It’s time to bring this one here

EAT THE RICH

PUNCH NAZIS

EQUITY FOR ALL

Some people might see this and be like “But you can’t just attack people unprovoked!!!”

My dude, that’s a fascist. It is not unprovoked. He threw the first punch by being a nazi. DO NOT feel obligated to be nice to people who want you dead.

Reminder

Credit to artist @_alyadadumb_ on Instagram. Sorry about not including it earlier.

Wife!!!

matpat is to fnaf theorists what freud is to psychologists.

rosie just went “not to be mean but i hope your freud matpat post breaches containment” what if i committed roommate-icide

she dies tonight.

@marshemillow

nice lol

Help fight for Florida abortion access!

Attention, fellow workers of Florida! Florida has a chance to help defend healthcare and bodily autonomy, but the organizers of this petition need your help!

From the website for Floridians Protecting Freedom:

Learn more and sign the petition at their website here:

Now this is one of my favourite tik toks

Trans ppl really are savants at turning the mundane into the sublime huh

This is me but in a trans woman way. I don't want to look like a supermodel. I want to be mom shaped, with a fat tummy and fatter tits, a smile permanently etched onto my face, cookies brownies and soup always ready for those who need it. I want to be the femme momdyke little queer kids can come to for hugs and love. I want to look like them.

I hope hobie says this in the next film

PLEASE

People be like "kinky trans women are the backbone of society!!!" And then complain about people who are into bondage, pet play, latex, leather, being whipped, being stepped on, cnc, hypnosis, musk, exhibitionism, voyeurism, somno, musk, etc.

BITCH WTF DO YOU THINK KINKY MEANS?

#these are such tame kinks too......

Yup. Because any more intense or taboo and people see it as a free excuse to harass people. One tumblr user got harassed off of the platform because they had a goddamn BURPING KINK. I'm so tired of what the porn ban turned this site into. Sorry if I just sound like a cranky old woman but as someone who was born in the early 2000s and has had about 5ish or so accounts on here throughout the years, it used to be super chill and friendly to anyone who wasn't a fascist. Now it's become the home of page-long DNIs, TERFs and cryptoTERFs, baeddels, and more that even mentioning leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

The point is, kink is what built pride from the ground up. If a lesbian wants to call her girlfriend mommy, daddy, master, mistress, god, goddess, bitch, whore, slut, etc. In the bedroom and she , that's their business not yours. Don't even get me started on how this website views sex workers. Thankfully it's chill with friends with benefits and open relationships in my experience for the most part, but this website has turned into a shithole for sex and kink positivity or anyone who doesn't want to be involved in discourse and do their own thing. This is getting long so I'll save my brainpower for the video game review I'm trying to write but this website is awful to kinky trans women, and worse to trans men.

Yeah this person gets it.

@silverscreeny

Okay. Since this seems to be genuinely in good faith and you seem pretty cool I'm going to try to explain this. To bigots, ALL PRIDE IS DISGUSTING KINK. ALL OF IT. Pride was founded by kinksters, trans people, and non straight people because of the common ground of bigots saying that they didn't consent to seeing their disgusting kinks and therefore it should be punishable by ruining their lives, something that we are starting to see pop up a lot again. Also please explain to me where I advocated for "sexually explicit acts in public". Kink at pride does not equal sex at pride. Kinksters literally shielded queer people from cops trying to KILL US. Pride is not and has never been "marketed" as anything, least of all kid or family friendly, because it's a protest.

Thank you for responding in good faith, but I have seen several advocates of Pride try and market it as a family friendly experience. I have often seen evidence, videos and pictures of children present at Pride, not only witnessing provocative acts, but those acts were displayed specifically for the children watching.

I have seen strip teases, dry humping, groping, public whippings, flashing of genitals, puppy plays in leather leashes, and the like, all in broad daylight. Again, whether children were present or not. While not sexual intercourse, these acts are very sexually explicit.

I understand your sentiment, and I applaud you for your enthusiasm on celebrating the Community. But either there is a rift in the community about what is and isn't acceptable at Pride, which includes Children being present, or the event is being hijacked by people who simply want to live out and showcase their fetishes, again, possibly in front of children.

Also, the blog you linked seems to have me blocked.

Bro, pride wouldn't even EXIST without kinksters! They made pride happen in the fucking first place! The leather pride flag is the second oldest pride flag, second ONLY to the original rainbow one! Pride is not supposed to be family-friendly because PRIDE IS A PROTEST!

How can you live in a world where every YouTuber gets demonetized for not being "family-friendly" enough, where tumblr's porn ban also banned a bunch of sfw queer blogs, where censorship of anything deemed "too risky" by republican shitheads has been so normalized that DECADES of queer history has simply been completely erased without a second thought, and tell me that we need to erase MORE of it for precisely the same reason as those republican shitheads???

As many others have already pointed out, "Family-Friendly" has become an anti-queer dog whistle. "No kink at pride" has already put anti-queer laws into practice. Look no further than drag shows/trans people being banned for "grooming minors" despite the fact that trans people existing and other people wearing clothing are not actually sexually explicit acts.

I understand there are some pride events that are meant to be more child friendly, perhaps where dry humping and groping could be seen as inappropriate, but how do I make people like you understand that when you say "wearing puppy masks and just the fucking human body is sexually explicit by default" you sound so fucking similar to the republicans who say "a woman pretending to be a man and using male pronouns and a man's name is just a confused girl playing out her sick fetish for the world to see!"???

Those conservatives are using purity culture to trick people, and it's fucking working. Don't let corporate sanitization into pride! It will spell doom for all of us!

You can't make conservatives happy by bashing your own community! Infighting only helps our oppressors!

WE ALL HAVE TO STAND TOGETHER, BECAUSE WHEN THE KINKSTERS ARE GONE, THEY'RE COMING FOR YOU NEXT!!!

Yeah. I was trying to assume good faith but after looking at some of the posts on silverscreeny's blog, it became clear that this person is either bluepilled, has some deconstruction of their leftover conservative thought patterns to do, or is just genuinely convinced that kink at pride is a new, invasive thing (or an old, outdated thing that makes us look bad). Kink belongs at pride because pride was founded by kinksters. If anybody has a case for kink being banned at pride it's me, as my parents who were pearl-clutchers wouldn't let me go because of kink. OH WAIT. THEY THOUGHT GAY PRIDE IS KINK. BECAUSE THAT'S HOW THESE PEOPLE WORK. THERE ARE KID FRIENDLY PRIDE EVENTS BECAUSE EVERYONE DESERVES A SAFE SPACE TO BE THEMSELVES. KINK MUST STAY AT PRIDE FOR THE SAME REASON.

Conflicting needs are a thing. I get it. Some children aren't ready for kink and it just makes some people genuinely uncomfortable. That's valid. But that's why, again, there's events for those people that don't have kink. And before you say "what about asexuals" I'm asexual. We are not a club for you to wield against kinksters, just like lesbians aren't a club to wield against trans people. Kink is at pride because kinksters founded pride. Pride is first and foremost a protest, and its about being yourself even when it's not deemed "politically acceptable." I've said it once I'll say it a thousand times. Legality is not morality. Abortion is considered illegal currently, are you gonna say that's immoral because it's illegal? I don't currently have children and I don't know if I will, but if I do, I would rather they (my children) spend 5 hours with kinksters (you know, the people who value CONSENT VERY HIGHLY) than 5 minutes with a bigot. Hell, I'M a kinkster. And I'd rather see someone getting eaten out at pride than have a single right taken away from anyone in the community. Because make no mistake. They want to take away our rights very badly. We can't simply lay down and take it. We need to fight for our rights. This was really long but I've spent my entire life making myself more palatable to people who hate me, like hell I'm going to do it at motherfucking. Goddamn. Pride.

It's not just that kink belongs at pride; Kink IS pride. They are inextricably linked. You cannot fully have one without the other, because like it or not, being queer IS a kink to conservative harpies.

Kink-free pride events are already a thing. Stop trying to extract kink from pride as a whole, because when you do that, you give legitimacy to anti-queer assholes and corporate sanitation, which erodes all of our rights, and you deny us our history.

Kinksters have DIED for you, and as thanks, you've tried to sweep them under the rug because you're just as ashamed of them as conservatives are of you. It's pathetic and it's shameful. Stop appealing to people who hate you by cutting off support from the people who would gladly give it to you if you asked.

People be like "kinky trans women are the backbone of society!!!" And then complain about people who are into bondage, pet play, latex, leather, being whipped, being stepped on, cnc, hypnosis, musk, exhibitionism, voyeurism, somno, musk, etc.

BITCH WTF DO YOU THINK KINKY MEANS?

#these are such tame kinks too......

Yup. Because any more intense or taboo and people see it as a free excuse to harass people. One tumblr user got harassed off of the platform because they had a goddamn BURPING KINK. I'm so tired of what the porn ban turned this site into. Sorry if I just sound like a cranky old woman but as someone who was born in the early 2000s and has had about 5ish or so accounts on here throughout the years, it used to be super chill and friendly to anyone who wasn't a fascist. Now it's become the home of page-long DNIs, TERFs and cryptoTERFs, baeddels, and more that even mentioning leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

The point is, kink is what built pride from the ground up. If a lesbian wants to call her girlfriend mommy, daddy, master, mistress, god, goddess, bitch, whore, slut, etc. In the bedroom and she , that's their business not yours. Don't even get me started on how this website views sex workers. Thankfully it's chill with friends with benefits and open relationships in my experience for the most part, but this website has turned into a shithole for sex and kink positivity or anyone who doesn't want to be involved in discourse and do their own thing. This is getting long so I'll save my brainpower for the video game review I'm trying to write but this website is awful to kinky trans women, and worse to trans men.

Yeah this person gets it.

@silverscreeny

Okay. Since this seems to be genuinely in good faith and you seem pretty cool I'm going to try to explain this. To bigots, ALL PRIDE IS DISGUSTING KINK. ALL OF IT. Pride was founded by kinksters, trans people, and non straight people because of the common ground of bigots saying that they didn't consent to seeing their disgusting kinks and therefore it should be punishable by ruining their lives, something that we are starting to see pop up a lot again. Also please explain to me where I advocated for "sexually explicit acts in public". Kink at pride does not equal sex at pride. Kinksters literally shielded queer people from cops trying to KILL US. Pride is not and has never been "marketed" as anything, least of all kid or family friendly, because it's a protest.

Thank you for responding in good faith, but I have seen several advocates of Pride try and market it as a family friendly experience. I have often seen evidence, videos and pictures of children present at Pride, not only witnessing provocative acts, but those acts were displayed specifically for the children watching.

I have seen strip teases, dry humping, groping, public whippings, flashing of genitals, puppy plays in leather leashes, and the like, all in broad daylight. Again, whether children were present or not. While not sexual intercourse, these acts are very sexually explicit.

I understand your sentiment, and I applaud you for your enthusiasm on celebrating the Community. But either there is a rift in the community about what is and isn't acceptable at Pride, which includes Children being present, or the event is being hijacked by people who simply want to live out and showcase their fetishes, again, possibly in front of children.

Also, the blog you linked seems to have me blocked.

Bro, pride wouldn't even EXIST without kinksters! They made pride happen in the fucking first place! The leather pride flag is the second oldest pride flag, second ONLY to the original rainbow one! Pride is not supposed to be family-friendly because PRIDE IS A PROTEST!

How can you live in a world where every YouTuber gets demonetized for not being "family-friendly" enough, where tumblr's porn ban also banned a bunch of sfw queer blogs, where censorship of anything deemed "too risky" by republican shitheads has been so normalized that DECADES of queer history has simply been completely erased without a second thought, and tell me that we need to erase MORE of it for precisely the same reason as those republican shitheads???

As many others have already pointed out, "Family-Friendly" has become an anti-queer dog whistle. "No kink at pride" has already put anti-queer laws into practice. Look no further than drag shows/trans people being banned for "grooming minors" despite the fact that trans people existing and other people wearing clothing are not actually sexually explicit acts.

I understand there are some pride events that are meant to be more child friendly, perhaps where dry humping and groping could be seen as inappropriate, but how do I make people like you understand that when you say "wearing puppy masks and just the fucking human body is sexually explicit by default" you sound so fucking similar to the republicans who say "a woman pretending to be a man and using male pronouns and a man's name is just a confused girl playing out her sick fetish for the world to see!"???

Those conservatives are using purity culture to trick people, and it's fucking working. Don't let corporate sanitization into pride! It will spell doom for all of us!

You can't make conservatives happy by bashing your own community! Infighting only helps our oppressors!

WE ALL HAVE TO STAND TOGETHER, BECAUSE WHEN THE KINKSTERS ARE GONE, THEY'RE COMING FOR YOU NEXT!!!

WHAT IS HE FUCKING DOING

This is the kinda thing 6-year-old me would have done with cheat codes in The Sims 3 because I was convinced being a god would make the game more fun.

REBLOG THIS POST IF YOU FEEL SAFER WHEN QUEER SPACES ARE OPENLY ACCEPTING OF AMAB NONBINARY PEOPLE

Everyone- eat the rich! everyone on the Titan was a self entitled rich person (except that poor kid rip)! They shouldn’t have exploited the victims of the Titanic!

News sources everywhere-

Why do I keep seeing James Cameron all over my news (I know these are both Insider, but I have been seeing James Cameron in the news for days from several different outlets, I’m just lazy) Listen, I know he did the time and made the movie but how is he any different? Rich white guy? Profited off of the exploitation of the tragedy of the Titanic? Self entitled expert? Bleh I’m over seeing his crusty wannabe Saruman face all over my phone. Go back to the Avatar movies and think about what you’ve done.

Image descriptions- two news articles, one titled “James Cameron estimates he’s spent more time with the Titanic than the ship’s actual captain after 33 voyages to the wreckage” and “The Titan sub was likely trying to surface and the passengers probably knew the hull was starting to crack before it imploded, James Cameron says.”

A news article titled James Cameron on Titanic Submarine Loss: “Struck by the Similarity of the Titanic Disaster Itself” and a lovely hands rubbing meme with the text “James Cameron eyeballing the opportunity he never thought would come: Titanic 2”

...I'm writing this under the assumption that you don't know any better, because hoo boy is this a bad take

James Cameron legitimately numbers among the small handful of people most qualified to talk about the Titan disaster. The reason why is because being a filmmaker is almost a side project compared to his very real contributions to submersible design, oceanography, and undersea exploration. Cameron has spent decades in the field of undersea science and submarine engineering. He co-designed a submersible called Deepsea Challenger which he personally took to the Challenger Deep, the lowest point of the Marianas Trench and the lowest point on Earth, alone; the first and to date only person to have ever done so solo. His hyperfixation is not the Titanic, it's submersible engineering and undersea exploration in general. Here's him being presented the Nierenberg Prize (for contributions to oceanography) in 2013:

Note that in the above interview he literally says that he made Titanic essentially just to get the funding to go to the wreck site (and to have the funding to continue to do so decades onward). He's made 33 dives to the wreck of the Titanic.

The reason why he appears in the news is not because he wants to talk about the disaster. It's got little to nothing to do with him having made Titanic (though that is tangentially related). It's because everyone knows that he is an actual, legitimate expert on the issue of submersible engineering (as well as both diving and diving to the Titanic wreck in particular), and so they bombarded him with interview requests and requests for comment. He specifically did not respond to any such requests until after the deaths of the passengers had been confirmed, because he knew that the sub had imploded and they were all dead, and he didn't want to be insensitive and drown everyone's hopes by telling everyone that the search and rescue was pointless. Here's him on ABC News next to his friend and associate Dr. Bob Ballad, the man who discovered the wreck of the Titanic, who is probably the only other person more qualified than Cameron to talk about the recent disaster:

TL;DR: James Cameron is not being interviewed because "he made Titanic"; he's being interviewed because he's a well-known and verifiable submersible engineering and undersea expert.

Some News Person: "Hey guys!!! These billionaires built their own submarine and then died trying to get down to see the Titanic wreckage due to the extreme water pressure down there!!! Isn't that wild???"

James Cameron, who has survived 3,300% more trips to the Titanic wreckage than those billionaires and has been down to the lowest point on earth all alone where the water pressure is so high it's like being crushed by a hydraulic press on all sides: "Yeah. Wild."