Avatar

Stay Tuned For My Excommunication

@latestagejenga

Behold! The field upon which I grow my fandom trash! (My icon art belongs to @brightgoat)
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
She/Her 18 yo
My main fandoms include Cuphead (casino cups) and ROTTMNT (cupcest, turtlecest, proship, etc DNI)

The EU is doing a big survey for LGBTQ people who live in the EU about how it is for them right now. That's the kind of survey that's used for official reports and for laws so it's super important that it has as many people taking it as possible. You can take it in every EU language. (You can change the language in the top right corner) Share it with your friends!

a king is drowning in piss. can you match 3 hard enough to save his wretched live

Avatar

I feel like I accidentally designed this as one of fake games for the Steam Summer Sale last year

Romance must be treated as optional and I am not joking but I don’t think many are going to get the scope that I’m going for if I don’t explain further.

If someone says they never want to get married, the response should not be waxing poetics about how they’ll find this magical mythical Right Person that will change their mind.

If someone asks someone else on a date and they reject them, nobody is the bad guy. This is a normal thing that happens to a lot of people and it’s fine. That someone else is under no obligation whatsoever to “give them a chance.” No mean no. No is a complete sentence. Coercion is not consent. We should be more horrified by it when entire groups try to manufacture consent to a romantic relationship between two people where one doesn’t want this.

If someone is single in their 30s, 40s, 50s, whatever, that is not a problem that needs fixing. You don’t need to get married to a romantic partner in your 20s.

If someone describes something they did with a friend as something that happened between friends and not lovers, it’s not romantic. Period. End of discussion. The individuals involved must mutually agree that it is romantic for it to be romantic. Third parties calling it romantic are being invasive and inappropriate. If one of the people involved is calling it romantic despite the second person outwardly saying it’s not romantic, that person is a creep. If that person is doing it without knowing that the other person doesn’t view it that way, that reflects poor communication and should be fixed immediately but whoever called the encounter non-romantic is the one that is correct.

If you look at a literal child and think about their future relationships and marriage, stop. The child is too young and will grow up thinking this is an obligation and it will result in them ending up in toxic relationships they did not want in the first place, especially if they are aromantic and don’t develop those feelings for others in the first place.

Arranging a marriage for your child with the expectation that a married couple is necessarily a romantically involved couple is a horrible idea. Your child should have the right to choose who they get involved with, with how many people they get involved, and whether they get involved at all.

I’m against anything that makes others feel compelled to engage in romance at all. I’m in favor of everyone getting to choose what is best for them and their emotional needs as long as everyone involved agrees to it.

Alright

I am officially done

I have snapped

I am putting this “fat” MM!April shit to bed once and for all

A while ago I saw someone take a photo of Taylor Swift, trace her waistline, and compare it side by side with a cartoon “skinny” woman to prove that cartoons often portray women with unrealistic proportions

I intend to do something rather similar

I am a very skinny woman. I’ve been told this my whole life. I have traced the outline of my waist and the outline of MM!April’s waist and have compared them side by side

It’s plain to see that there is like an inch difference at most. It’s called having room for your internal organs

I'm gonna be thinking about this all day

If you deadname someone in the death note it kills you

Avatar

In one of the Death Note live action movies (I think it was Light Up the New World), a man changes his name after harboring guilt about past crimes and trying to atone (not even answering to that name). He's only killed after his new name gets put in the book, since he shed his old name.

Man wasn't trans, but if the logic applied to him, logic should apply to trans people too!

This rule implies that birth names are not necessarily the names given to you at birth.

That means you can change your name or consider yourself to have a new name and the death note recognizes it.

Death Note is an ally.

Diversity win! this Death Note kills trans people but doesn’t deadname them!