Avatar

Alissa

@mcinalissa

Avatar

stats

* women were refused credit card without a male authority figures approval until 1975 https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/magazine-36662872

* In canada, martial rape was legal until 1983 https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/news/world/canadian-law-only-changed-26-years-ago/article1150644/

* women would need to work an extra three-and-a-half months per year to earn the same as men do in 12 months

* Indigenous women in Ontario face a 43 per cent gap, racialized women face a 38 per cent gap and immigrant women face a 34 per cent gap

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/globalnews.ca/news/4135180/gender-pay-gap-canada/amp/

* 1/5 women will be raped and 1/71 men will be raped in their life time

* 1/10 women have been raped by an intimate partner 1/45 for men

* 91% of rape survivors are female, 9% are male

* 8/10 cases the victim knew the person who sexually assaulted them

* health care is 16% higher for women who were sexually abused as children

* more than 90% of all sexual assaults on college campus’ are not reported

* 63.3% of men at one university, self reported acts that qualify as rape or sexual assault and have admitted committing rapes multiple times

* 63% of sexual assaults are not reported to the police

* the prevalence of false reporting is between 2-10%

“this leads to more ‘false’ claims then there actually are”

https://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/files/publications_nsvrc_factsheet_media-packet_statistics-about-sexual-violence_0.pdf

* domestic violence stats: http://www.women.gov.on.ca/owd/english/ending-violence/domestic_violence.shtml

* 83% of all domestic violence survivors are women

* women are 4x more likely than a man to be a victim of spousal violence

* 4 in 10 women victimized by their spouse report being physically injured (42%), more than twice the proportion of male victims (18%) (2009)

* Women are three times more likely to report being beaten, choked, sexually assaulted, or threatened with a gun or knife by their partner or ex-partner (2009)

* Most victims of domestic homicide are female, while most perpetrators are male

* 95% of spousal homicide victims in Ontario are female (2011)

* Of the cases reviewed in Ontario’s 2011 Domestic Violence Death Review Committee Report, 88% of spousal homicide perpetrators were male while 89% of victims were female

* Less than one-third (30%) of female spousal violence victims state that the incident was reported to police (2009), down from 36% in 2004

* 53% of incidents where women are sexually assaulted, and 60% of incidents where women are beaten, choked or have a weapon used against them are reported to police (2009)

* Many victims are victimized multiple times before they report to police

* 32% of restraining orders from female domestic violence survivors are breached

* all stats come from link above ^

* military sexual violence stats: https://www.google.ca/amp/www.latimes.com/news/la-oe-harman31mar31-story.html%3foutputType=amp

* “more likely to be raped then killed by the enemy” https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5760295&page=1

* violence against women by WHO: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women

* In 2017, just 24% of protagonists in the 100 highest grossing films were women. That was a drop of five percentage points from 29% in 2016

* movie goers were more than twice as likely to see male characters on the big screen than female ones

* Seventy-nine percent of the top 100-grossing films had 10 or more male characters with speaking roles. In contrast, only 32% of the most popular films featured 10 or more female characters with lines to say

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/variety.com/2018/film/news/hollywood-sexism-women-representation-in-film-1202707406/amp/

* 99.4% of rapists walk free and 69% of rapes go unreported https://www.rainn.org/statistics/criminal-justice-system

Avatar

Keep an Eye Out For Abusive People

Abusers can be hidden anywhere within any type of relationship you might have with another person. This could include professional, family, romantic, platonic, etc. The signs can be so clear to the people who care for you but you might have a severely difficult time seeing the red flags. Keep an open mind and take care of yourself. 

Here are some tell tale signs of abuse from women’s health.gov: 

  1. Keeping track of everything you do: demanding to know where you are and who you are with 24/7, expecting an instant reply to texts/calls, discouraging you from seeing friends/family/other acquaintances over them. 
  2. Jealousy, anger, and control: accusing you of cheating, having a quick temper, control over how you spend your money, making everyday decisions for you (clothes or food choices) or criticizing those decisions, constant or random outbursts of put downs, not saying sorry or owning up to their actions, use of sarcasm in an unpleasant tone of voice, or extreme moodiness.
  3. Demeaning you: putting you down by insulting your appearance, intelligence or activities you do, humiliating you or making you feel small in front of others, ignoring you or excluding you, saying you deserve the negative experiences you have shared to them, hyper-criticism, blaming you for their humiliating or harmful actions, backhanded compliments, seeing your accomplishments as their doing not your own, or gas-lighting (a tactic to misdirect, lie, and deny a truth to another person by making them doubt their perceptions, memory, and sanity). 
  4. Violence: threats, any unwanted physical touch, using weapons against you, threatening to harm themselves and blaming you for it, forcing any sexual activity, removing contraception without permission, or assuming consent.

Other toxic relationship red flags include: 

  • Focusing all your energy on your partner or things that revolve around them
  • Dropping or distancing yourself from friends, family, or activities you enjoy
  • Feel pressured or controlled by this person to do certain acts or activities
  • Often feel sad or scared to say anything to this person when with them or thinking about them
  • If this person does not support you or makes you feel insecure about future goals 
  • Do not feel comfortable being yourself or making your own decisions without consulting them
  • Cannot speak honestly to work out conflicts in the relationship, poor communication skills, feeling like the communication is one sided, or you are the only person compromising in the relationship
  • Cannot talk about your needs or changes in your life that are important
  • Withdrawing affection when it is convenient for them to do so or when trying to guilt you
  • Only displaying affection and attention towards them on their terms
  • Denying your feelings or opinions when trying to communicate
  • Feeling you cannot defend friends or family that that person has physically or emotionally harmed

Common phrases used by abusers from Bustle: 

  • “If you don’t...then I will...” which is a threatening or violent behaviour 
  • “I love you but...” which is followed by hypercritical statement or put-down
  • “If you love me, then you will...” which is an act of control
  • “I want what's best for us” when trying to explain out of the ordinary behavior or acts
  • “I want us to be a family” when trying to isolate you from your family or friends
  • “This is how much I love you” when trying to explain a controlling behavior
  • “It’s other people I don’t trust” when trying to explain their over controlling actions as an act of protection
  • “You’d be more attractive if ..” when criticizing your personality or appearance

Please look out for these warning signs and reach out to others for help. Some Canadian organizations that can also be used for escaping abusive situations are...

Anyone can be a victim to abuse. There is no gender association or relationship type that abuse targets. Everyone is vulnerable. We all have relationships with other humans. Toxic relationships can be hard to spot and even harder to leave. Stay safe and healthy. Also, my inbox is always open if need be. 

Sources:

Avatar

White Saviour Complex

Ignorance is bliss for most white people. Turning a blind eye to people who need help and support, is common. A failure to listen to minorities is killing our society. It is dividing us. White people do not care enough. If it is not effecting them, it is not their problem. This is fundamentally wrong. We, as a privileged community, have a moral obligation to every minority group. To aid in getting their voices heard and to step back when our help is not needed. Many white people do not feel the same way. 

The white savoir complex is a common narrative seen in today’s culture and media. It is when a white person is perceived as the ultimate savior of the person of colour. The white person will “save” the POC from their troubles that they would normally not be able to solve. Ironically, the trouble mostly stems from the racism created by white people. To simplify it, a white person creates a problem for a POC, that the POC cannot fix themselves, usually this is because of systematic racism. Then, the white person will step in, in the last possible moment, to save the POC from the hardship they’ve endured. The white person looks like a hero by saving someone from a problem they did not even have in the first place. This complex is also very popular in film making, from the civil rights era to current time. Some prime examples would be:

To Kill A Mocking Bird 

Mississippi Burning

Glory

Gran Torino

Green Book 

The Help 

The Blindside

Freedom Writers 

Hidden Figures

More information about how some of these examples are part of the White Savior Complex can be seen in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sdC6RxaY-Qto 

My point is that not only is this complex continually perpetuated within movies but also in real life. White people are applauded for having basic morals. Some white people use this to their advantage and end up stepping on the backs of hard working POC to gain their way to the “top”. The “top” can be from social media recognition or all the way to gaining electoral votes. These type of people only recognize their white privilege to have a pat on the back from the public, but do they really care about POC lives and want to better the circumstances? You can decide on that. 

The other point of view is the white people who turn away from the racism and act like it does not exist, or at least that it does not exist in their household. Upholding the “I don’t see colour” narrative is wrong because you fail to see the mistreatment and the unfair conditions of POC lives. People are dying and suffering, and you are acting like it is not happening. You are refusing to see the systematic failure where POC are being disadvantaged and white people are benefiting. It is a big part of why major change has not happened. It is the “All Lives Matter” approach. My favourite analogy for this argument is with the burning houses. Your neighbor’s house is burning down, the neighbor says “Help! My house is burning. Put the fire out!”. When you and the rest of your neighborhood hears this, you all collectively shout, “Hey! Our houses matter just as much as your’s does. Spray ours with water too!” Do you see the problem with that? One house is literally engulfed in flames and the other houses are perfectly fine, yet the other neighbors want the same treatment. They want equality. But what they are failing to recognize is that they are not in need of assistance the same way the burning house is. The neighborhood needed to be taught equity. Our society needs to be taught equity. Of course all lives matter, but it is the black lives that currently need our attention.

Most White People are not aware of their racism. When called out, most act as though being called racist is equivalent to experiencing racism. This is where communication plays a large role. Listening to others experiences can be life changing. Hearing people out, listening to their personal stories, and understanding their experiences will take us a long way but many people refuse.

My point is... white people need to do better. Open your mind. Read a book. Listen to a story. See a different perspective. Educate yourself and never stop learning.

A POC PERSPECTIVE:

Avatar

Rape Culture

I want to write about gender based violence and its effects. The fact that 1/5 women is a victim of rape or attempted rape and that marital rape is not seen as a crime in 53 countries across the world, is disturbing to see. Rape and rape culture is a widespread issue that is severely hurting our world today. I believe that rape culture is why we have so many assaults being unreported. Rape culture is something, that I would say we in Canada, see every day. These are things like rape jokes, any type of unwanted touch, catcalling, non-consensual photos or video, and victim blaming. This can also be seen at an extreme end of the spectrum with rape, drugging, domestic violence, and molestation. In our society we start with the normalization of rape culture, then move on to the degradation of women, and finally we start assaulting women.

I think this is such a large issue because in Canada, "sexual assault offenders were most often men, acting alone and under the age of 35. Just over half of victims knew the person who sexually assaulted them." This tells me that these men felt comfortable assaulting women they know because of the conditioning behavior they have been exposed to their entire life, and it is not until their older years when they learn that this behavior is not a positive one.

I truly believe education is the number one way to improve this issue. We need better sexual education, not only in Canada, but globally. We need to educate everyone on what consent is. It needs to start at an earlier age and not only in context with sex but everything we do. One always needs consent.

Everyone needs to know about rape culture and we need to stop it when we see it, because many people do not know they are participating in it. We can start on a small scale with our friends and family. Then move onto people in our community, at our schools or work. If more people are aware of how they affect this issue, hopefully it will better these statistics in the near future. This is an issue that cannot be ignored and we need to act now.

^This link contains a graphic of rape culture and how it escalates.

^This link contains Canadian rape statistics.

*Written in June 2018*

Avatar

Police Brutality

I wanted to specifically, speak about three police brutality cases that have recently occurred, then explain my opinion on the events. 

First, Alton Sterling in Baton Rouge. A homeless man called 911 on Sterling after getting into an altercation. The man saw Sterling selling CDs outside of a convenience store and persistently asked Sterling for money.  After declining many times Sterling allegedly showed the man his gun. Police were responding to a report about a man with a gun, once they arrived things escalated quickly. In video footage, two police officers are seen pulling him across the hood of a car then slamming him on the ground, one then proceeds to kneel on Sterling's back while the other straddled his legs, trying to detain him. In the next parts of the video it is hard to see exactly what happens but the word "gun" is shouted a few times by one of the officers and then two shots were fired directly at Sterling's chest. After the shots were heard in the video an officer is seen with his gun drawn approximately 3 feet away from Sterling's body. An officer then is seen reaching into and removing something from Sterling's pocket. It was not specified in the article weather or not Sterling was armed with a gun but a law enforcement source did tell CNN that a gun was removed from Sterling's body. For more background knowledge on Sterling, he was known as the CD man who commonly sold outside of the convenience store he was killed at. He was respected and loved in his community and the store owner had never seen him in a confrontation. He has had prior convictions in 2009 but there was no evidence that the officers responding to the 911 call knew this.

For this case in particular I feel that there should have been a few other deescalating tactics before Sterling was forced to the ground and later shot. First, verbal communication, to confirm if Sterling had a weapon, or if he was a dangerous suspect. Secondly, tasers could have been used in this case because if the officers did fear for their own well-being then they should use non-life threatening ways of disarming Sterling. Lastly, if all other options were too dangerous for the officers they could've used their firearms, targeting non-life threatening areas of the body (ei: foot or leg) if Sterling was aggressive toward the officers he would've immediately been halted but he would still have his life. I could not image the circumstance these police officers are faced with everyday, I could never do what they do, but they're job is to protect everyone and shooting civilians without proof of severe harm with intent to kill is wrong. It could've been avoided.

The next case is about Stephon Clark a more recent incident in Sacramento. Officers were responding to a call about a man who was breaking car windows and was hiding in a backyard. Clark was at the front of his grandmother’s house when police started pursuing him. Two officers gave him commands to stop and show his hands but he fled to the backyard. Once in the backyard Clark turned to police while holding an "object". The officers believed that Clark had a gun, was shot at 20 times by the officers and was hit multiple times. The unknown object was identified after his death as a cell phone and no other weapons were found on the scene. Clark was also never proven to be the car thief the police were searching for.

Again, this mans death could've been prevented and truly never should've happened. First, there was no time where Clark was, in any way, violent toward the police and it was never said that the suspect had a gun. They had no reason to expect that he was armed with anything other than a crowbar, which the suspect was seen to have been using to break into the cars, he could not have done any major harm to the officers with that. Second, its was specifically stated that the officers shot 20 times at Clark, this is a extensive amount of shots for self defense, which would be the only reason an officer would have to fatally shoot a suspect. It's also an extensive amount of shots for a person who is believed to be stealing things from and vandalizing cars. They could have easily used other techniques to make Clark, cooperate, like the examples mention above (tasers or rubber bullets, non-fatal shots).

The final case that the class discussed was about Saheed Vassell. A new yorker who was waving a metal object at passersby. Police were responding to three 911 calls by pedestrians who thought Vassell was waving a silver gun. When the officers arrived at the scene Vassell turned and pointed the object at them. There were four officers at the scene one in uniform and three in plain clothes, they fired 10 shots, hitting Vassel multiple times. In the article I was reading about the incident, the time between the officers radio to confirm that they were at the scene to the time they radioed for an ambulance was 27 seconds. There was no explanation to the timeline from NYPD. There was no firearm found at the scene only a metal pipe. A witness to the scene said that the officers "jumped out of their unmarked police car and fired without warning", they didn't try to speak with Vessall or say to put his hands up/surrender to the police. Witnesses even questioned why they shot to kill. Also, none of the officers were wearing body cameras. Some more information about Vessall, his 15 year old son described him as a caring father. Vessel was 63 years old when he died, he struggled with bipolar disorder and refused treatment. Vessall was known in his community as a "quirky character" and knew he meant no harm. The police officers in the area knew him and never had problems with him.

This is heartbreaking to hear about, I can understand the confusion officers and passersby may have with the object Vessall was holding in his hands. I don't blame them for calling the police but for the officers to fatally shoot 10 times (again excessive) with no warning or directions is inhumane and immoral. The officers weren't even in any type of identification (uniform or car) Vessall really had no time to compose himself before he was shot. Again, I couldn't imaging being in the police officers shoes, Vassell was probably fairly disturbed for pedestrians to call 911 three times but that is no reason to give the man no warning before they ended his life. Preventive measures could've been taken in this case as well, if speaking to Vassell didn't deescalate the problem I'm sure other non-life threatening protection techniques would've worked to subdue him.

Sadly, in all of these cases African American men lost their lives because the police had to use a gun instead of other techniques that could literally save lives. This saying has been used a lot lately but, a gun's only purpose is to kill, therefore when using one, the only good outcome of the situation would be to end a life. In all of these cases death would not be the best case scenario so the outcome should not have been death. I think better training needs to be a number one priority in the police force. Stereotypes about minorities should also be addressed because I see a pattern with all of the instances I mentioned along with many others that I see within the news. A lot of the victims of police brutality are minorities, specifically people of African descent, something is obviously wrong and needs to change. The first step is identifying that there's a problem, many people deny that race is a factor at all, it needs to be addressed so that we can get on the road to fixing it. Hopefully a change will come in the future because this issue continues to grow and needs immediate resolution.

*Written in March 2018* 

Avatar

You are a feminist.

Everyone should be a feminist.

Why is it called feminism and not humanism? Well...

First let’s start off with the definiton of feminism. Google difines it as: the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. My personal favourite definition is quoted by a woman named Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. She reads that, a feminist is a person who believes in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.

Before I break down this definition if you would like to hear her speech surrounding this quote it is linked here: https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_ngozi_adichie_we_should_all_be_feminists/transcript

Now with this quote a few things stand out to me. First, Adichi uses the words “a person who belives...”. To me this has a very direct meaning. If you think people should be equal, you are a feminist. It’s not about your opinion on whether or not people are equal in current time, it is about what you think about people being equal. Therefore, even if you believe the sexes are equal currently, you are a feminist.

It is not asking you if it’s occurring, it is asking you if you think it should/ shouldn’t occur.

Second, she uses the words “social, political, and economic” meaning we’re not just talking about “rights” or “laws” of all humans, we’re talking about our lives as a whole. This takes into account work, school, friends, family, transactions and interactions of any and all kinds.

Thirdly, one thing that I would change about this quote is the word “sex”. Feminism is not just about sexes it is about the gender spectrum as a whole and weather or not you belive in equality for every gender.

Basically the jist of feminism is a person who thinks sexism is wrong. Being anti-sexism. ((sexism: prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex.))

Now, it has been clearly stated above that the act of feminsim is not stating that women are better then men. This is a very common misconception. The reason “fem” is in the name is because people common associate feminine traits as lesser or bad.

Examples of this are depression statistics in men, how society differs male vs female children, sexist slurs, homophobia in the gay fem community, etc.

First, let’s talk about the men. All about toxic masculinity. An amazing documentary that would explain this more in detail with real life examples is called The Mask You Live In. To start off, toxic masculinity does not mean masculine = toxic. It really is about opening up a discussion surrounding strict masculine gender roles that restrict actions and emotions of men around the world. It is about why no man wants to see themselves (or any man), in any way, feminine.

There are typically two concequences to toxic masculinity, substance abuse or violence, which can lead to incarceration or death. Sometimes both. But what causes this? What are we doing to men that is so destructive? We are not allowing them to be feminine.

Some examples surrounding this topic are that discovering and voicing your emotions is seen as a female trait. Seeking help when in need is seen as a female trait. Confiding in a friend for emotional support is seen as a female trait. Wearing certain clothing or speaking a certain way is seen as a female trait. Crying, having a high voice, smiling in photos, wearing certain colours, person hygiene (grooming), or liking certain music are seen as female traits. Do I need to go on?

Things like emotional expression is seen as a female trait in the eyes of society, because of this many men suffer in silence and are not able to properly cope with their depression or, even simpler, the emotion of sadness.

This emotional deprivation causes even stronger emotions. But, because men have not learned how to deal with the emotion of sadness the only form of expression can be through anger. This increases violence and harmful personal habits. Therefore, when men are depressed the only way they know how to cope is through rage or self destruction.

Next, let’s talk about the different ways as a society we perpetuate gendered stereotypes. Two of the largest issues are within younger age groups. First, the way we force gender norms onto children is disturbing. We enforce certain colours, toys, music, TV programs, clothing, etc. onto a child based on its gentitals. We as a society are obsessive over these guidelines and they stick in a child’s head for the rest of their life.

These are all examples of the perpetuating stereo types. For young girls: they have baby dolls, fake makeup, kitchen sets. Often times their shirts say something about their body (thighs and smile were examples above). This tells children with vaginas that they must be nurturing, be good in the kitchen, and that appearance is everything. But for young boys: they play with fake tool sets, build yourself car tracks, and other types of machinery. Their clothing often tells them how bright of a future they will have or how smart they are. This tells children with penis’ they’re capable of anything, they’re smart and can do whatever the set their mind to.

Can you see the difference between the genders? How harmful it can be for young girls? How inflating it can be for young boys?

Also, but for both sides of the gender spectrum, adults obsess over heterosexuality. They sexualize their children before they’re out of the womb.

Most of these heteronormative statements say to girls that their father is the one that controls them. They do not have a say in their own relationships.

It tells boys that they cannot be controlled, that they are their own person. THIS is damaging and an abuse of power, between the genders, can already be seen in infancy.

To restate the point, this perpetuates gender stereotypes in society and is one of the root causes of sexism today. If we teach children that one group is meant to nurture and another group is meant to provide they will grow up believing it. This explains the gender pay gap (women choose the nurse vs the doctor or the desk job vs management position or the 911 operator vs the EMS personnel) and unequal treatment of males/females in heterosexual relationships (the man always has to pay b.s.).

The second largest way we as a society sustain gender stereotypes is with slang. Some of the most popular ones I’m going to speak about is “pussy” and “bitch”. These words have been reclaimed by women but over the years it has not only been women using them. I hear these words everyday.

What do they mean? What are they subconsciously telling us?

First, let’s talk about the obvious connection between these words and women. Google defines bitch as a “female dog, wolf, fox, or otter”. Google defines pussy as 1) a cat (which is generally the animal that embodies a women) 2) a women’s gentials 3) a women in general, considered sexual in nature 4) a weak, cowardly or effeminate man.

I think you can connect the dots with this one....both words are perfect examples of how we, as a society, degrade women in common speech. When you think about using these words in context they are commonly negative. Therefore, what you are subconsciously hearing is that femininity or being female=negative.

The word “pussy” is also used in persuading measures. Someone will call a man a pussy for not wanting to participate in something. What you are really saying is that someone is a girl for not wanting to participate in something.....so, stop calling people bitches and pussies because what you are indirectly saying is that women are weaker and/or lesser (when it’s used in a negative context), therefore preserving the stereotype.

Women have tried to reclaim these words. The word ‘bitch’ in particular stands out to me. It has many different meanings in current time, but it seems to me that when a man uses the word, it’s almost always used with a negative connotation. STOP. Expand your vocabulary.

Finally, homophobia in the gay fem community. Feminine gays are men that are sexually attracted to other men, and are in more touch with their feminine side than their masculine side. They present their more feminine qualities maybe with their speech style, or gestures etc. Overall, they are flamboyant. They are the stereotypical gay man. Fem gays are really the only type of gay representation there is in the media. Why I brought this up is because there are many people within the LGBTQ+ community that discriminate against fem gays. This is another form of sexism. When men express their femininity they are outlawed. Similarly to the pragraphs above, society says that, men expressing femininity=bad/wrong. People do not like it. THAT is wrong.

Everyone should be able to express themselves in anyway they see fit. Whether that’s with hyper masculinity or hyper femininity, it should be accepted. But, what I’m seeing in our current situation is that, society is only okay with one of those options. The other option is seen as lesser, weaker, bad, etc. This stigma needs to change for everyone. Sexism affects everyone. Everyone is feminine in some way. We cannot change that about ourselves but we need to start embracing it, as a society.

Although sexism affects everyone, women always come up with the short straw because in every instance it is the so called “feminine” traits that are the cause of the mistreatment. This is feminism-it affects everyone daily.

Also, please keep in mind that this entire blog is about the “white feminism” side of feminism. This in no way embodies the movement as a whole. There are a multitude of other perspectives that I have not spoken about. This blog is about my personal experience while being a white woman living in a first world country. Feminism is not really about me at all. It’s about the billions of other women and girls that have gone through indescribable circumstances because of the sexual organs they were born with. Please, keep that in mind when thinking about feminism.

FINALLY, if any males reading this still do not understand, do not care, and do not think it applies to them in anyway, you should still support this movement because it is benificial to me. It’s benificial to billions of women and girls world wide. Why does something have to benefit you to get your attention? See it from a different perspective. See how it benefits others, not just yourself. That is how we can become better. It starts with us.

Avatar

Dear xxxtentacion supporters,

I want to address this because many people have been and continue to be confused as to why I do not support xxxtentacion. So, here are some points as to why I do not like him.

There are two common arguments that most people like to use against my argument. These are the subjects I will be focusing on. They are on very opposite sides of the spectrum (they literally contradict each other) but are still commonly used together.

Number One:

“yes, x is an abuser, did assault and abuse Geneva but it doesn’t matter.”

Usually when people argue this they have more points to back it up such as:

* he made good music (He actually made abusive music, I talk about it further down)

* he saved lives

* he did charity work

* he has changed

* etc

I am here to tell you that these points are the epitome of an abuser sympathizer. So, to make things completely clear, what people are truly saying is, abuse is okay if....

he makes good music

he did a good deed

he donates to charity.

But all I hear is “abuse is okay” but abuse is never okay. I do not care about any of the good deeds he has done during his life, nothing will take back or fix the abuse.

X did not save lives. Unless I am unaware of him saving a drowning victim, running into a burning building to save someone, or literally giving someone a kidney.....he did not save any lives. Sorry to break it to you. He may have impacted your life in a positive way somehow. You may have been able to relate to him. But x did not solely “save” anyone from depression. And if he did solely save you from depression then you were never truly depressed in the first place. Sure his music may have helped you though a hard time, there’s no doubting that, but he did not “save” lives. EVEN IF HE DID ITS NO EXCUSE. Depression and anxiety disorders are serious issues that have to be diagnosed. They are not curable, but they are manageable. X is not a doctor, he may have been a way for people to find joy but that is the extent of what X did.

If him donating to charities and doing suicide prevention tactics is true I would not be surprised. This is because it is a common domestic abuse sign. Domestic abusers are AMAZING PEOPLE to everyone but their victims. They are manipulators. An example of this would be outlined in paragraph 14 of this article. LINK ONE*

With the example of x, he does things publicly to keep up appearances. He’s nice to his fans and the people who support him, he does good things now and then to make us forget about the allegations of what he does behind closed doors. It is typical abuser behaviour.

His past and childhood also is inadmissible. Him growing up in the “ghetto” must have been extremely hard, I understand that. It’s very tough to get out of a poor situation. He was probably seen as one of the lucky ones, who was able to get out and sustainably provide for themselves and their families. But this is not an excuse for abuse. It may be a reason for his abusive tendencies but it is not something that excuses the crimes.

He was a relatively wealthy man. If he applied himself and actually wanted to get better, he had the means to find himself help. It was also obvious that he needed some sort of guidance due to his extensive assault track record and his song lyrics. His defence lawyer, family, and close friends that claimed X was “bettering” himself should have helped and done something too.

Some people might argue that he donated to a women’s charity so he has bettered himself. But what charity? What money? Where is it? The founder of the alleged charity claims that they never saw any money from x himself.

I googled this for the most unbiased result as possible.

LINK TWO*

He also shows no signs of remorse or even emotion towards the accusations. I would like to think that a non abuser would be appalled by accusations such as these, would dedicate serious time and effort into bettering the situation. But we never saw how he was “dedicating himself to spreading a positive message”. This is all outlined in the link below where a video is seen, he jokes about domestic violence and the feminist movement after the allegations of abuser were public. LINK THREE*

As well, he has shown homophobic tendencies. X recalled in an interview that he almost murdered his cell mate because he thought the cell mate was gay. This is another example of how he has shown no signs of trying to improve himself. And how he continues to brutally attack innocent people.

also this

ALSO if he was trying to do better and change, why was it that in only a few months, a video surfaced of x punching a woman in the face? Even if it was a “joke”, which by the look on his face seems that it is not, it would be a pretty bad one due to the recent accusations of domestic violence, as well as the claims of x bettering himself. HOW has he “learned his lesson” and “bettered himself” if he continues to assault not only women, but people in general?

Personally, my interpretation of this video is that x was with this girl who thought she was sick for hanging out with a famous rapper. She decided to snapchat a video of them together and he didn’t like that so.....

THAT IS NOT FACT it’s just my interpretation of the situation from an outside perspective.

AND if he was bettering himself then why did he violate his his pre-trial agreement from previous assault charges? LINK FOUR*

In conclusion, this argument does not make sense because there is no valid proof that he wanted to change and become a better person.

Number Two:

x stans like to claim:

“Geneva was lying the entire time and x is not a domestic abuser.”

Well, as you can see above in the video that he is, but let’s say hypothetically, that video did not exist.

We have the legal facts of the case. X was essentially charged with a few domestic abuse charges, battery of a pregnant women, witness tampering, and false imprisonment.

In order to actually be arrested one needs to be either caught in the illegal act by a police officer or there needs to be probable cause that one has committed or will commit a crime. In order for an officer to have probable cause there must be “specific facts and circumstances, rather than simply from the officer's hunch or suspicion”. Therefore, an arrest after the fact of the crime or, of a crime that an officer did not see with their own eyes, must have supported facts and proof before it is made. So in the case of x, he was not literally seen by police domestically abusing Geneva. But when Geneva went to the police she had enough facts and proof to back up her story, they were able to make an arrest off of probable cause. LINK FIVE*

The odds of the domestic abuse claims actually getting to the point of an arrest is very low. This is due to the instances indicated in this article. LINK SIX*

Therefore, in the case of x and Geneva, it is very likely that the facts in the arrest warrant are true because the case was not only just reviewed by police but also sought out by the police to end in an arrest. LINK SEVEN*

Also, the only person who is more disrespected than the black man in America is the black woman. The narrative that x was treated unfairly by the justice system is hard to comprehend because yes, the system is racist and there’s no doubt about that. However, if this case was about race, then the domestic violence charges from the beginning never would have been pursued. The original officers who took time to listen to Geneva would have never arrested x if this was a race issue because it started with a black woman. They would have not listened to her story and swept her statements under the rug, like they have many other cases, because they do not care about a black woman’s well being. But this is all hypothetical because that did not happen. They listened to Geneva and believed her. They believed the black woman. Therefore, for this specific case, race was not an issue regarding x’s arrest.

X was never found “not guilty” by the courts because the trial never happened. The government and legal system did drop the charges because there is no point in trying someone for a crime if they have passed away. Once again, x was never tried for the domestic violence charges because the courts do not try dead people. A dead person cannot be charged or not charged with a crime. Therefore the charges were dropped after he was killed he was not found “not guilty”.

Finally, Geneva never admitted to lying from what I can see. The only physical thing I have seen regarding lying from Geneva was her changing her instagram username to “liar”. She did not come out with a statement as to why she did this so it can only be interpreted by the public. Many interpret it as her confession without any further evidence or a statement of lying. My interpretation of it is that during the time she changed the name, x had just died. She was getting many awful messages from his supporters and she was being called lots of names. One of these names was ‘liar’. So I think that she changed the name to appease the hate messages she was receiving. I look at it as ‘you are what other people see you as’ type of situation. She was reclaiming the hurtful message and taking it back for herself.

Other than Geneva changing her ig name she has not “confessed” anything. If I am wrong about this and there is other factual information that she said please send it to me but from my research this is the only “confession” I saw.

Don’t you think that if she did confess to lying about the entire situation it would be all over her and x’s social medias? Wouldn’t the x supporters want to blast that everywhere so everyone could see it and know their fave was not a bad person? The answer is yes, it would be front page news if she came out with a statement retracting her charges, but she hasn’t (from what I can see).

Again, let’s have a hypothetical situation. Even IF she did have a statement come out, completely lying about everything. Why would you believe it? If she was lying before why would she be telling the truth now? What makes you trust her all of a sudden? And if she did come out with this type of statement I wouldn’t believe that it was true. I would think that the threats and the disrespectful messages x’s fans were sending her, finally got the best of her. They have before. Earlier in domestic abuse case she tried to retract her statement to a judge. But the judge did not believe her and did not let her drop the charges because he believed x had tried to persuaded her into it. In return to that, he got another witness tampering charge placed onto his arrest. So if not even a judge believed Geneva when she tried to retract her statement and drop the charges, then why should we?

What she did publicly say was this

In conclusion, it is very unlikely that Geneva lied about the abuse she endured from x.

I also have some more points that x stans like to use after the beginning arguments..... here they are.

Thirdly, when all else fails x fans will start personally blaming and asking me things. Many of you have asked me why I care about this all of a sudden. Well I don’t just care all of a sudden. The first time I heard of x when when a group from my school wrote “free x” on a white board and posted it on snap chat. That was around the same time Geneva’s gofundme was circulating twitter. I also wrote a blog in my Media class at my high school about x, months before his death. This has been months, maybe even a year long, debate. The reason I said something on my snapchat publicly was because I did not know if everyone who was supporting X on their social medias knew of his history. If they didn’t know, I wanted to educate them. I also never stated he deserved to die because he did not. He deserved to pay for the crimes he committed, this did not include death.

Fourth, how does me liking his music supporting abuse? Well let me tell you...

When you listen to music it is never free. On any app it charges you. Some of apps you physically pay for but other may use adds. If you find x’s music on any platform, he is paid for it to be on there. He will get a fraction of the money you pay, every time you listen to a song. Therefore, you are directly giving an abuser money. So you saying that you don’t support abuse but still like x’s music is a complete contradiction because you are literally supporting an abuser with physical money.

Fifth, disrespecting the dead. Like I said to some people personally, already, X and his family will most likely never see my social media or your social media. There was no need for anyone to post anything on their social media’s, specifically snapchat. My post was just directed to the people I surround myself with. ALSO even if somehow x is looking down on me in the afterlife I want him to know I don’t want him to rest in peace. I want him for his entire afterlife to pay for what he did while he was on Earth. He does not deserve to rest in peace.

Sixth....about his lyrics. I took some time to listen to some of his more popular songs to see what his appeal is. I discovered that some of his lyrics directly support abusive behaviour in relationships. If you read the direct quotes from the song “SAD!” it basically says that if you ever try to “let me go” or leave, I’m going to commit “suicide”. This is another way abusers are manipulative. They tell their partners that they are suicidal and that they will die if they try to leave. It is a control tactic. A textbook example of an abusive relationship.

I also know that there might be a deeper meaning to this song for x himself and some of his deep supporters. But for the people who JUST listen to the music and know nothing else about him or his life, they are hearing these abusive lyrics and might think it is okay to treat people or be treated like this.

To finally conclude, the whole point of this (literal) essay was not really about x at all, it’s about how we treat victims. If when a victim comes out about their story we cannot treat them the way we treat Geneva. We need to stand in solidarity and support victims of any type of abuse. We need to question these serious accusations made towards abusers. Have empathy for victims and have an unbiased opinion towards accusations made towards someone you may look up to. You need to question who you support. If you support them through an abuse claim, you are supporting their abuse. Stop condoning abuse, of any and all kinds.

**ALL LINKS ARE LOCATED IN PREVIOUS POST**

EDIT**

This has come out as well

Avatar

LINKS

LINK ONE

LINK TWO

LINK THREE

LINK FOUR

LINK FIVE

LINK SIX

LINK SEVEN

Avatar
reblogged
Image
Image
Image

𝐎𝐓𝐑 𝐈𝐈: 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐎𝐑𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐍𝐒

Avatar
reblogged

Santa Clara, 29/09

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
slaybey
On The Run Tour II - Los Angeles (September 22, 2018)
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
aliswong

“I see music. It’s more than just what I hear. When I’m connected to something, I immediately see a visual or a series of images that are tied to a feeling or an emotion, a memory from my childhood, thoughts about life, my dreams, or my fantasies. And they’re all connected to the music.” - Beyoncé