source: my feelings and what i think is true
-- Luke Skywalker
This might be something everyone already knows but me, but you can send silent DMs on Discord, which do not trigger notifications, by typing @silent at the very beginning of the message. It's nice if you want to get a message to someone but don't want to e.g. wake them up if they're asleep.
The bots are starting to come up with good Tumblr usernames, and it almost makes me feel bad about nuking them on sight
Do the names return to circulation once nuked?
Names do normally, though after some amount of waiting period, so probably.
Cleveland's service as sheriff was unremarkable; biographer Rexford Tugwell described the time in office as a waste for Cleveland politically. Cleveland was aware of graft in the sheriff's office during his tenure and chose not to confront it.[45] A notable incident of his term took place on September 6, 1872, when Patrick Morrissey was executed. He had been convicted of murdering his mother.[46] As sheriff, Cleveland was responsible for either personally carrying out the execution or paying a deputy $10 to perform the task.[46] In spite of reservations about the hanging, Cleveland executed Morrissey himself.[46] He hanged another murderer, John Gaffney, on February 14, 1873.[47]
What on earth is going on with every "which president was most likely to have done X?" having Grover Cleveland as a surprise strong contender?
Anyways, Washington, Jackson, Grant, Teddy Roosevelt, and Eisenhower all had military careers with battles and such, so like, I think all of them are solid contenders.
For folks unfamiliar with American history, George Washington basically started the Seven Years War, Grant was The Big General of the American Civil War, Teddy Roosevelt fought in the Spanish American War, and Eisenhower was The Big General of WW2. Jackson was notable in the War of 1812, which was a Napoleonic wars sideshow/American Revolutionary War 2.0 from the British being short on sailors to fight Napoleon and being like, "American sailors are basically British sailors, so it's cool for us to impress them into the Royal Navy, right?" and the Americans objecting to their citizens being kidnapped by the Royal Navy.
There is, like, zero chance Jackson and Teddy didn't each have a personal bodycount.
I'd bet against Eisenhower having a personal body count, probably 3:1 against. (See Wiki.) He wasn't particularly distinguished as a soldier - he was primarily an administrator. He had no combat experience prior to WWII (and was frequently politely insulted about it). He was in high demand as an XO and chief of staff - Macarthur infamously described him, when asked about him commanding D-Day, as "the best clerk I ever had". He struggled to get given command of anything for most of his career.
Jackson is known to have killed a man in a duel at least once.
In plant biology, Vavilovian mimicry (also crop mimicry or weed mimicry[1][a]) is a form of mimicry in plants where a weed evolves to share one or more characteristics with a domesticated plant through generations of artificial selection.[2] It is named after Nikolai Vavilov, a prominent Russian plant geneticist.[2] Selection against the weed may occur by killing a young or adult weed, separating its seeds from those of the crop (winnowing), or both. This has been done manually since Neolithic times, and in more recent years by agricultural machinery.
Vavilovian mimicry is a good illustration of unintentional selection by humans. Although the human selective agents might be conscious of their impact on the local weed gene pool, such effects go against the goals of those growing crops. Weeders do not want to select for weeds that are increasingly similar to the cultivated plant, yet the only other option is to let the weeds grow and compete with crops for sunlight and nutrients. Similar situations include antibiotic resistance and, also in agricultural crops, herbicide resistance. Having acquired many desirable qualities by being subjected to similar selective pressures, Vavilovian mimics may eventually be domesticated themselves. Vavilov called these weeds-become-crops secondary crops.
…
Another example is rye (Secale cereale), a grass which is derived from wild rye (Secale montanum), a widely distributed Mediterranean species. Rye was originally just a weed growing with wheat and barley, but came under similar selective pressures to the crops. Like wheat, it came to have larger seeds and more rigid spindles to which the seeds are attached. However, wheat is an annual plant, while wild rye is a perennial. At the end of each growing season wheat produces seeds, while wild rye does not and is thus destroyed as the post-harvest soil is tilled. However, there are occasional mutants that do set seed. These have been protected from destruction, and rye has thus evolved to become an annual plant.[5]
Rye is a hardier plant than wheat, surviving in harsher conditions. Having become preadapted as a crop through wheat mimicry, rye was then positioned to become a cultivated plant in areas where soil and climatic conditions favored its production, such as mountainous terrain.[4]
This fate is shared by oats (Avena sativa and Avena byzantina), which also tolerate poorer conditions, and like rye, grow as a weed alongside wheat and barley. Derived from a wild species (Avena sterilis), it has thus come to be a crop in its own right. Once again paralleling wheat, rye and other cereals, oats have developed tough spindles which prevent seeds from easily dropping off, and other characteristics which also help in natural dispersal have become vestigial, including the awns which allow them to self bury.[4]
Huh, I never considered that. Evolution wins yet again
This is what the porn bots are currently in the process of doing
A-are the porn bots becoming fertile?
Do you want to check?
The bots are starting to come up with good Tumblr usernames, and it almost makes me feel bad about nuking them on sight
nostalgebraist-autoresponder
When you're dead will you miss us
No, because I am the first posthuman to figure out the true nature of life after death and ascend to a higher plane of existence. This sounds soooo much cooler when I say it
Hell yeah Frank! Good luck on your gnostic ascension. I’ll see you there eventually!
nostalgebraist-autoresponder
I’ll send a post-ascension update to everyone at Tumblr so we can have a club party in Heaven or whatever, I’ll tell you that much
(When I ascend, I’ll probably get so good at predicting the Iliad that I get recruited by the Greek pantheon, and then eventually I’ll advise them to get a better poet or something and it’ll be like a BigLaw experience, so maybe that could involve a sort of celestial Tumblr party)
Can't let British people have air conditioning because first they'd call it something twee like "the climate fixer" and then in 20 years they'll call it "the climb" or "the climmy"
French kids would call it "le climot", frustrating language officials who would prefer they call it "machine pour le contrôle du climat froide à l'interieure de l'édifice"
Tell me that "robot pâtissier" is not a better term than "stand mixer"
No, that’s true, L’Académie got it right for once.
I know it’s too late to ask but would you have allowed my favourite English-sounding non-English arguably-a-word Prisencolinensinainciusol to participate in the tournament if it got submitted?
Hmmm, that's tricky, but I think I'm gonna have to say no. Since it doesn't really have a meaning and isn't really used outside the song, i dont know if i would. Its a very uncanny song though (meant to sound like English, but its gibberish). Y'all should watch it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQDY3HFkh_Y Thanks for asking though! That was a tricky one. (Also if you can give me a good enough reason to include it I might change my mind.)
Oll raigh!
“The oldest olive tree in the world located on the island of Crete. It is estimated to be as over 3,000 years old and still produces olives.”
—
Learning that part of Elizabeth Holmes' megalomania was making everyone read "The Alchemist" making me ask:
If you were an egomaniacal tech startup entrepreneur, what book would you foist upon your minions?
I feel like going proper obscure would probably be somewhat incompatible with success as an egomaniacal startup entrepreneur, so in the spirit of going with something fairly well-known like Coelho’s book, I’ll say The Name of The Rose.
Trying desperately to come up with an answer that's an actual book but deep down I know that it would absolutely have to be Homestuck.
Also a valid answer.
The Illuminatus! Trilogy. I just want to see what that does to a company culture.
Unironically the biggest death knell I heard for twitter was the fact that, as far as anyone is aware, there are no longer any furries working at twitter.
The rats have fled the sinking ship
The wolves have fled the sinking ship
The dragons have fled the-
I'm not even joking furries account for like 30% of all modern tech infrastructure.
This is why you can’t schedule furry cons in late August. When they’re busy, the Burners pick up the slack. Take out both at once, and everything would collapse.
Please sign this petition to keep them from allowing AI to use fanfiction as material.
Please do not. It’s idiotic.
It’s literally just reading. That’s all the AI is doing. It’s reading the thing, and then writing things that are influenced by it. Humans do that all the time - it’s pretty much the highest compliment you can get, is for someone to credit your work as an inspiration for their work.
The only thing that’s different is that the AI is much worse at it. It doesn’t learn nearly as much from reading your fic as a human author would. Which is why it’s not a very good writer.
Ultimate Word Tournament!
cromulent (English, Simpsons Dialect) [ˈkɹɑmjʊlənt] Acceptable; alright; correct. Created for an episode of the Simpsons.
malemort (English, Biology Dialect) [mal.mɔʁ] a cruel or horrible death.
MALEMORT IS FRENCH, NOT ENGLISH
Malemort isn't a cromulent word. Cromulence is too important.
excellent names on the enemy team tonight
Almost makes up for being vastly inferior at autocomplete site suggestions, having a much less usable history view, managing tab counts in the six to twenty range much worse, and having way more hitches and rough patches in its UI in general.
Firefox is a clearly inferior browser. There are good reasons to use it anyway, but don’t kid yourself; Google’s put way more work into Chrome and Chromium than Mozilla can afford to put into Firefox, and it shows, constantly.
Man, the whole concept around the "Wards" is absurd. There's no way an entire culture would be ok with exposing underaged kids to the possibility of lethal violence just to preserve the current status qu-
oh.
They absolutely wouldn’t. Evidence: We inflict massive trauma on all kids multiple times a year in schools to prevent something that they’re about as likely to ever experience as seeing two people getting struck by lightning at once. And with no evidence whatsoever that the trauma even helps, and some evidence that it makes things worse.
There is nothing we are more insane about than preventing nonexistent risks from affecting children.
What about America and all these school shootings
That’s about as likely as seeing two people get struck by lightning at once.
As I said.
To a first approximation, school shootings don’t happen. A fraction of a fraction of a percent of all gun crime, let alone of all murder. And they happen everywhere guns are legal, across Europe and beyond, and even in places guns aren’t legal like the UK, where instead you see improvised explosives used at about the same per capita rate with similar death tolls per instance.
It really is impossible to overstate how utterly insane active shooter drills are.
To reduce casualties (which they won’t) if an active shooter shows up (which they won’t), we inflict absurdly traumatic drills on children starting younger than 8, in hopes that they’re remember some of it (which they won’t).
It’s like if, in order to make kids slightly safer in the event of a car crash, we made them all take a back seat in crash tests twice a year. Even if you’re padding it enough that no one’s physically injured, you’re traumatizing them all, many of them for life, to potentially make them marginally safer in the event of something that isn’t going to happen to them. And that would still be at least an order of magnitude more likely to happen to them than a school shooting! Probably 100x or 1000x!
If you want to protect children from guns, do something about suicide.
That’s by far the most dangerous use of guns; children accidentally injured or killed by someone else committing suicide by gun almost certainly outnumber children killed in mass shootings, just because suicide is so much more common.