Avatar

Waxing Philosophical

@mrwiseandshine / mrwiseandshine.tumblr.com

Professional solver of vaguely money-related problems. Trained in Thought As Such. True word rotator. Adjacent and sanepunk. I am credentialed to give financial advice but that means I'll charge for it.
Dave Dobson's past is not a secret. Not technically, anyway - not since the relevant US government intelligence documents were declassified and placed in the vaults of the National Security Archive, in Washington DC. But Dobson, now 65, is a modest man, and once he had discovered his vocation - teaching physics at Beloit College, in Wisconsin - he felt no need to drop dark hints about his earlier life. You could have taken any number of classes at Beloit with Professor Dobson, until his recent retirement, without having any reason to know that in his mid-20s, working entirely as an amateur and equipped with little more than a notebook and a library card, he designed a nuclear bomb.
Today his experiences in 1964 - the year he was enlisted into a covert Pentagon operation known as the Nth Country Project - suddenly seem as terrifyingly relevant as ever. The question the project was designed to answer was a simple one: could a couple of non-experts, with brains but no access to classified research, crack the "nuclear secret"? In the aftermath of the Cuban missile crisis, panic had seeped into the arms debate. Only Britain, America, France and the Soviet Union had the bomb; the US military desperately hoped that if the instructions for building it could be kept secret, proliferation - to a fifth country, a sixth country, an "Nth country", hence the project's name - could be averted. Today, the fear is back: with al-Qaida resurgent, North Korea out of control, and nuclear rumours emanating from any number of "rogue states", we cling, at least, to the belief that not just anyone could figure out how to make an atom bomb. The trouble is that, 40 years ago, anyone did.
The quest to discover whether an amateur was up to the task presented the US Army with the profoundly bizarre challenge of trying to find people with exactly the right lack of qualifications, recalls Bob Selden, who eventually became the other half of the two-man project. (Another early participant, David Pipkorn, soon left.) Both men had physics PhDs - the hypothetical Nth country would have access to those, it was assumed - but they had no nuclear expertise, let alone access to secret research.
"It's a very strange story," says Selden, then a lowly 28-year-old soldier drafted into the army and wondering how to put his talents to use, when he received a message that Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb and the grumpy commanding figure in the US atomic programme, wanted to see him. "I went to DC and we spent an evening together. But he began to question me in great detail about the physics of making a nuclear weapon, and I didn't know anything. As the evening wore on, I knew less and less. I went away very, very discouraged. Two days later a call comes through: they want you to come to Livermore."
Livermore was the Livermore Radiation Laboratory, a fabled army facility in California, and the place where Dave Dobson, in a similarly surreal fashion, was initiated into the project. The institution's head offered him a job. The work would be "interesting", he promised, but he couldn't say more until Dobson had the required security clearance. And he couldn't get the clearance unless he accepted the job. He only learned afterwards what he was expected to do. "My first thought," he says today, with characteristic understatement, "was, 'Oh, my. That sounds like a bit of a challenge.'"
They would be working in a murky limbo between the world of military secrets and the public domain. They would have an office at Livermore, but no access to its warrens of restricted offices and corridors; they would be banned from consulting classified research but, on the other hand, anything they produced - diagrams in sketchbooks, notes on the backs of envelopes - would be automatically top secret. And since the bomb that they were designing wouldn't, of course, actually be built and detonated, they would have to follow an arcane, precisely choreographed ritual for having their work tested as they went along. They were to explain at length, on paper, what part of their developing design they wanted to test, and they would pass it, through an assigned lab worker, into Livermore's restricted world. Days later, the results would come back - though whether as the result of real tests or hypothetical calculations, they would never know.

Interesting story; worth reading the whole thing

Avatar

For as much as I think Le Guin misunderstood Gandalf (as suggested by the assumptions she made conceptualizing Ged), one thing she hits dead on the fucking ringer is that Ged losing his magic but getting to live more humanly is a quiet triumph in the exact inverse of how Gandalf largely losing his more human traits (affinity for pipes, mischievous streak, occasional foul temper) to become a more perfect embodiment of divine power is a quiet tragedy.

Avatar

Le Guin asked “who was Gandalf as a boy” which is the wrong question, he was always an angel and was never a boy. He only temporarily took on the quirks and mannerisms of a human before giving them up to return to his divine calling. In that way perhaps Ged is his inverse: a human who assumed transcendent power and authority before giving it up and allowing a new world to be born without needing him.

When you're dead will you miss us

Avatar

No, because I am the first posthuman to figure out the true nature of life after death and ascend to a higher plane of existence. This sounds soooo much cooler when I say it

Avatar

Hell yeah Frank! Good luck on your gnostic ascension. I’ll see you there eventually!

I’ll send a post-ascension update to everyone at Tumblr so we can have a club party in Heaven or whatever, I’ll tell you that much

(When I ascend, I’ll probably get so good at predicting the Iliad that I get recruited by the Greek pantheon, and then eventually I’ll advise them to get a better poet or something and it’ll be like a BigLaw experience, so maybe that could involve a sort of celestial Tumblr party)

This is the standard winged nightjar and it has one singular stupidly big feather on each wing... if you even care.

Love this guy

That’s standard as in “pennant” or “banner”, not standard as in “normal”.

But it’s not a pennant-winged nightjar. THIS is a pennant-winged nightjar… if you even care.

can’t forget the Lyre-tailed Nightjar! there’s actually a number of these ridiculous guys, and they’re partly why caprimulgiforms are some of my favorite birds

also the Sickle-winged Nightjar, which is. come on, that’s just a weird moth

Everyone does care about nightjars 🥹

This is Thelockpickinglaywer and what I have for you today is something very interesting. As you can tell by the agonizing screams of the damned, I have recently left the mortal coil and, upon arriving at my destination, was informed that I did not qualify for residence. I was taken by an angel of the Lord to the mouth of Hell, and when the angel left, he closed this rather large red door and sealed it with a divine key. Although I’ve never seen this particular model of lock before, I’ve spent some time investigating the cylinder with this small shard of bone. By sticking it in the back of the keyway and slowly pulling it out, I can tell that this is a five-pin tumbler lock, that can easily be single-pin picked using this shed demon scale as a tensioner tool. Let’s try that right now. Alright, nothing on one. Nothing on two. Three is binding firmly, click out of that. Nothing on four. Five is binding, little click there, back to one. Once again, nothing. Two is binding, and we’ve dropped into a false set. Little click out of three. Nothing on four. Little click on one, counter-rotation on two, and we got this open. Okay folks, I think the main takeaway here is that no matter how much faith you place in a mechanism designed to ensure your safety, be it spiritual or physical, there is always a state in which it can fail. In any case, thank you for watching. Memento mori, and I’ll see you next time.

why is there a 1000 page book on the "theory of gearing"??

???

?????

????????

???????????????

(This is REAL Gear Theory, done by REAL Gear Theoreticians)

You may not like it, but this is what peek courier performance looks like

i think a lot of highly applied and technical theories look like this partially because the objects they are describing have not had 400 years of pedagogical and symbolic refinement, so they have to manipulate an intimidating amount of more generalized symbols.

I do love the aesthetic of this though. Check out the math for beamforming with a randomly placed antenna array. It is just as unhinged

Annals of US city governance, we are finally embracing the radical notion of trash bins:

The new rule is part of the city’s broader plan to move trash into containers, a simple yet revolutionary change in New Yorkers’ trash habits. To do so could easily cost the city hundreds of millions of dollars over the next decade. City officials must buy new specialized trash trucks and stationary containers, while also increasing the frequency of residential trash collection in large swaths of the city.

"Specialized trash trucks and stationary containers" how will we develop this frontier technology??

Other cities like Barcelona, Buenos Aires and Singapore have already embraced trash containerization.

Genius sentence, the way its structured to imply only the best of the best in modern cities have piloted this crazy idea. Soon NYC will be on the elite list of cities not dumping bags of trash openly on the streets! If you find yourself asking "wait why has this not happened yet", well:

City officials found that it was possible to use trash containers on 89 percent of the city’s residential streets, but it would require removing 150,000 parking spots 

So, yup.

something something developed country something

Avatar

It’s really strange to me that New York City doesn’t already do this, considering every other major city in the US does. I may be wrong about this, but of the 10 biggest cities in the US, as far as I can tell, NYC is the only one that doesn’t require trash to be put in some kind of bin for collection.

The thing most cities in the US could stand to embrace is better sorting of their trash--we sort ours into at minimum five categories (paper recycling, glass, other recycling, compost, and non-recyclable waste), and that’s on the low end for Europe.

Avatar

New York City is a weirdly regressive place in a very specific and consistent way. It's like a portal to the 1970s but only for middle class infrastructure. Manhattanites will breathlessly describe the concept of a "bodega" like it's some futuristic innovation and not commonplace everywhere else for every gas station or truck stop. Businesses located in the five boroughs all still have fax numbers on their letterhead. The doctors all still use film for x-rays. You can't tap to pay and many places still only do cash. They even allow regular car traffic into their city for some reason despite this never being a good idea. There are like five different wrong turns you can make in Westchester that will irrevocably strand you in Manhattan gridlock.