Avatar

please just give me acoherent definition of gender

@meanscaryevilwoman

22- Read my pinned post- I am here for respectful discussion! If you don't want to see people asking questions just block me

Hi, my name is Wren! I am an autistic asexual woman. I am American so most of my politics are centered on that fact, but I try to advocate for women in countries where systemic misogyny is more rampant as well. I will use tone indicators/tag potential triggers as requested. I made this blog so I could have a space to discuss my feelings and questions about various radical feminist ideas and what gender means in a space solely dedicated to doing so. Please interact if you have opinions you'd like to share/ you are interested in actual discussion! Please do not interact if you are unwilling to change your beliefs or even listen to others.

A lot of my beliefs would be considered socialist. I ♥️ poor people and also I think no one should be homeless or starve even if they're supposedly lazy.

I consider myself to have gender dysphoria as I often struggle with discomfort around my female body. My experiences are certainly different from everyone else's, and since the definition of gender dysphoria is not clearly defined some people would not consider me to fit the bill. I do not consider myself to have a gender identity; I am an adult female human. Presenting as a man would not help my dysphoria as for me it comes from a place of being uncomfortable with how I have been sexualized.

I support individual trans people's right to bodily autonomy and respect. I do not support the dismissal of biological sex and how it affects us.

Trans people are included in my feminism, particularly "afab" trans people. I am specifically focused on female liberation, not male issues, but I do not hate males. I agree with a lot of radfem beliefs (especially about pornography, prostitution, and beauty standards), however I have relationships with men and center them in my life. I tag discussion about what makes someone a "terf" with "what is a terf?" I've found a lot of really interesting points made. Otherwise, I'm pretty inconsistent tagging-wise.

sorry if this was hard to read, I wanted to cover as much as I could, but feel free to ask questions!

Honestly everyone should be celibate for a few years. You won’t die and you will come out of it way more confident and independent than if you go around chasing just anyone to stave off loneliness

It used to be normal in feminism to talk about how women are raised to define ourselves by romance. It used to be normal to talk about how harmful that serial monogamy pattern can be.

But it seems like women don't want to have those conversations anymore. Instead they're just giving up and saying they'll never be fulfilled without romance.

You say you feel like a woman. Why does that make you a woman?

There are people who feel they are animals. Why aren’t they animals?

There are people who feel like they are fictional characters. Why aren’t they fictional characters?

There are people who feel like they are people of colour. Why aren’t they people of colour?

Why is womanhood uniquely available for parody and mockery? Why is woman a term that can’t be strictly defined? What is it you feel that is inherent to womanhood? I don’t think most women feel anything like that, does that make them not women? Are you somehow an expert on womanhood to the point that you can say that what you feel is related to being a women, despite not being one?

What is a woman?

Why does that make you a woman?

Avatar

i think with collective effort we can make radblr great by going after every trad, conservative, homophobic, misogynistic, or racist loser on here until this space has been cleansed of their presence. 😌

Avatar

i walked away from radblr in 2019ish because (mostly het, mostly white) radfems refused to deplatform trads/white supremacists. i was alarmed to come back and scroll for not long at all before seeing women who are perfectly happy to cozy up to tradwives who just baaarely hide their racism under the veneer of #cottagecore. sorry but i have no interest in trying to build community with women who have aligned with patriarchy + whiteness and are bursting a blood vessel trying not to call me a slur, and neither should any other feminist who is serious about progress.

they aren’t your friends because they think trans women are men, they just hate gnc people on the whole. maybe they aren’t outright homophobic to ‘good’ lesbians but it’s because they see male homosexuality as the outright abomination and female homosexuality as a silly, inconsequential distraction from what women are called to do by their patriarchal god. they aren’t absorbing feminism through osmosis via your posts. they aren’t cool with your woke morals. they aren’t suddenly not racist because they follow you (you have to ignore how all their notes are swarmed w urls like dogwhistle1488 to believe this one).

white and het feminists- and ambivalent lesbians- need to do better. your community is worse off with nazis of any sort, even/especially the ones with infantilized housewifey homemaker blogs.

Avatar

Femmes if you are reading this, please share as much as material you can on AI P*RN with me. I am trying to do something against it in my country. But I need to research it as much as possible. Please share whatever material you have with me. I actually have an opportunity now. I will probably not get another chance like this. I’m tagging you all. So if you have anything please share.

Ok I feel happy with this compilation, but feel free to message me if you are looking at a specific aspect and I can look at that as well/am happy to chat.

I sorted the below by year, hopefully this helps! I tried to find things that ranged from very practical applications to theoretical as well as ranging in density/ease of reading. <3

  • "Intimate Image Abuse: Law Reform Report" from the UK Law Commission (2022) (link to pdf). It's very long piece (500 pages) but touches on a lot of different issues in deepfake pornography as related to many areas of law i.e., intimate partner violence, protected classes, violence against women, child exploitation etc This is a great starting point to find other resources as wellm as it utilizes many other pieces.
  • This is a brief via Western University (link, by Dianne Lalonde - 2021). It is a concise summary of arguments and issues you'll see in many articles and news pieces. It is in in info-graphicish style and easy to digest.
  • A 2020 report (link), this is a legal note about the implications for AI porn - and I think was my favorite go to resource as it is concise and well supported with its sources. Here is a particularly interesting quote: "Nonconsensual deepfake pornography exclusively targets and harms women. For example, one software application that produces nude images, DeepNude, will not function properly when presented with male images; it simply pastes a vulva over the male genitalia."
  • This report (link -2020) might be a little complex as it is looking at ways to disrupt AI generation from an image translation standpoint, but it is very helpful in explaining how these codes work, and the issues with the Deepnude app, and why things aren't solved when it was taken down as "the source codes had been released, and thus the same algorithm can be reproduced easily."
  • "Öhman, C. Introducing the pervert’s dilemma: a contribution to the critique of Deepfake Pornography" (link - 2020). This is more like a social theory kind of paper i.e., using the gamer's dillema for a new use case where "The consumption of Deepfakes is undeniably a highly gendered phenomenon, and arguably plays a role in the social degradation of women in society."
  • There is also a 2019 report which claimed that ~96% of deepfakes then in existence were nonconsensual pornography of women (this is a report via Deeptrace, the company is now called Sensity). Many later reports have relied on this.

listen I say this with patience bc some people may genuinely have not thought about this before but if you firmly say “AI art is terribly unethical and steals from artists” (which is correct) but then turn around and use voice AIs to generate songs/voice lines that sound like your favourite voice actors or singers……………………………………that is also AI art and it is also terribly unethical

just a few examples of voice actors making their stance clear for all the ppl who are trying to disagree w me

but but but I want to hear Kanye West sing “How Bad Can I Be?” from Lorax 😢😔

never forget the masterchef season where, christine, a blind woman, had ppl actively trying to use her blindness against her to win and had a punkass judge constantly bringing up her blindness and even saying that she "belonged in coat check" instead of the kitchen and she won the whole. mother. fuckin. thing.

fuck joe bastianich. queen christine on top.

joe has and has always been a little bitch. was just watching season 12 and Christina came back for a mystery box challenge and he criticized an Asian woman's Asian dish for not being European enough or something.

Anonymous asked:

www.tumblr.com/hadeantaiga/723502517175140352/ ((hadeantaiga at it againg 🙃))

"I've never seen proof of the "Nazi to TIM pipeline" but the radical feminist -> TERF -> NAZI pipeline is very well documented"

Oh really? Do you have some sources? Uh no? A couple screenshots? A quote at least?...

(And no, conservative/traditionalist women who are *At most* Trans critical (((not even gender critical ffs since they're agaisnt [LGB] gnc and uphold heteropatriarcal roles))) like KJK or the people that support her don't count)

Also this would be a rlly nice oportunity to share with our friend some of that proof that there's indeed a long documented phenomenom of TIMs being Nazis before or even Along being TransID. Iirc there's even old photos of crossdressing males having a great time next to fucking Tird Reich officials

It’s apparently so common it’s more or less a meme in some trans circles.

+ the crossdressing nazis from the 40s were a weird contradiction because they (or at least their side) definitely persecuted and tried to eradicate transvestites & transsexuals (who were seen as, and tbh at that time were, extensions of gay men)

Avatar

For goodness sake not everything can be inclusive of everyone, least of all sports

Fucking RUGBY of all sports. You already know why! Humans are sexually dimorphic! Men have 30% more body mass than women and twice the upper body strength! And I hate this language - nobody is being excluded! Trans women are welcome to join the men’s rugby team and play against the rest of the men. The only thing they are eXcLuDed from is smearing biological women across the pitch!

And one more thing - why sports?

Equity in housing and employment is an actual matter of life and death for trans people! The work needs to be done! The law and public opinion are on your side! So why, oh why would you spend your time trying to put men on women’s rugby teams? Do you want the public to hate you? I couldn’t invent a worse form of advocacy if I tried!

Avatar

i like when lesbians on here post like I hate your worthless ugly stupid boyfriend and in the notes are grown adults going This is not true for me because my boyfriend is actually amazing and beautiful I hope that is okay with everyone that I love my wonderuful boyfriend I'm sorry if that's not okay with you but this is how I feel

op turned off reblogs because she didn’t like what @she-is-ovarit had to say in response:

I am not saying this with the intention of stirring controversy, but this is similar to being gender critical while having trans-identifying friends, except where you consider for yourself to be a lack of relating to or understanding gender identity, for me it is this plus a lack of belief in it.

"Gender ideology" being a term for the mainstream belief system currently within trans populations and "LGBTQ+" groups surrounding gender identity.

I do not "hate trans people". I simply do not believe in gender ideology or some concept of an ethereal, metaphysical gender identity. It reminds me of astrology or zodiac signs taken to an extra level. Sex-based stereotypes and fashion aesthetics internalized. A person doesn't even need to believe in gender identity (how the term is commonly used today anyways) at all to consider themselves trans or transition, technically. I've even met a few trans-identifying individuals who go by the pronouns associated with their sex.

no like I genuinely believe you that mcwilliamsburg kids are posers and forrester-smith-tailor students are snooty potheads, but I have no way to apply and no reason to internalize this information

If snooty potheads and posers represented gender identities, aka someone's interpretation or meaning they placed on the "vibes" of certain schools, I don't believe that McWilliamsburg kids are posers and Forrester-Smith-Tailor students are snooty potheads, because that's your own perception of your reality (royal "you", not you personally OP). That's the lens in which you see your world and the meaning you place on it. I believe in material reality that these schools themselves exist (aka, biology/sex). I believe that your emotional experiences are real (feeling discomfort or a lack of relation to sex-based norms, stereotypes, roles, aesthetics; or feeling more of a kinship with people of one sex or the other). However your truth isn't mine, and I simply do not see or define people as snooty potheads, posers ("non-binary", "transfemme", "cisgender") etc. I don't believe that a student from McWilliamsburg can call herself a "Forrester-Smith-Tailor" student and this makes her one. It's an imperfect example because transferring schools exists or whatever, but unlike transferring schools as a biologist I have learned it's not actually possible to change one's sex.

I have no way to apply and no reason to internalize this information, and this all makes me feel like I'm in some sort of church. If I were to say, "well, I perceive reality differently and I don't think god exists and I'm homosexual and I won't be having sex with men ("AMAB/OMAB") regardless as to what they believe in and how they perceive themselves", the response is generally, "She's evil ("terf/bigot"), she's a sinner ("genital fetishist"), she's going to hell".

"Gender critical" is just gender ideology atheism. And then in addition to this I just believe in women's rights and gay rights and these two things inform my perspective/lens in which I view my own world in addition to my own experiences. Just like how as an atheist I don't want to "kill all Christians" or think "Christians don't exist", I don't want to "kill trans people" or think "trans people don't exist". Sorry - the astrological gender identity belief system doesn't make sense to me, I already tried unsuccessfully to brainwash myself into believing in it, and honestly it's built off of concepts and beliefs I personally consider homophobic and misogynistic. The threat of persecution, name calling, or the fact that this belief system is considered status quo or the pathway to heaven acceptance doesn't change that I don't believe in this. I can't make myself believe in what I don't believe in.

This is going to be difficult to articulate bc I thought of it a few hours ago, but:

The statements “I experience discomfort and physical disillusion being a female under the current patriarchy” and “I’m going to maintain my identity as a female despite what gender ideology suggests” should not be seen as contradictory.

The notion that transforming external characteristics to “match” internal struggle is clear cognitive dissonance perpetuated by choice feminism and TRA’s which enforces gender ideology and reduces female struggles to “well maybe you (a female) are actually a man (your oppressor)”. They understand these people are vulnerable and they prey on it to continue to enforce the “innate knowing” of gender (+ invasion of women’s spaces) instead of promoting gender abolition. Realizing this has changed my view as a new radfem and some who is detrans.

Men believe women deserve violence.

Now, they create little exceptions to the rule. If they're right-wing men, women deserve violence except the meek ones, the wives, the mothers. If you're a silent, useful, obedient woman, you may not deserve violence in their eyes. If you clean, cook, do all the childrearing, bring him his beer and pretend you don't know he's cheating, maybe in his eyes you won't deserve violence. But if you're a prostitute, a feminist, a woman who doesn't conform to traditional beauty norms, a woman who travels, works, takes risks, then you deserve the violence. On the left, the melody is the same, but in a different accent. If you go 50/50 but do all the chores and raise his kids alone, if you let yourself get chocked during sex, if you accept without questioning that trans women are women, that your bathrooms be changed into gender neutral bathrooms, if you let the men into your sports, into your rape crisis centers, if you coddle the left wing man who fills the air with Marxism but expects you to do the laundry and perfectly adhere to the beauty standards the right wing man expects, just with fewer clothes, if you are very, very careful to never hurt his feelings, if you accept the polyamorous open situationship, maybe in his eyes you won't deserve the violence. But if you're the right wing woman, the straight "cis" white woman who doesn't always apologize for existing every hour of the day, the terf, the swerf, the prude, then you do deserve the violence.

Both want you to obey and be of service and believe that you had it coming if you misbehave. They just expect different kind of services and behaviors.

Avatar

it's so telling that the "terf" position is so hugely condemned but every interaction myself or others have with the pro-trans side is us having to explain the absolute basics of our stance to them lmfao. they really are so outspoken against something they haven't bothered even the slightest bit trying to understand.

the amount of tra’s that genuinely believe that radfems believe women should be feminine and men should be masculine shocks me. one of the most common attacks i see them make against radfems is that we will apparently lose our minds if people are gnc despite most of us being gnc and all of us advocating for the abolition of gender itself. we do not want women to only be feminine we want women to look and act however they like because there’s no right way to be a women; women simply exist as female