Every Class,” which was generally viewed as a confusing sentiment.

This fighting between the CASI and MACUSA led to actual discussion of the benefits of including these magical inheritors. Rowdes’ book, Magic in my Bones, gave one of the more poignant arguments that arose:

The Squib is a pathetic creature. It is weak, small, and inefficient. It is the thing you mock other children for being, or secretly fear you are. 
Labeling an entire subset of witches and wizards as squibs is demeaning, disgusting, and downright dehumanizing. A “squib” has just as much latent magical properties as any other witch or wizard - take Huxley’s Bane, a simple relaxation potion that requires the breath of a witch or wizard to coalesce properly. I have given my breath to no short of 4 dozen separate droughts of Huxley’s Bane, simply to prove that I could. 
But we shun them. We ignore them. We speak in hushed whispers and submit our children to brutal tactics to appease ourselves, to force the magic out.
I am not a “squib.” I am not weak, pathetic, fallen short, or something to be ashamed of. I am a magical inheritor, like my brother, like my father and my mother. Unlike me, they can utilize this magic, but like them, I can pass it on. I can appreciate it. I can learn about it and reside in the magical world. Because I have just as much right’s the the magical world as my brother and shunning me will not change that.

This movement changed how the inheritors were viewed - however accidental that was at first - and it became clear just how many inheritors in fact already attended the regional schools.

From a practical point of view, this was inevitable. The regional schools accepted any child of magical lineage and any child that showed magical abilities. Because children could attend as early as age 4, it wasn’t discovered for nearly 6-7 years if a child couldn’t utilize their magic. While there were some who were kicked out of school for this, and some who left on their own, a majority of the students remained, sidelined to theoretical studies through to graduation. Because of Rowdes work with the AMUSS, magical inheritors now are permitted access to all theoretical studies, latent ability practical studies (such as astronomy, arithromancy, etc), and a special class, often entitled wandless potions, was formed that concentrates on potions that can be made without direct spell work.

Over the years, the term has been changed to suit the community (squib was never a chosen term and is typically considered a rather low brow term). For a short time in the 1950s, the term “magin” gained popularity, but by the ‘60s someone had noticed how “magic” and “in” (the prefix of “inheritors”) nearly spelled magician. For the last 50 years, that has been the preferred term in America.

In fact, some of the countries best “No-Maj” magicians have in fact been magical inheritors. David Kotkin (known in the No-Maj world as David Copperfield) was supposed to attend Drumstrang but never got invited - it was “quite obvious” that he had no magical abilities as a child. But Hyman Kotkin, his father, believed in the No-Maj American dream and he sent David to a regional school (he graduated a proud Albany Crup).

Ironically, this inclusion of magical inheritors led to the founding of the Magician’s Institute, a private school that could, like the name suggests, only be attended by magicians. Unlike Hogwards and Ilvermorny, however, this school was a university and was one of the few places where one could be certified in performing for No-Majs. It was, after all, showing off magic to the No-Maj population. To this day, the United States is the only country in the world to not only to certify the exposure of No-Majs to magic but to allow that exclusively for magicians.

Taking these phrases away from the Aro and Ace communities until they fucking learn to behave themselves and act normal about Non-partnering, Repulsed, Loveless, and Aplatonic ppl.

Bonus phrases being taken away that I couldn't put on meme without it getting crowded include: "But Aros and aces can still enter QPRs!!!" "Aromantic ppl can still be in relationships!" "Asexuals can still have sex!" "We're not all heartless freaks!" "We can still love our family and friends!" and other phrases that ignore non-favorable and non-partnering groups of ppl.

and I REALLY shouldn't have to put this but y'all really like reading shit that's not there but : NO this is not saying that there isn't a time or place for these phrases. this is saying that this shouldn't be the only response given because it ignores the existence and validity of repulsed, non-partnering, loveless, and aplatonic people! by only defending favorable experiences you are saying "Its ok to still attack the experiences your attacking but just know that not ALL of us are like THAT so WE shouldn't be attacked"

DO NOT DERAIL THIS POST!!!! THIS POST IS NOT ABOUT FAVORABLE, PARTNERING, OR ALLOPLATONICS!!! DO NOT RESPOND WITH "But favorable/partnering people -" or "but platonic love-" THIS POST IS NOT FOR YOU.

I hope that I always express this alongside my other explanations of aro/ace issues. I myself am self-sex repulsed (is that now what is called non-favorable?) and non-partnering, at least I believe myself to be at this point in my life. Then again, I once thought I was cisgender and completely hetero. In ten years I might change or learn new things about myself.

Anyway, the main reason I'm reblogging with commentary is that I know I've explained the various ways asexuals can be in sexual relationships and aromatics can be in romantic partnerships, but I hope I always remember to inform that they can also not be. They, we, can never want any of that. And there's absolutely nothing wrong with never wanting those relationships or those experiences. Not wanting is just as important to recognize and validate as wanting is. Dislike is just as important as like or indifference.

Some of us fit stereotype and cliche a lot more than others and that's just as good and valid as everyone else. Alienation isn't and as a joint community of broad spectrum aros and aces and aroaces, we should know better than to further alienate our own ranks.

Thank you, OP, for underlining this point. I truly hope I never forget to convey it in my explanations because for some reason people listen to me on this topic.

i’ve heard a lot of people say “don’t reach out to your friends first and see how many people will remain in your life. those are your true friends” and i get it. it sucks and it’s tiring constantly being the one to message first, to initiate hang outs but don’t take this so literally. some friendships require initiation. i have lost touch with so many people who genuinely cared about me and wanted me in their life because i stopped reaching out. it’s a hard pill to swallow but honestly some people just suck at it and it doesn’t mean they don’t love and value you. i’ve reconnected with some people over the past few months and it’s crazy how genuinely happy they are to see me and how engaged they are in the conversation. i just think sometimes we’re too harsh on each other & too quick to emphasize other peoples flaws and remove them from our lives but then we’ll all be alone and what’s the point of life then!!!!

I think it’s really important also to figure out if it’s just the means of reaching out that doesn’t work. my best friend sucks at text conversations, and after talking about it we now schedule in video calls and make sure to plan seeing each other in person every few months. not everyone communicates in the same way! it’s ok!! but please please please talk to your friends about it before cutting them off. there could be a better way

@berecovered makes a good point but I'd Iike to address something OP seems to state but isn't flat out with (for those of us bad at subtext) though I may be projecting.

If you stop reaching out to your friends, full stop, you need some situational context to expect anyone to keep reaching out to you. The fact of the matter is relationships take effort FROM BOTH SIDES.

This means that if you stop reaching out, you've let go of your end. Think of a relationship as carrying a couch. Sometimes one of you will have a heavier burden, maybe one or both might need a break even, but the burden only moves forward if both parties work. If only one person tries to move the couch, it becomes tiresome, tedious, and potentially damaging to the person and or their surroundings.

If you stop reaching out, you're dropping your end of the couch with the expectation that the other person will have it covered. That's unfair to them.

What is fair, and touches on bere's comment, is determining how to maintain a relationship in ways non damaging to both parties. For them it was video chatting, that's awesome, they found their niche. For others'... well, when I started down my road to understanding my psychological minefield and neurodivergencies, when I was able to confidently say to people, "I'm autistic," without feeling like a fraud because I'm afab and don't meet the checklist designed around white amab heternormative middle class boys in the ... late '80s? early '90s? I also started to see how damaging, how toxic, some of my relationships, past and present (at the time, which was like 2009), were. I had two conversations with a person who has been dear to me since I was an 11 yo, whose family was my second family. I called his mother 'ama and his father 'apa or somethings "secondary father-like figure" because that amused him. I held relationships with all his brothers, some stronger than others, but it was like they belonged equally to me. And the family welcomed me.

I had one conversation in the dreary Michigan autumn of 2009, waiting at the bus/train station i used to commute to university, walking around and not putting near enough care where I put my feet, despite the slippery, wet foliage that used to mark Octobers here. And I told him, "I love you, you will always be special to me, your family will never be strangers, but if you can't help me carry this relationship, I can't bear this burden any longer."

He's one of the best people - nice, genuine kindness, generous - that I've known. But that winter I made another call to tell him I can't hold up my end anymore. Unless he was prepared to hold the burden himself long enough for me to trust he wouldn't drop it on me again and again and again, I was setting my side of the couch down.

It's about balance, boundaries, and respecting both yourself and those you have relationships with. I had a similar conversation with another friend and he lifted his end and held it strong when shortly thereafter my parents separated, devastating me - I still live in my father's home, but with my mother, they began cohabitation 10 years later until his death 2 years ago, which still has me shattered.

I found out a few years later, when he called that day that that happened and said he was in town for the weekend, did I want to stay with him for the night? ... he hadn't been in town. He had begged his grandmother or mother to come get him and bring him home, a 3hr round trip, so he could be there for me as my sister, in another state, had texted him saying I might need him. After holding up relationships one sided most of my life, which is what the initial suggestion of stop reaching out and see who stays is - it's dumping the full weight of the relationship on the other - , he had lifted his side and I was so relieved I never even realized how special it was. How easy.

I know a lot of NDs struggle with this, especially ADHDrs. I think the statistic is 80% of ADHDrs will have trouble maintaining friendships by 2nd grade. This is what that looks like. Not one person dropping 3-12 couches. But one person holding that many and praying, hoping, maybe even deluding themselves that the other end is held too.

I've let go of a lot of couches only to watch them fall, completely unsupported.

It'd be cool - instead of arguing - to discuss why there's so much overlap between lesbian and aroace headcanons for female characters.

This might sound crazy, but perhaps there is a real, existing overlap in the way aroace women and the way lesbian women experience heteronormativity.

For example:

The pressure to engage in heterosexual relationships and/or marriage.

The pressure to produce children in a heterosexual marriage.

The pressure to be sexually and romantically available to men.

The pressure to cast aside personal desires for the sake of a male partner.

The devaluation of their relationships with other women.

etc.

Avatar

Will woke before Hannibal the next morning. He looked at the slack mouth, the closed eyes, the momentary absence of Hannibal’s terrifying intellect, and wanted to kiss him. Instead, he slid out of bed and went to shower. And to shave.

(This is the necklace Hannibal buys him.)

@emungere did you happen to save a pic of the necklace or the name? Or can you put the link so I can see if waybackmachine has it? Mobile won’t let me copy link address and when I click i get https://www.tiffany.com/jewelry/?fallback=true so that’s not helpful. I just really want to know what it looks like and how much it cost. The Bone collection bracelet was I think 26 grand? Hannibal would totally drop that cash to bring Will closer.

Btw found the perfect necklace to symbolize their relationship

Avatar

You certainly did, wow! That is some necklace.

I looked for Tiffany spinel necklaces and I think this one looks familiar, but also comes in under $500 (at least where it’s being resold), which is pretty modest for Hannibal. I do remember it was less than that bracelet, but…man it has just been a really long time, sorry! I think that is the best I can do.

I couldn't get the pic to load but it was $450 and I got the name. The only dif is the lengths. Thank you for that.

I guess Hannibal has to work up to the 26 thousand dollar jewelry :p

Beautiful story. Hannibal has zero chill. Very in character.

Avatar

Will woke before Hannibal the next morning. He looked at the slack mouth, the closed eyes, the momentary absence of Hannibal’s terrifying intellect, and wanted to kiss him. Instead, he slid out of bed and went to shower. And to shave.

(This is the necklace Hannibal buys him.)

@emungere did you happen to save a pic of the necklace or the name? Or can you put the link so I can see if waybackmachine has it? Mobile won't let me copy link address and when I click i get https://www.tiffany.com/jewelry/?fallback=true so that's not helpful. I just really want to know what it looks like and how much it cost. The Bone collection bracelet was I think 26 grand? Hannibal would totally drop that cash to bring Will closer.

Btw found the perfect necklace to symbolize their relationship

I love when baby gays are clearly still unlearning a lot of biases and like every couple of months try to find a progressive reason to explain why men wearing dresses makes them uncomfortable. Like obviously transmisogynistic caricatures are Bad but if it's just a guy irl who wants to do drag or something that's literally fine. This has been a thing longer than you've been alive

Also like I need you all to understand that historically the line between gnc & trans people has always been way less distinctly defined than you want it to be. And for a lot of people that's kind of the point. Drag in particular is about radical self expression it's about taking gender performance and turning it into a literal show and it rules

To the people in my notes talking about "it's okay if gnc men make you uncomfortable as long as you don't police anyone <3" no it's not actually. You need to think about why that is and deconstruct it. Lol

Everytime I get into arguments with people about clothing and what men should and shouldn't be allowed to wear (imo? Everything, conformity is sooooooo boring), i bring up the Greeks and them looking at Persian man in pants and calling him thulakos (literally a sack usually for meats... they called them slang for scrotum).

Then there's the invention of heels... for noblemen.

People tend to not bring up gender topics sound me. I have too many examples that if I climb them, their little reasoning can't survive the fall. Pants, shoes, leggings, stockings, makeup, jewelry...got historical receipts. The only consistent conformity is the ever changing nature and geeze does that make people mad too point out.

i’m so sick of people saying hannibal is bad queer representation because he’s a villain.

queer coding villians is a problem because their queerness is written to be the reason they’re evil. it’s an adjective used to make them more lecherous, more sinful. this is a huge problem, but if you conclude that problem by saying ‘villians can never be written as queer and the only good lgbt rep we can have are pure, morally perfect characters’, you’re completely missing the point.

hannibal is a fantastically written queer villian because his queerness has no influence over his sadism. him being evil has absolutely nothing to do with him being queer. he’s evil because he murders, manipulates, and cannibalizes people. he’s queer because he’s in love with a man.

as opposed to classic queer coded villians, hannibal being in love with will is seen as the only truly good part about him - that he’s capable of love, rather than simply violence.

let us have queer villians. queer antiheros. queer morally-gray characters. queerness in fiction being accepted only when it’s in relation to absolutely perfect gold-hearted characters is ridiculous. ‘good queer representation’ isn’t isolated to morally good characters. good queer representation is when a character’s queerness has no hold over their moral compass at all.

Let's not forget the range of queer expression in the series. None have clean hands but who tf does on the show? Every main character except for the least (or most, she's polarizing) liked character has legitimate blood on their hands (and she arguably has blood once removed).

Hannibal - We have I'm literally the Devil in an Ugly Suit That I Look Sexy af in But You'd Look Like a Couch. The original villain of the show, and like Satan, he tempts, he twists truths, and he does not make those horses drink even if he led them to the water. He finds what can be corrupted and plucks that string like he's playing his harpsichord (or therimen omg the nerd). He puts people into situations just to see what happens. He sends Will after a serial killer (arguably to punish him, and if so for A: rudely interrupting his dinner, B: kissing Alana Bloom, or C: all of the above including the see what happens bit) then mourns his possible loss, pettily killing his patient to punish the serial killer who wanted to kill him (no one liked poor Franklin) before openly killing the sk and calling in the FBI as a victim who fought for his life. He has tears in his eyes when he sees Will didn’t die. He's a complex character that Mads' plays as legitimately Satan in a person suit, pansexual (with a description attached that sounds demi but is not explicitly stated so is imo atm), and genuinely in love with and attracted to Will Graham. If you take Word of God (WoG from here on) then you also have to accept into canon that between Will turning him away in season 3 and the hours he spent outside Will's house in the cold, he was crying. Mads and Hugh also wanted to kiss pre swan dive and Bryan had to be the "reasonable one" and say I think it's overkill (pun intended). Because to the cast and crew, it was officially out in the world in season 3, Will just had to accept it. (Also tangentially connected: because Hannibal is played as a fallen angel, Mads also played him as not being a cannibal. He is the inverted Tantalus, a demigod feeding men to men. He is a hunter and farmer, feeding his carefully chosen prized hogs with feral swine he himself hunted and took down. Hence all the pig comments.)

Will Graham - he's an odd duck. I've personally heard no word on if he's bisexual or if he'd even identify as anything. Bryan Fuller used queer to describe most of the aspects of the show; as a gay man, he uses queer as the umbrella term for whatever orientation that's non normative. You have to watch unrelated Bryan interviews and speeches to get that much, as he's been fighting to get just one out out gay couple for 20 odd years. I believe ST:D was his first gay kiss on screen, though Hannibal might have had his first official queer couple (and no it's not Hannigram). (I just realized ST:D's initials are std...) Between his on screen attractions/ actions/ known relationships, we have no proof of former mlm relationships. He has romantic feelings for 2 women during the show and sexual attraction for 2 (Alana was confirmed as romantic, Molly was confirmed as both, Margot was presumed a sexual attraction - at the very least, she was a willing hook up on both his and her ends). He probably is sexually attracted to Alana at least in season 1 as well; he called her desirable, but that was also in/during an admitted bid for normalcy. I think he mentioned qn ex girlfriend at one point but I'm not positive. Hannibal is his only confirmed male prospect. All that being said, if you asked Will to label himself, I think he'd get annoyed and leave the conversation. He has a very pronounced dislike of labels, and it feels like it could spread to most hard to define corners of his identity. A much more common identity than many in community give credit too, btw, I know several "Im just me" orientated individuals. A queer Gen X woman I'm friends with defined herself as that but said queet can be used for simplicity. Will is interpreted by a lot of straight viewers as canonically straight and then they get confused and or surprised by season 3. The whole series was a courtship with a lot of weird break ups. Hannibal has a couple retaliatory relationships while genuinely having feelings at the same time (one must never forget he's a hedonist as well). Will's morality is odd, coming and going like the tides. He's autistic by admission, and maybe he's other things as well. He has intrusive thoughts that his job is to dive into. Over time, his distress over his intrusive thoughts recedes and he takes more interest in them. Perhaps this is an expression of Folie a Deux as Hannibal as a concept seems to be the blanket that covers his distress over said thoughts.

Margot Verger - possibly the only on screen verbally confirmed labeled character. She's a lesbian, easy as that. Let's address the accused lesbophobia in the room: yes she has sex with Will Graham. The show and Bryan Fuller received some criticism for this, but the fact is, if a lesbian chooses to have sex with a man, isn't it important to be supportive of that and not police it? She appreciated Will as a friend and thought him a good man (considering her alternatives especially). He used him to get pregnant in a way that wouldn't alert her controlling, abusive, monster of a brother, thinking him off the radar enough. And she almost got what she wanted (Hannibal was determined to take away every child Will ever had, that's a different story). Besides, that entire sexual kaleidoscope scene was pretty much an orgy, crisscrossing relationships between current happenings, past desires, and future outcomes. Her morality is fairly consistent. She wishes to protect innocents, but she's willing to put off doing the "right" thing (in her mind at least) until she is not ruined by the outcome. It isn't even a lack of integrity as she is up front about her motive (except to her brother and occasionally to people she wishes to use, which she is not sorry about because it leads to her greater purpose, such as using Will). She justifies the murder of her brother and frankly so does the audience. However she doesn't turn a blind eye to murder indiscriminately, wanting to save Will. She also helps free Hannibal because he gets her and Alana what they need and want (the means for IUI/IVF - I'd personally guess IVF - and Will's life). Once she has her son, she leaves it all behind an seems to live a normal life aside from her marriage.

Alana Bloom - two on screen relationships, one a tryst with Hannibal that ends in attempted but ever promised murder, one the results in her carrying her wife's nephew and son to term. The Vergers were weird. In the beginning she has unwavering morality and fights tooth and nail for what she believes. This leads to unfortunate blind spots sometimes. She most likely has the most societally acceptable morality and integrity in the first 2 seasons (discounting the lab rats, who I'm not getting into here) and it's only changed by the traumatic experience of near death, brutal rehabilitation, and a deep, twisting betrayal. Her transfigured morality extends to her partner and later wife, Margot and Margot's vendetta against her brother (again, most view this vendetta as completely justified). Her trauma led to her plotting murder, manipulating Mason Verger to utilize his resources - greater than hers and lacking scruples - committing murder, she claims purgering herself to give Hannibal a solid insanity defense (so she could keep an eye on him), and ploting and conspiring to commit/orcastrate premeditated murdering a dangerous bid that endangered law enforcement.

So we have 4 major queer characters that vary morally (as much as the show allows), two with shifting morality. It's limited to a degree but also greatly varied in expression, reaction, and characters.

For a murder show that had to get so aesthetic with murders as to be on prime time network, that's a good chunk of representation. Hopefully abstract more than literal, but still.

Anonymous asked:

Is there something for autism specific as a symbol besides the puzzle piece? And autisticat doesn't work. I want something that's simple but autism specific. (a tattoo, but nothing complicated) any suggestions? (the rainbow infinity is too vague)

Any advice for how to sit in/drive a car comfortably while fat? When I'm in other people's cars, I can't count the number of times the passenger seatbelts have child-locked on me because apparently wearing the belt normally stretches it to the limit. And when I'm driving my own car, the seatbelt clip digs painfully into my hip. I don't think seatbelt extenders will help; I can't very well carry one in other people's cars, and it's the placement of the clip that's the problem in my own car.

Avatar

I have the same problems. Readers?

Avatar

Check if the belt is attached to the car or the seat. Its usually the car and moving the seat back can help. Also, something that's less effective but has worked sometimes - since you need to pull out more than you're buckling with usually - try buckling inside the V of the belt. That is, once you start pulling the belt, put it over your head so only the lap belt is in front of you. Once it's buckled, carefully pull the chest belt into place, usually by leaning out or towards the door to pull it out as little as possible. Leaning the seat back for a moment can help with this if the belt is attached to the car and not seat.

Adjusting the height of the belt when possible also helps. I find lowering it is best for me.

As for your own car when driving, I'm not entirely sure. It depends on where the clasp connects first of all. Is it connected to the car or the seat. Can you move it or your seat in a safe qnd comfortable position? Have you tried a towel to pad it and or keep it in place. Some sort of collapsible material that is typically stiff can also be used to mitigate the pressure by putting it between yourself and the clasp and having the pressure better distributed. Something like an empty and cleaned out stiff plastic bottle like a pop bottle (not water as its almost always too collapsable).

writers envy but evil

do you ever see a banger concept executed a way you dont like and cup its face in your hands and tell it 'i can fix you'

I divorced my favorite show and took custody of the characters, the concepts, the themes, and even one of the designs

ive seen ridic beautiful concepts that were murdered in the prologue and i reached forward and said "i could do this better" as i set it aside and didnt do anything

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

You know the "Loki is essentially Satan" mentality that the unenlightened have? Do you think it's the other way around? It's more likely that Satan is a villified version of Loki (remember especially that Lucifer would have been pronounced Lukifer) that came about out of the Church's frustrations with how hard the Norse were to convert?

I gotta admit I never even thought of that (and actually had no idea about that pronunciation) lol but I think you could be right in a sense? In that there is the ‘one figure’ who is always responsible for the Bad Things going on, and They 'used to be on the good side’ sort of theme. But by the time the church was frustrated with that, how long had it been since the first versions of the Bible were written? What did they already know or not know at that time? Did they even know about Loki then or is that whole Loki = Norse Satan thing completely modern? I’d go with that.

EDIT: I had typed a buncha stuff after this but you know what? I was over thinking it, I mean with the imprisonment and afterward theres an apocalypse etc….yeah totally! Most of the polytheistic religions are all older than Christianity anyways yet I’m not saying it came out of the frustrations with the Norse because the original Bible was written before that frustration came about I think? But the idea?? Yes. I think so! Maybe?? Who knew about who and at which time? That’s actually the question here.

I’m thinking about the show Vikings tbh, and Christians not even knowing about the Norse and vice versa until after the Bible was written. I don’t know the actual history but if that’s how it went then the Loki = Norse Satan thing is simply a modern assumption mixing up which one is older and not even thinking about the timeline.

Avatar

@kingloptr this video is awesome and really explores exactly that topic!

Also; osp videos are awesome and well researched so i highly recommend them

Avatar

YES! YES! YES! YEAH.. YAH! YEs

It depends if you're talking Biblical literacy or "Christian" culture. (In quotation marks because I like to think a few of us have some sense but boy howdy did a lot take a wrong turn someplace). For one, Lucifer is for all intents and purposes Latin where (admittedly there's some conjecture here) Loki is mostlikely proto Germanic or proto Indo European. Lucifer is made up from lux or light and -fer or carrying. Luxifer > Lucifer (with a k sound) > Lucifer (with an s sound). Meanwhile Loki would then mean light. If Loki means light that means his name came from either PG laugiz (fire, lightning) ore PIE leuk- (light, to shine). However, it's argued his name is not from Old Norse logi (which came from the prementioned PG and PIE sources) but that linguistically it makes more sense to come from PG luką (lock) or PIE lewg (to bend), giving his name a meaning of entanglement.

The fact of the matter is that from the text itself, what Lucifer did was be prideful and his casting out was more like a bird leaving the nest. He is viewed as an awful torturer in hell, culturally, but Biblical hell means a separation from God. That's it. In fact, Lucifer several times works in tandem with God, such as with the suffering of Job or the temptations of Christ. The reviled Satan is, Biblically, not someone that makes people do evil things, but leaves the door unlocked for temptation, to fall past one's own convictions.

I was unable to watch the video so I'm not entirely sure where I stand in my comments but it's more cultural than anything, the way Satan/Lucifer is currently viewed.

That being said I 100% would have no doubt that certain Christian groups would twist a figure from especially a polytheistic religion. I cannot tell you how angry I get at the depictions of Hades, who by all texts is the sappiest, most chill of the Greek pantheon. He named his 3 headed giant beast of a hound whose spittle birthed the poisonous plants across the earth... Spot. Cerberus means basically Spot. Spot the Dog is like 6000 years old.

What is interesting about this Loki/Lucifer parallel is that it also requires Baldr to work. The most beloved (and wasnt he supposed to be beautiful? I cant remember, haven't read my Eddas in almost 10 years) is a very important part of the Lucifer identity.

I'd have to reprise my knowledge of the Revelations as well because I don't believe the dragon in it is stated to be Satan. I believe it's like the snake of the Garden, people just have culturally combined them but it's not in any of the texts.

No idea if this added anything. And obviously some of us non Norse fans of the character and not god, would find poetry in Loki's name coming from lightning. But linguistically it's unlikely.

I ever tell you about the time I accidentally kidnapped my neighbor's dog and took them for a walk?

Be a dear and tell us already!

this is the most polite reply I have ever received, I feel like I'm accepting an invitation to tea with someone's grandma.

*settles down into comfy floral armchair* ok so I was new to the neighborhood and one afternoon there was a small dog wandering the sidewalk. we get very little traffic but it was still a safety issue, so I got a dog leash and (after a frightfully one-sided game of Tag You're It) managed to convince the slightly chubby corgi to let me attach the leash to their collar. Unfortunately their collar didn't have tags, no address or phone number, and I was new to the area and too shy to knock on random doors. The corgi, meanwhile, was champing at the bit, so I decided to just hope they knew their way home and could lead me there. We set off through the neighborhood and walked for about a mile, which would have felt like a goose chase except the corgi was trotting along seeming very purposeful about where we were heading. Sure enough 15 minutes later we've made one big circle and are pretty much exactly where we started, except one house over.

And that is how I met my next-door neighbor, a friendly older lady who informed me her corgi's name is Biscuit.

I'm sorry did you start off sitting down for tea with a grandma and end with a Biscuit?

God I really wish carrying stuffed animals around with you was socially acceptable

I don’t mean to take over a post, but I actually did a project on this for my sociology of deviance class in college!

I carried a large stuffed rabbit whenever I went in public for about a week to observe the reaction of others. The point of the project was to do something harmless yet unusual to see if the action would be considered deviant, in which case someone had to try to correct or shame the behavior.

Long story short, nobody tried to correct my behavior. I was asked about it casually, had a few lingering stares thrown my way and when I was with my boyfriend, shop employees would direct questions to him instead of me. However, nobody refused to assist me when I was alone in a store, nobody said anything about the rabbit besides “oh, thats a cute bunny!” and I attended college classes without even a teacher questioning it.

In conclusion, it is socially acceptable to carry a stuffed animal, its just not a societal norm. ^^

DOING IT

My friend gave me a stuffed monkey plushy when I was struggling with uni, and I took him everywhere for like four years, usually velcrod to my backpack. No one said a damn thing, except my renaissance professor who saw it one day in the hallway and cracked the fuck up because I had a literal monkey on my back and he just looked at me like, “oh god, me too”. I used to leave him on desks during classes and exams (the monkey, not my prof). It was my reminder that someone cared if I was coping. But more than that it was soothing to have something to fidget with that wasn’t a pen. I used to ping those fucking things across the room I was so agitated. Harder to hurt people with a projectile stuffed monkey.

I got what I thought was a normal screen cleaning kit for my computer while I was in college. Much to my delight, instead of a little washcloth or whatever, the kit came with a tiny stuffed pig. 

So I carried this pig in my backpack all through college, periodically taking it out, spraying my screen, and using the pig to wipe it off. 

Now, I kept the pig in the side pocket of my bag where he was completely visible.

Then one day in screenwriting class I pulled him out to wipe my screen. 

One of the guys sitting next to me looked appalled. “You’re wiping it off with your little stuffed animal??” 

I explained what the pig was. 

Turns out, the guy had noticed it and just thought it was adorable I carried a stuffed animal with me every day. He’d never mentioned it before. 

Honestly, people do not care, and will not say anything. No matter the reason for your little stuffed animal friend. 

And if you’re still really nervous about it keep a stuffed animal keychain on your bag. I have a cute little frog that stays on my backpack so when work gets stressful I can squeeze it.

For my anxious followers.

Confirmed. I take my Venom tsum tsum to uni when I need a little mental boost. The little goo always brings me good luck and overall makes my day just a tiny bit better. I haven’t received a single comment about them so far.

Bring your stuffed buddies to class/work/whatever, guys. People don’t care.

I have a couple of Ikea sharks* and have had cause to periodically carry them around in public - one of which I bought with the last $15 I had at the time, after making a series of big life changes. “This is frivolous and I don’t have to care about that because I’m getting paid shortly—I’m going to do it!”

The reactions I get range from amusement through delight and “WHERE DID YOU GET THAT” but so far, never disapproval.

The moral of the story is Carry Your Emotional Support Plushie With Pride, You Deserve It.

*pictured: not my shark

Avatar

true story: I once had an appallingly awful day at the hell job and it coincided with my giant squishy Baymax being delivered from China, and no lie I hugged on that Baymax to keep from crying until it was time to leave

I travel with DC (”Don’t Care”) the Emotional Support Honey Badger.  I go through TSA with him attached to my backpack, I hug him when I sleep in transit, I prop him next to me in cafes in cities, towns, and rural areas.  The only time anyone’s ever so much as raised an eyebrow at me was the TSA agent who recognized what he was, and asked it he could get his picture taken with him.

People don’t judge.  Kids think you’re awesome. You get a companion who never judges you.  It’s all win.

I know probably everyone has seen this post already, but its too good not to reblog.

Don’t be afraid to carry your comfort items around with you! :D I take some of my stuffed friends to work sometimes, and no one ever bats an eye at them!

*looks at my pink teddy bear I named Ruby* you’re coming to college with me and that’s not a choice

This post made me cry bcuz sometimes i feel bad for having stuffed animals/plushies

i needed this a lot

the boyfriend had to go to hospital two years ago, big heart surgery and he wanted something of mine so I gave him my stuffed Toothless which I’ve gotten from the BFF a while back. Toothless sat on his nightstand in three different hospitals, watching over him and nobody even batted an eye. some nurses asked about him, but that was all. He was there when he came out of surgery and has been HIS ever since. so yeah, carry your emotional support plushy with you. It helps YOU and that’s all that matters!!! 

I take Tigz, the plushie Tiger I’ve had nearly forty years, with me on holiday because I can’t sleep without him. Every hotel I’ve stayed at I’ve come back to find room service have made the bed, changed the towels… And tucked Tigz up in the bed with his squashed little head on the pillow, or put him by the window so he can enjoy the view, or put in a comfy armchair with a book for company.

Seriously, if anyone takes offence to your plush, it’s their problem, not you. And IKEA sharks are AMAZING

When I was in high school I didn't know it was "atypical" to carry stuffed animals. My mom knew, but she never stopped me from expressing myself however I saw fit like carrying plushies or wrapping my hair in strips of nylon (to mimic anime and some sci fi hair styles). And no one harassed me (for those things) which still surprises me because I was definitely picked on.

Extremely City white people are so fucking weird they see a pic of a deer and theyre like “its an Old God, tell me the wisdom of the trees Forest Lord … wow this is just like game of thrones” its a deer. Its a fucking stupid idiot animal it doesnt know shit

Yes deer are dumb panicky dinguses in real life, but sometimes a picture will capture one looking all majestic and we just… want to believe…

Case in point: this dude

Yes he got like that by being so hormonally addled that he tried to fight a tree. But try to tell me a forest god wouldn’t have big leafy antlers just like that if he were to take a physical form.

who says the old gods aren’t stupid animals who are so hormonally addled they’d try to fight a tree

@librariansheart for your enjoyment

Look, I’ve lived a good chunk of my childhood in a halfway abandoned mountain village in the middle of nowhere. Which meant wildlife galore whether you liked it or not.

And that meant sometimes we saw a deer in the middle of the road at midnight and the majestic motherfucker just stared us down until my mom shredded our tires to stop from hitting him. Once we stopped he did a little half-bow as if saying ‘You have not committed an act of godslayer this night. Your bloodline shall bear no curse of mine’, and walked away chill as you please.

The next day a neighbor told us a deer with fucking big antlers got tangled in his fence because it was trying to steal his grapes.

I went on a hike with another neighbor to collect yarrow for tea. A bear came out of the woods towards us, went on its hind legs and inquiringly roared. And he pushed me, tiny as I was back then, behind me out of sight and spread his jacket wide to make himself seem bigger than he already was. He let out a sound I had not known humans were capable of making. He and the bear looked at each other for a moment, and came to an understanding. The bear went down and walked away, respecting a powerful opponent protecting its young.

A week ago, there had been a bear that completely tore apart our trashcan and gorged itself on half-fermented apples we threw away. My cousin had to chase it away, drunk out of its tiny fucking mind, with an umbrella that made weird noises when opened. The bear ran for its life, crashed into our wall, fell on its ass, and scampered away.

I was playing on a swing once, all alone, and a fox came up to me, the most beautiful animal I had seen in my ten years of life. Thinking it wanted to pass, I stopped swinging and sat still not to spook it. But instead of passing, the fox circled the swing, found it wanting, and came to sit before me perfectly poised and looked me in the eye, and I could swear it wished to tell me something but I could not understand the language spoken before human time.

Then my mom came out of the nearby inn, shrieked at the fox and swung her purse to chase it away. The fox jumped, ran off and fell into a ditch, all notions of grace gone with the wind.

What I’m saying is: the old gods are absolutely idiot animals who embraced the life of constant sex and hedonism in return for losing their higher power. Whether or not they regret it, we’ll never know.

Tell me the fucking deer are old gods despite their stupid, dumb, state down a car ways after your car has been hit by one. These slick bastards can tear an SUV up real bad and walk away fine. In Michigan we don't refer to it as hitting a deer, we say hit by a deer. Cause 9 out of 10 times your car in the one losing that match.

The local oldies station just played “All Star” by Smashmouth. Which was made in 1999 and popularized again in “Shrek” in 2001.

“All Star” is an oldie.

Shrek popularized it? What child wrote this. It was on what felt like every soundtrack form y2k. Im pretty sure its the most used song for sound tracks. Movies it was in include: Mystery Men, Digimon The Movie, Inspector Gadget, Rat Race, Go Tigers, and the aforementioned Shrek. Plus it came back around a decade later for an episode of Cold Case and various documentaries.

Shrek being more popular as a movie and a meme than all of those, Xer.

#ok old timer

Not even thirty yet.

The reason shrek has more memes is because it had sequels. Therefore the original becomes relevant all over again for every spin off and sequel created. Shrek carried it to younger people today but didnt popularize the song at the time anymore than any other movie it was in. In fact, the most underlined songs in that movie was I'm a Believer (also by Smashmouth) and Hallelujah (Rufus Wainwright's version). All Star memeified because of its spread not because of a single movie. That's literally what memeification is. At the time, it didnt popularize that song. It popularized two different songs. One has not been memeified and the other is more complicated due to it being an incredibly poignant Jewish song and its memeification is different. I wont discuss it because I fear I wouldnt do it justice.

If I'm an old timer for being 11 in 2001 when the movie came out, I can't imagine that you, OP, lived through it cognizantly. You're ascribing more importance to Shrek's using of the song than is historically accurate.

When Rat Race was released, it ranked 3red in American films behind American Pie 2 and Rush Hour. It's UK release also ranked 3 behind LotR Fellowship of the Ring and the first Harry Potter film.

Digimon the Movie ranked fifth in american charts and was one of the most successful anime theatrical releases internationally directly leading to the making of Howl's Moving Castle, an anime based on an American book and one of the most popular of Studio Ghibli.

Mystery Men was a box office flop but still ranked 6th in America.

Inspector Gadget ranked 2nd, same as Shrek, and was beat out by the Haunting. (Shrek was beat out by Pearl Harbor)

At the time, it wasnt uber popular. It got a better reaction than expected. It wasnt until it released sequels and spin offs when the internet was more accessible and less fragmented, that Shrek got any real memes. Had we not been bound by random geocities sites, some of the others probably would have got some memes too. Mystery Men, despite flopping, had some incredibly memetic moments.

Anyway, that's just what this 29 year old has experienced. But what do I know. I'm just some old timer.

It’s not super surprising that we have science deniers when so many books and movies we consume as kids make a big deal of how dumb those Silly Adults who Believe in Science are. 

Even after childhood, fantasy media tends to praise belief without evidence, skepticism of commonly accepted truths, and relying on intuition and feelings rather than observation. A lot of stories involve a subplot of a character letting go of what they “think” they know about the world in favor of a hidden truth that can only be accessed through introspection/faith/belief/an unconventional channel of obtaining knowledge. 

Also, educated people and science are seen as stuffy, set in their ways, and too rigid to be able to see truth. 

Discuss. 

Avatar

I…kind of disagree. Like I see the point you are making. And of course I’m no science denier. But also in media I see tons of scientists seen simply trying to find evidence of what they are told to believe, and I don’t think it’s seen as dumb. It’s seen as very practical, maybe overly so, yes, but also I see in fantasy the scientists also try to find evidence of things they have been taught/told should not exist. I think those who deny science are not really all that influenced by our media.

I think that it’s good when in entertainment science is crossed with those who believe things on intuition and feelings, and I wish real life was more like that actually. Intuition and feelings inspire science and experimentation as much as anything else. Science can look for evidence of the spiritual and be perfectly right and reasonable while they do that. There’s nothing wrong with intuition and feelings and spirituality. After all, people that hold to those things mostly do so because they feel there is truth there and as someone who is both spiritual and scientific, I think the depiction of both is important. It’s important that ANYONE be willing to let go of what they THINK they know in favor of being open to other truths. IMO lots of fantasy does a good job of presenting this balance. 

I really disagree too. In fact, Americans specifically have a culture of squashing fantasy as a serious genre for adults, which runs counternarritive to the original point (read Ursula K Le Guin's Why Are Americans Afraid Of Dragons? essay on this for a better understanding).

A LOT of modern fantasy is about questioning the reality you are told is true and exploring actual truth. One could argue this is a scientist's exact prerogative. In fact, sci fi and fantasy are, by many, considered to be either two ends of one genre spectrum or sibling genres. Arthur C. Clarke, not only a science fiction writer but a bonafide scientist through and through, is credited as saying, "Magic's just science that we don't understand yet."

The problem is the people who are science deniers are taught to not question and explore. They are taught blind belief. Which I think is the direct inverse of what OP is saying.

Mind you, some will read this and consider it to be about religion. It isn't. It can be, case to case, but one doesn't necessarily have to do with the other. I was raised in a church and am a Christian and was specifically taught to ask questions if I doubt, to seek answers, to challange. So I don't necessarily believe one automatically means the other.

The local oldies station just played “All Star” by Smashmouth. Which was made in 1999 and popularized again in “Shrek” in 2001.

“All Star” is an oldie.

Shrek popularized it? What child wrote this. It was on what felt like every soundtrack form y2k. Im pretty sure its the most used song for sound tracks. Movies it was in include: Mystery Men, Digimon The Movie, Inspector Gadget, Rat Race, Go Tigers, and the aforementioned Shrek. Plus it came back around a decade later for an episode of Cold Case and various documentaries.