reblogging to normalize. because we really should be uplifting sex workers as bread winners. Also because they should be able to show their face in public without fear of repercussions??? (cough cough), like this gentleman.
Honestly its unhinged and hilarious but yet also seriously something I want to see more of
image described in alt text
Reblog if you’re a cheap whore. Or respect cheap whores. Or have the power to turn young people into cheap whores. (they can never tell which)
support whores both cheap and expensive!
rb to explode a terf ^_^ nonrefundable ^_^
Why would you, a tumblr blogger, have respect for the author
can someone make a “what’s your opinion on war crimes” “in my opinion, all war is crimes” image or do i have to do it myself
wait ok mutuals what do you guys call your parents???????
Hey! What the fuck is going on in here
no where else
There's having sock puppet accounts, and then there's putting on a puppet show.
Shamelessly poaching someone elses idea, social media poll but the options arent solely geared 2wards 15 year olds
Reblog 4 a bigger sample size dadada you know how it is w polls
EXACTLY. And that is why he declared so far in advance. He thought it could thwart an indictment. 
He knew he'd be indicted because he deliberately ignored a request from the National Archives, refused to return all the documents required, did not secure the documents in his possession, told his lawyers to remove some documents before returning others, and lie to law enforcement about what was kept/returned. This goes above and beyond what Trumpsters accused Hillary Clinton of doing.
It's deliberately written as a narrative story and very easy to understand. The DOJ wanted us to see with our own eyes what the former guy did, when he did it, and why it was wrong.
Yes, it's 49 pages, but it's double-spaced with huge margins, crammed with photographs & tables. It only took me a few minutes, even accounting for the times I stopped to re-read some things because they are so batshit insane.
I guarantee you most people defending him haven't read it.
Just because facts don’t matter to Repuglicans doesn’t mean you shouldn’t know them.
I have a story that’s topical; I’ve told it before on tumblr, but it’s topical to this and thus worth repeating.
Back around 2005, I ran into a Baptist missionary who spotted my kippah and basically took that as permission to attempt to missionize at me.
I defended myself, using the basics of the knowledge I have of Christian theology and texts that I learned specifically to fend off missionaries.
We went back and forth and back and forth, and he wouldn’t leave me alone for… oh, probably the better part of an hour.
And then…
Then this part is seared into my memory. I have nightmares about it.
He smiled at me and said that, with my knowledge of the Gospels, I am sure to be one of the Elect when the time comes.
I asked what the hell that meant.
And he told me. He told me in a tone of utmost sincerity–even envy, because to his belief system, it was a good and enviable thing…
Because to be one of the “Elect” is to be one of the 144,000 Jews who accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior at the Apocalypse. This will happen when all of the Children of Israel have been Gathered in the Land of Israel; war will break out, the Assembled Jews will have the Gospels preached to us, and 144,000 Thousand–Twelve Tribes times Twelve Apostles times One Thousand–Jews will spontaneously convert to Christianity.
Once that occurs, all of the Jews die in the Apocalypse, but the Elect ascend to Heaven to be Jesus Christ’s personal escorts down to Earth for his Second Coming (the rest of the Jews go to hell for eternity, in case you’re wondering).
In short…
He told me that I existed to be a human blood sacrifice to bring back his god. I was not a person to him. I was nothing more than a means to that end.
And he was jealous. Jealous of the fact that he viewed my knowledge of his religion, something that I had learned specifically to fend him and his kind off, as proof that his religion was right and correct and inevitable. That in learning it, I had made myself more valuable to his worldview.
Jealous that, because I was more valuable, because I existed to die for his god, I would meet that god before him.
It was terrifying, to be told that I was to die… and he thought that it was a good thing.
This is how Evangelicals view death. Not as something to be avoided, but something to seek, something that is a positive, and not just for themselves… but for everybody.
They are the closest thing to a full-fledged Religion of Evil on the planet, and I say that without hyperbole.
When you guys say the US is being controlled by a death cult, you werent kidding!
I can confirm that there are evangelicals that believe this
this reminds me of the “she said yes” book/story and how that was so deeply instilled in us as children. for those who don’t know, it was a fictionalized story of a girl who actually died at columbine. she was killed after the shooters asked her “do you believe in God?” and she answered “yes.”
i remember being so offended when a friend in college was like “that’s so stupid—she should have said no and she’d still be alive.” when my entire identity up until that point was wrapped up in the supposition that i would also have said yes, and that i would have died without fear, not denying my God.
a lot has changed for me since then, but yeah. this post made me think of that.
when her boobs boob so boobily that you suffer from parkinsons
official boob post
why does the cereal look like gummy candies
neil babygirl how does aziraphale take his crepes
...orally?
telling trans men they could never understand the true oppression of women because they were actually socialized male because of their gender & therefore have the same experience of gender as cis men comes from the same place as telling transfems et al that same exact thing but with their sex. it comes from the need to distance trans people from our experiences with gender oppression & assert that only cis women are Really oppressed & gender oppression can only be measured by proximity to ciswomanhood
the solution to this is not arguing over whether or not socialization exists (it does to some extent but it is not uniform/universal nor does it define your relationship with gender) but recognizing trans experiences with gender & oppression in their own right, not lending validity to them based on how similar they are to cis women's. trans women, trans men, and everyone else do not need to try and match their experiences with gender oppression with cis women's to be seen as real victims of the patriarchy. we need moved beyond "see! we suffer just like cis women! please let us into your feminism and stop calling us oppressors!" and towards "these are our experiences, this is how we suffer, we should have solidarity with cis women but we don't need your approval & we don't need to base our liberation around being similar to you"
so i was trying to record some video of dennis' freakouts for an edit and you won't believe what interrupted me













