19th century walking stick, topped with a cat wearing goggles
Because I like making my life harder I decided Crowley needed a painting above his bed in Night Bright as Day. Since it’s in the background and you’ll never see it super detailed I thought you might like a peek.
(It’s only a love nibble 😅)
An ancient Greek walks into his tailor’s shop with a pair of torn pants.
“Euripides?” says the tailor.
“Yeah, Eumenides?” replies the man.
This is so awful. It must go on to infect others.
omfg this is hysterical!
I watched 5 seconds and smashed the reblog button. You have no idea how much I have wanted this.
This is amazing.
(If you want to support the singer who wrote and performs the song, he’s Thomas Benjamin Wild Esq. and you can stream his stuff on Spotify or buy it on Bandcamp. He seems to be rather charming, and when I mentioned on twitter wanting to arrange the above song into four part harmony was enthusiastic and supportive.)
I adore this song and pairing it with this character is brilliant!
omfg this is hysterical!
I watched 5 seconds and smashed the reblog button. You have no idea how much I have wanted this.
This is amazing.
(If you want to support the singer who wrote and performs the song, he’s Thomas Benjamin Wild Esq. and you can stream his stuff on Spotify or buy it on Bandcamp. He seems to be rather charming, and when I mentioned on twitter wanting to arrange the above song into four part harmony was enthusiastic and supportive.)
Why yes, it is time for some soft Geraskier!
Cozy sleepy times w the LADS
care and (man)handling of bards and witchers
Oh 1940s!Crowley, what mischief did you get up to?
(The AU is pilot Aziraphale, mechanic Crowley and is from a discord group brainstorm. This moment in particular is predominantly @liquidlyrium and @puppy-bums fault)
Reblog and put in the tags how many times you've changed usernames in your entire online career. (If you don't know the exact amount, an approximation is fine)
sometimes self-care is consuming a piece of media for the 174th time
[Tweet from @/fozmeadows: "human gender and sexuality are very much like animal taxonomy, in that both look structured and simple on the surface, but once you start investigating, it turns out there's actually no such thing as a fish despite the fact that we all know what a fish is, and that's okay"]
As a biologist, that is a fantastic comparison.
We talk about “fish” (which, cladistically, do not exist, there is no monophyletic group of “fish” that simultaneously includes all organisms we understand to be “fish”-like while also excluding, say, humans) because, despite the utter fiction that is fish, it’s still a useful label when we talk about certain features that “fish” tend to have in common.
Gender is absolutely the same way.









