always reblog
Don’t try and call yourself pro-life if you actually think like this. Are you kidding me?
I miss your posts :(
Hey! I don’t know when you sent this. I just wanted to say that I am alive and I’m sorry for disappearing. This past year or so has come with many challenges for my mental and physical health and although I am taking a break now, I never intended to leave my blog forever. I still believe I’ve met some of the coolest people through blogging here and it means a lot that people are checking up on me.
Being pro-life and anti-immunization is like saying, ‘Why kill your baby when you can just let some archaic disease do it for you?’
Being called transphobic for equating child-birth with women #prolifeproblems #transphobicpeopleproblems
^ ‘Pregnant person’ is a perfectly viable way of saying it that excludes nobody, guys.
give cash directly & unconditionally to the homeless
make sure they are spending it on something that will actualy help their lives tho
ah…
no.
give cash UNCONDITIONALLY. it’s not your business how they spend it. you don’t get to walk along with them holding on to the other end of the $1 until you see them pass it over to someone you approve of. if they get food do you get to decide where they get it from? if you see them pass it off to someone, do you get to interrogate that person as to whether they’re a friend or someone who lent them money earlier or a dealer? would you go around trying to stop any and every exchange of drugs, or just if you think someone is too poor or too homeless? how do you know if someone’s drug use is the “cause” (theres never just one cause) of someones homelessness? you do NOT get to feel superior. they ask for money, you choose to give it, it does NOT give you any right to “supervise” them or control how they use their own money. people think that everyone who is homeless or at risk of it (SO SO MANY people are at risk of it) are in that position because they did something to deserve it or are inherently lacking as people somehow, and that they have to be “led” into better Life Choices via patronizing conditionalities that often sabotage someones efforts to take care of themselves. they are NOT lesser people, you do not know anything about them, you don’t have any right to insert your judgment in what they should do to prove they “deserve” any tiny piece of the same resources we wouldn’t question going to anyone who seems Not-Poor enough. you don’t know what would actually improve their lives. you certainly don’t get to think that you know better than they do what they need at any given moment. they are individuals and they are people. to suggest they need your guidance to make good life choices only implies your own biased assumptions about why someone is homeless.
give cash directly and unconditionally to the homeless
If you need Plan B, here’s a printable $10 off coupon.
It doesn’t expire either! It’s a continual offer
Always reblog the plan-b coupon. If you don’t want a baby, stop it before it happens.
Where’s the pro life outrage?? They should be screaming about this mass death….
Here it is.
I don’t think you guys know …stuff. And you care so much that this is your first and only post about flint like drop the act please.
1. Don’t go asking why we aren’t saying anything and then argue when one of us does?
2. I have a themed blog. I post primarily about things that somewhat relate to one of the two causes in my URL. How much I post about something doesn’t say how sickened I am about it. Not to mention-- I’m Canadian. I’m not saying I was completely oblivious to this, but it’s certainly not something I get regular updates about. I was sent this post directly and went “Hey, you asked.” Sorry if I misunderstood you.
However, I do realize you have a point.
I’m pretty broke, but there’s some action from me if you’re not satisfied with words.
(In case anyone else wants a link to a charity that takes paypal donations from Canada. Provided you’re okay with United Way.)
Where’s the pro life outrage?? They should be screaming about this mass death….
Here it is.
By the way, if you want to debate with me, please don’t do it in the replies. I do not use my main blog for political stuff and will not be able to respond to you.
If you don’t want me to respond, go ahead, I guess.
I don't really understand. If someone is raped and gets pregnant with a child they do not want to birth, what are they to do? Sometimes someone just isn't ready, or does not have the resources and money to raise a child. Would it be ethical to force a child to be born into an abusive household in which they are neglected and possibly die, rather than stop that life from developing to consciousness in the first place? Pro-life seems to be anti-ethics and more gut reaction to me.
It’s not perfect, (needs a lot of fixing-up) but it’s a lot better than being dead.
There are already way too many kids in the foster system. And regardless, a fetus, if aborted early, isn’t even aware that it was ever going to potentially be alive. And if someone’s wanting to abort a child but legally not allowed to, they’re likely not going to treat that child well while they are still not in the womb. It doesn’t seem like a good option to let a life continue on if it’s going to end up deformed and miserable. There’s just less suffering that way.
Where do you get the right to decide whether or not the child would rather be alive or dead? I have friends who spent their entire childhoods in foster care and still want to be alive. I grew up with an abusive parent and I very much want to be alive and am glad that I am.
Yes, the foster-care/adoption system sucks, but it is always 100% better than death. Adoption/foster care means you have a chance. You may have a painful start, but you have your entire life ahead of you, many years to become a happy person again.
The idea of killing someone now to prevent possible suffering in the future, is ridiculous.
Also, deformed and miserable? That’s a horrible thing to say. Sure, if a child will be born brain-dead, or with some disorder/defect that will cause them a painful death, I think that should be left for the family to decide, but otherwise? As far as I’m concerned, if the child has a chance to experience happiness in their life, they deserve that chance.
As for non-life-threatening ‘deformities’, it’s super ableist to claim that they’d be better off dead, so I really hope that’s not what you meant.
EMERGENCY HELP PLEASE
I literally created a reddit account just so I could leave an actually helpful comment on a thread for a woman facing unplanned pregnancy. No one had left helpful or encouraging messages for the woman, who is pro-choice but doesn’t want to terminate. She asked for help and advice, but got none. Instead, she got messages about women who chose abortion instead, one even telling her that her risk of having a disabled baby is high and may be worth aborting now anyway just in case!!! One of those disabilities being ADHD!!!
Please go to this woman’s thread and show her compassion and support. I already linked her to my NFP and pregnancy resource blogs, but I know the pro-life fam has so much to offer individually. Comment and encourage and share resources! https://www.reddit.com/r/Parenting/comments/7fj745/unexpectedly_pregnant/
@prolifeproliberty @prolifefemale @rational-prolifer @lgbtprolife please spread and comment!
I don't really understand. If someone is raped and gets pregnant with a child they do not want to birth, what are they to do? Sometimes someone just isn't ready, or does not have the resources and money to raise a child. Would it be ethical to force a child to be born into an abusive household in which they are neglected and possibly die, rather than stop that life from developing to consciousness in the first place? Pro-life seems to be anti-ethics and more gut reaction to me.
It’s not perfect, (needs a lot of fixing-up) but it’s a lot better than being dead.











