oh my god this New Yorker article about the Titan holy fucking shit fuck???
Some notes: 1. the electrical system was designed by engineering undergrads who were working as interns. 2. because it is illegal to take passengers on an unclassed experimental submersible, they called the passengers "mission specialists" & instead of buying tickets they made donations. 3. the satellite beacon was held onto the outside of the sub with zip ties. 4. when Lochridge (the whistleblower) quit, Stockton Rush asked HIS FINANCE DIRECTOR if she wanted to be the pilot and she was like "sir I am an accountant" and the experience of having her boss ask his accountant to be the pilot made her so freaked out that she ALSO quit the company 5. the carbon fiber used to make the hull was bought from a deep discount from Boeing because it was past its expiry date for use in airplanes
AND MUCH, MUCH MORE
Totally reccomend reading the whole thing - but here are a few bits that stood out to me.
This whole bit? I'd love to see that report... The lawsuit that became public was damning enough tho
He was right about everything - and got fired for it??
wtf wtf wtf. It's fuckin horrifying that our legal system is so "pay to play" that they could harass a guy (who was 100% right) into dropping the case because he couldn't afford to go up against the company.
This isn't the only time I've heard of that either - I personally know people who had ex-employers threaten to litigate against them, or do so. Our legal system is broken, IMO, if even with a very strong case, a person can be intimidated into dropping it just because the company they're going up against is way wealthier and vindictive.
Yeah... In one of my other posts, I noticed that it looked like he made 3 different companies to pick and choose what laws he was subject to.
Carbon fibre makes noise... Generally before failing catastrophically. That noise is structural failure of the material.
Also, tangent but I found the patent for the system that was supposed to detect a hull failure 'in time' (and was super unequipped to) and I might make another engineering post on it later.
Nooo. Holy shit. I thought the controls were bad, but actually they were worse. Did they not fuckin test if the thrusters were on the right way round before they got to the fuckin sea floor? Even at my most amateur-hour ass jobs, we were testing shit better than that.
Like genuinely wtf??? I thought this shit was pants shittingly bad before I read this article? But it was worse? I'm honestly fuckin horrified the more I read about the legal side of things - so many experts knew it was a bad idea, but the corporation was still able to intimidate a whistleblower, set up a different corporate entity to dodge laws around engineering negligence, and continue to do the shit that anyone with two brain cells to rub together could see was gonna be deadly?
I said this in my first post on all this - but if companies can do this to billionaires, they can do this to anyone. I hope this whole thing gets people looking at the laws around corporate negligence with people's safety - because to me this feels like a case study of a much broader problem.
Legal disclaimer under the cut












