hello. welcome to the music box inside my head.

Hi can we talk about Sam smiths tattoo???

A boy in his underwear and high heels staring at himself in the mirror...? Hello???

Why are these men all the same?! Time and time again it’s always the same pedophilic, perverted, OBSESSION with a boy in women’s clothing. absolutely gross.

It's already ugly but I just feel like it's gonna look like a truly shitty tattoo in less than a decade, and that's the only upside here.

pedophiles running wild.

this is their dreamland reality.

#WakeTheFuckUp and #SpeakOut

Remember that reddit story I found where that exact thing happened? Like right in the post the op talked about how his MtF husband was supported more by his family because “at least you won’t be gay”

I was also linked an article by the MtF husband themself, written years earlier when he still identified as a gay man, in which he talks about the homophobia he suffered and how his family disowned him when he came out. I’ve discussed Jazz Jennings and how their parents supported childhood crushes on boys because they saw Jazz as a girl. Truly ask yourself if they would have done the same if, at that same age, Jazz simply identified as a gay boy? When was the last time you’ve seen “gay kids” celebrated and protected the way “trans kids” are? Hell, Jazz’s parents wouldn’t even let him wear a dress until they had transitioned him. During regression therapy Jazz dreamed they were a gay man still ‘hungry to be accepted’. What about trans ally of the year, Cher, who kicked her daughter out when she was a lesbian but accepted her trans man “son”? And what about stuff like this?

And the fact that there are religious institutions that will help fund some people’s transition…gotta wonder what the true motives are there. Have they helped anyone who was opposite-sex attracted or only the ones they see as sinners due to their same sex attraction? Why are so many of the “trans kids” we’ve been hearing about coming from religious households? Speaking of the Christian faith, I have personal experience in knowing that a lot of them would sooner accept trans people than gay people, since I was also raised in that faith and saw this first-hand. The thought process was basically that being gay was a choice that dirty perverts made of their own accord, but trans people can’t help being born in the wrong body. Being trans was seen more like a disability and many people were sympathetic, believing trans people should be able to transition for a fair chance to be ‘normal’. We weren’t even really aware of heterosexual (opposite sex attracted) trans people back then. This is not an unusual thought process in other religions, too. Lest we forget Iran’s pension for transitioning homosexuals, with the alternative being jail or death. And Iran is not the only country where homosexuality/gay marriage is unlawful but allows change of legal gender identity.

Hating gay people/preferring trans people has even been observed in the “religion” of gender. 

In so-called “progressive” spaces, homophobia is still astonishingly rampant (though often masked with terms like ‘cis’) while anything that can be construed as even slightly transphobic is very quickly and forcibly shut down. All this to say that, sure, trans people don’t always have it easy. And yet, a lot of what we consider “transphobia” is either homophobia or just general hatred of GNC people whether they identify as trans or not (often still a form of homophobia). Heterosexual (opposite sex attracted) MtFs still receive a lot of male privilege despite being trans, and it’s not like your average nonbinary is at high risk for being hate crimed in the street. Remember that most transphobic violence in the world is leveraged against homosexual prostitutes, often because their ‘buyer’ discovered that they aren’t actually female at some point during the encounter.

You say this view point has no “basis in reality” and yet we don’t have to look very far to see it at all. Even right-wing-leaning new sites can see it. Homosexuality is often treated as a symptom for transness. Listen to detransitioners’ stories about how all they had to do was mention their same sex attraction to get almost immediate access to cross-sex hormones. A bit fishy when similar hormones were given to gay people in the not-so distant past in hopes of “curing” them….and what of all those studies they used to include in the Standards of Care document about how “most kids with dysphoria” grow out of it?

It’s clear that societies that hold tightly to their gender roles are more likely to accept trans people or additional gender categories, even if begrudgingly, if the only alternative is that person remains gay and GNC. And while I’m sure there are some individual examples of people begging their kids to just “stay gay” rather than be trans, even those cases seem disproportionately low when considering the monetary costs and health risks associated with transition. You’d think way more parents would be hesitant. Often times when I do come across stories of such parents they are either 1) gay themselves or 2) their kid isn’t. Just some food for thought.

my favourite instagram account is "wheredoesthepeecomeout" and it's run by a girl who asks men on tinder where cis women pee from and then documents their answers

some highlights:

everybody sit down we have a winner

STOP CALLING WOMEN CIS WOMEN..

WOMEN ARE WOMEN.

thats it. nothing more nothing less.

it makes me so sad that a huge amount of female mainstream singers are unbearable to listen to because sex is what sells. their writers, their directors, their clothing designers, their music labels just degrade them to fucking sex dolls and because liberal feminism, these women are just going “now men wanna have sex with me, that means i have the power!….right?” at least back int he 90′s and even early 2000′s we were ‘allowed’ to criticise this shit but now we get called “anti feminist”. what the fuck is anti feminist about criticising societal structures where the only way women can make good money or be famous is to indirectly or directly sell their bodies??? and women do it because it gives them validation, and because it makes them feel superficially good, it’s immune from criticism? men’s dicks do truly rule the world.

It’s not a coincidence that all female pop stars “choose” to wear heels, bodysuits, mini skirts and short shorts, bejeweled bras, body paint, etc. etc. etc. It’s not a coincidence that they all wear makeup (shoutout to Alicia Keys for being the ONE exception). I think some female mainstream singers are really wonderful but I’m sad that they seem to be given a uniform, and the uniform code is “show as much skin as possible at all times.” Why can’t they just be singers?

Forever thinking about that picture from a couple years back of Beyonce and like Ed fucking Sheerdan or whatever where he looks like a college douchebag who rolled out of a bed in some dirty jeans and a shirt while Beyonce is decked head to toe, full hair curled full face makeup highlighter lipstick ect, whole body shaved and wearing this over the top ballgown like….women aren’t allowed to just Be. The closest example I can think of nowadays is maaaaaybe Billie E? Or maybe a little older Missy Elliot.

And here’s Jennifer Lopez’s new album cover:

Can you imagine any male pop singer pose like that? And on their album cover no less? 

I think a lot of it has to do with the influence of pornography. The pimp industry and the entertainment industry have merged a while ago. So now the women are dressed and told to dance like strippers, they are mimicking sex acts and positions so that the men watching can picture themselves fucking them. 

Not to be a dick but I feel like some of these pop stars just aren’t talented enough musically so this is how they make up for it. I do agree though that it makes them unlistenable.

I’d like songs as well that are more complex and aren’t just about self-gratification and adhering to our base needs. There’s more to human life than screwing like a horny pig.

There is that.

It didn’t use to be like this. So many women were giants in the music industry. Nina Simone, Aretha Franklin, Amy Winehouse, all of them sang beautifully about real life and its issues. Now it’s just garish displays of sexuality

this post is not for your christian morality fapping, it’s about female oppression  and the fact that women are unable to be famous now without objectifying themselves, with the clear cause and implication being porn culture, as well as how the male led free love movement invaded feminism in the 90′s and turned it on it’s head to pander to males. fuck off. jerking off with one hand and pointing with the other. 

Last week, an anti-transgender lesbian told me I couldn’t call myself a “dyke.” I’m not sure if it’s because I’m not exclusively attracted to women or if it’s that I’m a trans woman. Either way, this word is a reclaimed slur for anyone who’s a woman attracted to women (and usually those who dress along the masculine spectrum). I’m trans, queer, and attracted to multiple genders. That doesn’t negate my womanhood or attraction to women. 

Here’s some history for you: “dyke” emerged as a term in the mid 19th century to describe a well-dressed man. The term took on the original pejorative meaning as “bullydyke” in the late 1920’s following its coinage. However, by the 1970’s the term was widely reclaimed. Publications like the Women’s Press Collective encouraged the use of dyke to make it our own. I should also note that most of the members of the WPC supported trans women themselves. 

By the late 1970’s, the community dropped “bull” from the term. It quickly gained new popularity with the Alison Bechdel (another lesbian who supports trans women) comic “Dykes to Watch Out For” in 1983. Finally, “dyke” entered the mainstream as the first national Dyke March took place in Washington, D.C. in 1993. Held without a permit, it was organized by the Lesbian Avengers, a trans-inclusive group of radical women who loved women. They took part in direct actions around the country for decades. Many of the members did not identify as lesbians but instead as transgender, bisexual, or pansexual among other identities. Dyke is meant to include any woman who is attracted to women. To claim otherwise is not only inaccurate but also ahistorical.

no its not lmao.

the amount of entitled kids on tumblr who think they can rewrite history is hilarious. sit your ass down.

Dyke: Woman loving woman. That’s it. No man can call himself a dyke you shitbrain.

I made a post about this yesterday, and I didn’t expect to get this much done so quickly, but I’ve made a google docs document with as many sourced radical feminist arguments as I can find. I’m going to keep updating it as I come across more, but I’ve added quite a lot already so I figured I’d share the link now, so here it is: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-i6zYkIbnHqljJ6kw0aIlJu3qX_fsRSl6GOgnB1knbQ/edit

I went through all of the links to make sure they worked, but I might have missed some so if anyone finds any broken links, please let me know and I can find a replacement for it. Also, if you know of any posts you think should be added to this, you can add the link under this post or tag me in the post so that I can add it in.

[See the Read-First Introduction before proceeding]

CENSORED BY TRANSPOLITICS: A MASTERPOST

                                                    TIER 1

MURDER OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY

                                                  TIER 2

ASSAULT OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY

                                                   TIER 3

ECONOMIC PUNISHMENTS (SUCH AS UNEMPLOYMENT OR LEGAL FINES) OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY

                                                  TIER 4

THE NO-PLATFORMING, DISINVITATION, EVENT CANCELLATION, UNPUBLISHING AND CENSORSHIP OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY

BOLD links = this person has been deplatformed repeatedly (Meaning, this list is longer than it looks.)

                                                TIER 5

SOCIAL EXCLUSION, DOXXING, HARASSMENT, GENERAL INTIMIDATION OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY

There are so many open threats of violence made against trans-critical people, particularly against lesbians and/or radical feminists, that I cannot list them all. So I’ll summarize instead:

WITHDRAWAL OF SUPPORT

Transactivists are known to threaten to withdraw support for feminist causes/organizations if they fail to openly pledge allegiance to transgender ideology. Many such organizations are in desperate need of social support and funding, so they don’t have much of a choice except to go along with what transactivists tell them to say. The message is clear: “Your rights are important, but validating my beliefs is more important.”

One example:

SOCIAL MEDIA PHASE-OUTS

Ask ANY radical /gender critical/trans critical feminist, and they will tell you: we get deleted, harassed, banned and blocked more than anyone. Many of us have lost real-life friends over trans-critical Facebook posts or even for asking questions. It seems that transactivists patrol Facebook for the slightest hint of “transphobia” so they can pile-on and virtue-signal what a Good Trans Ally they are.

Again, there are too many examples to post here, so here are just a few examples: (x)(x)(x)

TERF BLACKLISTS Transactivists on Tumblr often make lists of alleged “TERFs” and command their followers not to engage with, or reblog anything from, people on the lists. Some examples:

The “TERF hive” commands trans allies to censor, harass, report, block and otherwise shut down trans-critical sites:

DIE CIS SCUM This is a popular slogan in transactivists circles. Transactivists argue that their use of this slogan is okay because “they’re more oppressed than cis people.” As you can see in the picture below, it’s a very threatening slogan, especially when tattooed on the body of a male holding a baseball bat.

#KILLALLTERFS A favorite hashtag of transactivists. Many examples of these open threats of violence can be found on the following websites:

TERF is a Slur | Violent Receipts | Violent Trans Male Witness

Here is a small sampling of the kinds of threats made against us by transactivists, taken from the 3 links above ^

VIDEOS:

TRANSACTIVISTS IN ACTION See it for yourself.

Anti-feminist protesters at the Vancouver Women’s Library Launch from GFC on Vimeo.

Also worth considering:

These major “feminist”/women’s websites will publish pro-transgender pieces but won’t publish “transphobic” (trans-critical, gender-critical or radical feminist) pieces:

Feministing, EverydayFeminism, Jezebel, xoJane, The Frisky, Bitch Media, The Establishment, Refinery29, Bustle, Black Girl Dangerous…

Autostraddle even blatantly admits to being inclined to give trans*people more money for their writing (source)

Many trans-critical writers have had to resort to publishing on Right-wing websites just to have a platform, even though they do not sympathize, or want to associate, with the Right. (This is part of where the “radfems are conservative” stereotype comes from.)

So now the question is:

WHO’S SILENCING WHO?

“The men struggle to distinguish porn scripts from real sexual assault situations. One observes, ”That feels like a sexual assault.” Another speculates that the situation before him is a #MeToo story. At the conclusion of the video, it is revealed that all of the scenarios were taken from pornography.”

Now we’re connecting some dots.

“What does it mean when pornography, the primary form of sexual education for young people, is indistinguishable from real life sexual abuse of women? What does it mean for women and girls? What does it mean for men and boys watching this content regularly, and from childhood? What is the impact on sexuality, intimate relationships and attitudes towards women when men and boys are socialised to find enjoyment in the abuse of women?”

Is this the new “People are Violent because of video games”? First of all there are plenty of women that enjoy dominant sex and should not be shamed for it. And second it is not that hard to distinguish porn from reality. Porn is like any other movie production and should not be viewed as real life. And lastly the general rule of thumb is if a woman gives you consent then you have a green light to do whatever she wants to her. If she says no and keeps protesting then you are a scumbag that should be locked up. So the porn is not to blame if your privileged ass thinks just because some paid actors in a movie are having hardcore sex then you need to force yourself on women wether they want it or not

Hi, I’d like to introduce you to a field of study known as Sociology. It’s basically the study of society. See, we understand that culture does in fact impact who we are as people, as much as we want to believe that we are in complete control of who we are, that is simply just not true.

Advertising companies wouldn’t spend make any money if advertising didn’t work. The human brain is like a sponge, constantly absorbing messages subconsciously. And an orgasm is a very powerful psychological conditioning tool. Porn use does in fact impact people.

Here, have some research:

Porn use:

Ex-porn star testimonies:

porn trends:

how pornographers feel about women:

2010 study on popular porn films:

cases of porn leading children to commit sexual assualt IN THE UK ALONE:

racism in porn:

Kid’s access to pornography:

Child Pornography

Your brain on porn:

Common porn addiction withdrawal symptoms include:

Adult (>18 years old) exposure to pornographic media is connected with:

Life and death of a porn star:

If you don’t feel like reading:

Just links:

HOW YOU CAN HELP

And also, have some testimonials from previous porn stars:

Wow, you type fast!