I don't think so! A warrant is a purely sapio thing, I don't see how it has any thaumaturgic effect any more than the date on the calender makes a difference to lunar transformations.
The real question is whether people of the night should work for the police (also no)
Ok, but certainly in the UK all land is legally ultimately owned by the crown, which is also the entity on whose ultimate authority warrants are issued. So a warrant could conceivably be interpreted as an invitation to enter by the "true" owner of the land.
So the question might be how much ownership over a property does one have to have in order to invite a vampire in? Is it legal or emotional ownership? Could a landlord invite a vampire into a property they own but do not live in, or would the occupying tenants have to invite the vampire in despite the landlord's legal ownership? How long does a renter have to live in a property before they have enough ownership over the space for their invite to be the one that counts? If a renter never makes an emotional connection with a property as "home" does that mean vampires can enter at will?
And if the crown had a big enough sense of entitlement over British land, would that mean that vampires would require written permission from the crown to enter any private residence, regardless of the occupiers wishes?
I think this sort of misses the point in the same way the original question does. Magic isnt about what human courts put on human pieces of paper. I don't think ownership has anything to do with being able to invite vampires or not - most of the time the invitation is being extended by someone who is just.... inside the building lol not necessarily people who live there.
A more interesting question I think is what makes a place a home, and what constitutes a threshold. If you're squatting in an abandoned building, does your experience of that place make it a home? Is a shelter a home, if nobody lives there permanently? does a hotel count? if you sleep in your car, are you safe?
The real question isnt "how do vampire cops function". it's "what makes a home", which I think is more interesting.
Yeah, that's kinda what I was getting at with "is it legal or emotional ownership" that counts. Fwiw, something I'm sparking off here is that I've just finished a rewatch of buffy and there's an interesting bit in season 7 when the residents have all fled Sunnydale and spike says he can just walk into any of the houses without an invitation, which would suggest at least in that lore that it is the emotional attachment to a place that makes it a home. Spike can enter because the residents have physically and emotionally abandoned the houses even if they still have legal ownership. (in their lore it is established that a guest in a house cannot invite a vampire in, only someone who lives there can, when Dawn invites vamp harmony into the house.)
Which led me to have this tingle in the back of my mind about a British monarch whose emotional belief in their ultimate possession of all the land in the UK is so strong that it manifests thaumaturgic energies strong enough to affect vampires etc. The Crown as a cosmic manifestation of concentrated possessive entitlement sort of deal.
Like, if you knew that not inviting vampires into your home was meant to be a guaranteed way of keeping yourself safe, what could be more horrifying than discovering that a powerful stranger has such a strong sense of entitlement over your home that they too can invite the vampires in...
ooooh I love the fact you just made the monarchy even more skin-crawling haha! Also, I just realised that because I was on mobile when I replied before, I was less exclamation mark-y than usual and might have sounded a bit grumpy, sorry!
I think that's a really fun, dark direction to take it in, where "home" is about "ownership". The two Buffy examples are interesting because Dawn certainly doesn't own the house she's in - apart from her being 16, if I remember right there's a whole arc about how the bank owns the house at that point? So it's definitely a lore where calling a place home is what counts.
Interesting too that abandoning your home out of fear for your safety makes it not your home any more in the Buffyverse. I'd love to riff on the idea of like, when does your childhood home stop being your home? Whenever I dream of "home", it's the house I grew up in - I feel like in a very emotional magical world, there could be fun to be had with the idea that I can still invite people into that place, because it's still my home in my heart.
And then to expand on what I was thinking about earlier, it's interesting how much this depends on the universe you're in and the story you're trying to tell. In Monstrous Agonies, I would hope it's been politically consistent enough that the question would be "how do we keep unhoused people, people in temporary housing and other marginalised groups safe", but there's definitely a flip-side of that that's "how would cops, landlords and land-owners use this power to erode/undermine your rights".






























